Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Minecraft

    Game » consists of 33 releases. Released May 17, 2009

    A 3D procedurally-generated game of world exploration, resource harvesting, and freeform construction, featuring a unique block-based art style and online multiplayer. It received numerous ports and updates for nearly a decade after its initial release.

    Should Minecraft be at least considered for PC Game of the year?

    • 66 results
    • 1
    • 2
    Avatar image for bennym6
    bennym6

    479

    Forum Posts

    757

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 6

    User Lists: 5

    #1  Edited By bennym6

    Should it? It did come out this year technically.

    Avatar image for deactivated-59123fe38ab28
    deactivated-59123fe38ab28

    1154

    Forum Posts

    543

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    Why wouldn't it? If I recall, Dave but it on his Top 10 list last year, but that's just him.

    Avatar image for milkman
    Milkman

    19372

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #3  Edited By Milkman

    "Game of the year." The keyword is "game."

    Avatar image for emergency
    emergency

    1206

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #4  Edited By emergency

    @Milkman said:

    "Game of the year." The keyword is "game."

    Feeble attempt at humour :(

    Avatar image for dingofighter
    Dingofighter

    1888

    Forum Posts

    251

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #5  Edited By Dingofighter
    @Milkman said:

    "Game of the year." The keyword is "game."

    So, yes then? 
    Minecraft is a game, right?
    Avatar image for bocam
    Bocam

    4099

    Forum Posts

    3868

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #6  Edited By Bocam

    @MaFoLu: It's a java program

    Avatar image for jack268
    Jack268

    3370

    Forum Posts

    1299

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #7  Edited By Jack268
    @Bocam: AND ALL PC GAMES ARE JUST EXZECUTABLES RITE
    Avatar image for vexxan
    Vexxan

    4642

    Forum Posts

    943

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #8  Edited By Vexxan

    Like it stands a chance against all the other games that have been released this year!

    Avatar image for mosespippy
    mosespippy

    4751

    Forum Posts

    2163

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 8

    #9  Edited By mosespippy

    Of course it should be considered for GotY. It came out this year and is a top quality product. I know ShackNews is considering it for GotY.

    Avatar image for colinwright
    ColinWright

    755

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 8

    #10  Edited By ColinWright

    Yes, but it has no chance in hell since none of them have any interest in it. 

    Avatar image for mikkaq
    MikkaQ

    10296

    Forum Posts

    52

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #11  Edited By MikkaQ

    No, it came out in 2009, just cause you slap a 1 on it, and develop it slower than molasses doesn't change that.

    Avatar image for beachthunder
    BeachThunder

    15269

    Forum Posts

    319005

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 30

    #12  Edited By BeachThunder

    Yes; anyone that considered it a 2009 or 2010 game was seriously jumping the gun.

    Avatar image for banefirelord
    BaneFireLord

    4035

    Forum Posts

    638

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #13  Edited By BaneFireLord

    ...No, I don't think so. When you are asking people to pay for something that they can play right away, it's released. Anyway, what sort of chance does it have, really? Skyrim, Portal 2, Witcher 2...heck, even stuff like Battlefield are going to be prioritized over Minecraft.

    Avatar image for benjaebe
    benjaebe

    2868

    Forum Posts

    7204

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 6

    #14  Edited By benjaebe

    Even if it was it wouldn't get anywhere, and it's been more or less feature complete for a while now so I don't really think it should. Minecraft is great for what it is, but it's pointless to compare it to any other game on the market.

    Avatar image for i_smell
    I_smell

    4221

    Forum Posts

    1650

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 11

    #15  Edited By I_smell

    They're not doing platform-specific games of the year any more, because most games come out on everything anyway.

    Also Minecraft isn't that great really:

    Avatar image for dagbiker
    Dagbiker

    7057

    Forum Posts

    1019

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 16

    #16  Edited By Dagbiker

    No because they charged for it, and released it two years ago.

    Avatar image for ahmadmetallic
    AhmadMetallic

    19300

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    #17  Edited By AhmadMetallic

    Depends on how different it is, really.... If it's just the enhanced version of the enhanced version of the same old 09 game, it's really an 09 game.

    Avatar image for gunslingerpanda
    GunslingerPanda

    5263

    Forum Posts

    40

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #18  Edited By GunslingerPanda

    lolno.

    Avatar image for marz
    Marz

    6097

    Forum Posts

    755

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 11

    #19  Edited By Marz

    no

    Avatar image for laserbolts
    laserbolts

    5506

    Forum Posts

    4

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #20  Edited By laserbolts

    Yeah I don't see why not. It's a game that came out this year.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5f00787182625
    deactivated-5f00787182625

    3325

    Forum Posts

    604

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    @MikkaQ said:

    No, it came out in 2009, just cause you slap a 1 on it, and develop it slower than molasses doesn't change that.

    By that logic Diablo 3 can only be considered for this years GOTY.

    Just for the record, it won't be considered. I love minecraft but alongside some of the other gems no way.

    Avatar image for mikkaq
    MikkaQ

    10296

    Forum Posts

    52

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #22  Edited By MikkaQ

    @zudthespud said:

    @MikkaQ said:

    No, it came out in 2009, just cause you slap a 1 on it, and develop it slower than molasses doesn't change that.

    By that logic Diablo 3 can only be considered for this years GOTY.

    Just for the record, it won't be considered. I love minecraft but alongside some of the other gems no way.

    Why has Blizzard released it and is asking money for it, and I never heard of it?

    Avatar image for deactivated-5f00787182625
    deactivated-5f00787182625

    3325

    Forum Posts

    604

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    @MikkaQ said:

    @zudthespud said:

    @MikkaQ said:

    No, it came out in 2009, just cause you slap a 1 on it, and develop it slower than molasses doesn't change that.

    By that logic Diablo 3 can only be considered for this years GOTY.

    Just for the record, it won't be considered. I love minecraft but alongside some of the other gems no way.

    Why has Blizzard released it and is asking money for it, and I never heard of it?

    That was a bad example, a better example would be C.A.R.S., a new racing sim by the guys who made NFS Shift. It basically uses a crowd sourced funding, like Minecraft. Unlike Minecraft it has varying levels of membership starting at 10 Euro, going up to thousands. Members get regular alpha builds, more frequent depending on how much they paid. Since it's still in Alpha, like Minecraft was this time last year, it would be extremely unfair to review it and consider it for GOTY if that meant ruling it out of future GOTY deliberations while it's not feature complete and there is still a lot of jank.

    Another example is Overgrowth, a game where you are a rabbit that fights other rabbits. Currently in alpha but accepting payments to try out these builds. It looks really cool from videos but it would be extremely unfair to consider it released when it is still so bare.

    My point is, this time last year Minecraft wasn't a game, there was no aim and it was basically a play thing. Now there is a start and a finish and specific goals to achieve. I think when a company says "Yep, this is the final released product" and people start reviewing it, then it is considered to be released. Considering alpha versions of games is unfair to those games.

    I've gone off Minecraft a bit but if you were ever going to consider it for GOTY this is the only year I think it would be fair to.

    Avatar image for mikemcn
    mikemcn

    8642

    Forum Posts

    4863

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 8

    #24  Edited By mikemcn

    There isn't a single person on the GB crew who has spent more than a few hours playing it, and besides, Skyrim.

    Avatar image for mikkaq
    MikkaQ

    10296

    Forum Posts

    52

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #25  Edited By MikkaQ

    @zudthespud: The problem with those games is that if you tier out the release like that, pretty much no one will consider them for GOTY. The release of Minecraft had barely any fanfare besides the insular minecon they held. People were tired of it before it was even out. If you're a developer who even cares about that stuff, then you shouldn't tier it out like that.

    Luckily not that many people actually think GOTY holds that much weight. Any game that wants to slap that title on it already does, so it's not like it exactly matters.

    Avatar image for deactivated-5f00787182625
    deactivated-5f00787182625

    3325

    Forum Posts

    604

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    @MikkaQ: Yeah, Minecraft got so massive so early that a year later people (including me) had started to lose interest by the release. The only games that have this kind of funding are indie games anyway and they don't usually get considered for GOTY by anyone.

    Avatar image for jimbo
    Jimbo

    10472

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #27  Edited By Jimbo

    No, a game is 'out' as soon as they're taking money for a playable version of it.

    Avatar image for sackmanjones
    Sackmanjones

    5596

    Forum Posts

    50

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 5

    #28  Edited By Sackmanjones

    I really like minecraft, but no it does not.

    Avatar image for ethanml
    EthanML

    486

    Forum Posts

    233

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #29  Edited By EthanML

    Of course it shouldn't, and that has nothing to do with when it "came out".

    Avatar image for driadon
    Driadon

    3265

    Forum Posts

    763

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 14

    #30  Edited By Driadon

    Yeah, because it's now officially what the bomb crew would call a "game" as it does have an ultimate goal as of 1.0

    Prior to this they never could have considered it a game, no matter how many people enjoyed what they played.

    Avatar image for agent47
    Agent47

    1931

    Forum Posts

    8849

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #31  Edited By Agent47

    @I_smell:The review was good except for the weird picture that shows Notch's twitter saying "We let niggers vote so why not?" what kind of stupid dumb shit is that?Are they trying to be funny?

    Avatar image for bennym6
    bennym6

    479

    Forum Posts

    757

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 6

    User Lists: 5

    #32  Edited By bennym6

    @BaneFireLord: PC GAME OF THE YEAR

    Avatar image for xeiphyer
    Xeiphyer

    5962

    Forum Posts

    1193

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 8

    #33  Edited By Xeiphyer

    Its officially out now, so sure.  
     
    Just because it was available last year in alpha and beta form doesn't mean that it should have been considered last year and not this one upon release. Its not like the act of being able to pay money for something is the requirement for reviewability and therefore GotY considerations.
     
     If I pay for a preorder of an MMO that comes out next year to get beta access this year, that doesn't mean I get to consider that MMO for GotY this year because the game isn't out yet. I just have early access to an unfinished product.
     
    Games are reviewed upon being officially released, and when a game is out, we can consider it for GotY during the year which it came out. Its not rocket science guys.
     
    On topic though: It wouldn't make it into deliberations for GotY, because none of them care about the game. It can certainly try and make it into the User listings though. But lets be serious, Skyrim.

    Avatar image for humanity
    Humanity

    21858

    Forum Posts

    5738

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 40

    User Lists: 16

    #34  Edited By Humanity

    @Agent47 said:

    @I_smell:The review was good except for the weird picture that shows Notch's twitter saying "We let niggers vote so why not?" what kind of stupid dumb shit is that?Are they trying to be funny?

    Was Notch trying to be funny with that tweet?

    Avatar image for deactivated-59123fe38ab28
    deactivated-59123fe38ab28

    1154

    Forum Posts

    543

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    Why are people saying "well you could pay to play it, so no"? Paid beta's happen all the fucking time, just look at the EA Gun Club stuff, with Medal of Honor and Battlefield 3. No one was saying "Well now you can pay to play an unfinished version of Medal of Honor so I guess it's out now", so why are they saying the same for Minecraft?

    Avatar image for awesomeusername
    awesomeusername

    4651

    Forum Posts

    242

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #36  Edited By awesomeusername

    It's being considered on the Spike VGA's.

    Avatar image for ravenlight
    Ravenlight

    8057

    Forum Posts

    12306

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #37  Edited By Ravenlight

    I'm not sure. I hope the Bombsquad talks about this topic, I'd like to hear their final verdict on the matter.

    Avatar image for little_socrates
    Little_Socrates

    5847

    Forum Posts

    1570

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 16

    User Lists: 23

    #38  Edited By Little_Socrates

    At Giant Bomb, they established that they're considering it the year it's actually released during last year's GOTY deliberations. So it's eligible now. None of them are playing it, though; I'd say Terraria seems more likely.

    @Mikemcn: Almost every single one of them is playing Skyrim on an Xbox still.

    Avatar image for coakroach
    coakroach

    2499

    Forum Posts

    27

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #39  Edited By coakroach

    Oh god no.

    The game is unfinished and totally unplayable without a wiki or the advice of someone who has played the game before.

    Avatar image for freakache
    FreakAche

    3102

    Forum Posts

    114

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 8

    #40  Edited By FreakAche

    No

    Avatar image for benpicko
    benpicko

    2020

    Forum Posts

    7

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #41  Edited By benpicko

    @Milkman said:

    "Game of the year." The keyword is "game."

    Have you even played it?

    Avatar image for paulus
    Paulus

    182

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #42  Edited By Paulus

    No, I got excited when I first noticed minecraft it had incredible potential.

    But it wasted it, if you just look at what got added to minecraft recently and compare it to some of the things the mod community have done...

    Avatar image for dagbiker
    Dagbiker

    7057

    Forum Posts

    1019

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 16

    #43  Edited By Dagbiker

    @zudthespud said:

    @MikkaQ said:

    @zudthespud said:

    @MikkaQ said:

    No, it came out in 2009, just cause you slap a 1 on it, and develop it slower than molasses doesn't change that.

    By that logic Diablo 3 can only be considered for this years GOTY.

    Just for the record, it won't be considered. I love minecraft but alongside some of the other gems no way.

    Why has Blizzard released it and is asking money for it, and I never heard of it?

    That was a bad example, a better example would be C.A.R.S., a new racing sim by the guys who made NFS Shift. It basically uses a crowd sourced funding, like Minecraft. Unlike Minecraft it has varying levels of membership starting at 10 Euro, going up to thousands. Members get regular alpha builds, more frequent depending on how much they paid. Since it's still in Alpha, like Minecraft was this time last year, it would be extremely unfair to review it and consider it for GOTY if that meant ruling it out of future GOTY deliberations while it's not feature complete and there is still a lot of jank.

    Another example is Overgrowth, a game where you are a rabbit that fights other rabbits. Currently in alpha but accepting payments to try out these builds. It looks really cool from videos but it would be extremely unfair to consider it released when it is still so bare.

    My point is, this time last year Minecraft wasn't a game, there was no aim and it was basically a play thing. Now there is a start and a finish and specific goals to achieve. I think when a company says "Yep, this is the final released product" and people start reviewing it, then it is considered to be released. Considering alpha versions of games is unfair to those games.

    I've gone off Minecraft a bit but if you were ever going to consider it for GOTY this is the only year I think it would be fair to.

    Thats just as fair as asking some one to pay not knowing what the final build will look like, or if there will ever be a final build.

    Avatar image for mysteriousbob
    MysteriousBob

    6262

    Forum Posts

    2231

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 5

    #44  Edited By MysteriousBob

    I like Minecraft, but no. A game is 'released' when the public can buy it.

    Besides, even if it could be considered as a GOTY 2011... there were better PC games.

    I still hate the fact that you can't play Minecraft without an external guide. Reminds me of games like Simon's Quest.

    Avatar image for banefirelord
    BaneFireLord

    4035

    Forum Posts

    638

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #45  Edited By BaneFireLord
    @bennym6 said:

    @BaneFireLord: PC GAME OF THE YEAR

    Yes, I know. I only chose multiplatform that are best played on PC, because there very few PC exclusives that I can think of that would warrant being in the category. Also, Minecraft would be disqualified as well, because it's technically on iOS and is coming to 360. 
    Avatar image for wildfire
    WildFire

    154

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 15

    User Lists: 5

    #46  Edited By WildFire

    Minecraft hasn't done anything better than the other Game of The Year nominations and hasn't sold nearly as many copies due to it's niche market. I say no, regardless of when it was "Released".

    Avatar image for sirdesmond
    sirdesmond

    1545

    Forum Posts

    1672

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #47  Edited By sirdesmond

    It was released this year. Of course, it would be eligible.

    Avatar image for lukeweizer
    Lukeweizer

    3304

    Forum Posts

    24753

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    #48  Edited By Lukeweizer

    They could differentiate between "Minecraft" and "Minecraft Beta".

    Avatar image for hot_karl
    Hot_Karl

    3321

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #49  Edited By Hot_Karl

    @laserbolts said:

    Yeah I don't see why not. It's a game that came out this year.

    This. Even if I don't get Minecraft whatsoever, it's definitely eligible.

    @I_smell: Don't they do "PC-Only" game of the year awards? StarCraft II won last year.

    Avatar image for liber
    Liber

    657

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #50  Edited By Liber

    No.

    Its 2009 game.

    People and websites who give it 9.0/10 are fucking dumb.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.