PS4 ToS gives PlayStation rights to all your communication

  • 51 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for andheez
Andheez

648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

#1  Edited By Andheez

Well, I guess the TOS just confirmed what I think everyone suspected.

http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/ps4-may-monitor-communications-192317278.html

Avatar image for alkusanagi
AlKusanagi

1667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Dammit! Now I can't keep selling meth making secrets to the Russians while I no-scope anymore!!!

Avatar image for crusader8463
crusader8463

14850

Forum Posts

4290

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 5

So they are nice enough to tell you they are doing it instead of just doing it and not telling?

Avatar image for strainedeyes
strainedeyes

1365

Forum Posts

342

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Too bad, I conduct all my drug dealing and murder planning via PSN messages. Guess I'll have to rethink things.

Avatar image for bigjeffrey
bigjeffrey

5282

Forum Posts

7872

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Send you Psn messages backwards to combat this "repmac a ruoy"

Avatar image for yinstarrunner
yinstarrunner

1314

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By yinstarrunner

Isn't this pretty much standard policy for.... pretty much everything now? I'm pretty sure there are just legal reasons for them to have this stipulation beyond them being evil.

Avatar image for deactivated-5998b7e12fabb
deactivated-5998b7e12fabb

275

Forum Posts

165

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is going to be a problem. I tend to talk about very serious and private conversations over PSN... I might need to start coding my messages... that or use a different method of talking about private matters with friends/family.

Avatar image for somejerk
SomeJerk

4077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By SomeJerk

Isn't this pretty much standard policy for.... pretty much everything now? I'm pretty sure there are just legal reasons for them to have this stipulation beyond them being evil.

Ayup.

Avatar image for levio
Levio

1953

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

I don't really have any secrets anyway. Maybe my name and address? Not like Sony doesn't already have that.

Avatar image for animasta
Animasta

14948

Forum Posts

3563

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 5

Isn't this pretty much standard policy for.... pretty much everything now? I'm pretty sure there are just legal reasons for them to have this stipulation beyond them being evil.

yeah but a lot of people were shitting on microsoft for doing this (in which the assumption is that Sony wouldn't, obviously).

Avatar image for theht
TheHT

15998

Forum Posts

1562

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

isn't all of your communication already being monitored?

<_<

>_>

Avatar image for musubi
musubi

17524

Forum Posts

5650

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 17

I might raise an eyebrow at this if the NSA weren't already pretty much taking a peek and everything on the internet anyways.

Avatar image for shinjin977
shinjin977

911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Before someone melt down about why no one is raging at sony for this, this is what AIM, MSN, trillion, phone messaging and even phone calls you make to your local ISP/businesses/customer services/tech support does. They tell you "your call maybe monitored to ensured quality service" or w/e, it is very different from having a (before 180) mandatory camera capable of reading your expressions, monitor your heart rate, (before 180) is always on and (before 180) connected to a device that is always connected to the internet.

Big difference here, not saying this practice is great by any means, this is still a practice I do not agree with but there is a difference between telling me all my text will be kept on record when I use this service and telling me you are going to install a camera in my living room that's always on, can do all kind of creepy night vision shit but don't worry it wont do anything.

Avatar image for funkasaurasrex
FunkasaurasRex

854

Forum Posts

84

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By FunkasaurasRex

Has anyone said "fuck the NSA" yet? Nope?

Fuck the NSA.

I know you're reading this motherfucker.

I hardly ever send messages over PSN.

Avatar image for afabs515
afabs515

2005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By afabs515

Take a cryptology course. Learn how to code all your messages. Make sure you and your friends all know the system. If we all work together, we can beat the NSA! They'll never be able to figure out what I'm calling the dude on the other end of the PlayStation Network! Also, make sure that you and your friends speak in code too.

7 15 15 4 12 21 3 11

Avatar image for bribo
Bribo

738

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#17  Edited By Bribo

@funkasaurasrex said:

Has anyone said "fuck the NSA" yet? Nope?

Fuck the NSA.

I know you're reading this motherfucker.

I work for the NSA and thanks to your flippant remark I now have to spend the next six weeks sitting in this van parked across the street from you.

I hope you're happy now.

Avatar image for jarmahead
jArmAhead

354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Before someone melt down about why no one is raging at sony for this, this is what AIM, MSN, trillion, phone messaging and even phone calls you make to your local ISP/businesses/customer services/tech support does. They tell you "your call maybe monitored to ensured quality service" or w/e, it is very different from having a (before 180) mandatory camera capable of reading your expressions, monitor your heart rate, (before 180) is always on and (before 180) connected to a device that is always connected to the internet.

Big difference here, not saying this practice is great by any means, this is still a practice I do not agree with but there is a difference between telling me all my text will be kept on record when I use this service and telling me you are going to install a camera in my living room that's always on, can do all kind of creepy night vision shit but don't worry it wont do anything.

OhMan, are people really still spreading lies about the Kinect? Duder, I don't know where you heard that the Kinect is some evil baby snatching, snatch watching monster, but it never was. Sure, it was going to be always on. But not always transmitting to some evil laboratory. In fact, it was never really sending any data except when clearly there was no other option, like uploading videos. The Kinect is not a spy program created by MS to control you. It's a camera like any other camera and was only going to always be on because it's a major push for the platform and they want to make sure people use it and see how awesome it is (or how not awesome it is, but that's probably not the position they are taking on the matter).

Lets not grossly take things out of context or suggest things that are blatantly untrue. I don't know if you are just misinformed or one of those people who can't help but insult one MS product or another in every post, but the Kinect was never what you are implying it was, and certainly isn't now.

All that said, I'm pretty sure this is just them saying "we will probably observe you if someone reports you, so don't get pissy about privacy when we have record of you being a horrible racist." I'm not concerned. I don't do my banking over PSN so whatevs.

Avatar image for joshwent
joshwent

2897

Forum Posts

2987

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

The latest update to the next-gen console’s software usage terms includes the disclosure that the company may monitor and record the content of voice and text communication over the PlayStation Network.

This is the big difference between their ToS and the potential abuses of the Kinect. Sony is specifically allowing themselves access to your messages/gameplay/etc. through their services. MS was never specific that their info gathering was limited to when you were explicitly using their device, so it was conceivable that they'd use it to monitor what you're watching on TV, etc.

This actually seems like they're specifically making legal room for themselves to weed out people who are sending horrible messages and cheating in games. a.k.a., the times we'd want them to monitor communications.

Or they're the Japanese reptilian shape-shifting Illuminati.

Avatar image for shinjin977
shinjin977

911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jarmahead: I have never said anything about kinect being evil or even sending data. Not a word. I explained why people were pissed at Microsoft for the whole kinect/always online/NSA thing and not at this. Microsoft is probably not going to collect any information or anything without consent but if my friends wanted me to hook up a kinect to my laptop and leave it on, all the while telling me "nah man its not gonna do anything". Being a logical human being, I have to ask "Then why the fuck you do want me to leave it on?" and that's if my friend told me to do it. When Microsoft drop the requirement for the kinect to be connected the rage was gone, people don't give a shit even if microsoft fully intend to monitor everything, as long as they can just unhook it.

And no sir all the information that I type on what kinect can do is accurate, I never even imply that it will do those things but that it can and (before 180) was going to always be on and that's why people rage at it. And for your last question, no sir, I am a pc gamer first and foremost.

Avatar image for connerthekewlkid
connerthekewlkid

1873

Forum Posts

31

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21  Edited By connerthekewlkid

Don't worry guys if the Freemasons dig anything up on any of you ill be sure to tell you.

Avatar image for geraltitude
GERALTITUDE

5991

Forum Posts

8980

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 2

Huge lol at the original post.

Yeah man we all been just dreading this for weeks now.

Avatar image for mrfluke
mrfluke

6260

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

maybe im just too blinded by sony's messaging, but im actually still willing to trust them watch me play games and chat with folks about stupid shit :P

Avatar image for viking_funeral
viking_funeral

2881

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

I love how complacent people are with this.

Avatar image for angrighandi
AngriGhandi

953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26  Edited By AngriGhandi

I suppose the thing that makes this seem less gross is that it's all within Sony's closed system, and confidentiality was never part of the pitch to begin with?

Or maybe it's because we've realized we have a much bigger problem right now as far as information privacy is concerned. Like, a total, all-encompassing problem.

It's probably that one.

Avatar image for flappy
Flappy

2415

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Guess they'll hear my "ooooos" and "aaaaaaahs" as I play online basketball with folks.

Avatar image for nags
Nags

189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28  Edited By Nags

@jarmahead: Thanks for your spin. I'll make sure to ignore all comments by you in the future.

@shinjin977:

+1 for truth.

Avatar image for nettacki
Nettacki

1333

Forum Posts

74

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

I'd like to think that the reason why people aren't totally pissed off at Sony so far is because Sony at least gives solid answers to concerns like this recent privacy ToS thing. MS on the other hand has given dodged questions and contradictory answers for the longest time, which only really served to frustrate people.

Avatar image for missacre
Missacre

568

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@animasta said:

@yinstarrunner said:

Isn't this pretty much standard policy for.... pretty much everything now? I'm pretty sure there are just legal reasons for them to have this stipulation beyond them being evil.

yeah but a lot of people were shitting on microsoft for doing this (in which the assumption is that Sony wouldn't, obviously).

Yeah, this just shows the amount of Sony fanboyism on this site. Their precious Sony can do no wrong in their eyes.

Avatar image for slag
Slag

8308

Forum Posts

15965

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 45

#33  Edited By Slag

Before someone melt down about why no one is raging at sony for this, this is what AIM, MSN, trillion, phone messaging and even phone calls you make to your local ISP/businesses/customer services/tech support does. They tell you "your call maybe monitored to ensured quality service" or w/e, it is very different from having a (before 180) mandatory camera capable of reading your expressions, monitor your heart rate, (before 180) is always on and (before 180) connected to a device that is always connected to the internet.

Big difference here, not saying this practice is great by any means, this is still a practice I do not agree with but there is a difference between telling me all my text will be kept on record when I use this service and telling me you are going to install a camera in my living room that's always on, can do all kind of creepy night vision shit but don't worry it wont do anything.

+1

you nailed it

Avatar image for mike
mike

18011

Forum Posts

23067

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 6

@andheez: moved to PS4 forum- please review this thread before posting any new topics, thanks.

Avatar image for krullban
Krullban

1470

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Ah yes. Sony does something that Microsoft would get shit on for and everybody just defends them and gives excuses.

Disclaimer: I don't care about this.

Avatar image for joshwent
joshwent

2897

Forum Posts

2987

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

@missacre said:

@animasta said:

@yinstarrunner said:

Isn't this pretty much standard policy for.... pretty much everything now? I'm pretty sure there are just legal reasons for them to have this stipulation beyond them being evil.

yeah but a lot of people were shitting on microsoft for doing this (in which the assumption is that Sony wouldn't, obviously).

Yeah, this just shows the amount of Sony fanboyism on this site. Their precious Sony can do no wrong in their eyes.

Or maybe some of us are rational and can tell the difference between... two different things? Just like I calmly explained above in this very thread.

I'm a fanboy, of logic.

Avatar image for internetdotcom
InternetDotCom

4038

Forum Posts

133

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Too bad, I conduct all my drug dealing and murder planning via PSN messages. Guess I'll have to rethink things.

id like to buy some murder drugs do you know the name of any one who has murder drugs for me to buy?

Avatar image for firecracker22
firecracker22

750

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#38  Edited By firecracker22

There goes my up and coming meth business.

Avatar image for viciousbearmauling
ViciousBearMauling

2094

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

This is very normal...

Avatar image for firecracker22
firecracker22

750

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Well, yeah.

But if you're a young go-getter, hustling on the streets of the Playstation Network...it hampers your enterprising endeavors. It's like they don't want a young money maker to keep his hustle and flow.

Avatar image for dizzymedal
DizzyMedal

420

Forum Posts

78

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@afabs515 said:

Take a cryptology course. Learn how to code all your messages. Make sure you and your friends all know the system. If we all work together, we can beat the NSA! They'll never be able to figure out what I'm calling the dude on the other end of the PlayStation Network! Also, make sure that you and your friends speak in code too.

7 15 15 4 12 20 3 11

8 1 22 5 2 1 20 13 1 14

Avatar image for broomhitches
Broomhitches

177

Forum Posts

58

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The only reason why this is normal is that our society has simply become too lazy when it comes to standing against it. Instead, we post special avatars on social media sites, or sign internet petitions and wrap ourselves in a false sense of security while our rights are slowly being signed away.

Avatar image for afabs515
afabs515

2005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@afabs515 said:

Take a cryptology course. Learn how to code all your messages. Make sure you and your friends all know the system. If we all work together, we can beat the NSA! They'll never be able to figure out what I'm calling the dude on the other end of the PlayStation Network! Also, make sure that you and your friends speak in code too.

7 15 15 4 12 20 3 11

8 1 22 5 2 1 20 13 1 14

20 = 21

Avatar image for missacre
Missacre

568

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@joshwent said:

@missacre said:

@animasta said:

@yinstarrunner said:

Isn't this pretty much standard policy for.... pretty much everything now? I'm pretty sure there are just legal reasons for them to have this stipulation beyond them being evil.

yeah but a lot of people were shitting on microsoft for doing this (in which the assumption is that Sony wouldn't, obviously).

Yeah, this just shows the amount of Sony fanboyism on this site. Their precious Sony can do no wrong in their eyes.

Or maybe some of us are rational and can tell the difference between... two different things? Just like I calmly explained above in this very thread.

I'm a fanboy, of logic.

So, what's the big difference between Sony doing it and Microsoft doing it?

Avatar image for humanity
Humanity

21858

Forum Posts

5738

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 16

@missacre said:

@joshwent said:

@missacre said:

@animasta said:

@yinstarrunner said:

Isn't this pretty much standard policy for.... pretty much everything now? I'm pretty sure there are just legal reasons for them to have this stipulation beyond them being evil.

yeah but a lot of people were shitting on microsoft for doing this (in which the assumption is that Sony wouldn't, obviously).

Yeah, this just shows the amount of Sony fanboyism on this site. Their precious Sony can do no wrong in their eyes.

Or maybe some of us are rational and can tell the difference between... two different things? Just like I calmly explained above in this very thread.

I'm a fanboy, of logic.

So, what's the big difference between Sony doing it and Microsoft doing it?

The camera is obviously spying on you, I mean logically speaking, like all laptop cameras.

Avatar image for missacre
Missacre

568

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46  Edited By Missacre
@humanity said:

@missacre said:

@joshwent said:

@missacre said:

@animasta said:

@yinstarrunner said:

Isn't this pretty much standard policy for.... pretty much everything now? I'm pretty sure there are just legal reasons for them to have this stipulation beyond them being evil.

yeah but a lot of people were shitting on microsoft for doing this (in which the assumption is that Sony wouldn't, obviously).

Yeah, this just shows the amount of Sony fanboyism on this site. Their precious Sony can do no wrong in their eyes.

Or maybe some of us are rational and can tell the difference between... two different things? Just like I calmly explained above in this very thread.

I'm a fanboy, of logic.

So, what's the big difference between Sony doing it and Microsoft doing it?

The camera is obviously spying on you, I mean logically speaking, like all laptop cameras.

Good thing I don't own a laptop, then.

Avatar image for humanity
Humanity

21858

Forum Posts

5738

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 16

#47  Edited By Humanity

@missacre said:
@humanity said:

@missacre said:

@joshwent said:

@missacre said:

@animasta said:

@yinstarrunner said:

Isn't this pretty much standard policy for.... pretty much everything now? I'm pretty sure there are just legal reasons for them to have this stipulation beyond them being evil.

yeah but a lot of people were shitting on microsoft for doing this (in which the assumption is that Sony wouldn't, obviously).

Yeah, this just shows the amount of Sony fanboyism on this site. Their precious Sony can do no wrong in their eyes.

Or maybe some of us are rational and can tell the difference between... two different things? Just like I calmly explained above in this very thread.

I'm a fanboy, of logic.

So, what's the big difference between Sony doing it and Microsoft doing it?

The camera is obviously spying on you, I mean logically speaking, like all laptop cameras.

Good thing I don't own a laptop, then.

Do you own a phone, with a camera? Well enjoy being spied on every time you use it to text, I mean how do you know that thing isn't on and recording for Apple?

Avatar image for missacre
Missacre

568

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@humanity said:

@missacre said:
@humanity said:

@missacre said:

@joshwent said:

@missacre said:

@animasta said:

@yinstarrunner said:

Isn't this pretty much standard policy for.... pretty much everything now? I'm pretty sure there are just legal reasons for them to have this stipulation beyond them being evil.

yeah but a lot of people were shitting on microsoft for doing this (in which the assumption is that Sony wouldn't, obviously).

Yeah, this just shows the amount of Sony fanboyism on this site. Their precious Sony can do no wrong in their eyes.

Or maybe some of us are rational and can tell the difference between... two different things? Just like I calmly explained above in this very thread.

I'm a fanboy, of logic.

So, what's the big difference between Sony doing it and Microsoft doing it?

The camera is obviously spying on you, I mean logically speaking, like all laptop cameras.

Good thing I don't own a laptop, then.

Do you own a phone, with a camera? Well enjoy being spied on every time you use it to text, I mean how do you know that thing isn't on and recording for Apple?

Apple? I don't own an iPhone. Never have. Yes, I do have a phone. I'm not saying it is, and I'm not saying it isn't recording me. How did this even transition to phones, anyway? I thought we were talking about how evil Sony is.

Avatar image for mattyftm
MattyFTM

14914

Forum Posts

67415

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 11

#50  Edited By MattyFTM  Moderator

Everyone complains about how horrible online gaming communities are. You get people spewing horrible racist, sexist and homophobic language, death threats and all sorts of other horrible shit. Yet when Sony implement a policy that allows them full access to look at these peoples chat history and see the kind of things they've been doing and then ban them, people complain?

I don't understand people sometimes.