@polygon-al said:
It was just a big hat tip to old Mad Max films. I did think it was a bit strange that Charlize Theron seemed to be more of the protagonist rather than Max. Tom Hardy said hardly anything the whole film. It didn't annoy me, it was just a little odd considering the film is called Mad Max.
I think the name 'Mad Max' more referes to the universe in question than it does to the actual character. Besides it did follow Max's perspective, so while this wasn't his story, it did still follow him. It's no different than Dredd 3D, which despite the films' name clearly focused on rookie Anderson. Miller has already told Max's story three times, unless this was a reboot, there's no reason to tell the same story again, so focusing on a completely new character makes sense.
Also, Furiosa is a way more interesting character than Max ever was.
Metaphorically speaking yes, you could argue that the name Mad Max refers to the world as a whole being "Mad to the Max", but the originals were mainly focused on the character of Max and his story. I also feel like the perspective shifted from Max to Furiosa at the start until they teamed up. For these reasons, it made me think that most people going into this film who haven't seen the previous, might be a bit confused as to why Charlize was seemingly the main character.
Like I said though, it didn't annoy me and I totally agree with you. Her story and mission was so much better than in any of the previous Mad Max films. It was purely an observation and one that was echoed by my girlfriend, who hasn't seen any of the previous films.
Log in to comment