@dracomaster01 said:
@gaspower said:
No, I'd have to disagree there. As much as you'd see that there was a slight forward movement in slo-mo, seeing it again in real time it'd look more like he's trying to make a move and not trying to kick the puck in. Besides, Andersen did hit the puck towards the direction of Hossa's skate and most of the force came from Hossa's momentum and not because he was deliberate making a forward kicking motion.
Eh, shouldn't any extra forward momentum that isn't coming from stopping consider it a kicking motion? The biggest problem might be that it was called a goal on the ice, and there wasn't 100% evidence that it wasn't a kicking motion. To me it was, and changed the game. It's all what if talk after that though.
Since this is still being talked about... I suggest watching some clips of players putting on the brakes when driving towards the net. To me it's pretty clear Hossa is attempting to make a play on the puck with his stick, but he needs to slow down to make it. His skate is on the ice, digging in to slow down and steer himself away from Andersen to avoid a collision. Hossa could have probably made the play with his stick, but if you watch the replay, Despres slashes at Hossa's stick instead of making a play for the puck himself. Despres ends up breaking his own stick in the attempt, but does tie up Hossa's stick.
I personally thought it was a good goal, but I was expecting the refs to disallow it, since the Blackhawks have a history of having good goals disallowed in the playoffs - and bad goals against them being allowed. "Wasn't 100% evidence that it wasn't a kicking motion," means it should have been ruled a good goal on the ice. All goals are reviewed, so it wouldn't have mattered if it was a kicking motion and the refs missed it, the video replay judge could have ruled it a kicking motion if it was one. Could the replay judge still make a mistake? After the last game, sure, but I think they got this one right.
I don't think it changed the outcome of the game. If it's not a goal, it's a 3-1 lead going into the third period. Maybe I have more respect for the Ducks in thinking that they continued to play hard and didn't give up. The bottom-line is that the Blackhawks also continued to play well in the third period. The extra goal didn't affect their play because they remembered game 4 and knew the Ducks could come back if they sat back on defense.
Log in to comment