Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

221 Comments

The Kid Who Created Team Fortress 2's Controversial Anti-Free-to-Play Mod

Asher Baker created the mod getting headlines, but he's not even against free-to-play.

Moving Team Fortress 2 free-to-play follows Valve enabling other F2P games on Steam.
Moving Team Fortress 2 free-to-play follows Valve enabling other F2P games on Steam.

When Valve turned Team Fortress 2 into a free-to-play experience, it opened the floodgates. It's not like Team Fortress 2 hasn't been ridiculously cheap in the past--once, it was just a few dollars on Steam--but the difference between any amount of money and free is a big one.

The people who have been playing Team Fortress 2 since its launch in 2007, however, are a dedicated bunch. You don't play a game for this many years without forming expectations about the people you play with.

As such, not everyone responded to the decision with open arms.

Asher Baker, known in the Steam community for his various Valve-related plugins and workarounds, created "Free2BeKicked (Anti-F2P)," a plugin that detects whether a player has a Team Fortress 2 premium account. Getting bumped to premium after downloading the game for free is simple; you only have to purchase an item from the in-game store. If you don't have one, you're kicked out.

It's worth remembering this is happening exclusively on private servers, not on Valve's, and anyone who purchased Team Fortress 2 in the past automatically became a premium member when the switch was pulled.

Baker and others in the community got the sense Team Fortress 2 was heading towards free-to-play before Valve ever announced it, as some backend changes rolled out. As this happened, then followed by the official announcement, there was chatter about a plugin to kick free-to-play users. Baker was first asked by a friend in the Team Fortress 2 trading community.

To provide a better sense of the mindset, Baker provided me with a transcript of an IRC dialogue between himself and "dvander," the founder of Alliedmodders, where Baker's plugin is hosted.

<dvander> personally i put it in the same category as banning high ping people which i hate
<dvander> but valve has created a problem
<dvander> a community needs a barrier to entry and it needs a way to heal itself if there is a misbehaving member
<dvander> if there is no barrier to entry - and no recourse against those people - it could be bad
<dvander> but its too early to tell
<asherkin> there are also a large number of tf2 servers aimed specifically at trading, the non-premium players can't start trades and therefore just end up in these servers taking up a slot and begging for items
<asherkin> (it's a trade server owner that originally asked me for the plugin)
<asherkin> and yeah, I also dislike high ping kickers, that silly cross-game vac ban detector, and even this one
<asherkin> but I figured it was better to do it myself properly before someone released something that did something silly like parse their backpack page to see how many slots they had etc.

Between some public requests for a plugin and other private conversations, Baker relented.

"Basically it just boils down to there being a demand for it," explained Baker over email recently, "yet there being very few developers who had the necessary background knowledge to do it without 'hacks.' I was in a unique position due to my work on Open Steamworks."

Team Fortress 2 quickly overtook Counter-Strike as the most popular game on Steam.
Team Fortress 2 quickly overtook Counter-Strike as the most popular game on Steam.

Open Steamworks, as Baker puts it, is "a series of scrounged, leaked and reverse engineered headers that allow the usage of the client-side portions of Valve's Steamworks API [application programming interface]." It allows people like Baker to create things that are not necessarily kosher.

According to Source Mod (and Baker), there are 16 servers running his mod. He can't be sure, since the ability to query servers running on Linux for their rulesets is broken at the moment, and from what he can tell, the majority of Team Fortress 2 servers are hosted on Linux machines.

To get a sense of how the community is hashing this out, read this rather contentious thread. Hostilities are definitely abound.

I've contacted Valve about whether the company's okay with Baker's mod, but haven't heard back. Baker expects it's not, though less because of what the plugin does, more that it's possible.

"I would doubt Valve are okay with [this] method," he said.

To explain how Baker's plugin works would get unnecessarily technical, but when asked whether Valve would have an easy way to get rid of it, Baker launched into a lengthy breakdown of how the plugin detects free-to-play users. In summary, it comes down to the way Steam authenticates.

"While Valve may wish to prevent the plugin from operating," he said, "it would only end up with a large amount of work and worse methods being used to the same effect. As long as there is demand a version of the plugin will exist, although probably not written by myself."

It wouldn't be surprising if Team Fortress 2 moving free-to-play is a signal for future Valve products.
It wouldn't be surprising if Team Fortress 2 moving free-to-play is a signal for future Valve products.

And while you might expect that Baker is one of the many outraged at the influx of newcomers to the Team Fortress 2 userbase, it's not true. Baker's loyalty, as he puts it, "is to the server operators."

"I anticipated a negative response from the general player base and a positive response from the server operators," he said. "I hadn't anticipated it to be this strong either way, even including receiving death threats. [...] I don't really have a personal opinion about TF2 going free to play, it's brought in lots of new players, but I'm not sure it's worth the long-term cost. I think that once the droves of inexperienced players dies down, we're going to be left with a (slow) steady stream of new players (good), but primarily just cheaters and people evading server bans."

It's understandable there's issues within the community, as Team Fortress 2 was not free-to-play on day one. Were Valve to release a game with a free-to-play model on day one, the fervor would be less.

DOTA 2, anyone?

Patrick Klepek on Google+

221 Comments

Avatar image for spctre
spctre

349

Forum Posts

36

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Edited By spctre

The elitist jerk in me fucking loves this.

Avatar image for poweredbyhentai
PoweredByHentai

16

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By PoweredByHentai

At first I couldn't understand why people were so butthurt over the whole F2P aspect. But after reading what the creator has to say I kind of understand. It's not like it's hard to become a premium player anyways. It's your own prerogative whether you want to or not. 
 
But it's not like the whole mod affects me in any way. I bought TF2 long ago.

Avatar image for hippolord
Hippolord

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Hippolord

Wow, awesome story get Patrick!

Avatar image for orbitz89
Orbitz89

230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Orbitz89

... I really, really dislike elitists.

Avatar image for dookysharpgun
Dookysharpgun

622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

Edited By Dookysharpgun
@Tim_the_Corsair said:
@Dookysharpgun Nothing remotely "pseudo-intellectual" about my post. This is how I speak, whether it is in person or online, and I am generally polite even in situations where perhaps I shouldn't be. Furthermore, I read every comment in the thread upto the point where I posted, and have since caught up on everything posted since. I quoted that particular post as the one that highlighted what I was saying: your post was childish, as were your earlier and subsequent posts. You are correct that I don't know Ygg - indeed, I don't know whether I've even posted in the same thread as him/her before. That is immaterial to the fact that absolutely nothing he said was out of line or even really contentious, even if we might have differed on a few points. You, however, were so forceful and willfully antagonistic in your rambling diatribes that it caught my notice. Whether you and I share multiple beliefs on this topic or could even grow to be BFFs is completely immaterial to the matter at hand. You are freely admitting that you are playing a persona to get a rise out of people while simultaneously overreacting - and yes, you are overreacting enough that you are coming off as a raving lunatic - almost comically to well thought out, decent posts on a topic that is essentially a non-issue. There is a name for people who play personas on the Internet while manipulating people into getting angry: Troll. Now while I feel that word is tossed around too freely whenever someone has a differing point of view, the fact is that by playing a character for the purpose of causing anger, anything you have to say on this matter is rendered null and void. Your method is not how intelligent adults argue a point; it's how ignorant ones do it.
And by the extension of your logic, shouldn't everyone have the same excuse for the way they talk? Again, totally and absolutely contradictory on your part, but I can see that arguing the point with you won't let you see that.
 
Also, if you're going to overuse words to make yourself seem more intelligent than you actually are, do so in manner that doesn't show that fact so transparently. 
 
I actually admitted to playing a persona to get a rise out of a single individual who was blindly shooting down other people's opinions, without actually giving an opinion of their own, simply put, I may have been, perhaps, 'trolling' a single, ignorant individual, but where I come from, we do that to put a stop to them. And I did so. Mission accomplished. 
 
But I digress, if I was to put this in a simple to read post, for chaps such as yourself, it would be this: People who support this, are petulant children, who corrupted a perfectly nice outreach action by a developer, something the industry needs right now, to bring more people into their fold. The only solace I take from this situation, is that PC gaming is a bubble that is fairly close to bursting, and when that happens, these people will be lucky if they can act like such greedy, pathetic individuals, as their worlds crash around their ankles, and the rest of us can get back to our lives of dealing with pricks who argue over what FPS is better.
 
Intelligent adults? Seriously, isn't that a matter of perspective...and  I would say that it is an opinion. A poor opinion. That sentence simply seeks to get a rise out of me, in some way, shape or form, to prove the accuser, you,  right, in your own little way. It benefits no one else but you. And therefore, if I put your logic forward once again: does that not make you, the 'troll'? Btw I hate that term, it's thrown around way too much by kids these days! "Oh look, someone with a somewhat more radical opinion than my own, they must be a troll, or a lunatic!" The funny thing is, 'trolls' come along to piss a lot of people off. I just aim to piss the ignorant off so the rest of us can get back to debating the topic at hand. Because, you know....forums tend to be about that!
 
The truth be told, arguing with the likes of you is a lot of fun, you accuse and insult, because in some manner, my very existence has offended you in some way. I have no issue with that, but when you overlook underlying ideas that people could be raising, no matter what form they may take, you're actually just judging them and spitting on them from a moral high-horse. And to make matters even worse, the opinions I hold are the same as your own...so are you really saying that you dislike yourself? Or that someone has the nerve to share your opinions, but put them forward in a more vocal way? Besides, I've seen plenty of people of forums be shunned for making points everyone else might have had, but only because they said it in such a manner as to make the high-strung of said individuals dislike them, because they sullied their opinions. 
 
You are clearly opinionated, with your own deeply rooted beliefs, and if you really thought I was so bad, that I am so ignorant and childish...why waste your time reading my posts, and replying to me, if you are so much better as a person,  because really, who describes themselves in a manner to people they don't think are worth a shit? Why did you feel the need to join in where other people just didn't give a shit, and left after they posted their opinions? What does that say about you, as a person? Someone like myself, we simply don't care, we argue the points, we get things done, and we move on. And I don't usually want or like saying this...but seriously dude, grow up, the picture you've painted of yourself cannot be taken seriously. I couldn't care less if you were the most polite man in the world, you're still not able to accept that people can, and always will have, different methods of getting their points across. Non-issue or not, this happened. IT HAPPENED. In this realm of reality, some people were so elitist, that they actually did this. For a videogame. Now that right there, complete and utter, sickening insanity. That is what I was talking about. You don't think it's a big issue, well good for you, you must feel so good about things then. But guess what? Other people, who actually back their opinions with more than 'kind' words and spineless talk, believe that this is disgusting, small matter or not. Maybe you are don't play consoles, and don't really keep up with the times, but to a lover of all consoles, hearing about something like this is still wrong, and deserves nothing less than a funny, well-structured, and entertaining insight of the world these people are coming from.  Why is that such a bad thing? But again, I digress, begin aging procedures, and realize that not everyone shares your old-school world view. Some of us are far too old for such a bobble-headedly optimistic world view.
Avatar image for sreya92
sreya92

229

Forum Posts

85

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By sreya92
@Dookysharpgun said:
@Tim_the_Corsair said:
@Dookysharpgun Nothing remotely "pseudo-intellectual" about my post. This is how I speak, whether it is in person or online, and I am generally polite even in situations where perhaps I shouldn't be. Furthermore, I read every comment in the thread upto the point where I posted, and have since caught up on everything posted since. I quoted that particular post as the one that highlighted what I was saying: your post was childish, as were your earlier and subsequent posts. You are correct that I don't know Ygg - indeed, I don't know whether I've even posted in the same thread as him/her before. That is immaterial to the fact that absolutely nothing he said was out of line or even really contentious, even if we might have differed on a few points. You, however, were so forceful and willfully antagonistic in your rambling diatribes that it caught my notice. Whether you and I share multiple beliefs on this topic or could even grow to be BFFs is completely immaterial to the matter at hand. You are freely admitting that you are playing a persona to get a rise out of people while simultaneously overreacting - and yes, you are overreacting enough that you are coming off as a raving lunatic - almost comically to well thought out, decent posts on a topic that is essentially a non-issue. There is a name for people who play personas on the Internet while manipulating people into getting angry: Troll. Now while I feel that word is tossed around too freely whenever someone has a differing point of view, the fact is that by playing a character for the purpose of causing anger, anything you have to say on this matter is rendered null and void. Your method is not how intelligent adults argue a point; it's how ignorant ones do it.
And by the extension of your logic, shouldn't everyone have the same excuse for the way they talk? Again, totally and absolutely contradictory on your part, but I can see that arguing the point with you won't let you see that.  Also, if you're going to overuse words to make yourself seem more intelligent than you actually are, do so in manner that doesn't show that fact so transparently.    I actually admitted to playing a persona to get a rise out of a single individual who was blindly shooting down other people's opinions, without actually giving an opinion of their own, simply put, I may have been, perhaps, 'trolling' a single, ignorant individual, but where I come from, we do that to put a stop to them. And I did so. Mission accomplished.   But I digress, if I was to put this in a simple to read post, for chaps such as yourself, it would be this: People who support this, are petulant children, who corrupted a perfectly nice outreach action by a developer, something the industry needs right now, to bring more people into their fold. The only solace I take from this situation, is that PC gaming is a bubble that is fairly close to bursting, and when that happens, these people will be lucky if they can act like such greedy, pathetic individuals, as their worlds crash around their ankles, and the rest of us can get back to our lives of dealing with pricks who argue over what FPS is better. Intelligent adults? Seriously, isn't that a matter of perspective...and  I would say that it is an opinion. A poor opinion. That sentence simply seeks to get a rise out of me, in some way, shape or form, to prove the accuser, you,  right, in your own little way. It benefits no one else but you. And therefore, if I put your logic forward once again: does that not make you, the 'troll'? Btw I hate that term, it's thrown around way too much by kids these days! "Oh look, someone with a somewhat more radical opinion than my own, they must be a troll, or a lunatic!" The funny thing is, 'trolls' come along to piss a lot of people off. I just aim to piss the ignorant off so the rest of us can get back to debating the topic at hand. Because, you know....forums tend to be about that!  The truth be told, arguing with the likes of you is a lot of fun, you accuse and insult, because in some manner, my very existence has offended you in some way. I have no issue with that, but when you overlook underlying ideas that people could be raising, no matter what form they may take, you're actually just judging them and spitting on them from a moral high-horse. And to make matters even worse, the opinions I hold are the same as your own...so are you really saying that you dislike yourself? Or that someone has the nerve to share your opinions, but put them forward in a more vocal way? Besides, I've seen plenty of people of forums be shunned for making points everyone else might have had, but only because they said it in such a manner as to make the high-strung of said individuals dislike them, because they sullied their opinions.   You are clearly opinionated, with your own deeply rooted beliefs, and if you really thought I was so bad, that I am so ignorant and childish...why waste your time reading my posts, and replying to me, if you are so much better as a person,  because really, who describes themselves in a manner to people they don't think are worth a shit? Why did you feel the need to join in where other people just didn't give a shit, and left after they posted their opinions? What does that say about you, as a person? Someone like myself, we simply don't care, we argue the points, we get things done, and we move on. And I don't usually want or like saying this...but seriously dude, grow up, the picture you've painted of yourself cannot be taken seriously. I couldn't care less if you were the most polite man in the world, you're still not able to accept that people can, and always will have, different methods of getting their points across. Non-issue or not, this happened. IT HAPPENED. In this realm of reality, some people were so elitist, that they actually did this. For a videogame. Now that right there, complete and utter, sickening insanity. That is what I was talking about. You don't think it's a big issue, well good for you, you must feel so good about things then. But guess what? Other people, who actually back their opinions with more than 'kind' words and spineless talk, believe that this is disgusting, small matter or not. Maybe you are don't play consoles, and don't really keep up with the times, but to a lover of all consoles, hearing about something like this is still wrong, and deserves nothing less than a funny, well-structured, and entertaining insight of the world these people are coming from.  Why is that such a bad thing? But again, I digress, begin aging procedures, and realize that not everyone shares your old-school world view. Some of us are far too old for such a bobble-headedly optimistic world view.
...I think this wins for longest response post ever. I mean dear god why don't you both write a book on how much you hate each other
Avatar image for spike94
Spike94

760

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Spike94
@Tim_the_Corsair said:

@Dookysharpgun Nothing remotely "pseudo-intellectual" about my post. This is how I speak, whether it is in person or online, and I am generally polite even in situations where perhaps I shouldn't be. Furthermore, I read every comment in the thread upto the point where I posted, and have since caught up on everything posted since. I quoted that particular post as the one that highlighted what I was saying: your post was childish, as were your earlier and subsequent posts.

You are correct that I don't know Ygg - indeed, I don't know whether I've even posted in the same thread as him/her before. That is immaterial to the fact that absolutely nothing he said was out of line or even really contentious, even if we might have differed on a few points. You, however, were so forceful and willfully antagonistic in your rambling diatribes that it caught my notice.

Whether you and I share multiple beliefs on this topic or could even grow to be BFFs is completely immaterial to the matter at hand. You are freely admitting that you are playing a persona to get a rise out of people while simultaneously overreacting - and yes, you are overreacting enough that you are coming off as a raving lunatic - almost comically to well thought out, decent posts on a topic that is essentially a non-issue.

There is a name for people who play personas on the Internet while manipulating people into getting angry: Troll. 

Now while I feel that word is tossed around too freely whenever someone has a differing point of view, the fact is that by playing a character for the purpose of causing anger, anything you have to say on this matter is rendered null and void.

Your method is not how intelligent adults argue a point; it's how ignorant ones do it.
           


I freakin love this post. Well done, sir, and thanks for the laughs. No offence to Dooky or anything, but yeah... 
 
Anyway yes: F2P TF2 is a wonderful thing and I love it. The more the merrier, right? Although I do believe that a server owner can run his/her sever however the crap he/she pleases unless Valve says otherwise (such as if they put a stop to this mod, which I don't think they'll do). It's weird how this can almost be taken as a metaphor for politics and how one views government...The server owners are business owners and Valve are the powers that be! 
 
EDIT: Didn't mean for all that to be italicized at the top but it acts weird on my screen. Tried to remove it...I'll see if it works when I post. 
EDIT: Yeah nothing doing...
Avatar image for iam3green
iam3green

14368

Forum Posts

350

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By iam3green

when i heard that tf2 was going to be free, i was a little disappointed with that. i bought it for when it was on sale one time, but i also had it for xbox 360. the good it brings more players around.

Avatar image for lordelkdeer
LordElkDeer

53

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By LordElkDeer

Meh, I bought it years ago. the $20 I paid for it doesn't matter to me now, and the influx of noobs that don't know ho to play can be fun, eh? :P
 
Also. I Was Here.

Avatar image for williamrlbaker
WilliamRLBaker

4941

Forum Posts

1420

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By WilliamRLBaker

Decided to edit since not all pc users are elitest pricks. 
 
Ahhh PC gaming creating elitest pricks since the 80's. 
How dare they not have instant god like skill with this game like I did I shall make it so they cannot play on my servers. 
Avatar image for cooldevi
cooldevi

9

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By cooldevi

Great article!
I dont mind F2P on Team Fortress, I've bought the game less than a year ago, I spent 13 euros on it and I haven't even played that much since. Its a great game, and Valve knows it and they like us to be pleased! It's the best company for pc gamers and we shouldn't complain, we should support them because they're the one of the few who still fully support us!

Avatar image for shinjiex
ShinjiEx

793

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

Edited By ShinjiEx

What a douche... I play on official servers anyways ^__^

Avatar image for shinobiolium
Shinobiolium

9

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Shinobiolium

I'd say it's up to the private server owners. They pay for their own servers, so they get to do what they want on them. It's not like it'll have a huge impact seeing as how there are literally thousands of servers available for the public. I couldn't imagine how frustrating it is to have to continuously ban dozens people for item begging if I were an admin.

Avatar image for kennyisme93
KennyIsMe93

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By KennyIsMe93

Never really cared about TF2 anyway.

Avatar image for dystopiax
DystopiaX

5776

Forum Posts

416

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By DystopiaX

@Shinobiolium said:

I'd say it's up to the private server owners. They pay for their own servers, so they get to do what they want on them. It's not like it'll have a huge impact seeing as how there are literally thousands of servers available for the public. I couldn't imagine how frustrating it is to have to continuously ban dozens people for item begging if I were an admin.

I don't particularly care about TF2, but I'd have to say that if I had to play tons of noobs in a game I had invested hundreds if not thousands of hours into I'd get pissed as well. Not sure that warrants essentially banning them all but I can kind of see where they're coming from.

Avatar image for bitteralmond
BitterAlmond

422

Forum Posts

21

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By BitterAlmond

I don't mind that it's free-to-play, I mind the in-game Mann Co. store. I uninstalled that shit the day they tried to sell me a fucking hat. I was disgusted the day they turned a game I always saw as the perfect example of how to run a fun, functional online game into another korean-style microtransaction-powered cash cow. There ought to be a mod that kicks anyone who HAS purchased something from the TF2 store.

Avatar image for lockwoodx
lockwoodx

2531

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By lockwoodx

Good for him. Kick those mouth-breathing xboxLive scrubs who ditched their gold memberships so they could mooch off steam's generosity. F2P doesn't have to mean a lower caliber of game quality, but it always means a lower caliber of human quality.

Avatar image for colonel_fury
Colonel_Fury

462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Colonel_Fury

Games are ... fun?

Avatar image for trident523
trident523

8

Forum Posts

520

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By trident523

Server owners can do what they do.

Avatar image for tim_the_corsair
tim_the_corsair

3053

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By tim_the_corsair
@BitterAlmond Those items that don't alter the game at all sure are ruining it, hey?

I just don't get this sort of comment at all
Avatar image for trodorne
Trodorne

17

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Trodorne

i find it strange that we as a society have to put emphasis on paying monthly into a game which entertains us for a couple hours at a time. especially anything that has an online aspect to it. when it comes to technology and games. There will always be people trying to play a game for free. And heaven forbid that people do not make money on games, I guess that would mean people would end up going outside to play or maybe read a book. GASP! If people want to play then let them. what he made was something of his own choice, cause he chose to boot people who did not pay. There is always going to be players others do not like at all so what good will it do to cut down on the quality of the players. You will always get that kid who is 9 years old using their parents card who has access to online play and just kill someones buzz.