Seems an awesome addition on top of Co-op and multiplayer. Guess their trying to combat Left 4 Dead.

Even this can't save that game.

Wow, thats pretty funny. The footage makes that bonus out to look kinda fun, but I doubt I would play it more then having a look at it and moving on. Stuff like this is not really a clincher for me and I was planning to buy this game anyways.

I think I'll stick with Left 4 Dead instead. Nice try though.

"I think I'll stick with Left 4 Dead instead. Nice try though."

"Even this can't save that game."

Awesome!

I don't understand all of the World at War/Treyarch bashing. Call of Duty 3 wasn't as bad as a lot of people claim it is. It was a solid game. World at War, which is based on the Call of Duty 4 engine and has been in development for two years, is going to be a really solid game. I expect it will be just as good, if not better, than Call of Duty 4.

"Awesome!

I don't understand all of the World at War/Treyarch bashing. Call of Duty 3 wasn't as bad as a lot of people claim it is. It was a solid game. World at War, which is based on the Call of Duty 4 engine and has been in development for two years, is going to be a really solid game. I expect it will be just as good, if not better, than Call of Duty 4."

"AndrewGaspar said:

"Awesome!

I don't understand all of the World at War/Treyarch bashing. Call of Duty 3 wasn't as bad as a lot of people claim it is. It was a solid game. World at War, which is based on the Call of Duty 4 engine and has been in development for two years, is going to be a really solid game. I expect it will be just as good, if not better, than Call of Duty 4."

You apparently haven't played it."

I totally saw it coming

"No... are you basing this off the beta? I'd imagine it probably runs like shit and is unbalanced in the beta. That's why they do the beta. They want to fix all of the problems before the game is released."

"AndrewGaspar said:

"No... are you basing this off the beta? I'd imagine it probably runs like shit and is unbalanced in the beta. That's why they do the beta. They want to fix all of the problems before the game is released."

It's a demo, not a beta. They definitely do not have time to fix even 1/4 of the glaring issues that make the game bad before it goes gold, if it hasn't gone gold already. And I doubt they would bother patching it up if it doesn't sell as well as Activision wants, and it probably won't. There are fundamental problems with the game's design itself that balancing couldn't fix."

It will sell well, it will probably not meet Activision's projections (which are undoubtedly inflated, although slightly subdued, from last year's due to a combination of new releases). The game has turned a ton of people off from the beta, and word of mouth spreads, combined with the aforementioned new releases.

What's with this of adding zombie mini games as of now? Not that it's a bad thing, but adding zombie mini games to games that have nothing to do with zombies is just weird to me. It looks pretty nice but I'll take Left 4 Dead.

"AndrewGaspar said:

"No... are you basing this off the beta? I'd imagine it probably runs like shit and is unbalanced in the beta. That's why they do the beta. They want to fix all of the problems before the game is released."

It's a demo, not a beta. They definitely do not have time to fix even 1/4 of the glaring issues that make the game bad before it goes gold, if it hasn't gone gold already. And I doubt they would bother patching it up if it doesn't sell as well as Activision wants, and it probably won't. There are fundamental problems with the game's design itself that balancing couldn't fix."

"Jayge said:

"AndrewGaspar said:

"No... are you basing this off the beta? I'd imagine it probably runs like shit and is unbalanced in the beta. That's why they do the beta. They want to fix all of the problems before the game is released."

It's a demo, not a beta. They definitely do not have time to fix even 1/4 of the glaring issues that make the game bad before it goes gold, if it hasn't gone gold already. And I doubt they would bother patching it up if it doesn't sell as well as Activision wants, and it probably won't. There are fundamental problems with the game's design itself that balancing couldn't fix."

1. It's a  beta.

2. They've stated that they're planning to support the title with downloadable content.

3. Left4Dead isn't original an concept. Stop being a cunt.

I'm looking forward to seeing how this game turns out. :D"

"Relys said:

"Jayge said:

"AndrewGaspar said:

"No... are you basing this off the beta? I'd imagine it probably runs like shit and is unbalanced in the beta. That's why they do the beta. They want to fix all of the problems before the game is released."

It's a demo, not a beta. They definitely do not have time to fix even 1/4 of the glaring issues that make the game bad before it goes gold, if it hasn't gone gold already. And I doubt they would bother patching it up if it doesn't sell as well as Activision wants, and it probably won't. There are fundamental problems with the game's design itself that balancing couldn't fix."

1. It's a  beta.

2. They've stated that they're planning to support the title with downloadable content.

3. Left4Dead isn't original an concept. Stop being a cunt.

I'm looking forward to seeing how this game turns out. :D"

How deeply did you pull that out of your ass from, big boy? I never said anything about Left4Dead, I never mentioned Downloadable Content, and you're just plain ignorant if you think this is a real beta."

You just called me a cunt. Don't make me spell the irony of that post out to you.

"You just called me a cunt. Don't make me spell the irony of that post out to you."

"Jayge said:

"You just called me a cunt. Don't make me spell the irony of that post out to you."

Have a nice day."

I don't have a problem with a developer adding more content to their games... What the hell is wrong with you people?! Get over the fact that it isn't  Ultra Realistic Modern Warfare. If I wanna do that I'll go play CoD4...

"I don't have a problem with a developer adding more content to their games... What the hell is wrong with you people?! Get over the fact that it isn't  Ultra Realistic Modern Warfare. If I wanna do that I'll go play CoD4..."

"r3b3lr0b0t said:

"I don't have a problem with a developer adding more content to their games... What the hell is wrong with you people?! Get over the fact that it isn't  Ultra Realistic Modern Warfare. If I wanna do that I'll go play CoD4..."

Sometimes I wonder if people even read topics they respond to, or if the rest of the internet is an artificial intelligence designed to make me balk."

"I don't have a problem with a developer adding more content to their games... What the hell is wrong with you people?! Get over the fact that it isn't  Ultra Realistic Modern Warfare. If I wanna do that I'll go play CoD4..."

"r3b3lr0b0t said:

"I don't have a problem with a developer adding more content to their games... What the hell is wrong with you people?! Get over the fact that it isn't  Ultra Realistic Modern Warfare. If I wanna do that I'll go play CoD4..."

You understand it's a fast paced FPS shooter right?"

Just makin' sure.

"r3b3lr0b0t said:

"I don't have a problem with a developer adding more content to their games... What the hell is wrong with you people?! Get over the fact that it isn't  Ultra Realistic Modern Warfare. If I wanna do that I'll go play CoD4..."

Sometimes I wonder if people even read topics they respond to, or if the rest of the internet is an artificial intelligence designed to make me balk."

"Nah, I just skip over your posts because they are absolute rubbish :D"

"r3b3lr0b0t said:

"Nah, I just skip over your posts because they are absolute rubbish :D"

Nice try, but that made no sense, given that your original post said "you people" implying a collective that was criticizing the game for not being realistic/modern. Seriously. At least *try* when you're going to attempt to troll me."

That's awesome.  This game is going to be a lot of fun. 

"r3b3lr0b0t said:

"Nah, I just skip over your posts because they are absolute rubbish :D"

Nice try, but that made no sense, given that your original post said "you people" implying a collective that was criticizing the game for not being realistic/modern. Seriously. At least *try* when you're going to attempt to troll me."

I was planning to get this anyways, so just a bit of a bonus, really.

Call of Duty has officially jumped the shark.  I'm surprised they also didn't add in chainsaws on the M1 Garands.

"Call of Duty has officially jumped the shark.  I'm surprised they also didn't add in chainsaws on the M1 Garands."

I love how everyone that complains about what people say about this game not standing up to Cod4 and kinda being disappointed are the ones that have not played it at all. Get this straight - The 'beta' is not a beta, if anything changes from that beta, it won't be all that much at all. The game is coming out in less than 3 weeks...I'm giving it a rent for a co-op playthrough and will at least try this mode...but I'll take Left4Dead over it in a second. Also, for whoever it was that said "what I've seen makes this hand in hand or better than Cod4" I can only tell you, be prepared to be disappointed then.

So they have finally added something that wasn't in COD4. Great, now people will get COD4 WW2 mod and a new mode when they buy the game.

This will never replace left4dead, but it's still a cool addition.

"That's awesome.  This game is going to be a lot of fun. "

"DOUBLESHOCK said:

"That's awesome.  This game is going to be a lot of fun. "

+1 for positive post!

At least DOUBLESHOCK isn't jaded like the rest of us..."

Sounds interesting, but a rip-off of Left 4 Dead and Gears 2's Horde mode.

Honestly stop thinking any of us that say anything negative about this are wrong when you haven't even played the 'demo'....secondly though, Gears 2 's Horde mode,regardless of the circumstances, that type of co-op gametype is welcome in any kind of shooter...you say that as if they invented this shit, I'm glad they are doing it and I hope more games do it, ones that are actually good though. If you're gonna claim this is ripping off Horde mode though, then I guess horde mode is obviously just a rip off of Terrorist Hunt from R6, so get over it...if more shooters actually had a seperate co-op gametype, ones that were good at least..it would really help with replay value, especially if their competitve online isn't the most interesting.

"AndrewGaspar said:

"No... are you basing this off the beta? I'd imagine it probably runs like shit and is unbalanced in the beta. That's why they do the beta. They want to fix all of the problems before the game is released."

It's a demo, not a beta. They definitely do not have time to fix even 1/4 of the glaring issues that make the game bad before it goes gold, if it hasn't gone gold already. And I doubt they would bother patching it up if it doesn't sell as well as Activision wants, and it probably won't. There are fundamental problems with the game's design itself that balancing couldn't fix."

Meh, does not really interest me at all, considering that Left 4 Dead is out soon. Think I will pass on WaW, and wait for the next infinity ward COD (fingers crossed the Sci-fi rumors are true)

Its far from 'cod4 with WWII weapons' ....it felt very unpolished, and the level design is pretty poor...and just a lot of other little things that make it not even close to cod4 quality. the beta is a 'demo' also, not a beta.

I'm surprised that some people still think the retail game is going to be drastically different from the demo.  I'm predicting that it's going to be exactly the same, people - the game is done.  Just because Treyarch hasn''t announced that it has gone Gold doesn't mean the game isn't finished. 

The final game will be the same as this so-called "beta", just you watch.  There may be a patch a few weeks or months down the road, but again, don't expect any major changes.  Holding onto some false hope that World At War will somehow magically become a perfectly polished COD4-like experience upon release is just delusional in my opinion.

Far from even opinion, its a fact. I'm not saying it won't be a 'decent' game, and as I've stated several times, I'll give it a rent for some co-op at least...its just not gonna be simply "Cod4 in WWII" which so many people want to try to make it out to be, that would be giving it a huge compliment...and everyone that seems to think this hasn't played the 'beta', and if they still think it after that, they try to stress that its a 'beta', when its not. Pretty much everyone I know that has played it, and even the response from different game reviewers playing previews of it and stuff, pretty much everyone, after playing this has gone back to Cod4..even if they weren't playing it much at the time before, just because it doesn't even come close to holding up next to it.

"I'm surprised that some people still think the retail game is going to be drastically different from the demo.  I'm predicting that it's going to be exactly the same, people - the game is done.  Just because Treyarch hasn''t announced that it has gone Gold doesn't mean the game isn't finished. 

The final game will be the same as this so-called "beta", just you watch.  There may be a patch a few weeks or months down the road, but again, don't expect any major changes.  Holding onto some false hope that World At War will somehow magically become a perfectly polished COD4-like experience upon release is just delusional in my opinion."

This will be interesting...

"Sounds interesting, but a rip-off of Left 4 Dead and Gears 2's Horde mode."

"Even this can't save that game."