@zombievac: Well, yes and no. While I agree that intensive workloads will cut the battery life of those devices from their 10 hour estimates to something more resembling the three or four that the Switch may get, tests have been run that show you can do far more than just barely use them and still get great battery life: CNET's streaming video playback test has the 13-inch Macbook Pro lasting ten hours and eight minutes, for example.
So, apples to apples, you may be right; that ten hours is probably more like three if you break out Civ 6, or whatever your game of choice is. But in the real world, if I have a six hour flight without an outlet (still can happen here in the US, sadly), and my choice boils down to three hours of Switch gaming versus six hours of movies, I'm going with the movies. Apples to apples goes out the window at that point, as I just want to be entertained for the duration of my travel, even if the game is more entertaining for however long it lasts.
Now, if the Switch gets five, that rebalances the equation. I might take an hour of boredom as a trade off to have "extra" fun over watching a movie. But three? Even if the other devices I have could only do three hours when faced with the same task, they can also do different, less intensive tasks and still keep me entertained, so three would probably be a deal-breaker for my use case.
Log in to comment