Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

148 Comments

Activision Blizzard Buys MLG for $46M, Aims to Build "The ESPN of eSports"

This acquisition follows the recent creation of an Activision eSports Division. It also seems like it could be a bad move.

Is this eSports?
Is this eSports?

Back in October, Activision Blizzard announced its intentions to make a splash in the growing eSports industry by establishing a discrete eSports division, hiring former ESPN president Steve Bornstein and Major League Gaming co-founder and then president Mike Sepso. Now it's taking another step in that direction by acquiring the rest of Major League Gaming.

Activision-Blizzard announced the purchase in a press release posted yesterday, and though no figure is given in the release itself, an early report from the eSports Observer cites a stockholder letter indicating that that Activision Blizzard is spending $46M on the acquisition.

In a statement included in the press release, Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick re-iterated the company's eSports plans:

“Our acquisition of Major League Gaming’s business furthers our plans to create the ESPN of esports. MLG’s ability to create premium content and its proven broadcast technology platform – including its live streaming capabilities – strengthens our strategic position in competitive gaming. MLG has an incredibly strong and seasoned team and a thriving community. Together, we will create new ways to celebrate players and their unique skills, dedication and commitment to gaming.”

While there's no disputing that eSports is continuing to grow, I can't help but see this as an incredibly bold claim for a number of reasons.

First, as of the time of this announcement, Activision Blizzard has no public deal allowing them to broadcast footage from major eSports like League of Legends or DOTA2. Put simply, being unable to cover LCS or The International would be like ESPN being unable to cover the Super Bowl. That's not to say that Activision Blizzard doesn't have its own eSports properties. Heroes of the Storm, Starcraft, and to a lesser degree Call of Duty have established competitive scenes (EDIT: And, as GotFrag co-founder and former COO of Evil Geniuses Scott Smith correctly reminds me, so does Hearthstone!) Looking forward, I can Activision Blizzard's share of the eSports market continuing to grow (especially if Overwatch does well), but so long as eSports coverage remains fractured and company-run, it's hard to imagine anyone becoming "the ESPN of eSports."

Building off of this problem is the fact that MLG just may not be the best way to build this sort of network. When eSports was first kicking off, MLG positioned itself uniquely as the place to go to for competitive gaming. But as game companies began running their own major tournaments, MLG's importance started to fade. This is reflected in the purchase price: When you look at Activision Blizzard's balance book, $46M isn't that much. After all, this is the company that (sort of) spent $5.9B on King last fall. In speaking with our own Brad Shoemaker about the deal earlier, he said it incisively: "$46M is probably more than MLG is worth, but it's also less than it should have been worth."

For what it's worth, this purchase doesn't make me any less excited for Overwatch. That's... something, right?
For what it's worth, this purchase doesn't make me any less excited for Overwatch. That's... something, right?

There's also the matter of shareholder response to this purchase. The report from the eSports Observer reveals that this acquisition was a “corporate action taken without a stockholders’ meeting by less than unanimous written consent of our stockholders." Among the group of stockholders who did decide to make this purchase was Legion Capital Investments LLC, a group managed by Mike Sepso--Yes, the Mike Sepso who recently left MLG and joined Activision Blizzard. That's not really enough to get conspiratorial about, but things get worse when you look at the current state of MLG. Again, from the eSports Observer report:

Stockholders not in these categories are largely meeting the decision in disbelief. Some speculate that the majority of the sale will go towards paying off MLG’s debts, leaving little to go around for the remaining stockholders. MLG has filed for multiple debtfinancing rounds this year alone, for a sum of over $6 million. “I got fucked on stock,” said an affected stockholder, who wanted to remain anonymous.

Yikes.

Look, we just don't know enough to say that anything shady happened here, but it's pretty easy to see why an investor not involved in voting on this purchase might wonder about the motivation. At best, it makes an already questionable decision look worse. At worst, well... it's a bad, bad look.

At this point, it's hard to know how all of this will shake out. Activision Blizzard joins a number of other companies in the hunt to be the top spot for eSports coverage--including ESPN itself. While eSports can be just as exciting and dramatic as traditional sports, eSports brings unique challenges that mean that it needs to be covered in genuinely new ways. I think someone will figure that out eventually, but I'm just not sure that this purchase indicates that Activision Blizzard will be addressing those challenges. Time will tell if I'm proven wrong.

148 Comments

Avatar image for the_interrupter
The_Interrupter

49

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Yeesh.

Avatar image for benpack
benpack

3926

Forum Posts

7030

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 14

Honestly anything else offered by Activision right now is not appealing to me, and this might mean more funding and exposure for a few genuinely good esports games, which is good for the scene overall.

Avatar image for aidros
aidros

332

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Big Plays?

Avatar image for oni
Oni

2345

Forum Posts

5885

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 12

Aside from being a bad move, isn't it super shady for a publisher to own a supposedly independent channel for esports? I mean, it's just a brand, so there's nothing stopping them from doing so, but why would an EA or a Ubisoft or anyone else broadcast their games on an Activision channel? It's not like Steam, which is too big to ignore.

Avatar image for l44
L44

638

Forum Posts

33

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Weird thing is that for quite a while Riot has been running their production of the LCS with former NBC producer and emmy award winner Ariel Horn. With their own panel show now and in addition last year they pulled streaming of all the various regions leagues out of their various deals and channels to be broadcast by their own streaming channels. I don't know about how invested Valve are in broadcasting Dota but if they're anywhere as near as invested as Riot are I can't see either giving up or sharing the broadcast rights of their games easily. If MLG can't broadcast the two major esports I don't see it reaching the kind of success they're probably aiming for.

Avatar image for dropkickpikachu
dropkickpikachu

191

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

eSports (viable ones at least) will happen organically or it won't happen at all. If and when eSports dies out, this kind of forced move is what's going to kill it.

Avatar image for bobatrainwreck
BobaTrainwreck

807

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

re: The header image question.

Of course Bobby Kotick is eSports. He was in MONEYBALL!

Avatar image for johnnymcginley
johnnymcginley

550

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The ESPN of eSports is a weird comparison because ESPN isn't run by sports teams or leagues.

Avatar image for amyggen
AMyggen

7738

Forum Posts

7669

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I swear, there's like three pictures of Kotick on the net.

Avatar image for lttibbles
LtTibbles

157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

45 mil for MLG seems way over priced honestly.

Avatar image for ruthloose
RuthLoose

909

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By RuthLoose

Everyone here is debating the future viability of the eSports brand, while I'm just waiting for the triumphant return of Jeff's "sleazy mid-'90s eSports businessman" vocal impression.

Avatar image for mike
mike

18011

Forum Posts

23067

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 6

The ESPN of eSports is a weird comparison because ESPN isn't run by sports teams or leagues.

They are comparing ESPN's sports broadcasting to MLG's eSports broadcasting.

Avatar image for bicycle_repairman
Bicycle_Repairman

715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The problem is that this creates major conflicts of interest that could, and for me has completely ruined the credibility they need for this "e sports ESPN" to work. You cant own the channel for all "e sports" and at the same time be a publisher of a select group of these e sports. That is just ethically wrong.

Avatar image for notnert427
notnert427

2389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

If they want to be like ESPN, they'll need the following:

- Obnoxious blowhard "personalities" that troll everyone by constantly saying offensive/stupid shit
- Wholly useless reports on social media posts made by MLG players
- Hyperfocus on the select few most popular MLG teams/players and non-coverage of the rest
- TMZ-esque coverage on any and all personal drama
- Willingness to present entirely baseless rumors as fact
- Brazen conflicts of interest, with the vast majority of coverage devoted to advertising these "partners"
- Announcers who fancy themselves experts on all video gaming because they once played Pong poorly

Avatar image for dberg
Dberg

1025

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Dberg

Esports is soooooo 2015.

The future is watching people in their basement play games on their own. Not a team of people in a stadium.

Avatar image for benmo316
Benmo316

1153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It makes sense to buy MLG for their tech. This means Activision doesn't have to spend time making their own platform, they can just use what MLG already has.

And being the ESPN of e-sports could be interesting. You don't need to broadcast every e-sports match, just like ESPN doesn't broadcast every game. I can picture a 8-12 hour/day block of shows that cover e-sports. It doesn't seem crazy at this point in time.

Avatar image for ch3burashka
ch3burashka

6086

Forum Posts

100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

I thought the goal was to create the World Poker Tournament of eSports.

Avatar image for amyggen
AMyggen

7738

Forum Posts

7669

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

If they want to be like ESPN, they'll need the following:

- Obnoxious blowhard "personalities" that troll everyone by constantly saying offensive/stupid shit

- Wholly useless reports on social media posts made by MLG players

- Hyperfocus on the select few most popular MLG teams/players and non-coverage of the rest

- TMZ-esque coverage on any and all personal drama

- Willingness to present entirely baseless rumors as fact

- Brazen conflicts of interest, with the vast majority of coverage devoted to advertising these "partners"

- Announcers who fancy themselves experts on all video gaming because they once played Pong poorly

Who's gonna be the Skip Bayless of esports?

Avatar image for johnnymcginley
johnnymcginley

550

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By johnnymcginley

@mike said:

@johnnymcginley said:

The ESPN of eSports is a weird comparison because ESPN isn't run by sports teams or leagues.

They are comparing ESPN's sports broadcasting to MLG's eSports broadcasting.

I know, but the NFL doesn't own ESPN. ESPN is successful due to diversity of TV rights held & journalistic independence.

It would be weird if one of the major leagues owned ESPN as Activision Blizzard now does MLG broadcasting as it will inevitably become a promotional and marketing tool for one aspect of eSports (Activision Blizzard products) rather than serving eSports as a whole, like ESPN does with sports.

It's weird for them to say that, is all.

If they wanted to say "the MLB TV of eSports" then that's much closer.

Avatar image for makari
makari

675

Forum Posts

2686

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

Edited By makari

This purchase was most likely to make use of MLG's platform as a stable foundation for their own, foremost. There was a patent filed by Blizzard last year that involved a catch-all eSports platform that combined major event streaming with community-run end-user event planning/streaming and integration with Activision/Blizzard game clients (and I would assume services like Battle.net) which is a thing Blizzard game clients have been missing and players have been asking for. Instead of developing an in-client streaming service for each individual game they can use this kind of platform to give a similar event streaming experience to DotA2's in-client offering for all their games.

Avatar image for chicken008
Chicken008

1146

Forum Posts

45088

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Bobby Kotick has a face that you just want to punch.

Avatar image for gold_skulltulla
Gold_Skulltulla

329

Forum Posts

169

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

I mean, ESPN doesn't broadcast the Super Bowl either...

Avatar image for homelessbird
Homelessbird

1681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Homelessbird

I think anyone watching the moves ActiBlizzard have been making won't be too surprised by this. Bad idea though it may be, it is clear that a number of people at that company are sold on the eSports strategy big time. It's pretty plain from the way they've been positioning their old franchises, and how they're launching their new ones. Overwatch is getting the eSports treatment almost as hard as Evolve, and the way they've pushed Hearthstone as an eSport thing has always seemed crazy.

Honestly, I think you're focusing too much on the "ESPN of eSports" bit here (although to be fair, man that's a stupid thing to say). I think this is way more of a continuation of what they've already been doing - use "eSports" as a strategy to drive long-term commitment to their existing and new brands, and use that commitment to drive secondary revenue streams. If you look at it that way, the amount they spent seems reasonable for acquiring a team that already has the built-in infrastructure to increase their footprint in this area without having to figure out how to build it from the ground up themselves. I genuinely don't think they have much interest in trying to bring in DotA and League - they would have to think that Valve and Riot are run by crazy morons to believe they could get the International or LCS on some sort of ActiBlizzard branded channel. They're greedy, but they're not that out of touch. I think this is all about stuff they already own.

That stuff about how the purchase went down sounds shady, though.

Avatar image for grimreefz
GRIMREEFZ

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

idk about u, but 46m seems like a bargain

Avatar image for subyman
subyman

729

Forum Posts

2719

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

eSports has been a side show for a long time. I think there is potential for it to become more popular. What is funny is that the sleazier the company that tries to get eSports big, the better they will do. Activision is absolutely perfect for getting something like this off the ground. I don't quite know what form it will take, but it will be interesting to watch it either burn to the ground or become something that may be enjoyable to view.

Avatar image for dizzyhippos
Dizzyhippos

5461

Forum Posts

383

Wiki Points

21

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

So they want to copy a network that has been losing subscribers like crazy? I mean I guess they could use it for HoTS SC2 and Overwatch casting. But by doing so there shutting out ESL which is one of the bigger independent tournament organizers there is.

This whole thing just screams "esports is big we should buy some of that"

Avatar image for dhiatensor
DHIATENSOR

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Because why build something when you can just buy it, run it in to the ground then forget about it. Or am I thinking of EA?

Avatar image for monkeyking1969
monkeyking1969

9098

Forum Posts

1241

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 18

Well, this will turn sour real fast.... Are we too imagine that more EA games might be deemed eSport worthy?

Why do I imagine this will turn out like BASEketball without the funny bits or the happy ending?

Avatar image for nickhead
nickhead

1305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 10

Waiting for the headline "Activision Blizzard buys video games. All video games."

I'm still not someone who pays attention to the scene outside of 1 or 2 International matches but I don't see it going away any time soon. Crazy to think that $46 million might be a gamble in case it explodes even more.

Avatar image for irishalwaystake
irishalwaystake

67

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Hey this isn't life is strange!

But on a serious note, I've really enjoyed MLG's dota 2 content last year and this is a little worrying.

Also a small sort correction just on your point about Dota 2. Broadcasting rights gets a little weird around Dota 2. Anyone can get buy a tournament ticket (TI is free to watch for all) and stream the game from their client, it does also get even a bit more weird and frowned upon if you are using the TO's in-game commentary. I can't remember a time when Valve has stepped in to protect a tournament from rebroadcasters at all (which I've seen include pro-players doing their oen commentary, and sometimes with TO's blessings, alternate language commentaries). TO's dont really seem to have much legit power, and aside from whining about rebroadcasts on twitter/reddit etc. They're go-to is usually complaining to twitch.tv which cause of their obvious close relationships, tend to aggressively side with TO's.

There wouldnt be a lot of incentive to watch an MLG stream of TI. Valve tends to invite the majority of popular casters and analysts to TI, and I don't see it being received well and it would create a very weird dynamic if whoever was left went to MLG.

Avatar image for ztf
ZTF

62

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

ActiBlizzard seem really invested in pushing Over Watch.

Avatar image for austin_walker
austin_walker

568

Forum Posts

5245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@gold_skulltulla: No, but they have agreements that allow them to show highlights from every game in the NFL all through season and through the Super Bowl (in addition to airing Monday Night Football, themselves.) They're part of the NFL's ecosystem. As it stands it's hard to see companies like Riot and Valve allowing a competitor access to content in that same sort of way.

Avatar image for fisty
fisty

5

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The main thing I wonder is if they're willing to spend even more to make MLG a more international organisation or if they're going to focus their esports development on North America. The latter seems like it would be a misstep since there seem to be very few esports scenes that are US-centric at all, but it sounds like getting the kind of funding in place required for the former would be pretty contentious.

Twitch is a huge question mark here, too, since MLG runs their own streaming platform which hasn't seemed able to tempt people away from the de facto home of watching people play video games online. Curious to see if they continue to push it or if they move over.

Avatar image for colonel_pockets
Colonel_Pockets

1458

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 46

I don't care about esports, but isn't there a major conflict of interest here?

Avatar image for notnert427
notnert427

2389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

@amyggen said:
@notnert427 said:

If they want to be like ESPN, they'll need the following:

- Obnoxious blowhard "personalities" that troll everyone by constantly saying offensive/stupid shit

- Wholly useless reports on social media posts made by MLG players

- Hyperfocus on the select few most popular MLG teams/players and non-coverage of the rest

- TMZ-esque coverage on any and all personal drama

- Willingness to present entirely baseless rumors as fact

- Brazen conflicts of interest, with the vast majority of coverage devoted to advertising these "partners"

- Announcers who fancy themselves experts on all video gaming because they once played Pong poorly

Who's gonna be the Skip Bayless of esports?

Dr. Tracksuit?

Avatar image for juggaloacidman
JuggaloAcidman

427

Forum Posts

49

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 4

Grab your tin foil hats! It's a conspiracy! #YeeHawd

Avatar image for earthen
Earthen

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Earthen

@johnnymcginley: Also ESPN is hemorrhaging cash at an alarming rate.

@dhiatensor I dunno dude MLG has been flagging for a long time because of the two biggest esports staying in-company. Like Sleepy_Brad said, $46M is too much for MLG, but MLG should've been worth more than that.

Avatar image for longmasterwolf
LongMasterWolf

244

Forum Posts

290

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By LongMasterWolf

Way to continue one of the worst trends of 2015 Activision.

Avatar image for the_ruckus
THE_RUCKUS

420

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By THE_RUCKUS

I suppose Activision got spend it's profits somehow so that it can avoid paying tax. why not waste it on brand that no one cares about.

Avatar image for gaspower
GaspoweR

4904

Forum Posts

272

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By GaspoweR

They are actually trying to compete with Twitch and I don't see that going too well. MLG TV never took off for a reason and for as much as Activision might want to keep pushing their own stuff and platform, they'll just end up competing with Valve and Riot. They'll probably be using Overwatch as a way to push their stuff once they decide to launch their revamped competitive gaming platform alongside whatever big tournament they have planned for that game in order to grab viewers.

Avatar image for legalbagel
LegalBagel

1955

Forum Posts

1590

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 7

Edited By LegalBagel

Five years ago, back when Starcraft 2 ruled the competitive and streaming scene, the MLG tournaments were pretty great. But now they rank far below a ton of other tournaments. I used to tune into every MLG, but I don't think I've watched one in over three years. And MLGs proprietary streaming services are now irrelevant given that everyone now uses Twitch/Youtube. Seems like the only thing Activision is buying here is the name.

Which I suppose might be enough, just so they can get more control over the scenes for their games and a venue to put out new eSports titles under a semi-official banner. I'm guessing we'll see pop-up MLG tournaments for Overwatch and any other new eSports-focused title they release, instead of the incredibly stupid E3 shoutcasts over games you've barely heard of. Sort of like Valve with The International, but less required investment and using existing infrastructure/branding.

Also I'm sure it's just bluster and PR talk, but it's almost impossible they could be ESPN, given that most major event in eSports involves non-Activision games. I doubt they're going to cover independent LoL, Dota2, or CSGO tournaments, much less run their own. It's not just trying to be an eSports company and not covering the Super Bowl, it's being an eSports company and pretending Football, Basketball, and Baseball don't exist because you have an interest in Hockey. Which I suppose isn't too far from ESPN these days with the interests they have in various sports, but at least ESPN doesn't official own the sports.

Avatar image for falconer
falconer

2136

Forum Posts

7383

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 21

Edited By falconer

I understand the analogy, but NO ONE should want to be the ESPN of ANYTHING. As someone that watched it religiously a decade ago, ESPN is fucking awful nowadays.

Avatar image for jakob187
jakob187

22972

Forum Posts

10045

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 9

I have a feeling that, very soon, Activision Blizzard will be announcing that Heroes of the Storm, Call of Duty, Overwatch, and any of their other games will ONLY be available for stream through MLG.

I mean, let's be honest: that's totally the kind of thing Bobby Kotick would do.

Avatar image for recroulette
recroulette

5460

Forum Posts

13841

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 11

Waiting for the inevitable "Give MLG money and get a HotS Mount/Hearthstone Card Back/Overwatch Skin" stuff that is going to happen.

Avatar image for dornath
Dornath

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Dornath

How deep does the hole go?

Avatar image for kevino13
kevino13

219

Forum Posts

551

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By kevino13

I am surprised by this move, but compared to the $5 billion purchase of King a few months ago, this is nothing. I can understand Activision Blizzard's want for an outlet to control their prospective eSport ventures, both from the Activision and Blizzard sides, but why MLG? I think it's no secret that MLG has basically become a big joke in recent years, not to mention its failing business and relevency as new eSport games are controlled by other companies. MLG basically only had broadcasting rights for a couple FPS tournaments and maybe WoW PVP Arena tournaments, right?

I only hope this isn't some misguided venture to re-establish Blizzard eSports. Starcraft is done, HotS doesn't seem to be hitting as an eSport, and WoW arena was never popular since it's just a clusterfuck to most viewers. Overwatch has potential, but I know little about FPS's, and while Hearthstone has tournaments, I think the casual playerbase is more important to that game than an eSports scene. We'll see, but short of Blizz holding DOTA International size tournaments (including the viewership), I doubt anything will restore Blizzard spot in the eSport spotlight.

Oh, and Austin, in the before-last paragraph, a sentence reads "At best, it makes an already questionable look worse." I think you wanted to say, "...an already questionable decision..."

Avatar image for evilsbane
Evilsbane

5624

Forum Posts

315

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Edited By Evilsbane

The ESPN of Esports...so you want to bleed money at an alarming rate and become one of the most shitty and bloated collection of stations on TV and be starved for anything to talk about? Sure go for it.