I do NOT support this as 100% legit but SOME people on the internet are saying the shooter's name is Jared Loughner and this is his youtube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/Classitup10
His myspace is also mentioned there but it doesn't exist anymore.
Gunman Shoots Arizona Congresswoman.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I'm not blaming Palin. I'm blaming the shooter. The flier is simply a point of interest that might suggest why he did it.
" @Slaker117 said:I don't think anyone is blaming Palin, though. I think people were just disgusted at her flier and this tragedy is just reigniting that feeling. Also, Palin does represent the growing sense of extremism in American politics that does lead to these sort of incidents. You're right though, we as gamers we shouldn't fall into the trap of, "violent rhetoric cause violent people!"Where does self accountability come into play when it comes to clearly crazy people going on killing sprees? Are we pretending this person doesn't still eventually snap if this flier is never made? Fliers don't turn regular people into serial killers. The back of a cereal box could have set him off for all we know. "" @Dany said:
I don't want to use this for cheap political shots, but the flier does seem relevant to me. I'm not going to pretend Palin is endorsing or even suggesting actual murder, but it certainly looks like a factor. "" @EvilTwin said:
" @A_Cute_Squirtle said:Completely agree, its just inflaming the narrow minds of delusionalist. "" That flier is fucking ridiculous. I hope Palin pays for this. "Posting that flier is just inflammatory bullshit. OP should take it down. It has nothing to do with this and neither does Sarah Palin. "
" @Meowshi said:A quick google search of "politician shot" pulls results from Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippines, India, Taiwan and Bulgaria. First page alone. Only two mentions of US politicians being shot, one being the current story. News flash, America didn't invent violence, stop acting like it. Only in America, my ass." @PrimeSynergy said:This isn't a dick waving contest to see which country has the most dangerous living conditions. Besides you can't compare the U.S. to a region that has, for the most part, always been unstable. Of course it seems like a paradise in that light. "" @Gap said:Oh bull. This is a paradise compared to some parts of the world. Love to see you guys live in an African warzone and then talk about how America is so bad. "" Only in America. "Sadly. "
Symbolic? It was kinda directly telling people "let's shoot these people." That's not much of a thing to hold against Sarah Palin fans in general (they're already pretty stupid for liking Sarah Palin :P), but it is relevant to the discussion. Games don't directly tell people to kill each other; hell, the games people cite sometimes punish you for killing people. The poster, however, was somewhat encouraging violence, although I will agree that it is indicative of something larger.
@FugitiveJ:
For some reason, I read it as "German Shoots Arizona Congresswoman."
" @EvilTwin said:A) I don't think it matters. Using a fully automatic weapon to take out one person or one hundred people is still far more effective than using a knife for either." @MrKlorox: Not really. There will always be violence, but a crazy person with a knife is significantly less scary than a crazy person with a gun, and a crazy person with a gun is significantly less scary than a crazy person with a nuke, etc. This guy wounded 12 people right? How many do you think he could have gotten with a knife? Maybe not even one. "Was it an attempted mass slaughter? Or was it a assassination attempt that 'ended' with time and ammo to spare? We don't know yet. "
B)
@Purple_Proletarius said:
" Via MSNBC:There's your answer."Jared Laughner, the man who shot Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), was described by eyewitnesses as a young white man who looked like a "fringe character."
Laughner shot Giffords and 12 others at a public event at a Safeway grocery store in Tucscon. He reportedly shot the congresswoman "point blank" in the head and may have come from inside the store. After shooting Giffords, he allegedly fired 20-30 rounds and hit "a number of people," including a child. He attempted to flee after running out of ammunition and was tackled by one of Giffords' staffers.
Eyewitnesses have described Laughner as "young, mid-to-late 20s, white, clean-shaven with short hair and wearing dark clothing."
"
This flier is one of many, many examples of the Tea Party's symbolism. The OP could have pulled any number of double entendres they've used to imply democrats should be harmed. But this one literally had her name, and location on a map represented by a crosshair. The poster is propaganda, and history has shown that propaganda works." @Video_Game_King: The flier had nothing to do with shooting people that disagreed with Sarah Palin. It was symbolic. Plenty of other people agree with Sarah Palin who didn't shoot this Congresswoman. If gamers are going to defend video games as not causing people to shoot other people, then isn't it hypocritical to turn around and say that a political campaign poster was the cause of this shooting? "
@EvilTwin
said:Thanks for helping prove my point about motivation." There's your answer. "
" @Video_Game_King: The flier had nothing to do with shooting people that disagreed with Sarah Palin. It was symbolic. Plenty of other people agree with Sarah Palin who didn't shoot this Congresswoman. If gamers are going to defend video games as not causing people to shoot other people, then isn't it hypocritical to turn around and say that a political campaign poster was the cause of this shooting? "Not the issue. Andrew Sullivan: " Giffords was one of twenty members of Congress placed within metaphorical "gun-sights" in SarahPac's graphic. That is not the same thing as placing a gun-sight over someone's face or person. No one can possibly believe - or should - that Sarah Palin is anything but horrified by what has taken place. But it remains the kind of rhetorical excess which was warned about at the time, and which loners can use to dreadful purposes. It is compounded by the kind of language used by the Arizona Wildcat as well. Maybe "Palin Reloads; Aims For Giffords" is good copy as a headline. But next time, an editor should surely pause before enabling forces whose capacity for violence is real."
" @EvilTwin said:I'm sure she's horrified. Even though I don't support her policies doesn't mean I think she's not human. The sad thing is there are crazy people out there who take everything that their favorite pundits or public figures say to an extreme. It's just sad that this happened. They are also reporting a child is dead after the incident. I don't care what side of the party line you lie on that is fucked." @Video_Game_King: The flier had nothing to do with shooting people that disagreed with Sarah Palin. It was symbolic. Plenty of other people agree with Sarah Palin who didn't shoot this Congresswoman. If gamers are going to defend video games as not causing people to shoot other people, then isn't it hypocritical to turn around and say that a political campaign poster was the cause of this shooting? "Not the issue. Andrew Sullivan: " Giffords was one of twenty members of Congress placed within metaphorical "gun-sights" in SarahPac's graphic. That is not the same thing as placing a gun-sight over someone's face or person. No one can possibly believe - or should - that Sarah Palin is anything but horrified by what has taken place. But it remains the kind of rhetorical excess which was warned about at the time, and which loners can use to dreadful purposes. It is compounded by the kind of language used by the Arizona Wildcat as well. Maybe "Palin Reloads; Aims For Giffords" is good copy as a headline. But next time, an editor should surely pause before enabling forces whose capacity for violence is real." "
" @ryanwho: I'm not saying it did. In my first post I even state directly it was the shooters fault, not Palin's. But that doesn't mean the flier isn't relevant to his motivation. That's all I'm saying. I'm not blaming Palin. I'm blaming the shooter. The flier is simply a point of interest that might suggest why he did it. "A lot probably contributed. Last campaign, everyone was huffing and beating their chests, on both sides of the aisle, because of how successfully it worked for Palin. If there's a silver lining here at all its the prospect of politicians all being forced to dial down their gimmick laden smear campaigns instead of just going down a laundry list of market research that results in your 'tough momma grizzly' flier here. Or that ad where a dude is shooting a bill amendment. If you wanna go that silly homespun 'real America' angle, you're going to have to go with apple pies and picnics for a while and drop this "hey let's have a violent revolution" inference.
" @EvilTwin:It was not encouraging violence at all. In hindsight, it was in poor taste, but it's ridiculous to look back at a single poster with some reticules on it saying that they caused someone to be shot. That poster was no more dangerous to those people on it than Sarah Palin saying "I disagree with these people and hope they lose their incumbency." Because a crazy man who agreed with Sarah Palin could have taken either as a call for violence.
Symbolic? It was kinda directly telling people "let's shoot these people." That's not much of a thing to hold against Sarah Palin fans in general (they're already pretty stupid for liking Sarah Palin :P), but it is relevant to the discussion. Games don't directly tell people to kill each other; hell, the games people cite sometimes punish you for killing people. The poster, however, was somewhat encouraging violence, although I will agree that it is indicative of something larger. "
" @ryanwho said:Wow, that's a pretty stupid thing to say." @Gap said:Was on about the fact that in America you can so freely gain access to firearms and shoot anyone you please, be they politicians or most of the time school children. Sure the UK is shit but the gun laws here are fine: you can't really go on a killing spree with a knife like you can an assault rifle, it just wouldn't happen. "" Only in America. "Yeah politically motivated shootings only happen in America. That is a profound and true statement, great contribution. "
The people blaming Palin for this are morons. They are the same ones blaming GTA for school violence.
That's what you get for riling up the people with your cowboy-rhetoric, Palin. There were warnings about this exact scenario months ago when Palin's list and her "Reload"-twitter-BS surfaced.
Yeah, I know it's not just Palin who contributed to this. It took a crazy mind and the whole staff of Fox News & co.
From the YouTube channel: " I had favorite books: Animal Farm, Brave New World, The Wizard Of OZ, Aesop Fables, The Odyssey, Alice Adventures Into Wonderland, Fahrenheit 451, Peter Pan, To Kill A Mockingbird, We The Living, Phantom Toll Booth, One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest, Pulp,Through The Looking Glass, The Communist Manifesto, Siddhartha, The Old Man And The Sea, Gulliver's Travels, Mein Kampf, The Republic, and Meno. "
It reads like a high schooler's list, but I think we can start erasing the Tea Party relation speculation.
" Thanks for helping prove my point about motivation. "
How did I help you prove your point? His target was the Congresswoman. He shot her point blank. After wards he sprayed the crowd with bullets because he could. If a similar situation happened and someone only had access to a knife, he likely would have only been able to kill one or two people if that.
Anybody who puts Mein Kampf as one of their favorite books is somebody I don't want to associate with.
" @RecSpec: Don't think very many people are blaming Palin. "I didn't mean here specifically. Just in general.
Of all people, we should know better than to go connecting things together like that.
Actually, yea, the sign was encouraging violence. Hell, it specifically kept tally of the Congresspeople who were already harmed by similar attacks. That's not encouraging violence?
Granted, the guy was already likely to do something violent, but he probably wouldn't have known who to lash out against had it not been for something along those lines. As for the Sarah Palin example, that probably would've been less dangerous, since it doesn't exactly use violent rhetoric that encourages people to do crap like this. I don't want to strawman this into another debate, but why do you think the Bush administration liked using the phrase "war on terror?" It created a sense of urgency that made their policies easier to pass; this type of wording employs a very similar strategy.
But then again, I mostly only pay attention to people I respect. There are a lot of idiots out there who like to make knee jerk conclusions.
Progressive radicals DID oppose the health care bill." @Mr_Pips said:
Yeah, I'm sure the Progressive radical attacked her because she supported Health Care Reform. Progressives hate that so much! "" The shooter is 22 which doesn't fit a profile of a Tea Party member. However, 22 does fit into a profile of a Progressive radical
http://www.openmarket.org/2009/12/29/progressives-against-health-care-bill-for-wrong-reasons/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-samuels/the-progressive-case-agai_b_508473.html
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7016302873?Progressives%20Warn%20Obama%20Against
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30737.html
" @ryanwho said:Very nice, going for pointless, reactionary hyperbole. Good show." @Gap said:Was on about the fact that in America you can so freely gain access to firearms and shoot anyone you please, be they politicians or most of the time school children. Sure the UK is shit but the gun laws here are fine: you can't really go on a killing spree with a knife like you can an assault rifle, it just wouldn't happen. "" Only in America. "Yeah politically motivated shootings only happen in America. That is a profound and true statement, great contribution. "
Anyone in any country can gain access to a gun if they try hard enough. The fact that the general American populace has the ability to purchase guns doesn't really mean anything in the long run. Especially since people that really want to kill other people will find a way to make an attempt even if they don't have a gun. Who's to say that this nutball that attacked the congresswoman and crowd wouldn't have tried a bomb plot, or perhaps attacked people with a knife? Maybe try to run over people in a truck?
Crazy people do crazy things regardless of their access to guns.
" @EvilTwin: Actually, yea, the sign was encouraging violence. Hell, it specifically kept tally of the Congresspeople who were already harmed by similar attacks. That's not encouraging violence? "I think you are woefully misinformed. The three people that are crossed off the list retired of their own volition. Nobody literally shot at them.
" @Hamz said:gun control won't work because population density, I AM SMART YOU ARE DUMB RARARAR" Perhaps it's about time the politicians rethink that "right to bear arms" bit in the constitution. "A random shooting= nanny state time. Clearly what works in Cuba, Japan, and the UK, 3 densely populated small islands, will work in the US. Great observation. Smart people itt. "
" @Meowshi said:Hmm. Fair enough then, my mistake.Progressive radicals DID oppose the health care bill. http://www.openmarket.org/2009/12/29/progressives-against-health-care-bill-for-wrong-reasons/ http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-samuels/the-progressive-case-agai_b_508473.html http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7016302873?Progressives%20Warn%20Obama%20Against http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1209/30737.html "" @Mr_Pips said:
Yeah, I'm sure the Progressive radical attacked her because she supported Health Care Reform. Progressives hate that so much! "" The shooter is 22 which doesn't fit a profile of a Tea Party member. However, 22 does fit into a profile of a Progressive radical
Palin unnessecarily riled up her supporters against specific persons ("enemies") in a particularly hostile political environment using particularly violent rhetoric. There's no doubt that Palin didn't mean to literally have these people assassinated but there have been warnings that some crazy people could be affected by her violent rhetoric and put her symbolic call into practice. Now it happened.
" UGH now they're talking about how we should thank god shes alive. HOW ABOUT THANK THE FUCKING DOCTORS WHO ARE KEEPING HER ALIVE. i need to turn this off as its just getting me enraged "You have issues.
And speaking of insane atheists, it seems the dude was not politically motivated so maybe we can drop the HURRRRRRRR LIBS PALIN DEMOCRATS thing for now.
Oh politics.
Even if he was motivated by Palin, dude is crazy and at the only one we can mark as at fault. Whether or not the flier had anything to do with it, Palin should probably stop referring to gun violence against her political adversaries.
There. Can we agree on that?
Huh? Unfortunately, this is where the debate ends, since I can't look up the names to see what happened to them, and if somebody posted the picture, it would lead to shit like this again. Still, the use of crosshairs and the wording still lead me to believe it was an inflammatory picture meant to incite people to just this.
" UGH now they're talking about how we should thank god shes alive. HOW ABOUT THANK THE FUCKING DOCTORS WHO ARE KEEPING HER ALIVE. i need to turn this off as its just getting me enraged "How about thanking the drug and medical supply companies that produced the drugs and tools the doctors are using to keep her alive?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment