Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Motor Rock

    Game » consists of 1 releases. Released Dec 16, 2013

    An isometric racing game for PC that began as a fan remake of the 1993 Blizzard game Rock N' Roll Racing. It drew heavy criticism when it briefly came to Steam as a commercial release in 2013, with many overt references to the original game unchanged; it is now available only as a free download.

    So this is a pretty blatant rip-off.

    • 50 results
    • 1
    • 2
    Avatar image for machofantastico
    MachoFantastico

    6762

    Forum Posts

    24

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 73

    User Lists: 4

    #1  Edited By MachoFantastico

    Heard about a little game called Rock and Roll Racing?
    Apparently this is on Steam? What the hell are Valve doing these days, allowing this to get onto Steam.

    Avatar image for impartialgecko
    impartialgecko

    1964

    Forum Posts

    27

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 15

    User Lists: 2

    #2  Edited By impartialgecko

    Greenlit? Greenlit.

    Avatar image for capum15
    Capum15

    6019

    Forum Posts

    411

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #3  Edited By Capum15

    That's uh...hmm.

    Avatar image for kowalskimandown
    KowalskiManDown

    4170

    Forum Posts

    3525

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 19

    #4  Edited By KowalskiManDown

    Jeff needs to QL this.

    Avatar image for chaser324
    chaser324

    9416

    Forum Posts

    14945

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 15

    #5  Edited By chaser324  Moderator

    So...is this officially affiliated with the Rock n' Roll racing license, or is this a case of some Russian studio intentionally misleading people? When I saw this game on Steam, I of course immediately thought it was just a blatant rip-off, but the written description kinda confused me:

    Motor Rock recreates the spirit and gameplay of the best oldschool 90’s race games. And The Rock’n’Roll Racing is certainly leader among them.

    Notice the mention of "The Rock'n'Roll Racing".

    Also, I noticed that somebody added this game to the Rock 'n Roll Racing page on Wikipedia. Seems sketchy as hell.

    EDIT: Alright, now that I've watched the video, this seems even more sketchy. I would ask how this managed to make its way onto Steam, but at this point I'm more curious about how it hasn't been pulled.

    Avatar image for alanm26v5
    alanm26v5

    557

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 9

    This is stickied in the game's steam forum, written by the developer.

    The game has no copyright issues , since negotiations with Blizzard were , and allowed the company YardTeam to publish the game with the condition a change in name . Blizzard does not want to announce it . Please do not create more threads with similar questions and statements , since many times it's all been said . In the future such topics will be deleted . I also want to note that almost all of the content created by the developers of the game again. The game does not use Blizzard's labels and does not use the content of the original game too (we left the original voice acting commentator at the request of fans of the game , it's ok ) . Thank you.

    Yeah...

    Avatar image for wolfgame
    Wolfgame

    1168

    Forum Posts

    252

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #7  Edited By Wolfgame

    Did the company scrub some of the complaints from their website. This youtube guy suggested they had a clear FAQ where they said something to the effect of, "yea we don't have a license, but no one has complained" . I couldn't find that anywhere, I am not saying it didn't happen. It looks like they have completely locked their english message board also.

    EDIT: Oh steam, I see I went to their official homepage, but that is pretty damning to have on your games own steam page

    Avatar image for christoffer
    Christoffer

    2409

    Forum Posts

    58

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    This is stickied in the game's steam forum, written by the developer.

    The game has no copyright issues , since negotiations with Blizzard were , and allowed the company YardTeam to publish the game with the condition a change in name . Blizzard does not want to announce it . Please do not create more threads with similar questions and statements , since many times it's all been said . In the future such topics will be deleted . I also want to note that almost all of the content created by the developers of the game again. The game does not use Blizzard's labels and does not use the content of the original game too (we left the original voice acting commentator at the request of fans of the game , it's ok ) . Thank you.

    Yeah...

    Can someone please re-write this sentence so I can understand what it means.

    Avatar image for hamst3r
    Hamst3r

    5520

    Forum Posts

    7837

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 2

    #9  Edited By Hamst3r

    For anyone else who was a bit confused like I was upon first reading this thread, here are some pictures that should make everything a bit more clear:

    Rock and Roll RacingMotor Rock
    No Caption Provided
    No Caption Provided
    No Caption Provided
    No Caption Provided
    Airblade
    Airblade
    Viper
    Viper
    Viper
    Viper
    Marauder
    Marauder
    No Caption Provided

    Avatar image for wolfgame
    Wolfgame

    1168

    Forum Posts

    252

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    I personally don't like pitchfork armies started by prolific youtubers, but I did some digging and here's another recent post on their forums

    As for Larry - yes, there is a chance to get to the head from Blizzard. But also, if you have not read fixed subject in this section of the forum - were conducted negotiations with Blizzard, and us were allowed to publish the game under a different name. We changed the name because Blizzard does not want any of the fans had been misled, and that's all. And I can say that the talks were in a fairly warm environment, and hardly Blizzard will put forward any claim to game.

    It could be that more than anything it is simply a difficulty in language barrier. It seems like they may not be fully understanding the question, but regardless of that it sounds like a conversation was had with Blizzard, whether or not they are now capable of performing the legalese speak required to satisfy youtube armies is another question.

    Avatar image for chaser324
    chaser324

    9416

    Forum Posts

    14945

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 15

    #11  Edited By chaser324  Moderator

    @christoffer: I think they were trying to say that they created almost all of the content in the game (the music covers, graphics, etc.). They only blatantly stole the announcer audio and sound effects from the original Rock 'n Roll Racing...and they probably didn't license those songs...and the extent to which they just cloned almost everything is pretty insane too.

    I just don't understand why they would do all of this stuff. You could totally make a great game inspired by Rock 'n Roll Racing in a way that doesn't cross into this copyright infringement territory. Why would you risk putting so much effort into something that there's a high probability could get shut down by legal teams from multi-billion dollar companies.

    If they were just giving this game away for free as a fan project, I would fully support it, but the fact that they're selling this is crazy.

    Avatar image for bisonhero
    BisonHero

    12794

    Forum Posts

    625

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    Hey guys, hardly Blizzard will put forward any claim to game. Don't worry about.

    Avatar image for oldmanlight
    OldManLight

    1328

    Forum Posts

    177

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 9

    @hamst3r: holy crap. If that's not someone stealing IP, i don't know what is.

    Avatar image for cmblasko
    cmblasko

    2955

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    Sure, I can definitely believe that Activision-Blizzard would let some faceless developer infringe upon their IP without any form of compensation.

    Avatar image for chaser324
    chaser324

    9416

    Forum Posts

    14945

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 15

    #15  Edited By chaser324  Moderator

    @bisonhero: I find this line from their statement kinda hilarious -

    (we left the original voice acting commentator at the request of fans of the game , it's ok ) .

    We left in assets we stole from a Genesis game at the request of fans...but hey, it's ok.

    Avatar image for alternate
    alternate

    3040

    Forum Posts

    1390

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    They claim it is authorised. You will know if it is true eventually, if it goes on sale without a Cease and Dissist.

    Avatar image for rethdakair
    rethdakair

    2

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #17  Edited By rethdakair

    Yesterday, they removed the annoncer, change the names of all the drivers. Today their website is in reconstruction.

    At first, they were aiming for a freeware without any exit on Steam or other, seems like it changed somewhere on the road.

    The game is really good, but has many glitches in multi player. I do recommand it and hope they will settle everything with Blizzard, because I was waiting for a game like that for several years.

    Avatar image for artisanbreads
    ArtisanBreads

    9107

    Forum Posts

    154

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 6

    This is a great idea for a game, not sure why they needed to so clearly copy the original. Just make the appropriate tweaks.

    Avatar image for bisonhero
    BisonHero

    12794

    Forum Posts

    625

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 2

    @artisanbreads said:

    This is a great idea for a game, not sure why they needed to so clearly copy the original. Just make the appropriate tweaks.

    I'm pretty sure China and Russia just don't have designers of anything, ever. So nope, no original character designs/game ideas. They have mountains of coders and artists, but since producing an original idea is forbidden by law, those coders and artists must instead create games using the characters and game ideas others have created. No exceptions.

    Avatar image for egg
    egg

    1666

    Forum Posts

    23283

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 10

    I don't see the big deal... presumably this "ripoff" took more time/effort to create than the original.

    Also, it's funny how the youtube video in the OP, has a 1 minute 10 second ad, when all he is doing is posting footage of games other people made. Now who's milking the fruits of others' labor?

    Avatar image for likeassur
    LikeaSsur

    1625

    Forum Posts

    517

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #21  Edited By LikeaSsur

    @egg said:

    I don't see the big deal... presumably this "ripoff" took more time/effort to create than the original.

    You don't see the big deal in blatant copyright infringement? Who cares how long it took, you don't steal people's work.

    Avatar image for egg
    egg

    1666

    Forum Posts

    23283

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 10

    @egg said:

    I don't see the big deal... presumably this "ripoff" took more time/effort to create than the original.

    You don't see the big deal in blatant copyright infringement? Who cares how long it took, you don't steal people's work.

    They didn't steal work though.. the entire game had to have been made from scratch.

    Avatar image for hatking
    hatking

    7673

    Forum Posts

    82

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #23  Edited By hatking

    If they hadn't pulled content directly, this would probably be totally fine regardless if they had permission. But, it sounds like they did? Or, that guy is playing the "shut up, we got permission" card in hopes that nobody tells Blizzard or whoever now owns the rights.

    Avatar image for jeanluc
    jeanluc

    4066

    Forum Posts

    7939

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 13

    #24 jeanluc  Staff

    @egg said:

    @likeassur said:

    @egg said:

    I don't see the big deal... presumably this "ripoff" took more time/effort to create than the original.

    You don't see the big deal in blatant copyright infringement? Who cares how long it took, you don't steal people's work.

    They didn't steal work though.. the entire game had to have been made from scratch.

    Did you watch the video? They took the narrator voice tracks right from the old game. And that music... oh boy.

    Avatar image for egg
    egg

    1666

    Forum Posts

    23283

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 10

    @jeanluc said:

    @egg said:

    @likeassur said:

    @egg said:

    I don't see the big deal... presumably this "ripoff" took more time/effort to create than the original.

    You don't see the big deal in blatant copyright infringement? Who cares how long it took, you don't steal people's work.

    They didn't steal work though.. the entire game had to have been made from scratch.

    Did you watch the video? They took the narrator voice tracks right from the old game. And that music... oh boy.

    Ok maybe the music... but that aside... why does this offend us? If it is an SNES game... and if no official remake happened for over a decade... and if it benefits us as gamers to have a new classic racer to play.

    And for that matter, why is it bad for devs to make a homage to a game we all love, and make some money off of it, yet it's ok for Youtubers to make money off playthroughs/footage of games as if it's their God given right?

    It's not like we're taking the side of the little guy, since apparently Rock'n'Roll Racing is owned by BLIZZARD

    Avatar image for zombie_bigdaddy
    zombie_bigdaddy

    141

    Forum Posts

    14

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    Yesterday, they removed the annoncer, change the names of all the drivers. Today their website is in reconstruction.

    At first, they were aiming for a freeware without any exit on Steam or other, seems like it changed somewhere on the road.

    The game is really good, but has many glitches in multi player. I do recommand it and hope they will settle everything with Blizzard, because I was waiting for a game like that for several years.

    Something seems odd about this post lol.

    Avatar image for ll_exile_ll
    ll_Exile_ll

    3386

    Forum Posts

    25

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    @egg said:

    @jeanluc said:

    @egg said:

    @likeassur said:

    @egg said:

    I don't see the big deal... presumably this "ripoff" took more time/effort to create than the original.

    You don't see the big deal in blatant copyright infringement? Who cares how long it took, you don't steal people's work.

    They didn't steal work though.. the entire game had to have been made from scratch.

    Did you watch the video? They took the narrator voice tracks right from the old game. And that music... oh boy.

    Ok maybe the music... but that aside... why does this offend us? If it is an SNES game... and if no official remake happened for over a decade... and if it benefits us as gamers to have a new classic racer to play.

    And for that matter, why is it bad for devs to make a homage to a game we all love, and make some money off of it, yet it's ok for Youtubers to make money off playthroughs/footage of games as if it's their God given right?

    It's not like we're taking the side of the little guy, since apparently Rock'n'Roll Racing is owned by BLIZZARD

    So, you're saying basically copying the entire design doc of an old game and creating new assets to sell for a profit is fine, but doing an editorial video and making money off of it isn't? You do realize what website your on, right?

    If you have such a problem with professional video game critics using game footage in an editorial/first impression capacity and being paid to do so, you must hate Giant Bomb (and every other video game website in existence).

    Avatar image for development
    development

    3749

    Forum Posts

    61

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #28  Edited By development

    I was willing to defend these guys until I heard the voice track and the music. That changes things from "homage" to "we're trying to pass this off as an official remake." I can appreciate the time and effort that went into this game, but you just can't go and take assets from another game without asking and sell it with your game, even if you are merely paying homage. Regardless of whether you think it's "right" or "wrong," it's illegal... and stupid.

    edit:

    @zombie_bigdaddy

    @rethdakair said:

    Yesterday, they removed the annoncer, change the names of all the drivers. Today their website is in reconstruction.

    At first, they were aiming for a freeware without any exit on Steam or other, seems like it changed somewhere on the road.

    The game is really good, but has many glitches in multi player. I do recommand it and hope they will settle everything with Blizzard, because I was waiting for a game like that for several years.

    Something seems odd about this post lol.

    Hah, yeah. If it's true that they removed the announcer and are making changes, then I guess they're doing what needs to be done, though. The game doesn't actually look bad, to be honest, but then again I always despised those isometric racing games. Can't stomach what seems to me to just be a terrible camera angle.

    Avatar image for hailinel
    Hailinel

    25785

    Forum Posts

    219681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 28

    @egg said:

    @jeanluc said:

    @egg said:

    @likeassur said:

    @egg said:

    I don't see the big deal... presumably this "ripoff" took more time/effort to create than the original.

    You don't see the big deal in blatant copyright infringement? Who cares how long it took, you don't steal people's work.

    They didn't steal work though.. the entire game had to have been made from scratch.

    Did you watch the video? They took the narrator voice tracks right from the old game. And that music... oh boy.

    Ok maybe the music... but that aside... why does this offend us? If it is an SNES game... and if no official remake happened for over a decade... and if it benefits us as gamers to have a new classic racer to play.

    And for that matter, why is it bad for devs to make a homage to a game we all love, and make some money off of it, yet it's ok for Youtubers to make money off playthroughs/footage of games as if it's their God given right?

    It's not like we're taking the side of the little guy, since apparently Rock'n'Roll Racing is owned by BLIZZARD

    The developers blatantly ripped audio from Blizzard's game to use in their own without Blizzard's permission. This isn't a case of the little guy going up against the big nasty corporation. This is about straight-up theft of assets and designs that, while put together to make what is apparently a fun game and decent homage to Rock n' Roll Racing, is still illegal. The people that made this game could have come up with their own vehicle and character designs, their own announcer audio, and could have properly licensed music for the soundtrack, but they didn't. It's a game that is built on content that they had no legal right to utilize.

    Avatar image for egg
    egg

    1666

    Forum Posts

    23283

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 10

    #30  Edited By egg

    @ll_exile_ll said:

    @egg said:

    @jeanluc said:

    @egg said:

    @likeassur said:

    @egg said:

    I don't see the big deal... presumably this "ripoff" took more time/effort to create than the original.

    You don't see the big deal in blatant copyright infringement? Who cares how long it took, you don't steal people's work.

    They didn't steal work though.. the entire game had to have been made from scratch.

    Did you watch the video? They took the narrator voice tracks right from the old game. And that music... oh boy.

    Ok maybe the music... but that aside... why does this offend us? If it is an SNES game... and if no official remake happened for over a decade... and if it benefits us as gamers to have a new classic racer to play.

    And for that matter, why is it bad for devs to make a homage to a game we all love, and make some money off of it, yet it's ok for Youtubers to make money off playthroughs/footage of games as if it's their God given right?

    It's not like we're taking the side of the little guy, since apparently Rock'n'Roll Racing is owned by BLIZZARD

    So, you're saying basically copying the entire design doc of an old game and creating new assets to sell for a profit is fine, but doing an editorial video and making money off of it isn't? You do realize what website your on, right?

    If you have such a problem with professional video game critics using game footage in an editorial/first impression capacity and being paid to do so, you must hate Giant Bomb (and every other video game website in existence).

    "So, you're saying basically copying the entire design doc of an old game"

    Since when is this a bad thing? If someone made a CoD clone nobody would bat an eye.

    "you must hate Giant Bomb (and every other video game website in existence)."

    I'm not saying people are wrong to want money from youtube vids, I'm just pointing out the double standard here. If someone posted a "Let's Play" (ugh) of RocknRoll Racing for the SNES they would get ad money and everyone would act like this is the way it should be, then they'd turn around and villainize someone who did actual work, and who took the time to create something.

    Avatar image for tsutohiro
    tsutohiro

    371

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #31  Edited By tsutohiro

    Nice to see someone paying attention. Too bad it isn't Steam.

    "We've had no complaints yet."

    ...Wait for it.

    Avatar image for joshwent
    joshwent

    2897

    Forum Posts

    2987

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    @egg said:

    Since when is this a bad thing? If someone made a CoD clone nobody would bat an eye.

    It depends on what you mean. If you're saying CoD clone, as in Doom clone, as in... another military first-person shooter, you're right, no one would care. However, if a game came out that said it was highly influenced by the original CoD, mentioned that game a lot in their press material, had a lot of the same missions, weapons, squadmates, and maps from the game, used ACTUAL audio from CoD... and then somehow got on Steam?!

    The internet would loose its shit. And rightfully so.

    Also, to clarify, Rock'n'Roll Racing is owned by Blizzard because it was made by Blizzard (then called Silicon &Synapse).

    Loading Video...

    Avatar image for ll_exile_ll
    ll_Exile_ll

    3386

    Forum Posts

    25

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    @egg said:

    @ll_exile_ll said:

    @egg said:

    @jeanluc said:

    @egg said:

    @likeassur said:

    @egg said:

    I don't see the big deal... presumably this "ripoff" took more time/effort to create than the original.

    You don't see the big deal in blatant copyright infringement? Who cares how long it took, you don't steal people's work.

    They didn't steal work though.. the entire game had to have been made from scratch.

    Did you watch the video? They took the narrator voice tracks right from the old game. And that music... oh boy.

    Ok maybe the music... but that aside... why does this offend us? If it is an SNES game... and if no official remake happened for over a decade... and if it benefits us as gamers to have a new classic racer to play.

    And for that matter, why is it bad for devs to make a homage to a game we all love, and make some money off of it, yet it's ok for Youtubers to make money off playthroughs/footage of games as if it's their God given right?

    It's not like we're taking the side of the little guy, since apparently Rock'n'Roll Racing is owned by BLIZZARD

    So, you're saying basically copying the entire design doc of an old game and creating new assets to sell for a profit is fine, but doing an editorial video and making money off of it isn't? You do realize what website your on, right?

    If you have such a problem with professional video game critics using game footage in an editorial/first impression capacity and being paid to do so, you must hate Giant Bomb (and every other video game website in existence).

    "So, you're saying basically copying the entire design doc of an old game"

    Since when is this a bad thing? If someone made a CoD clone nobody would bat an eye.

    "you must hate Giant Bomb (and every other video game website in existence)."

    I'm not saying people are wrong to want money from youtube vids, I'm just pointing out the double standard here. If someone posted a "Let's Play" (ugh) of RocknRoll Racing for the SNES they would get ad money and everyone would act like this is the way it should be, then they'd turn around and villainize someone who did actual work, and who took the time to create something.

    I don't see how the amount of work someone puts into something even remotely correlates to legitimacy. Putting aside your extremely over simplification of how much work goes into putting out professional quality gaming videos on a regular basis, how does saying the developers put a lot of work into their rip-off game do anything to make up for the fact that it's a rip off.

    I bet it takes a shit load of work to plan and successfully pull off a bank heist or to produce counterfeit money that could pass as the real thing, but the amount of effort it takes doesn't make those activities anything but illegal.

    Avatar image for crithon
    crithon

    3979

    Forum Posts

    1823

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    #34  Edited By crithon

    Blizzard getting ripped off, well that's what I called KARMA!!!!!

    You know this genre is so under used, I keep wondering why Rare didn't go back to RC Pro Am for 360 XBLA ONLINE PLAY!!!!

    Avatar image for hailinel
    Hailinel

    25785

    Forum Posts

    219681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 28

    #35  Edited By Hailinel

    @crithon said:

    Blizzard getting ripped off, well that's what I called KARMA!!!!!

    You know this genre is so under used, I keep wondering why Rare didn't go back to RC Pro Am for 360 XBLA ONLINE PLAY!!!!

    Karma for what?

    And Rare likely hasn't made an XBLA RC Pro Am because any talent that might have had interest in such has either left the studio or acquiesced to Microsoft's turning the studio in a a Kinect game salt mine.

    Avatar image for crithon
    crithon

    3979

    Forum Posts

    1823

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    Avatar image for veektarius
    veektarius

    6420

    Forum Posts

    45

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 1

    @hailinel: I'm sure he's referring to the fact they 'adapted' Games Workshop licenses when creating Starcraft after they lost they license to make a WH40k game. (For what it's worth, I like DoW way better than Starcraft)

    Avatar image for egg
    egg

    1666

    Forum Posts

    23283

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 10

    @egg said:

    @ll_exile_ll said:

    @egg said:

    @jeanluc said:

    @egg said:

    @likeassur said:

    @egg said:

    I don't see the big deal... presumably this "ripoff" took more time/effort to create than the original.

    You don't see the big deal in blatant copyright infringement? Who cares how long it took, you don't steal people's work.

    They didn't steal work though.. the entire game had to have been made from scratch.

    Did you watch the video? They took the narrator voice tracks right from the old game. And that music... oh boy.

    Ok maybe the music... but that aside... why does this offend us? If it is an SNES game... and if no official remake happened for over a decade... and if it benefits us as gamers to have a new classic racer to play.

    And for that matter, why is it bad for devs to make a homage to a game we all love, and make some money off of it, yet it's ok for Youtubers to make money off playthroughs/footage of games as if it's their God given right?

    It's not like we're taking the side of the little guy, since apparently Rock'n'Roll Racing is owned by BLIZZARD

    So, you're saying basically copying the entire design doc of an old game and creating new assets to sell for a profit is fine, but doing an editorial video and making money off of it isn't? You do realize what website your on, right?

    If you have such a problem with professional video game critics using game footage in an editorial/first impression capacity and being paid to do so, you must hate Giant Bomb (and every other video game website in existence).

    "So, you're saying basically copying the entire design doc of an old game"

    Since when is this a bad thing? If someone made a CoD clone nobody would bat an eye.

    "you must hate Giant Bomb (and every other video game website in existence)."

    I'm not saying people are wrong to want money from youtube vids, I'm just pointing out the double standard here. If someone posted a "Let's Play" (ugh) of RocknRoll Racing for the SNES they would get ad money and everyone would act like this is the way it should be, then they'd turn around and villainize someone who did actual work, and who took the time to create something.

    I don't see how the amount of work someone puts into something even remotely correlates to legitimacy. Putting aside your extremely over simplification of how much work goes into putting out professional quality gaming videos on a regular basis, how does saying the developers put a lot of work into their rip-off game do anything to make up for the fact that it's a rip off.

    I bet it takes a shit load of work to plan and successfully pull off a bank heist or to produce counterfeit money that could pass as the real thing, but the amount of effort it takes doesn't make those activities anything but illegal.

    That's what I was about to say ... the game makers didn't exactly break into a bank or murder anyone, they created a videogame. If they wanted to leech off an IP, there might have been more insidious and profitable ways of doing so, rather than reviving a 90s SNES isometric racer.

    That said, I'm not saying they had the right to rip off the music, nor that it was a good idea on their part... but that maybe we should just let Blizzard handle it.

    Avatar image for fredchuckdave
    Fredchuckdave

    10824

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #39  Edited By Fredchuckdave

    This game looks great, who doesn't love rock and roll racing?

    Avatar image for magicwalnuts
    magicwalnuts

    135

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    I am not offended by this game's existence, whatsoever. Also, it looks like a lot of fun. More Rock and Roll Racing? Cool!

    Avatar image for reisz
    reisz

    1626

    Forum Posts

    1095

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #41  Edited By reisz

    @christoffer said:

    @alanm26v5 said:

    This is stickied in the game's steam forum, written by the developer.

    The game has no copyright issues , since negotiations with Blizzard were , and allowed the company YardTeam to publish the game with the condition a change in name . Blizzard does not want to announce it . Please do not create more threads with similar questions and statements , since many times it's all been said . In the future such topics will be deleted . I also want to note that almost all of the content created by the developers of the game again. The game does not use Blizzard's labels and does not use the content of the original game too (we left the original voice acting commentator at the request of fans of the game , it's ok ) . Thank you.

    Yeah...

    Can someone please re-write this sentence so I can understand what it means.

    "We stole the idea and some of the assets outright and don't want Blizzard to know about it. We're pretty much just anticipating that since no one really cares about Rock and Roll Racing anymore, we can get away with it."

    I'm not going to buy it by any stretch but is it any good? If it actually plays like Rock and Roll Racing I might have to give it a shot one of these days.

    Avatar image for schrodngrsfalco
    SchrodngrsFalco

    4618

    Forum Posts

    454

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 7

    Intellectual property... that is all...

    Avatar image for hailinel
    Hailinel

    25785

    Forum Posts

    219681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 28

    @hailinel: I'm sure he's referring to the fact they 'adapted' Games Workshop licenses when creating Starcraft after they lost they license to make a WH40k game. (For what it's worth, I like DoW way better than Starcraft)

    If that's the case, I didn't even know about it.

    @crithon said:

    @hailinel: oh come on, really?

    Yes, really.

    Avatar image for nekroskop
    Nekroskop

    2830

    Forum Posts

    47

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    I don't get why people are upset. It's not like Blizzard would ever do something other than WoW, Starcraft and Diablo these days. Activision have them by the balls and intend to squeeze all the money out of them until they dry up. Small projects with a low profit margin are squashed. Let the fans have their "spiritual successor"

    Avatar image for doctorchimp
    Doctorchimp

    4190

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #45  Edited By Doctorchimp

    I don't get why people are upset. It's not like Blizzard would ever do something other than WoW, Starcraft and Diablo these days. Activision have them by the balls and intend to squeeze all the money out of them until they dry up. Small projects with a low profit margin are squashed. Let the fans have their "spiritual successor"

    A spiritual successor would be something like Mighty Number no. 9, or even that fantastic looking 3D Chrono Trigger remake that got shut down for no reason when the small team behind was going to release it for free.

    This is a company that wanted to make money off of ideas that weren't their's nor was it anything they had a right to.

    Avatar image for nekroskop
    Nekroskop

    2830

    Forum Posts

    47

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    @nekroskop said:

    I don't get why people are upset. It's not like Blizzard would ever do something other than WoW, Starcraft and Diablo these days. Activision have them by the balls and intend to squeeze all the money out of them until they dry up. Small projects with a low profit margin are squashed. Let the fans have their "spiritual successor"

    A spiritual successor would be something like Mighty Number no. 9, or even that fantastic looking 3D Chrono Trigger remake that got shut down for no reason when the small team behind was going to release it for free.

    This is a company that wanted to make money off of ideas that weren't their's nor was it anything they had a right to.

    Don't remind me....

    Avatar image for animasta
    Animasta

    14948

    Forum Posts

    3563

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 5

    #48  Edited By Animasta

    @artisanbreads said:

    This is a great idea for a game, not sure why they needed to so clearly copy the original. Just make the appropriate tweaks.

    I'm pretty sure China and Russia just don't have designers of anything, ever. So nope, no original character designs/game ideas. They have mountains of coders and artists, but since producing an original idea is forbidden by law, those coders and artists must instead create games using the characters and game ideas others have created. No exceptions.

    Yo that is blatantly untrue. Ice Pick Lodge, makers of fine games like The Void or Pathologic or 'fine' games like Cargo: The Quest for Gravity live in Moscow. Hell, 1C's entire catalog pretty much.

    Avatar image for connerthekewlkid
    connerthekewlkid

    1873

    Forum Posts

    31

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    @hailinel said:

    @crithon said:

    Blizzard getting ripped off, well that's what I called KARMA!!!!!

    You know this genre is so under used, I keep wondering why Rare didn't go back to RC Pro Am for 360 XBLA ONLINE PLAY!!!!

    Karma for what?

    And Rare likely hasn't made an XBLA RC Pro Am because any talent that might have had interest in such has either left the studio or acquiesced to Microsoft's turning the studio in a a Kinect game salt mine.

    Or because that could never translate well into a modern game.

    Avatar image for crithon
    crithon

    3979

    Forum Posts

    1823

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    @hailinel: well a. everyone and their mother has a axe to grind with blizzard and they haven't done anything to please them. b. I have a few friends who work in blizzard as animators and confess they do "barrow from other artists" and c. this is a genre of game we haven't seen in a long time so people do want a revival of some kind. That's what I mean by karma

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.