Say that out of sheer irony, historians conclude that John Romero's body of work was philosophically profound and worthy of being studied as intentently as those of the Greeks, Nietzsche, Jung, etc. How do you think he would be studied under those contexts? Basically, what I'm asking is if you were a university-level philosophy professor and your curriculum had to cover John Romero, what exactly would you discuss?
If John Romero were to be immortalized as a philosopher....
"-HaircareYes, his beautiful flowing locks would be the focus point of the lecture.-Design-Law-Laws of Design-Designs of Laws-Tiny enemies-Pikes-Haircuts and why they mean defeat-Primary colors and why to use only those colors when making a level"
Though I disagree with the primary colors part. It should just be "Brown - Why it Is The Only Choice"
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.