Something went wrong. Try again later

baltimore

This user has not updated recently.

406 344 0 6
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

What IS Final Fantasy in 2012?

What IS Final Fantasy? After finishing FF13 in preparation for FF13-2 I asked that question.

Originally, Final Fantasy was the last ditch effort of SquareSoft to remain a video game company. Back then, the company was in dire straights and only could produce one more game. Thankfully FF1 was released and it was a smash hit. Heck, I finished it on IOS a few months ago and I have to say that game still holds up really well.

I digress.

What, in 2012, is Final Fantasy? In 8-bit age it was was introduced me to RPG’s. In the 16-bit era it was what showed me what kinds of story telling video games were capable of. In the PSOne era it pushed graphics to a new level. And in the PS2 / PC era it pushed the graphics even further, explored on-line worlds and showed me lots of zippers.

Over the recent years the Final Fantasy brand has taken a few hits. Most noticeably the release of the atrocious MMO, Final Fantasy 14. That game release was marred by multiple bugs, lackluster graphics, outdated features and the ‘reassignment’ of the entire production team. But the MMO was not the only game to have troubles. Final Fantasy 13 was released in January of 2011 to an eager public, but to many the game felt only half baked.

The reasons for the 13th franchise installment’s nearly five year production cycle are varied. Bad management, the switching of consoles mid-development, multiple changes in direction and story, etc.

Again I ask, what the heck is this series now?

I think that Final Fantasy is a story. I think it is a story about characters that have been given a challenged that is much greater then they are and the journey to complete. In my eyes this is what Final Fantasy should be. But that is not what is has become.

Sure, the last several games have had that element. In 13, the characters have been given a crazy task that, if they don’t complete it, then they will be turned to monsters. But where 13 fell on it’s face was that there was no time spent on diving into what made the characters tick. Now it could be argued that some other characters in the FF universe are the same (FF7’s Yuffie for example) but the main characters usually have some time dedicated to them in order to flesh out their story (and level them up).

That didn’t really happen in 13. Yes, we got some character development, but why was Lightning so cold to the world? Why is Snow the eternal optimist? What the hell happened in the past with Vanille and Fang? And why are the all the big bads in this game giant, evil faces?!?!

Along with the characters development the series has fallen into a rut artistically. Final Fantasy 10, 10-2, 11, 12, 13, 13-2, and 14 all have the same exact art and character design. In fact, the most radical difference in the art was having a black man as a main character in 13. I realize that in 11 and 14 you can make your skin tone very dark but I don’t think you can make someone with actual African features. What I’m trying to say is that the character design style has become stagnant. I believe what is needed in this respect is to turn to some other artists and see what they can come up with.

And while they are at it, I think that (1) control of all characters needs to be returned to the play and (2) the battle/leveling systems need to be simplified greatly. You know, the materia system for FF7 was pretty straightforward, why can’t that be built off of a little bit?

I’m starting to ramble now so let’s try and bring this to a close.

In 2012 Final Fantasy is, sadly, over complicated. What I mean by that is I believe that SquareEnix has lost site of what has made the series great. Meaningful and complex characters that are on a fantastic journey to stop evil from destroying the world. That and Chocabos.

55 Comments

55 Comments

Avatar image for m_shini
M_Shini

571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By M_Shini

Final fantasy to me is a kind of experimental thing right now , mabey in a couple years they will settle down on something good, and altho its a pain its nice they still take they're damn time with making the games in the series, even if 13 was regarded as not so awesome, it was still very polished.

Avatar image for cottonwolf
CottonWolf

109

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By CottonWolf

@WinterSnowblind said:

They'll still have to delay it for the 360 port.

Yeah, if that remains PS3 exclusive, I'll be shocked. Square likes money.

---

But as for what is Final Fantasy in 2012? As several people have pointed out, Final Fantasy isn't really a thing. It's more of a marketing strategy Square uses to sell games, a kind of 'this is our next big JRPG thing'. With the mainline games, it tends to mean that it's a big budget release. With the side games it doesn't really mean anything at all. As it is, I tend to like the style of game that comes under the Final Fantasy umbrella. And I do believe that the Final Fantasy name, at least for the main games, is a seal of quality (excluding the MMOs, I know nothing about the MMOs). People say that X game isn't like Final Fantasy anymore, or that Y game is the epitome of the series and all the other games should be like that. I can see why. People want games to be like the games that they enjoy. But Final Fantasy isn't a description. I would argue that there is no defining feature shared between all the games (except perhaps the vague notion of saving the world/a country/your girlfriend) that make them a Final Fantasy game, except for Square's desire to brand them as Final Fantasy games.

Therefore, I'd argue that Final Fantasy is what it's always has been; ultimately nothing. That is its greatest strength; it can explore anything, be anything without having to worry about the weight of canon. But it is also its greatest weakness; going into a Final Fantasy game you have no idea if you'll like it, or even what it is. It could be an action RPG, it could be a turn based RPG, it could even be a real time strategy game. They are what they are.

Avatar image for baltimore
baltimore

406

Forum Posts

344

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 4

Edited By baltimore

@StarvingGamer: Didn't even realize that it was bolded. Removed the BOLD.

Avatar image for deranged_midget
Deranged

2022

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 5

Edited By Deranged

@BaneFireLord said:

Final Fantasy is still a franchise I couldn't care less about.

Fixed.

Avatar image for xplay25
xplay25

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By xplay25

@WinterSnowblind said:

@xplay25 said:

@Beforet said:

You know what Final Fantasy in 2012 doesn't look like? Versus 13. That game is never coming out, is it?

It is indeed coming out. Probably not this year, but next year is quite likely. It is simply that Square-Enix showed the game too early. They were marketing the Fabula Nova Crystallis series quite heavily, and this is one of the core parts of that. Nevertheless, they have been in full production since early fall, so it is coming out. The technology is all there at this point, so all it takes is creating content. So 1-2 years is the range we're looking at. In Playstation world, this is obviously not a big deal, since FFXII came out in 06, the year that the PS3 launched.

They'll still have to delay it for the 360 port.

They can release the PS3 version and then bring the 360 port out 6 months later or something. It's hard to say how they are handling this, if the assumption is correct in the first place. But man, if it does come to 360 (likely enough), I will still get the PS3 version, I think. The Xbox 360 port of FFXIII had severely compressed CG, and lesser quality graphics.