If I had a PC good enough to run it, no. Mods help a lot.

A resounding yes. Really hope this happens because my laptop can't run The Witcher 1. I played for the first hour or so, fell in love, then realized my computer was about to crumble. Really hope they bring this to the 360!!

Yeah.

Yes, I could run it on medium settings but I don't enjoy playing on PC as much as I do on consoles. So yes, I'm waiting for a console version.

Yes, as my PC isnt powerful enough to run it.
Apparently the Witcher devs have a "surprise" console E3 announcement.

I'll get it if I can't run the game at a decent setting on my PC.

Absolutely!

 Apparently the Witcher devs have a "surprise" console E3 announcement.

Well, I already played it, so no. But I'm sure it would make a fine game on consoles, since it already has the control scheme down.

Yeah. I'm too poor to buy a better PC. 

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

Sure. I need an excuse to play the other half of the game anyhow.

Since I don't have a PC that can run it, yeah.

@Enigma777 said:

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

No. If i were to get it i'd get the PC version. The console version won't even look close to the PC one.

@Kombat said:

@Enigma777 said:

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

That's broken according to half the Giantbomb staff.

@zoner said:

@Kombat said:

@Enigma777 said:

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

That's broken according to half the Giantbomb staff.

It won't be the first time the GB staff has been wrong on something. 

If the console versions got extra content than sure but otherwise no only because Ive already got on the PC

It looks interesting, but I can't run in on my laptop. Sure.

Definitely, I've managed to get it running on my computer, but ultimately I'd rather be playing it in front of my TV. Doing so with my PC is just not practical with my set-up. I also (likely) wouldn't have to worry about overheating or crashes/freezing, something that is constantly in the back of my mind when playing anything on my broken-ass PC - not exactly condusive to playing an RPG I just want to be absorbed by and play for hours at a time.

No, not now. Firstly, it would look gimped on any current console, secondly, I much prefer Keyboard & Mouse, and this game was designed for K & M first and foremost.

@Turambar said:

@zoner said:

@Kombat said:

@Enigma777 said:

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

That's broken according to half the Giantbomb staff.

It won't be the first time the GB staff has been wrong on something. 

I don't think they said broken, just that it was the worst part of the game--and based on what I've seen and heard, it is.

@HatKing said:

@Turambar said:

@zoner said:

@Kombat said:

@Enigma777 said:

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

That's broken according to half the Giantbomb staff.

It won't be the first time the GB staff has been wrong on something. 

I don't think they said broken, just that it was the worst part of the game--and based on what I've seen and heard, it is.

Ryan says in the latest Bombcast that it's broken. If he had said it was the worst part, I wouldn't have noticed as well, but I remember hearing that and going, 'wait, what?'. Don't get me wrong; it's not perfect, but it's far from broken.  Personally I think AC's combat system is 'broken' because it's way too easy, but people seem to like that. Same thing with Batman

Why not play it on a console. The game plays much better with a controller, minus having to pause to access the journal, map, ect. With a console port, you'd have to assume that CDP would streamline accessing them a bit. CDP would make some dough if people buy the console game perhaps leading to more money spent on their next project, Witcher 3 perhaps? Plus going through certification might force them to release a more stable and bug free game than what they've released so far. 
 
Those are positives, but people's fear may be that if the console port does well, Wither 3 will be a Dragon Age II scenario.  
 
also its been said many many times, hook your PC up to your TV via HDMI, plug in your 360 controller, win. This is not a relevant complaint not to play a pc game that has controller support. My PC is now a 360 with a HD 5850, 4gb ram, and 4 core AMD phenom.

Most definitely for 360.  Then again I'd also accept a Mac version.

yeah I would buy it on console.

If I was limited to only consoles and wanted the game, yes.

Sure will. Funny I just had a conversation with a friend of mine about this very subject today. Will be kinda cool if they did but frankly I don't see it happening any time soon. CD Projekt have shown little to no interest in console development. If they do make a console version then I see them outsourcing it to a different company much like what Bioware did with the console versions of DAO.

@Turambar said:

@zoner said:

@Kombat said:

@Enigma777 said:

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

That's broken according to half the Giantbomb staff.

It won't be the first time the GB staff has been wrong on something. 

I don't think they said broken, just that it was the worst part of the game--and based on what I've seen and heard, it is.

@Turambar said:

@zoner said:

@Kombat said:

@Enigma777 said:

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

That's broken according to half the Giantbomb staff.

It won't be the first time the GB staff has been wrong on something. 

I don't think they said broken, just that it was the worst part of the game--and based on what I've seen and heard, it is.

Hell yes! My computer blows...

@Enigma777 said:

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

I feel like I would need to play the first Witcher, and I just don't see that happening.

yes

I already own it on PC, so no, but if they can make it run and look good then great for all the rest of you!
I have my doubts though. Not to be too much of a troll, but this shows what I mean :P
http://onebit.us/images/lolconsolesuncharted.jpg

yeah totally !

Yes i probably would, but theres to many good console games coming out this year which would probably overshadow it.

I already have it on my PC, but I voted yes anyways, because I think the feel of it would fit a console well. I still prefer the PC version though.

No, I've already got a PC that can run it perfectly well. 
But I would still like to see it happen, it's perfectly suited to consoles and arguably even plays better using the 360 pad for PC.  I'd love for the series to gain more popularity.. perhaps we'll finally get the rest of the books translated.

I will, my pc can barely run it, it seems, but I rather have it on Xbox without my pc possibly dying midgame.

Um yes I would as the game looks bad-ass man I hope it comes to 360, after all it can be played with a 360 controller on PC so we should have seen this coming but now I have another reason to watch E3 HELL YEA!

@HatKing said: 

@Turambar said: 

@zoner said: 

@Kombat said: 

@Enigma777 said: 

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

That's broken according to half the Giantbomb staff.

It won't be the first time the GB staff has been wrong on something. 

I don't think they said broken, just that it was the worst part of the game--and based on what I've seen and heard, it is.

Ryan says in the latest Bombcast that it's broken. If he had said it was the worst part, I wouldn't have noticed as well, but I remember hearing that and going, 'wait, what?'. Don't get me wrong; it's not perfect, but it's far from broken.  Personally I think AC's combat system is 'broken' because it's way too easy, but people seem to like that. Same thing with Batman

@zoner said:

@HatKing said:

@Turambar said:

@zoner said:

@Kombat said:

@Enigma777 said:

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

That's broken according to half the Giantbomb staff.

It won't be the first time the GB staff has been wrong on something. 

I don't think they said broken, just that it was the worst part of the game--and based on what I've seen and heard, it is.

Ryan says in the latest Bombcast that it's broken. If he had said it was the worst part, I wouldn't have noticed as well, but I remember hearing that and going, 'wait, what?'. Don't get me wrong; it's not perfect, but it's far from broken.  Personally I think AC's combat system is 'broken' because it's way too easy, but people seem to like that. Same thing with Batman

To me broken means it just doesn't work.  Like Fallout New Vegas is partially broken.  Though I guess if you take it as just done very poorly or wrong, it's in the eye of the beholder.  My suggestion is to watch the Quick Look.  That'll give you a good idea.

@Kombat said:

@Enigma777 said:

If they fix the combat, absolutely.

The combat's broken? Last I checked it was just challenging.

That's broken according to half the Giantbomb staff.