So Blacker Ops in 2012 and The Call of Duty in 2013? Also with that Sledgehammer 3rd person CoD game at some kind of mid year point I would assume.
Call of Duty
Originally starting as a World War II-themed first-person shooter, the Call of Duty franchise now incorporates other time periods and conflicts and can be found on virtually every modern platform.
Hey, Guys! There’s Another Call of Duty Coming, Too
A Call of Duty AND an Assassin's Creed next year? WHAT GOD DID I PLEASE
Yeah, I'll probably end up playing AC while shunning CoD #doublestandard
I'll admit to spending most of my day playing Modern Warfare 3. I think the campaign is the best the series has had in a long time. But I can't help feeling stupid for doing so when Activision starts talking about their next Call of Duty game on the same day their newest one was released. As long as the campaigns stay fun, I'll probably keep playing, but it all has to slow down sometime, right? ..Right?
@wsowen02 said:
You guys notice how Klepek has started trying to write sassy headlines like Alex does, except he's not funny like Alex is?
Alex is funny?
i havent even gotten block ops their already comin with another even with mw3 just came out what , i cant express what i feel about activision lately , first the crap fest known as goldeneye reloaded - which as of this point still dont have a 00 agent walkthrough on how to beat trevelyn ,
now they gonna double dose with cod
@Example1013 said:
@wsowen02 said:
You guys notice how Klepek has started trying to write sassy headlines like Alex does, except he's not funny like Alex is?
Alex is funny?
Quite so. He's also the best writer on the site who generally doesn't post half-baked news stories for the sake of fanning flames or pandering to the lowest common denominator. I was about to comment on the amount of stupid whinging going on in here, and then realised that this is exactly what it was designed for. Cool journalismz.
@sofacitysweetheart said:
@Example1013 said:
@wsowen02 said:
You guys notice how Klepek has started trying to write sassy headlines like Alex does, except he's not funny like Alex is?
Alex is funny?
Quite so. He's also the best writer on the site who generally doesn't post half-baked news stories for the sake of fanning flames or pandering to the lowest common denominator. I was about to comment on the amount of stupid whinging going on in here, and then realised that this is exactly what it was designed for. Cool journalismz.
completely agree.
Not going to lie, I'm actually really excited about Treyarch's next effort because Black Ops was awesome, and my favourite Call of Duty game (and I've played them all). I used to consider them the B-squad to Infinity Ward, but no way after Black Ops. The currency system, balancing tweaks, and Wager matches made it one of my favourite games of this generation.
This story has got me wondering how Activision will end up handling the jump to next gen. If they go for a two year cycle again then in theory both Sledgehammer and IW could release a Call of Duty in 2013 which would possibly be the last Call of Dutys aimed at the PS3/360 generation. Maybe IW have made their last current gen Call of Duty and will now embark on a 3 year cycle for the first Nextbox/PS4 Call of Duty while Sledgehammer round out this gen of Call of Duty in 2013?
I am all for Blops 2. More Gary Oldman!
Even if it's imaginary Gary Oldman.
Also, that's a legit spoiler if you haven't beaten Blops. Highlight at your own risk!
I'm surprised Activision isn't putting out more than one Call of Duty game a year yet. If these games make enough money to buy a solid platinum mansion, why not release more than one game a year? You know they're going to do that eventually.
I would suspect the new console would be Vita, since a CoD game has been announced (with no info) and the WiiU may not be out in time to enjoy the next CoD. I may be wrong on the second part, but why develop a new game for the Vita. Just port the one you are working on.
Well, of course they are. They have to keep something out there for pretentious gits to get all smarmy about and feel about one set of gamers the way we PC gamers are often accused of feeling about non PC-gamers. Except, of course, it's okay when the pretentious gits do it about shooters (and COD in particular), because, hey, it's not by Jonothan Blow.
Frankly, I'd hate it if there was no more COD. I think an annual release is ridiculous, but every other year would be great. It does fill a niche that a lot of other shooters aren't doing right now. A solid online multiplayer arena type of game. It's too bad they just can't have one team do single player every two years and another team do the multiplayer every two years and just release them separately, alternately It is a completely different experience from Red Orchestra, Battlefield, and Counter-Strike and you go to it when you want something those don't provide
The problem is going to be that if the next release doesn't make jaws drop, it may run the risk of over-exposing itself and drive a lot of people away (as MW3 already has) before the next generation starts to drip out the year after that.
Of course, maybe once COD starts to fall off, it'll give rise to a more creative and new mass-appeal shooter, so . . . that would be good. :)
@Clonedzero said:
@sofacitysweetheart said:
@Example1013 said:
@wsowen02 said:
You guys notice how Klepek has started trying to write sassy headlines like Alex does, except he's not funny like Alex is?
Alex is funny?
Quite so. He's also the best writer on the site who generally doesn't post half-baked news stories for the sake of fanning flames or pandering to the lowest common denominator. I was about to comment on the amount of stupid whinging going on in here, and then realised that this is exactly what it was designed for. Cool journalismz.
completely agree.
You guys are pulling my leg, right? The most "journalistic" things I've seen him do are "sexism in games" and "religion in games", which is only the mainstay of every "look at me, I'm a real journalist" writer at every game site and gets trumped out at least monthly as fodder you can count on producing views and comments (because we never do enough navel-gazing).
I dig Patrick and all, but let's not be delusional about what he has brought to the table. Yeah, he has done more than just forward on press releases, but not a fuck of a lot more.
God, I hope it doesn't sell 9 million copies in a single fucking day. That is so pathetic; that would mean that there are just far too many gamers out there who are fucking stupid, and don't play original games at all. They only play stuff that is up to 2, 3, 4 or beyond that literally everyone has been talking about for years. The most mainstream of the mainstream. Which means it's hurting so many other studios, with much better ideas and more fun/memorable games... and that's never funny.
@vinsanityv22 said:
God, I hope it doesn't sell 9 million copies in a single fucking day. That is so pathetic; that would mean that there are just far too many gamers out there who are fucking stupid, and don't play original games at all. They only play stuff that is up to 2, 3, 4 or beyond that literally everyone has been talking about for years. The most mainstream of the mainstream. Which means it's hurting so many other studios, with much better ideas and more fun/memorable games... and that's never funny.
So u are calling me stupid
@Branthog: Who were you talking about there? You seemed to be disagreeing with me, but the second paragraph seems in-line with most of what I was saying.
@vinsanityv22 said:
God, I hope it doesn't sell 9 million copies in a single fucking day. That is so pathetic; that would mean that there are just far too many gamers out there who are fucking stupid, and don't play original games at all. They only play stuff that is up to 2, 3, 4 or beyond that literally everyone has been talking about for years. The most mainstream of the mainstream. Which means it's hurting so many other studios, with much better ideas and more fun/memorable games... and that's never funny.
Right, because people only play one game. Ever. Because I bought two copies of MW3 today (one for myself and one for someone else), it means I'm not also playing and finishing several other games every month and don't buy around fifty or more games per year, ranging from Civilization to Red Orchestra to Shadows of the Damned to Frozen Synapse to Heavy Rain to Mass Effect to Sykyrim and everything in-between and beyond.
You know what else sucks? The Beatles. They're just too popular and people who like them only like popular music. They're too dumb and simple to like good stuff like the bands you and I like, which nobody else has never heard of, because they're totally obscure (but when they're no longer obscure, we'll start to hate them, too, because we're totally edgy like that!).
COD games are a fun ride (though less fun some years than others) ride with a pretty solid and enjoyable multiplayer that you can get into without letting your brain dribble through your nose. It's perfectly okay to take a break from other games and have a mindless blast, if you like. Even if it does cut into your Braid fan-fic writing time.
Also, let's get over the idea that because one game is popular it's hurting all the other games. Music isn't dead, because there are some globally renowned bands that get shitloads of marketing and promotion. Good movies aren't dead, just because there's "Meet the Spartans" and twenty-two Harry Potter films. It isn't a finite resource. And, in fact, there's a good argument to be made that the cash-cow generates so much revenue that it makes other games possible that they might not have bothered to make. Or otherwise brings interest into the industry and potential franchises that wouldn't be there if not for this. Again, like movies, a lot of them fail miserably and you count on your few massive block-busters to compensate for the missteps (in revenue generating films; not quality of the film, since that isn't always tied together).
Now, don't take all of the above as me condoning these ridiculous Madden-style annual releases. That shit has to stop at some point, when you're no longer making significant changes from one year to the next.
@Branthog said:
@vinsanityv22 said:
God, I hope it doesn't sell 9 million copies in a single fucking day. That is so pathetic; that would mean that there are just far too many gamers out there who are fucking stupid, and don't play original games at all. They only play stuff that is up to 2, 3, 4 or beyond that literally everyone has been talking about for years. The most mainstream of the mainstream. Which means it's hurting so many other studios, with much better ideas and more fun/memorable games... and that's never funny.
Right, because people only play one game. Ever. Because I bought two copies of MW3 today (one for myself and one for someone else), it means I'm not also playing and finishing several other games every month and don't buy around fifty or more games per year, ranging from Civilization to Red Orchestra to Shadows of the Damned to Frozen Synapse to Heavy Rain to Mass Effect to Sykyrim and everything in-between and beyond.
You know what else sucks? The Beatles. They're just too popular and people who like them only like popular music. They're too dumb and simple to like good stuff like the bands you and I like, which nobody else has never heard of, because they're totally obscure (but when they're no longer obscure, we'll start to hate them, too, because we're totally edgy like that!).
COD games are a fun ride (though less fun some years than others) ride with a pretty solid and enjoyable multiplayer that you can get into without letting your brain dribble through your nose. It's perfectly okay to take a break from other games and have a mindless blast, if you like. Even if it does cut into your Braid fan-fic writing time.
Also, let's get over the idea that because one game is popular it's hurting all the other games. Music isn't dead, because there are some globally renowned bands that get shitloads of marketing and promotion. Good movies aren't dead, just because there's "Meet the Spartans" and twenty-two Harry Potter films. It isn't a finite resource. And, in fact, there's a good argument to be made that the cash-cow generates so much revenue that it makes other games possible that they might not have bothered to make. Or otherwise brings interest into the industry and potential franchises that wouldn't be there if not for this. Again, like movies, a lot of them fail miserably and you count on your few massive block-busters to compensate for the missteps (in revenue generating films; not quality of the film, since that isn't always tied together).
Now, don't take all of the above as me condoning these ridiculous Madden-style annual releases. That shit has to stop at some point, when you're no longer making significant changes from one year to the next.
I agree with the first guy.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment