Cute Anthropomorphic Animals

Posted by Tiny_Tank (57 posts) -

I just picked this game up. After watching the beginning of the quicklook I was sold. I've only scratched the surface and played about 30 minutes of it but I already can only think "Holy shit this is fantastic". Most would be doing themselves a disservice to overlook this.

#1 Posted by Tiny_Tank (57 posts) -

I just picked this game up. After watching the beginning of the quicklook I was sold. I've only scratched the surface and played about 30 minutes of it but I already can only think "Holy shit this is fantastic". Most would be doing themselves a disservice to overlook this.

#2 Posted by Brodehouse (9949 posts) -

Yeah, it seems like a game for people who like cute anthropomorphic animals. Seems that way, indeed. Very cute animals.

#3 Posted by TobbRobb (4639 posts) -

Too bad the Cute anthroanimals are made by a bad artist.

The game is preeeetty goddamn awesome though, love the fluidity of the gameplay and animation.

#4 Edited by ervonymous (1297 posts) -

Enemies are way too passive, as well as the combat flows it feels like a 2D Dynasty Warriors when hordes of enemies just eat your five different combos and beg for more. I'm 60% in on Tough, I doubt the difficulty level matters though.

#5 Posted by Tyashki (213 posts) -

I just like the fact that one of the many indie games made by one dude isn't using pixel art for a change. XD

And yes, I can think of others. Shhh.

#6 Posted by WilliamRLBaker (4777 posts) -

@TobbRobb said:

Too bad the Cute anthroanimals are made by a bad artist.

The game is preeeetty goddamn awesome though, love the fluidity of the gameplay and animation.

.....bad artist....fluid animation....

oh god my head hurts!

#7 Posted by Humanity (9207 posts) -

If only fidget had this tight little bikini and a sweet rack..

#8 Posted by TobbRobb (4639 posts) -

@WilliamRLBaker: Dude, animation can be fluid no matter what the artstyle is. I think it looks good in motion, but I think the characters look bad. Well, Dust and his squirrel looks alright but 99% of the characters look like complete ass.

#9 Posted by WilliamRLBaker (4777 posts) -

eh It just seems that the sign of a bad artist is bad art where in animation this includes its fluidity. and I would have to disagree the characters look on-par with dust and fidget.

#10 Posted by Terramagi (1159 posts) -

@WilliamRLBaker said:

@TobbRobb said:

Too bad the Cute anthroanimals are made by a bad artist.

The game is preeeetty goddamn awesome though, love the fluidity of the gameplay and animation.

.....bad artist....fluid animation....

oh god my head hurts!

If you think the two are mutually exclusive, you obviously don't remember Xiao Xiao.

#11 Posted by TobbRobb (4639 posts) -

@WilliamRLBaker: Alright I can see that point, but calling him an bad artist was both quicker and more effective in defining my feelings for the art. let's call the artstyle and to some extent the character design bad.

Oh and I don't really feel like Dust or Fidget are a LOT better looking. Just slightly. Most likely because you don't really see Dusts face and Fidget is a bit more animal than everyone else.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.