I want to say this as bluntly as possible. Battlefield Heroes you're boring and bear no resemblence to either your pc or console counter-parts such as BF2142 or Battlefield: Bad Company. With that said most of us can also argue that Bf Heroes will never match the still reigning champ of the series BF2. Now while i lookforward to BF 1943, as it's more of a proper follow up along with Battlefield Bad Company 2, i can't stress just how much Bf Heroes seems out of place. It is the red headed step child. Personally, i hope it's a flop because to me it seems to scream more "give us your money via microtranscaction" than "cute-fun level battlefield game." If anything BF Heroes is a cheaters enviroment, the game is horribly balanced, and none of it is really inspired (i'm looking at you TF2 stylized art design). I used to defen this game, seeing it as a great way for my friends and myself to have fun on a budget. Turns out, i was wrong. The game is just, ugg, here are a list of problems:

1. Unbalanced gameplay
2. Cheaters bastion
3. Too much advantage to those that use micro-transaction

With that said, let us continue to Quake Live. Oh hi there Quake 3! Do you know what actually made you special? Mods. Quake live, you don't have mods, well then, fuck me. So there is my synopsis of Quake Live and Battlefield Heroes. Both of which i've played and both of which i have no desire to try again. (I will check out BF Heroes when it is properly released though, if anything to see what my friends think)

I want to say this as bluntly as possible. Battlefield Heroes you're boring and bear no resemblence to either your pc or console counter-parts such as BF2142 or Battlefield: Bad Company. With that said most of us can also argue that Bf Heroes will never match the still reigning champ of the series BF2. Now while i lookforward to BF 1943, as it's more of a proper follow up along with Battlefield Bad Company 2, i can't stress just how much Bf Heroes seems out of place. It is the red headed step child. Personally, i hope it's a flop because to me it seems to scream more "give us your money via microtranscaction" than "cute-fun level battlefield game." If anything BF Heroes is a cheaters enviroment, the game is horribly balanced, and none of it is really inspired (i'm looking at you TF2 stylized art design). I used to defen this game, seeing it as a great way for my friends and myself to have fun on a budget. Turns out, i was wrong. The game is just, ugg, here are a list of problems:

1. Unbalanced gameplay
2. Cheaters bastion
3. Too much advantage to those that use micro-transaction

With that said, let us continue to Quake Live. Oh hi there Quake 3! Do you know what actually made you special? Mods. Quake live, you don't have mods, well then, fuck me. So there is my synopsis of Quake Live and Battlefield Heroes. Both of which i've played and both of which i have no desire to try again. (I will check out BF Heroes when it is properly released though, if anything to see what my friends think)

First off, you're looking at Battlefield Heroes the wrong way if you're looking for a game to replace Bad Company or BF2.  Second, you're bitching about a game in closed beta, the purpose of which is to balance the game and get user feedback to help make the game good, which is silly.  And finally, I doubt you've actually played the game because if you had, you'd know that this is breaking the NDA you had to sign to the max.

My bad....i broke NDA....and i'm not going to sit here and argue with you as to if i've actually played the game or not. I have voiced my concerns, critiques, bugs, etc... on the beta forums of which i am part of. I'm sure if DICE finds me in violation with the NDA they will ban my account.

Also, yes i am complaining about a BETA, but let's be clear; the beta's for the following games: LOTR: Online, Hellgate London, Warhammer Online, DoW 2 were reflective of the quality to be expected of the final product. Note which games are flourishing, note which are dead, and note the one's that actually took user feedback to make their game better. I stand behind what i've said, i stand behind breaking the NDA, for the reason alone that BETA's are really no longer BETA's because some games still get released after BETA
with the problems in had in BETA.

Screenshot taken from my pc: http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/626/58248631.jpg