Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

108 Comments

Blizzard and Valve Sort Out Their Legal Dispute Over DOTA Trademark

The two publishers come to a mutually beneficial agreement that allows all of the DOTAs to come out as scheduled.

Make that Blizzard All-Stars.
Make that Blizzard All-Stars.

Marking the end of one of the shortest legal battles (more of a skirmish, really) in video game industry history, Blizzard and Valve today came to a mutual agreement over the trademark rights for DOTA. DOTA is, of course, the popular Warcraft III mod that somehow became a commercial sequel in development at Valve, even though Blizzard had decided to make its own official update of the mod for Starcraft II and...you know what? Never mind. It's way too long and convoluted to try and explain in a news blurb.

The point is, the fight over the trademark is now over with. Valve and Blizzard sent out a joint press release today letting everyone know that everything was hunky dory between the two publishers. As per the settlement, Valve gets to keep the DOTA name for whatever commercial uses it might like--such as the eventual release of DOTA 2--and Blizzard fans are A-OK to use the name for any noncommercial projects without fear of legal reprisal. As for the upcoming official DOTA update from Blizzard, that has been renamed Blizzard All-Stars. Because apparently that was the best name they could come up with on short notice.

Blizzard had previously claimed that the DOTA trademark had too much history with Blizzard to be trademarked by another company. They stated in their original complaint that the name DOTA had "become firmly associated in the mind of consumers with Blizzard."

Ultimately, it seems the two parties were able to find common ground they could both work within, and now everybody's happy. While it would have been great for the two companies to figure this stuff out without involving the legal system, that just isn't really how business is done nowadays. At least this one ended quickly, and on a friendly enough note.

Alex Navarro on Google+

108 Comments

Avatar image for shabs
Shabs

906

Forum Posts

312

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Edited By Shabs

Wow. I didn't think Blizzard would be the ones to back down on the name.

Valve is more powerful than I thought.

Avatar image for soyombo2001
soyombo2001

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By soyombo2001

@TPoppaPuff: I don't really know what you saying but you need get your facts straight. Blizzard All-stars is not a title, its not an IP, its not even a stand-alone game. It is a mod made for free for Starcraft 2 owners. They can name it whatever they want. They don't care how it sounds. It's just something fun for the fans that they are providing for free just like the mods that came before it. I might be off a little but they were called "Aiur Chef", "Star Jeweled", and "Left 2 Die". Get over it.

Avatar image for tpoppapuff
TPoppaPuff

522

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

Edited By TPoppaPuff

@soyombo2001: O RLY?

If it's not an IP then I could package the title and sell it to anyone I feel like and use all the characters and assets for my own commercial use, correct? I could jut steal the graphics and use them in my own game and sell it without any repercussions right? If it's not an intellectual property than there is literally nothing they could do.

Now fanboys are arguing it isn't an IP!

lol

Avatar image for duckbutter
Duckbutter

387

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Duckbutter

you people in the Giantbomb community talk too much.

about 96% of the way through reading this article's title sentence, i thought they were gonna settle this dispute with an actual in-game Dota battle. that would have been cooler.

Avatar image for orange_pork
orange_pork

726

Forum Posts

420

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Edited By orange_pork

@Duckbutter said:

you people

Avatar image for slag
Slag

8308

Forum Posts

15965

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 45

Edited By Slag

@TPoppaPuff said:

Valve gave up practically nothing (except the right not to sue user mods with the name dota? lol good luck with that anyways) and Blizzard gave up everything.

I strongly suspect that when the terms of the actual agreement are released that we will see Valve gave up some decent $$$ to make Activision/Blizzard go away.

I agree with you that Valve has got the better end of the deal longterm, but it's not like Blizzard didn't get what they were really after (a quick payday and the freedom to still release their SCII mod). Whether Blizzard should have gone for more is a fair question.

Avatar image for jokers_wild
Jokers_Wild

248

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Jokers_Wild

@Addfwyn said:

Worth pointing out that the guy who Valve hired (Icefrog) did not make dota, he maintained and did some of the updates for dota. The original dota was made by Eul, though that bears little to no resemble to dota allstars which was created by Guinsoo (who works for Riot Games which makes League of Legends). So it's not really as cut and dry as 'maker of dota made dota 2'.

Icefrog's been overseeing DotA All-Stars for the last seven years. Given how much the game has changed (and grown in popularity) under his direction, he is essentially the person responsible for the iteration of Dota which most people are familiar with.

Avatar image for tpoppapuff
TPoppaPuff

522

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 1

Edited By TPoppaPuff

I'd also like to point out that on the point out on the 5-15 bombcast Patrick and Vinny agreed the name is indeed dumb.

So, y'know, winner winner chicken dinner. ;P