Should it? It did come out this year technically.
Minecraft
Game » consists of 33 releases. Released May 17, 2009
- Android
- iPhone
- iPad
- Mac
- + 17 more
- PC
- Xbox 360 Games Store
- Xbox 360
- PlayStation Network (PS3)
- PlayStation 3
- PlayStation 4
- Xbox One
- PlayStation Network (Vita)
- PlayStation Vita
- Windows Phone
- Wii U
- Nintendo Switch
- New Nintendo 3DS
- Browser
- Linux
- Amazon Fire TV
- Xbox Series X|S
A 3D procedurally-generated game of world exploration, resource harvesting, and freeform construction, featuring a unique block-based art style and online multiplayer. It received numerous ports and updates for nearly a decade after its initial release.
Should Minecraft be at least considered for PC Game of the year?
Of course it should be considered for GotY. It came out this year and is a top quality product. I know ShackNews is considering it for GotY.
...No, I don't think so. When you are asking people to pay for something that they can play right away, it's released. Anyway, what sort of chance does it have, really? Skyrim, Portal 2, Witcher 2...heck, even stuff like Battlefield are going to be prioritized over Minecraft.
Depends on how different it is, really.... If it's just the enhanced version of the enhanced version of the same old 09 game, it's really an 09 game.
@MikkaQ said:
No, it came out in 2009, just cause you slap a 1 on it, and develop it slower than molasses doesn't change that.
By that logic Diablo 3 can only be considered for this years GOTY.
Just for the record, it won't be considered. I love minecraft but alongside some of the other gems no way.
@zudthespud said:
@MikkaQ said:
No, it came out in 2009, just cause you slap a 1 on it, and develop it slower than molasses doesn't change that.
By that logic Diablo 3 can only be considered for this years GOTY.
Just for the record, it won't be considered. I love minecraft but alongside some of the other gems no way.
Why has Blizzard released it and is asking money for it, and I never heard of it?
@MikkaQ said:
@zudthespud said:
@MikkaQ said:
No, it came out in 2009, just cause you slap a 1 on it, and develop it slower than molasses doesn't change that.
By that logic Diablo 3 can only be considered for this years GOTY.
Just for the record, it won't be considered. I love minecraft but alongside some of the other gems no way.
Why has Blizzard released it and is asking money for it, and I never heard of it?
That was a bad example, a better example would be C.A.R.S., a new racing sim by the guys who made NFS Shift. It basically uses a crowd sourced funding, like Minecraft. Unlike Minecraft it has varying levels of membership starting at 10 Euro, going up to thousands. Members get regular alpha builds, more frequent depending on how much they paid. Since it's still in Alpha, like Minecraft was this time last year, it would be extremely unfair to review it and consider it for GOTY if that meant ruling it out of future GOTY deliberations while it's not feature complete and there is still a lot of jank.
Another example is Overgrowth, a game where you are a rabbit that fights other rabbits. Currently in alpha but accepting payments to try out these builds. It looks really cool from videos but it would be extremely unfair to consider it released when it is still so bare.
My point is, this time last year Minecraft wasn't a game, there was no aim and it was basically a play thing. Now there is a start and a finish and specific goals to achieve. I think when a company says "Yep, this is the final released product" and people start reviewing it, then it is considered to be released. Considering alpha versions of games is unfair to those games.
I've gone off Minecraft a bit but if you were ever going to consider it for GOTY this is the only year I think it would be fair to.
@zudthespud: The problem with those games is that if you tier out the release like that, pretty much no one will consider them for GOTY. The release of Minecraft had barely any fanfare besides the insular minecon they held. People were tired of it before it was even out. If you're a developer who even cares about that stuff, then you shouldn't tier it out like that.
Luckily not that many people actually think GOTY holds that much weight. Any game that wants to slap that title on it already does, so it's not like it exactly matters.
@MikkaQ: Yeah, Minecraft got so massive so early that a year later people (including me) had started to lose interest by the release. The only games that have this kind of funding are indie games anyway and they don't usually get considered for GOTY by anyone.
Its officially out now, so sure.
Just because it was available last year in alpha and beta form doesn't mean that it should have been considered last year and not this one upon release. Its not like the act of being able to pay money for something is the requirement for reviewability and therefore GotY considerations.
If I pay for a preorder of an MMO that comes out next year to get beta access this year, that doesn't mean I get to consider that MMO for GotY this year because the game isn't out yet. I just have early access to an unfinished product.
Games are reviewed upon being officially released, and when a game is out, we can consider it for GotY during the year which it came out. Its not rocket science guys.
On topic though: It wouldn't make it into deliberations for GotY, because none of them care about the game. It can certainly try and make it into the User listings though. But lets be serious, Skyrim.
Why are people saying "well you could pay to play it, so no"? Paid beta's happen all the fucking time, just look at the EA Gun Club stuff, with Medal of Honor and Battlefield 3. No one was saying "Well now you can pay to play an unfinished version of Medal of Honor so I guess it's out now", so why are they saying the same for Minecraft?
I'm not sure. I hope the Bombsquad talks about this topic, I'd like to hear their final verdict on the matter.
At Giant Bomb, they established that they're considering it the year it's actually released during last year's GOTY deliberations. So it's eligible now. None of them are playing it, though; I'd say Terraria seems more likely.
@Mikemcn: Almost every single one of them is playing Skyrim on an Xbox still.
@zudthespud said:
@MikkaQ said:
@zudthespud said:
@MikkaQ said:
No, it came out in 2009, just cause you slap a 1 on it, and develop it slower than molasses doesn't change that.
By that logic Diablo 3 can only be considered for this years GOTY.
Just for the record, it won't be considered. I love minecraft but alongside some of the other gems no way.
Why has Blizzard released it and is asking money for it, and I never heard of it?
That was a bad example, a better example would be C.A.R.S., a new racing sim by the guys who made NFS Shift. It basically uses a crowd sourced funding, like Minecraft. Unlike Minecraft it has varying levels of membership starting at 10 Euro, going up to thousands. Members get regular alpha builds, more frequent depending on how much they paid. Since it's still in Alpha, like Minecraft was this time last year, it would be extremely unfair to review it and consider it for GOTY if that meant ruling it out of future GOTY deliberations while it's not feature complete and there is still a lot of jank.
Another example is Overgrowth, a game where you are a rabbit that fights other rabbits. Currently in alpha but accepting payments to try out these builds. It looks really cool from videos but it would be extremely unfair to consider it released when it is still so bare.
My point is, this time last year Minecraft wasn't a game, there was no aim and it was basically a play thing. Now there is a start and a finish and specific goals to achieve. I think when a company says "Yep, this is the final released product" and people start reviewing it, then it is considered to be released. Considering alpha versions of games is unfair to those games.
I've gone off Minecraft a bit but if you were ever going to consider it for GOTY this is the only year I think it would be fair to.
Thats just as fair as asking some one to pay not knowing what the final build will look like, or if there will ever be a final build.
I like Minecraft, but no. A game is 'released' when the public can buy it.
Besides, even if it could be considered as a GOTY 2011... there were better PC games.
I still hate the fact that you can't play Minecraft without an external guide. Reminds me of games like Simon's Quest.
Yes, I know. I only chose multiplatform that are best played on PC, because there very few PC exclusives that I can think of that would warrant being in the category. Also, Minecraft would be disqualified as well, because it's technically on iOS and is coming to 360.@BaneFireLord: PC GAME OF THE YEAR
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment