Something went wrong. Try again later

odinsmana

This user has not updated recently.

982 0 13 3
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

odinsmana's forum posts

Avatar image for odinsmana
odinsmana

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@kadaju86 said:

@notnert427: Just as a small addition to the point about compulsory military service, you get called in the year you turn 18 for an assessment and then for deployment into an army/navy/airforce unit after finishing high school, though you can postpone it to finish up a college education first if you want to. The compulsory service used to be only for men, but just a few years ago it was extended to apply for women as well. If you choose to not serve in the army you will be put to to some other sort of civil service instead which is usually a bit longer than the 12 months that the military service is. (Personally I was only in for the assessment as there were cutbacks in the military at the time and I never got a call in for anything else).

The National Guard also numbers about 45000 currently out of a population of around 5 million, so the unit is fairly large I would say. It also consists of something that is more close to a special forces unit which was even sent on some tours to Afghanistan. That part was somewhat debated when it first happened, but at least it shows how well trained some of the soldiers in the National Guard is I suppose.

You answered his question about the National Guard better than I could, so I don`t have anything to add to that part.

As for the compulsory military service it seems to have been cut back a lot in recent years. I am 22, so I was up for it a few years and at that time it seemed to be harder to get into the compulsory military service than it was to get out of it. It seemed like it was mostly people who were interested in doing it that got in and only a handful of people I knew did it (I did not).

Avatar image for odinsmana
odinsmana

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Like other people said it`s more Far Cry and if you liked 3 and 4 you will probably like this too. They have both added and removed enough stuff that it stops the game from feeling too similar compared to the previous games. As someone already mentioned towers are no longer a thing and you`re no longer crafting bags and holsters which means hunting is now completely optional and only gives you money. They have also added companion characters to the game which I have actually really enjoyed so far. The prepper caches which are short optional puzzle/platforming challenges have also been a lot of fun so far.

Avatar image for odinsmana
odinsmana

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By odinsmana

@notnert427 said:
@fatalbanana said:

One more thing. I think you already made my point in your post already but I have a real problem with this line of logic. Saying "bad people are going to do bad things anyway so why do anything to try and stop it" its surprising to me how often I see this echoed. I know this isn't exactly what you are saying but what sticks out to me is how you only apply this to guns but seem to ignore the other places where this exact sentiment could be applicable. Why do we have laws at all if bad people are just going to break them anyway? Again I'm oversimplifying your point but I don't think I'm actually doing it that badly. The bias in the way of thinking here is heavily tipped towards guns being some exception to everything else we regulate in this country but I just don't think that's true or even should be true.

Well, ideally laws serve as a deterrent to crime. With murder already being one of the most legally punitive crimes there is (for good reason), the idea of a far less punitive law like illegally possessing a firearm succeeding as a deterrent to (gun) murder where the law against murder did not is inherently asinine.

Guns are treated differently than other things and often viewed outside the realm of logic for reasons I've never understood. No one blames trucks for the tragedy in Nice. No one blames airplanes for 9/11. Yet when guns are used to commit horrific acts, suddenly the object is somehow to blame? I don't subscribe to that at all.

The difference is that trucks and planes are necessary tools whose primary purpose is not related to violence. Regular people both need and use trucks and airplanes a lot more than they need and use guns (hunting rifles and shotguns are excluded to a certain degree).

I also wanted to comment on the discussion in this thread about the government becoming tyrannical if the citizens are not armed. As a non-American I always found this argument kinda confusing. Are the people using that argument saying that all the other western democracies where it`s not normal for people to own guns are either already tyrannical or on the verge of becoming so? If not then why will this happen in the US when it`s not happened elsewhere?

I guess I would also add that while I am for gun control and I am glad my country (Norway) employs it I still thinks guns are both cool and really fun to shoot. My father is both a hunter and used to be part of the Norwegian Home Guard which meant that I grew up shooting guns for fun and I still really enjoy skeet shooting. Guns are really fun and cool, but also incredibly dangerous and need to be treated as such.

Avatar image for odinsmana
odinsmana

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The Darkness 2 is a really great game. I`m glad more people get to play it. It`s such a bummer they never made a follow up.

Avatar image for odinsmana
odinsmana

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is great! Keep that Yakuza localization train rolling!

I'm glad they are bringing this over. Now I think all that's missing is the turn of the century one that came out in the early ps4 days?! That looked really cool too, certainly a more interesting spin-off than the zombie thing.

There are two samurai spin-offs that were never brought over. One early PS3 game (Kenzan) and one early Ps4 game (Ishin). There were also two PSP games that I think were made by another developer. There is also the upcoming Fist of the North Star Yakuza game.

Avatar image for odinsmana
odinsmana

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By odinsmana

@hayt: You have a point, but he also said that BF 4 teasing mechs and hovertanks was what made him want a sci-fi bf,so it might qualify for his definition of light sci-fi.

I accidentally deleted my first post, so for those trying to follow the conversation I wondered if a sort of follow up to BF 2142 was what @mems1224 was looking for in a new BF game.

Avatar image for odinsmana
odinsmana

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By odinsmana

I remember this game looking really neat when they played it on UPF way back. I'll have to check this out.

Avatar image for odinsmana
odinsmana

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By odinsmana

Some info dumps and plot stuff is delivered outside of cutscenes (in the text only conversations you have in the game world), but if you have played the section before you will probably get most of the stuff you need from the cutscenes and remember the important stuff that is not in cutscenes. Even if you don`t remember everything it will probably be fine since the game is decent at recapping and reminding you of the most important stuff.

Avatar image for odinsmana
odinsmana

982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

My answer is no. For me the 3rd act really fell flat. Especially compared to the way other people talk about it.