Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

172 Comments

"Write About This Game We're Promoting And We'll Let You Play It Early"

Well here's an interesting e-mail...

I'm not too sure if this sort of thing happens too often, since we're usually not on the kinds of mailing lists that get hit with this sort of offer, but hey, let's not beat around the bush: Giant Bomb isn't the largest site for video games on the Internet... yet. Maybe we just need to get a little more "word of mouth" going, right? Maybe we need to "take it viral." Or maybe we just need to keep doing our thing and, as we become more entrenched in your hearts and in your minds, we'll become a more frequent part of the daily lives of game players around the world. OK, I'm getting off topic before I've even told you what the topic actually is... sorry.

As I understand it, there are a lot of non-commercial game sites out there that don't typically receive too much attention from the game publishers of the world. The concept of receiving review copies ahead of retail release is something of a rarity for these outlets. But since they provide a useful, community-like voice, sometimes publishers hire smaller marketing firms to reach out to these outlets, either overtly with direct contact, or covertly by posting HEY MAN YOU SHOULD CHECK OUT THIS GAME on the site's message boards or comments.

It's the overt contact that proves to be a dangerous test for the folks that run these community sites. Will they pass the test and get ahold of a reviewable disc or other asset without bending over backwards and doing something they wouldn't normally do? Or does the lure of free games become so enticing that they're say anything to keep them coming in? It reminds me of a story from a few years back, where a PC game publisher provided a few of these sites with brand new video cards "just to make sure the game was reviewed on proper hardware." It's a fine line, but as a rule of thumb, if it doesn't feel right, it probably isn't.

We received this e-mail today from an external promotions firm (meaning not THQ directly) that effectively says "if you write about this trailer we posted, we will let you into a closed beta for the game." This is, for starters, poor bait. Considering the main idea is to get people excited about the release of said game, shouldn't you be letting in as many credible journalist-types as possible?

Before I get too much further ahead of myself, here's the e-mail:

Hey Jeff,

[REDACTED] here with a great exclusive for your site! We’re working with THQ on the FPS Red Faction: Guerilla (PS3, X360, PC). As a valued member of our network, we would like to invite you to an exclusive closed multiplayer beta tourney and share your initial thoughts. Red Faction releases on June 9th.

To get in to the closed multiplayer beta, all you have to do is write up a post and feature the teaser spot below on your site and send me the link. The closed beta tourney will occur on May 1st.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCrfNArzx68

Looking forward to seeing what you think of the game!

So here's the proposed timeline of events:

1. Outlet writes about trailer (which I'm sort of bummed to be doing here in the first place, I feel like I've already lost this battle)
2. Outlet gets download code for multiplayer Red Faction beta (which, unless they're releasing a newer version, I'm pretty sure I've had since late last year)
3. Outlet participates in tournament, writes about game again.

Kind of funky. We often get e-mails and PMs from people looking for advice on how to get into our line of work. So here's my advice: if the lure of getting to play something before someone else or perhaps getting something for free is the sole reason you want to write about games, you've already lost, and you're destined to be swayed by the possibility of getting something for free. This means that the first time you give a game a negative review, the company will threaten to cut you off from the games, and you'll probably cave and retract the review.

But, really, the big loser here is THQ. Why? Because Red Faction: Guerrilla is a game that deserves better than this trailer that this external promotion company is trying to get us to... promote. Seriously, check out this totally busted trailer with audio that's around 12 seconds out of sync.

  


I know, right? On top of that it's got a description of "red faction guerilla ps3 rocks just like fallout mi rite or mi rite" on YouTube. Quality material, all you people at the promotion company! Corner offices for all.

[UPDATE] THQ got in touch with us about this story. While THQ does work with the promotions company involved with this stuff, a company spokesperson for THQ stated that it never approved this specific campaign. Considering the game's multiplayer beta launched on Xbox 360 last year and the awful quality of that trailer, I'm inclined to believe them.
Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

172 Comments

Avatar image for grakkath
Grakkath

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Grakkath

Wow... really 140+ comments of pure idiots? I mean look at the trailer by "JorgeConstanza11"

Does that look like anything whatsover offical? I'm sure THQ sends out mail hailing its "FPS" shooter red faction guerilla in press releases... considering its a third person shooter..

Not only that  the trailer  looks like a 30 minute hackjob - it's not to hard to splice together previously release video and a splash screen.

I hope THQ goes after whoever duped Jeff. Maybe the site should actually make sure what they post before they slander a name.

Plus.. just went look at Red Faction's site... a demo comes out on Friday for pre orders - why the hell would they try to promote the game through sites when word of mouth is gonna either start slamming or praising them this weekend?

Avatar image for wings
wings

47

Forum Posts

62

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By wings

The original Red Faction is stupid good.

Avatar image for jeff
jeff

6357

Forum Posts

107208

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 20

Edited By jeff

Just wanted to call attention to an update to this story that we've appeneded to the original post:


"[UPDATE] THQ got in touch with us about this story. While THQ does work with the promotions company involved with this stuff, a company spokesperson for THQ stated that it never approved this specific campaign. Considering the game's multiplayer beta launched on Xbox 360 last year and the awful quality of that trailer, I'm inclined to believe them."

Hopefully publishers will think twice before partnering up with these external companies devoted to "building buzz" or whatever. Though if you subscribe to the "no publicity is bad publicity" model, we're all totally thinking about the next Red Faction game now. Hmm.
Avatar image for buzz_killington
buzz_killington

3674

Forum Posts

5319

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 2

Edited By buzz_killington

I think it was a dare or something. Some guy who had the beta decided to make a lame video and make fun of some smaller websites... Its a practical joke. NOT FUNNY!!

Avatar image for hausdog
Hausdog

365

Forum Posts

17

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Hausdog

"This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by THQ"
Haha, guess it was a joke after all.

Avatar image for cheapoz
Cheapoz

1142

Forum Posts

108

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Cheapoz
Jeff said:
we're all totally thinking about the next Red Faction game now. Hmm.
Maybe so, but I have no friggin clue why, or what about in particular?

How about building buzz with good product? That might actually build sales.
Avatar image for jeff
jeff

6357

Forum Posts

107208

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 20

Edited By jeff
Cheapoz said:
How about building buzz with good product? That might actually build sales.
Sorry, you're making too much sense, so you have no future in video game marketing.
Avatar image for cheapoz
Cheapoz

1142

Forum Posts

108

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Cheapoz
Jeff said:
"Cheapoz said:
How about building buzz with good product? That might actually build sales.
Sorry, you're making too much sense, so you have no future in video game marketing.
"
Dammit. You have crushed my ambition.

(I actually work in marketing, eek!)
Avatar image for al3xand3r
Al3xand3r

7912

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Al3xand3r

Lol. So it really wasn't them doing it. Yet this article went up without double checking, or at least contacting them for comment first, smearing THQ's name over it to boost the site's indy character. Not good. Should have contacted them asking about it, without negative comments. Then they might have admitted it was them. Or told  you no, we don't know who's doing this. And you'd write your article accordingly. I suppose it's possible they were doing this and pulled it because of your article, but from their comment it sounds to me it wasn't them, or someone working for them, but they leave the potential open by simply saying they didn't "authorise it" as they're still investigating the companies they have hired.

Avatar image for kylebaron
KyleBaron

181

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By KyleBaron

Wait a second, isn't this the same game I played the beta of ages ago that absolutely stank? If I remember correctly, they made the beta public because NO ONE WAS PLAYING IT. lol

Avatar image for harv9
harv9

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By harv9
You're essentially being an internet tough guy by bitching about shitty marketers, then do exactly their bidding by posting their video.  Way to go, bro, you're part of the problem!
Avatar image for jeff
jeff

6357

Forum Posts

107208

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 20

Edited By jeff
harv9 said:
"
You're essentially being an internet tough guy by bitching about shitty marketers, then do exactly their bidding by posting their video.  Way to go, bro, you're part of the problem!
"

That's a fair point, and I did kind of wrestle with the thought of running the video vs. not running the video, but the video was so fucking stupid that it needed to be seen. Predictably, it's since been removed.

(Also, wow, it's like 23-year-old me showed up to bitch at his future self, right down to calling me "part of the problem." Rad.)
Avatar image for harv9
harv9

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By harv9

"That's a fair point, and I did kind of wrestle with the thought of running the video vs. not running the video, but the video was so fucking stupid that it needed to be seen."

Editorial discretion, I guess.  But you look like a hypocrite by going into such histrionics, and then end up copping out at the end...taking the high road would have been much more tactful.  You learned all about tactful writing at GameSpot, right?  right?

Avatar image for ryshe
RyShe

126

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 8

Edited By RyShe

I'm no expert, but in journalism you are not suppose to recive anything, let's say free liquor, from someone you may in the future cover, let's say Harmonix. I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just saying...

Avatar image for cheapoz
Cheapoz

1142

Forum Posts

108

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Cheapoz
harv9 said:
"
You're essentially being an internet tough guy by bitching about shitty marketers, then do exactly their bidding by posting their video.  Way to go, bro, you're part of the problem!
"
Have your heard of irony? I would've thought reading this site for a few minutes would realise you need a sense of humour here.
Avatar image for mattyftm
MattyFTM

14914

Forum Posts

67415

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 11

Edited By MattyFTM  Moderator
Jeff said:
"(Also, wow, it's like 23-year-old me showed up to bitch at his future self, right down to calling me "part of the problem." Rad.)"
Lol, awesome. Jeff's 23 year old self has a time machine. We're all doooooooooooooooooomed.
Avatar image for fuzzylemon
FuzzYLemoN

1609

Forum Posts

2558

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By FuzzYLemoN

Video's broken.

Avatar image for mike
mike

18011

Forum Posts

23067

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 6

Edited By mike
@Jeff:This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by THQ / Volition Inc.

Gotta love it.
Avatar image for disgaeamad
Disgaeamad

1404

Forum Posts

24092

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

Edited By Disgaeamad
@MB said:
" @Jeff:This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by THQ / Volition Inc. Gotta love it. "
Reported for bumping a 2 month old thread.
Avatar image for mike
mike

18011

Forum Posts

23067

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 6

Edited By mike
@Disgaeamad: I could delete my post and then edit yours to make it look like you bumped it...
Avatar image for snail
Snail

8908

Forum Posts

16390

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Edited By Snail

A winrar is Jeff.

Avatar image for disgaeamad
Disgaeamad

1404

Forum Posts

24092

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

Edited By Disgaeamad
@MB: But then I would just delete my post and put the blame on Snail.