Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Battlefield Heroes

    Game » consists of 1 releases. Released Jun 25, 2009

    Battlefield Heroes is EA DICE's casual take on the Battlefield series. It features a cartoon-like graphical style and is played from a third person perspective. It is also a "Play 4 Free" game.

    No longer "play 4 free"

    Avatar image for rallier
    rallier

    1947

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #1  Edited By rallier

    I'll miss you
    I'll miss you
    In Battlefield Heroes players rent their weapons with using the in-game currency and can also buy bandages and wrenches with it. If they so desired they could permanently by these weapons with actual money and buy XP-boost and such. People could also buy clothing for actual money that does not affect your skills making someone who does not pay for the game equal to someone who does. 
     
    Until now it was possible to play the game and use the in game currency that you get by playing the game to pay the rent of your weapons.
     
    However today EA/DICE decided to up the in game currency price of all the weapons and all the bandages to a point that it is impossible to afford their rent by using the ingame currency (ex a Gunner would not be able to rent his bazooka making him useless in combat) forcing players to buy weapons for real money and spend actual money on bandages giving those who pay for all of this a huge tactical advantage. 
     
    Quite a shame that this happened, despite the bugs and the somewhat unbalanced classes i enjoyed my time playing the game but I refuse to be forced to pay for a game that i have always played for free and has always been promoted as being free to play.
     
    Check out the BF:Heroes forums for a dose of mass anger and disbelief: http://www.battlefieldheroes.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=29
    Avatar image for snail
    Snail

    8908

    Forum Posts

    16390

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 9

    #2  Edited By Snail

    I never payed much attention to that game, I guess now it is completely pointless.

    Avatar image for aquamooch
    aquamooch

    86

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #3  Edited By aquamooch

    I didn't like BF:H one bit  but it must suck for the people who do.
     
    I suspected that this was going to happen sooner or later

    Avatar image for adamantium
    Adamantium

    891

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #4  Edited By Adamantium

     Wow... I guess EA got pissed that not enough people were willing to give up their nickels and dimes, so they decided to make the game unplayable for those folks? Weaksauce.
     
    Good thing I never got into this game, as F2P and microtransaction games just aren't my thing. You get what you pay for; both for good and ill.

    Avatar image for rallier
    rallier

    1947

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #5  Edited By rallier
    @Adamantium said:

    "  Wow... I guess EA got pissed that not enough people were willing to give up their nickels and dimes, so they decided to make the game unplayable for those folks? Weaksauce.   Good thing I never got into this game, as F2P and microtransaction games just aren't my thing. You get what you pay for; both for good and ill. "

    This happening is extra crazy when you consider that Ben Cousins is blaming this on the "recession" while the game is in open-beta, has plenty of problems going on and only has 5 maps so far. 
    Avatar image for ahmadmetallic
    AhmadMetallic

    19300

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    #6  Edited By AhmadMetallic
    @aquamooch said:
    " I didn't like BF:H one bit  but it must suck for the people who do."
    Avatar image for adamantium
    Adamantium

    891

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #7  Edited By Adamantium
    @Rallier said:
    " This happening is extra crazy when you consider that Ben Cousins is blaming this on the "recession" while the game is in open-beta, has plenty of problems going on and only has 5 maps so far.  "
    Jeez for real? That's shameless.
    Avatar image for linkyshinks
    Linkyshinks

    11399

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 0

    #8  Edited By Linkyshinks

    Shameless indeed, is what EA are.  
      
    I would rather play Quake Live anyway.

    Avatar image for skald
    Skald

    4450

    Forum Posts

    621

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 7

    #9  Edited By Skald

    Having not charged you for the base game, I am inclined to say they don't really have an obligation to keep it free. A game that does not make money is a failure. On the other hand, it does kind of go against what they said this game would be, and that's a bit disappointing. 

    Avatar image for adamantium
    Adamantium

    891

    Forum Posts

    5

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #10  Edited By Adamantium
    @Linkyshinks said:

    " Shameless indeed, is what EA are.    I would rather play Quake Live anyway. "

    No doubt. I mean we all know EA is far from benevolent, though thanks to Kotick, Activision has taken the title of "Most Evil Video Game Megacoporationglomerate".
     
    Still, I never thought EA would stoop so low as to try to build up the value of a "play for free" game (using such a notable franchise as BF) and then make it basically unplayable for those who actually tried to, you know, play for free. That's really frustrating. How can they expect the goodwill of the serious half of gamers when they pull this junk? The hardcore BFH guys will still pay, I imagine, but the casuals will simply quit without realizing just how sneaky and underhanded this is; and the "hardcore gamers" already know how messed up EA is and how they're hemorrhaging employees and studios already. It's like all EA cares about is the tiniest amount of money they can get, even while they seriously need to build their reputation. 
     
    Man, just when I was starting to think EA was turning stuff around, they just keep trying to bend their own customer base over more and more. Makes me sad I bought DA:O, frankly.
     
    Anyway, /rant.
    Avatar image for alexander
    Alexander

    1760

    Forum Posts

    731

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 4

    #11  Edited By Alexander

    It's all good, I stopped playing it after 2 weeks. It was quite novel to play for a while and the abilities offered up some degree of variety, but if you're on the PC hold out for 1943s release.

    Avatar image for angelkanarias
    angelkanarias

    1523

    Forum Posts

    168

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 3

    #12  Edited By angelkanarias

    rofl, they were announcing the game as the first one to be totally free and now they are just raping in the asses the dudes who play it.

    Avatar image for joeltgm
    JoelTGM

    5784

    Forum Posts

    1760

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    #13  Edited By JoelTGM

    That's a bummer.  They did a really bad job handling all that.  Just plan ahead, make a proper fair system from the start, don't one day change your mind and betray everyone.

    Avatar image for karmum
    Karmum

    11514

    Forum Posts

    479

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 1

    #14  Edited By Karmum

    Although I haven't played it in awhile, that's kind of unfortunate. Not many things stay free forever.

    Avatar image for rallier
    rallier

    1947

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #15  Edited By rallier

    My it is even getting worse... They are introducing clothing that you can buy that cancels out enemy skills. I've never hated a company but the EA DICE combo gets really close.

    Avatar image for sxbig
    SXBIG

    135

    Forum Posts

    847

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #16  Edited By SXBIG

    Ouch that sucks.

    Avatar image for jim_dandy
    jim_dandy

    885

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #17  Edited By jim_dandy
    @DOUBLESHOCK said:
    " That's a bummer.  They did a really bad job handling all that.  Just plan ahead, make a proper fair system from the start, don't one day change your mind and betray everyone. "
    Considering this is EA, it's possible this was planned from the start.
     
    /tinfoilhat
    Avatar image for drrandle
    DrRandle

    1390

    Forum Posts

    2197

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 20

    User Lists: 6

    #18  Edited By DrRandle

    Wartime economy, man, wartime economy.
     
    Come on over to Team Fortress 2! It's a great time!

    Avatar image for mrfizzy
    mrfizzy

    1666

    Forum Posts

    58

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 6

    #19  Edited By mrfizzy

    I played that game for a few weeks when it was first made public. Didnt think it was much to be honest. 

    Avatar image for delta_ass
    delta_ass

    3776

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 36

    User Lists: 7

    #20  Edited By delta_ass

    I dunno why EA thinks this is going to work, people already know about TF2, a similar game that's free and generally regarded as better.

    Avatar image for al3xand3r
    Al3xand3r

    7912

    Forum Posts

    3

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #21  Edited By Al3xand3r

    It was a solid little game for the week I played it, but now it's really worthless. Why are they so greedy anyway? I remember them boasting how much money this thing brought in. Such a cheap production, yet they made millions while offering it for free. That's not enough? If they made a Wii port that did away with all the real money stuff and added several more maps etc it would be worth a buy, but to constantly keep paying for this? No way, EA!

    Avatar image for rallier
    rallier

    1947

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #22  Edited By rallier
    Avatar image for darkshaper
    DarkShaper

    1388

    Forum Posts

    1095

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 8

    #23  Edited By DarkShaper
    Sucks for the people who play it but I never thought it was any fun.
    Avatar image for rallier
    rallier

    1947

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    Avatar image for jakob187
    jakob187

    22972

    Forum Posts

    10045

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 9

    #25  Edited By jakob187

    So we're all getting pissed off about a F2P game deciding to increase the price of some items through Valor Points and reduce the price of other things through BattleFunds (that's the real cash)...and yet the game still doesn't actually cost anything to play?  It may take me some time to actually get some stuff through rentals, and they won't last...but nonetheless, I can still play the game. 
     
    And that, ladies and gents, is the world of F2P online gaming.  You play for free, and you have a limited amount of stuff available to you.  Meanwhile, if you want to REALLY play the game with all the jacked-up awesomeness, then yeah...you've gotta pay.  Name any online F2P/micro-trans game that DOESN'T follow this exact same pattern...besides fucking RuneScape.

    Avatar image for empfeix
    empfeix

    794

    Forum Posts

    252

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #26  Edited By empfeix
    @aquamooch said:
    " I didn't like BF:H one bit  but it must suck for the people who do.  I suspected that this was going to happen sooner or later "
    Yeah I also saw this coming, didnt really matter to me tho because the game got boring after a couple of days
    Avatar image for rallier
    rallier

    1947

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #27  Edited By rallier
    @jakob187 said:
    " So we're all getting pissed off about a F2P game deciding to increase the price of some items through Valor Points and reduce the price of other things through BattleFunds (that's the real cash)...and yet the game still doesn't actually cost anything to play?  It may take me some time to actually get some stuff through rentals, and they won't last...but nonetheless, I can still play the game.  And that, ladies and gents, is the world of F2P online gaming.  You play for free, and you have a limited amount of stuff available to you.  Meanwhile, if you want to REALLY play the game with all the jacked-up awesomeness, then yeah...you've gotta pay.  Name any online F2P/micro-trans game that DOESN'T follow this exact same pattern...besides fucking RuneScape. "
    The cost of bandages in VP went up by 21 times wich is not some minor just some minor change. Right now someone would have to win 2 games to just be able to afford one and bandages were an essential thing for snipers when they got light on fire. The prices for all the weapons went up at such insane rates, in order for a gunner the only class that can use a RPG to rent his RPG for one day using VP it would take him 3 hours of play and win every single game to be able to afford it for example and that is just for the RPG. 
     
    The game taking this route is not something wrong in itself but from the very start the game has been advertised as play 4 free and that there would not be a difference in combat potential between people who decide to pay for some stuff and those who don't however without any notice the whole philosophy behind the came gets thrown out of the window from one day to another. 
     
    If you would go online now without buying the needed weapons for your class you are going to get raped over by those who spend money on unlimited weapons. Good luck playing a gunner with who only has the standard TNT against a tank.

    League of Legends
    Avatar image for damnboyadvance
    damnboyadvance

    4216

    Forum Posts

    1020

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 20

    User Lists: 4

    #28  Edited By damnboyadvance

    It was a pretty good game too. I enjoyed it while I played it. But the prices are just way too high for those of us playing for free, as advertised.
     
    I thought about buying Battlefunds, but for right now I'm postponing the very thought. I don't want to support this shit anymore. Not at least not until they make it as free as it should be again, and until they don't force me to play for 5 hours just so I can keep my weapon. It's crazy. I can't imagine how they could even think of this. I enjoy the game, but I'm not paying for something that's supposed to be free. I'm out until they fix the prices.

    Avatar image for lind_l_taylor
    Lind_L_Taylor

    4125

    Forum Posts

    6

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #29  Edited By Lind_L_Taylor

    Might make more sense if people actually liked the game & they had a ton of people playing it & overloading the servers already..
     
    but they don't.

    Avatar image for griddler
    Griddler

    3374

    Forum Posts

    2865

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 6

    User Lists: 15

    #30  Edited By Griddler

    I hate that game anyway.

    Avatar image for purerok
    PureRok

    4272

    Forum Posts

    4226

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #31  Edited By PureRok
    @Rallier said:
    " @jakob187 said:
    " So we're all getting pissed off about a F2P game deciding to increase the price of some items through Valor Points and reduce the price of other things through BattleFunds (that's the real cash)...and yet the game still doesn't actually cost anything to play?  It may take me some time to actually get some stuff through rentals, and they won't last...but nonetheless, I can still play the game.  And that, ladies and gents, is the world of F2P online gaming.  You play for free, and you have a limited amount of stuff available to you.  Meanwhile, if you want to REALLY play the game with all the jacked-up awesomeness, then yeah...you've gotta pay.  Name any online F2P/micro-trans game that DOESN'T follow this exact same pattern...besides fucking RuneScape. "
    The cost of bandages in VP went up by 21 times wich is not some minor just some minor change. Right now someone would have to win 2 games to just be able to afford one and bandages were an essential thing for snipers when they got light on fire. The prices for all the weapons went up at such insane rates, in order for a gunner the only class that can use a RPG to rent his RPG for one day using VP it would take him 3 hours of play and win every single game to be able to afford it for example and that is just for the RPG.   The game taking this route is not something wrong in itself but from the very start the game has been advertised as play 4 free and that there would not be a difference in combat potential between people who decide to pay for some stuff and those who don't however without any notice the whole philosophy behind the came gets thrown out of the window from one day to another.   If you would go online now without buying the needed weapons for your class you are going to get raped over by those who spend money on unlimited weapons. Good luck playing a gunner with who only has the standard TNT against a tank. League of Legends "
    The thing is... the game is still play for free. You can't say it's no longer play for free just because they increased the price of the optional micro-transactions. You are spinning this.
    Avatar image for intheend
    InTheEnd

    274

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #32  Edited By InTheEnd

    EA's a corporation, what did you expect? 

    Avatar image for toomuchsky
    TooMuchSky

    28

    Forum Posts

    265

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #33  Edited By TooMuchSky

    BFH used to be really sweet, easy to get into for short bursts of play and very polished for a game with such low spec requirements. I was literally about to drop cash on an outfit for a few bucks because I wanted to support DICE. 
     
    Now, I'm really happy I didn't, seeing as there is a lot of people who invested up to $100 into what they thought was a solid game with a fair economy - Only to find that all of a sudden, EA had swooped in and turned it upside down. Despite their vow to never sell in-game advantages for real world cash. With this breach of trust, there is no telling when it'll happen again (and it does, just check for fireproof underpants that make you invulnerable to the soldier class' important burning bullet ability), so in effect, EA is scaring off potential investors. The weapon you buy today can be underpowered or canceled out tomorrow.
     
    Their announcing  3 million registered accounts is a slap in the face of close to 2000 angry customers who already complained about the changes on the forum - and adding insult to injury, the entire thread goes largely ignored by EA representatives.

    Avatar image for toowalrus
    toowalrus

    13408

    Forum Posts

    29

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #34  Edited By toowalrus
    You mean 'free 2 play' right? How about you go play some 'Left 2 Die' !!
    Avatar image for rallier
    rallier

    1947

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #35  Edited By rallier

    @TooWalrus: Nope that is actually how they marketed the game.
     
    edit: Battle-forge another EA game uses the same title.
     
     @TooMuchSky: I believe the "IGN Free multiplayer game of the year" was the biggest slap in the face
    Avatar image for kohe321
    Kohe321

    3569

    Forum Posts

    1444

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #36  Edited By Kohe321

    I remember watching my friend play it, and not being very impressed.

    Avatar image for thedoublej
    TheDoubleJ

    222

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 0

    #37  Edited By TheDoubleJ

    Well that is stupid, but i geuss it makes sense. 

    Avatar image for bubahula
    bubahula

    2232

    Forum Posts

    74

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #38  Edited By bubahula

    thats gross

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.