I told myself when we started this here album club that I was going to try as hard as I possibly could to not rely on snark. There's enough bullshit on the internet, particularly video game forums *cough cough* (I'm kidding!), that I don't feel the need to contribute to it. I've failed on the front. A few times lately. But I make a sincere effort to try not to do that. I can't prove that to you, but I do. (Says the guy who added a snarky joke to his point about not doing snark.)
Yet, as I listened to this album, the phrase, "This sounds like music specifically made to not do coke to" kept crossing my mind. Like I imagine someone saying, "I'm going to sit down, put on a Dire Straits album, and not do cocaine to it." I know what I'm really trying to say is that I found this album lacking a certain amount of juice, and as this is my first Dire Straits album, I get why some have referred to this band as "dad rock" now. However, I don't know why my mind wanted to phrase it like that. I don't even know if that's even an insult or not. It kind of sounds like it's in the cadence of an insult, but with a particular emphasis on "kind of."
I'm mentioning all this for one simple reason: To express that despite my best efforts, sometimes I'm an asshole and nothing I say about this album, and probably this band, should be taken seriously.
There is nothing wrong with Love Over Gold or Dire Straits. The talent on display is obvious, the songwriting is clever, it's deeply satisfying and cohesive. It's just not my tonality. Or rather, it's selling a mood and an experience I'm not personally buying. Broadly speaking, aggressively 80s ass 80s rock isn't my thing. I realize I'm wrong. But I get it! I really do! Again, don't turn to me when it comes to Dire Straits or this album.
Favorite Songs: "Telegraph Road" (I went K-6th grade on a Telegraph Road!), "Private Investigations," "It Never Rains"
Log in to comment