@belegorm: I should say a darling rather than the darling, and from childhood before concepts of religion and its ramifications are well formed. But childhood passions die hard.
Oh I'm not debating either side. Your comparison points are perfectly valid. I'm just saying the only one who could know Lewis's intent was Lewis, and by the most credible reports he said, no, it was not his intent. He could have lied. But I don't know why he would. As mentioned elsewhere, though raised a Christian he became an atheist but for most of his adult life he returned to his faith, and devoutly so. He wrote widely in theology: allegories, opinion, analysis and personal memoir. Certainly at the time children's books with an overt Christian foundation would have been well received in his native UK. So he could've lied but he had no clear reason to lie. Perhaps he meant more that the Narnia novels meant what the reader wished them to mean, and that, for him, did not require an interpretation of a Christian message. Maybe he was too close to the work to see how influenced he was. Who knows. But, again, he said no, I didn't mean it that way.
Log in to comment