Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

55 Comments

Project Milo Still In The Works

Microsoft confirms Milo is alive and well after missing E3 2010.

The vapid child that wooed audiences with his color-recognition gag and slumping shoulders at E3 2009 might have been MIA at this year's event, but that doesn't mean he's rotting in a hole somewhere on the side of US41. Project Milo is still alive according to Microsoft.

In a recent statement given to Kotaku, a spokesman confirmed that the little scamp is still part of an ongoing project at Lionhead. The details beyond that, though, are lacking. "Project Milo is something that is in ongoing development at Lionhead Studios," a representative said. "Lionhead has always been a center of innovation and will continue to deliver against that charter." 
 

Milo and his bucket. 
Milo and his bucket. 
 
A more impressive and toothier digital inhabitant, Skittles the baby tiger, upstaged Milo's demonstration during an E3 2010 live demo of Kinectimals. In the demo, a girl scratched and then played hide-and-seek with an excited Skittles, who like Milo, appeared as a lone character in the forefront of a picturesque background. But unlike Milo, Skittles didn't appear to have suffered any sort of head trauma. 
 
Lionhead's Peter Molyneux recently spoke to CVG (via MTV Multiplayer) about Project Milo and promised that it is "now ten times more amazing than you'd expect it to be from what you saw at E3 2009." He didn't elaborate, leaving me to wonder if Milo has been given a jetpack or dual submachine guns or something since last year. 
 
No word on when or in what form Milo will come to shelves, of course.

55 Comments

Avatar image for mr_skeleton
Mr_Skeleton

5195

Forum Posts

7918

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 15

Edited By Mr_Skeleton

You filed it under the wrong game, you should link it to this page.

Avatar image for addfwyn
Addfwyn

2057

Forum Posts

33

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 11

Edited By Addfwyn

Pedophiles around the world rejoice~!

Avatar image for deusoma
Deusoma

3224

Forum Posts

128695

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 4

Edited By Deusoma
@hpv said:
" @Meteora said:
" I'm confused at why they would be still working on this game. It was a cool tech demo, but the viability of it being an actual game is... slim. "
That's a pretty good description of Kinect in general. "

That's a pretty good description of motion control tech in general, but certain companies are stubborn enough that it's somehow acceptable now.
Avatar image for hpv
hpv

195

Forum Posts

101

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 6

Edited By hpv
@Deusoma said:
" @hpv said:
" @Meteora said:
" I'm confused at why they would be still working on this game. It was a cool tech demo, but the viability of it being an actual game is... slim. "
That's a pretty good description of Kinect in general. "

That's a pretty good description of motion control tech in general, but certain companies are stubborn enough that it's somehow acceptable now. "
That isn't true at all.  Wii has proven, unfortunately in far too few games, that motion controls, especially when paired with a direct pointer, have real world applications in actual games.  While Nintendo made a lot of mistakes, largely by excessively cheap corner cutting, that have hurt their ability to realize these advantages in more games they at least have moved that conversation forward in a right direction.  Sony is positioned to deliver on that example in a much deeper way as their motion control technology delivers a much higher fidelity version of that basic concept.  I don't think that such a setup is necessarily going to deliver a superior gameplay experience for most games but there are enough proven examples that it should be more than clear that there is a place for real games to use it. 
 
Kinect on the other hand is merely a high fidelity version of something that has never been proven to deliver entertaining or compelling gameplay experiences.  Sony's EyeToy for PS2 didn't fail as an input device because it lacked fidelity or precision, though it did have a host of short comings, particularly its inability to operate properly in anything short of optimal lighting, but rather it failed because waving your arms and jumping around to interact with a game isn't fun or precise and has limited, if any, ability to add to the experience to offset those failures. 
 
I've been playing "tech demos" of camera-driven games for at least 20 years and the closest thing I've ever seen to something rising to the level of real game is EyeToy Antigrav. But even there I'm not sure that it would really be fun or compelling for more than 15 minutes even if the tech worked 100% and I'd probably still rather see a game like that controlled with a gamepad because it's faster, more precise, and doesn't require jumping around my living room.  Back on that first hand we've got actual retail games on Wii that use motion controls and a pointer to actually make a game better even if the inputs could be handled just as easily with a gamepad.  Of course I can only name a small handful of games on Wii where this is true (even though I generally hate Wii) so I'm open to hearing an argument that it isn't worth the investment but I'm not even having a conversation that it is pointless.  Making that argument just shows that you don't know what you are talking about.
Avatar image for killerbears
KillerBears

254

Forum Posts

81

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By KillerBears

The only reason I'm looking forward to this is because I want to see all of the horrible, horrible things people do.