Doom 3 or Quake 4?

#1 Posted by GristleMcThornbody (163 posts) -

I'm in the mood for some id gaming. Both of these games are pretty cheap on steam right now. Any recommendations? I loved Quake 2 but I've never gotten around to either of these....

#2 Posted by razkazz (169 posts) -

Definitely Doom 3. I grew to love Quake 4 by the end but, for whatever reason, for the first like 6 hours there aren't tons of enemies, your squadmates kill the atmosphere, and it's just pretty boring. It does pick up and feel more like Quake II for the last 12 plus hours, but Doom 3 is solid throughout. Whichever you choose, make sure to play on hard because in a very un-idlike move they made the normal difficulty of both way too easy.

#3 Posted by UnrealDP (1223 posts) -

@razkazz said:

Definitely Doom 3. I grew to love Quake 4 by the end but, for whatever reason, for the first like 6 hours there aren't tons of enemies, your squadmates kill the atmosphere, and it's just pretty boring. It does pick up and feel more like Quake II for the last 12 plus hours, but Doom 3 is solid throughout. Whichever you choose, make sure to play on hard because in a very un-idlike move they made the normal difficulty of both way too easy.

This! I've also recently played Quake 4 and it's also got some piss poor level design in a spot or two. Just old timey levels where you're sitting around for like 5 minutes trying to figure out the obtuse way you're supposed to advance.

#4 Posted by SomeDeliCook (2341 posts) -

Doom 3 and its expansion. Quake 4 was cool too and way more of a shooter, but Doom 3 is the better game. id Software also made Doom 3 while Raven made Quake 4.

#5 Posted by Guided_By_Tigers (8061 posts) -

Quake 4 slightly.....they're both very good games, but I just think Quake 4 has better shooting.

#6 Posted by Icicle7x3 (1188 posts) -

Quake 4 has Peter Stormare, the choice is clear.

#7 Posted by bybeach (4899 posts) -

Doom 3. Quake 4 wasn't bad though... and a hell of a docter's visit to the Strogg I remember....

#8 Edited by Sooty (8082 posts) -

Quake III

or the other two bad games you mentioned

#9 Posted by Demoskinos (15017 posts) -

I'm going to say Doom 3. And if you can swing it get the original NOT the BFG edition on PC. Its pretty dope. The flashlight might have been an technical limitation at the time but it also actually really made to up the horror and tension of the game and that added to the experience if you are going to play Doom 3 or the expansion don't cheat yourself out of a good time by playing the new one where they "fixed" a problem that didn't need fixed.

#10 Posted by Manhattan_Project (2162 posts) -

If I had a copy of Quake 4, I would burn it. If I had a copy of Doom 3, I wouldn't play it. But if I had to play one of them, Doom 3 is clearly the answer.

#11 Posted by csl316 (8964 posts) -

I actually really enjoyed Quake 4, despite horrible loading on the 360. Good old school combat, with some varied enemies and some memorable parts in the campaign.

Doom 3 is well made, but I honestly can't finish it since it scares the hell out of me. Great tension and atmosphere if you aren't a wuss.

#12 Posted by ShaggE (6554 posts) -

I love both of them, but unless you really like the Strogg, go for Doom 3.

#13 Posted by razkazz (169 posts) -

@UnrealDP said:

@razkazz said:

Definitely Doom 3. I grew to love Quake 4 by the end but, for whatever reason, for the first like 6 hours there aren't tons of enemies, your squadmates kill the atmosphere, and it's just pretty boring. It does pick up and feel more like Quake II for the last 12 plus hours, but Doom 3 is solid throughout. Whichever you choose, make sure to play on hard because in a very un-idlike move they made the normal difficulty of both way too easy.

This! I've also recently played Quake 4 and it's also got some piss poor level design in a spot or two. Just old timey levels where you're sitting around for like 5 minutes trying to figure out the obtuse way you're supposed to advance.

So true. I was replaying a section not long ago where you're outside in some trenches and after you clear the enemies it tells you your objective but not where to go. So I'm running in circles for like 10 minutes because the only logical path is this cave entrance that I should totally be able to enter but it has an invisible wall. Eventually I jumped on some crates and it let me jump out of the trenches and run to the next area. It was just odd because, even though invisible walls are always poor design, it would've been much more understandable to have them blocking off the top of the trenches. I was surprised to see that kind of shoddy work from Raven.

#14 Posted by FMinus (395 posts) -

Both are great games. Quake 4 was slightly better in my eyes due to fiction and setting.

#15 Posted by UnrealDP (1223 posts) -

@razkazz said:

@UnrealDP said:

@razkazz said:

Definitely Doom 3. I grew to love Quake 4 by the end but, for whatever reason, for the first like 6 hours there aren't tons of enemies, your squadmates kill the atmosphere, and it's just pretty boring. It does pick up and feel more like Quake II for the last 12 plus hours, but Doom 3 is solid throughout. Whichever you choose, make sure to play on hard because in a very un-idlike move they made the normal difficulty of both way too easy.

This! I've also recently played Quake 4 and it's also got some piss poor level design in a spot or two. Just old timey levels where you're sitting around for like 5 minutes trying to figure out the obtuse way you're supposed to advance.

So true. I was replaying a section not long ago where you're outside in some trenches and after you clear the enemies it tells you your objective but not where to go. So I'm running in circles for like 10 minutes because the only logical path is this cave entrance that I should totally be able to enter but it has an invisible wall. Eventually I jumped on some crates and it let me jump out of the trenches and run to the next area. It was just odd because, even though invisible walls are always poor design, it would've been much more understandable to have them blocking off the top of the trenches. I was surprised to see that kind of shoddy work from Raven.

OHMYGOD TOTALLY! That part was the most goddamn infuriating thing. What that game asks you to pull off right there just felt like an exploit. I was pretty sure I had messed it up or was finding some secret, but no, that's just janky level design, folks. I remember there was a later part with these lifting walls in the Strogg (christ am I spelling that right?) facility that also messed me up, but it's been a bit.

#16 Posted by Cold_Wolven (2259 posts) -

They're both cool games but I think I have to give it Doom 3 for just being more atmospheric with PDAs containing emails and audio logs.

#17 Posted by believer258 (11992 posts) -

They're both pretty good games. The choice mostly boils down to whether you prefer a more horror or action oriented focus. Doom3 is more horror, Quake 4 is more action.

#18 Posted by believer258 (11992 posts) -

Also, Quake 4 was made by Raven, I believe, not id.

#19 Posted by Vextroid (1418 posts) -

Definitely Doom 3 + Sikkmod.

#20 Posted by Mr_Misery (261 posts) -

Doom 3 if you need help sleeping or Quake 4 if you want to have a good time.

#21 Posted by Wampa1 (710 posts) -

@Icicle7x3: He asked me to check up and make sure you are enjoying your... Cinco boy.

Playing through the BFG edition of Doom 3 (which feels both faster and more tightly packed with enemies) I'm starting to believe that I judged that game to harshly as a teen. Still it isn't really "run at 100 mph" doom.

Online

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.