Something went wrong. Try again later

Jeffsekai

butts

7162 1060 57 141
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Violence in Video Games


 

     In the article Gaming and Violence by Harvey Rothwell, Harvey writes about how a boy who played a lot of video games essentially took the law into his own hands and died because of it. The boy was shot and killed with his own hand gun by the custodian Brice Smith after a botched robbery. After the boy’s death Coalition against Teen Subversion (CATS) is calling for a Canadian ban on internet communities for students under the age of 16. For the most part I agree, I think that kids should not have access to online communities until they are at least 16+.

                Kids are like sponges they suck up any information that is presented to them, which is why they should be banned from online communities, I say this because most online communities are sees-pools of hate and violence towards each other. It is the last place any parent should let their kid spend time. So really it’s not the violence in the actual game I am worried about (TV, movies, and music are easier to use and just as violent/vulgar) it’s the people that they will interact will interact with. I have been on X-Box Live for almost 4 years and I cannot even fathom the amount of times I have heard the words nigger, fuck you, shit etc. But I don’t let it bother me (I also report the person that spews this hate) but I cannot say the same for kids (heck half the time it is a kid saying the vulgar words), because of this I think that kids should be allowed to play the games online as long as they meet the ESRB’s age restrictions) but should be banned from talking to others, they should be able to still talk to friends and people they know.

                A lot of people would probably ask how I can count the actual violence in video games as such a moot point. Well that’s quit easy for me, if the parents are supervising their kids (You know instead of using the video game as a babysitter) and talking about right and wrong, and the difference between the virtual worlds vs. the real world. I for example grew up with Mortal Kombat, and Turok two extremely violent video games and I turned out fine, mostly because my mom was always making sure I know what I was doing and that it was not okay to do in real life.

                At the end of the day this whole “violent video games are evil” thing will be over this same exact thing happened to TV, Movies, and Music. It’s just a collection of people freaking out about something they do not understand. Education on the subject of violent video games would be beneficial to both parents and their children. Also, the video game industry has its own rating system called the ESRB which rates games based on their content (i.e. violence, drugs, and sex) and gives them an appropriate rating, E for Everyone, T for Teen, and M for Mature are the main ones. So if a child is playing an M or T game and the child is not actually old enough it’s not the video game industry’s fault it’s the parents. At the same time just following these letter grades isn’t where the parenting should stop, parents need to make sure they know who their child is talking too, because generally people online are horrible people and as such kids should not be allowed to interact with the online gaming community until they are 16 or older.

7 Comments

7 Comments

Avatar image for jeffsekai
Jeffsekai

7162

Forum Posts

1060

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Jeffsekai

 

     In the article Gaming and Violence by Harvey Rothwell, Harvey writes about how a boy who played a lot of video games essentially took the law into his own hands and died because of it. The boy was shot and killed with his own hand gun by the custodian Brice Smith after a botched robbery. After the boy’s death Coalition against Teen Subversion (CATS) is calling for a Canadian ban on internet communities for students under the age of 16. For the most part I agree, I think that kids should not have access to online communities until they are at least 16+.

                Kids are like sponges they suck up any information that is presented to them, which is why they should be banned from online communities, I say this because most online communities are sees-pools of hate and violence towards each other. It is the last place any parent should let their kid spend time. So really it’s not the violence in the actual game I am worried about (TV, movies, and music are easier to use and just as violent/vulgar) it’s the people that they will interact will interact with. I have been on X-Box Live for almost 4 years and I cannot even fathom the amount of times I have heard the words nigger, fuck you, shit etc. But I don’t let it bother me (I also report the person that spews this hate) but I cannot say the same for kids (heck half the time it is a kid saying the vulgar words), because of this I think that kids should be allowed to play the games online as long as they meet the ESRB’s age restrictions) but should be banned from talking to others, they should be able to still talk to friends and people they know.

                A lot of people would probably ask how I can count the actual violence in video games as such a moot point. Well that’s quit easy for me, if the parents are supervising their kids (You know instead of using the video game as a babysitter) and talking about right and wrong, and the difference between the virtual worlds vs. the real world. I for example grew up with Mortal Kombat, and Turok two extremely violent video games and I turned out fine, mostly because my mom was always making sure I know what I was doing and that it was not okay to do in real life.

                At the end of the day this whole “violent video games are evil” thing will be over this same exact thing happened to TV, Movies, and Music. It’s just a collection of people freaking out about something they do not understand. Education on the subject of violent video games would be beneficial to both parents and their children. Also, the video game industry has its own rating system called the ESRB which rates games based on their content (i.e. violence, drugs, and sex) and gives them an appropriate rating, E for Everyone, T for Teen, and M for Mature are the main ones. So if a child is playing an M or T game and the child is not actually old enough it’s not the video game industry’s fault it’s the parents. At the same time just following these letter grades isn’t where the parenting should stop, parents need to make sure they know who their child is talking too, because generally people online are horrible people and as such kids should not be allowed to interact with the online gaming community until they are 16 or older.

Avatar image for napalm
napalm

9227

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By napalm

Your paragraphs aren't really paragraphs. They're like, two sentences. I honestly think you should clean up the language a bit. It sounds like you're talking to your friends. Essays are meant more for an analysis of a situation/problem/whatever/etc. And you also shouldn't actually say "nigger," "fuck you," and, "shit." Also, you're missing commas and punctuation like fucking whoa. Also, sentences should never be started with the word "but."

Avatar image for stang
Stang

4755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Stang

I hate to echo Napalm's sentiments, but he is right. 
 
1. Proof read! 
2. Since this is a college paper, you should write in a formal matter.Contractions are a no no. 
3. Your general sentence structure needs work. A lot of your sentences begin with words like "so" or "but," eliminate them! 
 
Not trying to bash you Jeff, I am just giving you tips from personal experience. I had a Nazi business communication teacher (she was German!), she would mark you down an entire letter grade for trivial grammar mistakes. I assume you are a freshman/sophomore, there is no time better than now to correct bad habits. You will not be able to get away with the types of mistakes you made when you take higher level classes.

Avatar image for jeffsekai
Jeffsekai

7162

Forum Posts

1060

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Jeffsekai

You're both prolly right, but I got a 4.5/5 on the rough draft so i didn't really change anything.

Avatar image for bones8677
Bones8677

3539

Forum Posts

567

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 11

Edited By Bones8677

So you HAD to take this particular position on this subject?

Avatar image for napalm
napalm

9227

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By napalm
@Jeffsekai said:
" You're both prolly right, but I got a 4.5/5 on the rough draft so i didn't really change anything. "
What school/teacher has a rating scale out of 5? What does that even mean? Anyway, it's much less just writing better for College's sake, and just more for experience in life if you end up writing letters to send to possible job employers, or any type of writing you'll need to do.
 
Not to be dickish, but I had a paper due for a critical study of a film, I wrote it in about 25 minutes and I received a A- on it. I guess I've always had a natural knack for awesome writing that goes above simple sentences. Like I said, not knocking you, but that's why I was quick to point out vital errors.
Avatar image for stang
Stang

4755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Stang
@Napalm: Your only vital error is you main Guile. Scrub. :p