Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    PC

    Platform »

    The PC (Personal Computer) is a highly configurable and upgradable gaming platform that, among home systems, sports the widest variety of control methods, largest library of games, and cutting edge graphics and sound capabilities.

    Screens!

    Avatar image for nekusakuraba
    NekuSakuraba

    7810

    Forum Posts

    1670

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #1  Edited By NekuSakuraba

    So guys I was wondering a few things about screens and maybe you guys could help? Firstly, is it worth getting a 3D monitor if you are not using 3D? I'm aware they have a rate of 120hz but what benefit does that give when not in 3D?

    Also when it comes to screen resolutions which is the best and what determines the resolution? I've never taken much notice of screens of resolution (even I'm a pc gamer) since they didnt seem like a big deal but I guess they are. I curenntly have a 1680 x 1050 screen, should I upgrade to a higher resolution?

    Thanks.

    Avatar image for nekusakuraba
    NekuSakuraba

    7810

    Forum Posts

    1670

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #2  Edited By NekuSakuraba

    Bump!

    Avatar image for winsord
    winsord

    1642

    Forum Posts

    86

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 13

    #3  Edited By winsord

    Don't get a 3D monitor if you're not using 3D. As for resolutions, it's determined by the size and aspect ratio of your monitor. Essentially if you wanted a higher resolution, you'd be looking at buying a bigger monitor than the 22", 16:10 monitor you have now. So, only buy a new monitor if you just want a bigger one.

    Avatar image for nekusakuraba
    NekuSakuraba

    7810

    Forum Posts

    1670

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #4  Edited By NekuSakuraba

    @Winsord said:

    Don't get a 3D monitor if you're not using 3D. As for resolutions, it's determined by the size and aspect ratio of your monitor. Essentially if you wanted a higher resolution, you'd be looking at buying a bigger monitor than the 22", 16:10 monitor you have now. So, only buy a new monitor if you just want a bigger one.

    So what is the best resolution to go for? My current specs are -

    Intel Core i7 920 2.66Ghz

    Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5

    2 x GTX 570

    Corsair 6GB Kit (3x2GB), PC-12800 (1600MHz) DDR3

    Western Digital 1TB, Caviar Black, SATA-II, 7200RPM, 32MB Cache

    HAF 932

    So I want something to do it justice in terms of resolution.

    Avatar image for adz117
    adz117

    140

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #5  Edited By adz117

    There isn't really a best resolution, your setup will be able to handle most games on a 26" in native resolution which I think is 1920x1200

    Avatar image for nekusakuraba
    NekuSakuraba

    7810

    Forum Posts

    1670

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #6  Edited By NekuSakuraba

    @adz117 said:

    There isn't really a best resolution, your setup will be able to handle most games on a 26" in native resolution which I think is 1920x1200

    Does it look significantly better? I'd imagine a drop in frame rate so is it really worth it?

    Avatar image for winsord
    winsord

    1642

    Forum Posts

    86

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 13

    #7  Edited By winsord

    Well, for your computer specs, you could go for a 2560x1600 monitor which is a 30" but you will notice frame rate differences. I mean, from a 22" there's not much upgrade room without a big leap. You could go for a 24" but then that's not much of an upgrade, 26" monitors hardly exist at all, so you would be going for a 27" monitor at that point. You're always going to be looking at performance drops when buying a bigger monitor, but with your rig a 27" definitely be manageable. It really comes down to what's more important to you in terms of slightly higher frame rates or a relatively substantial size upgrade.

    Avatar image for ghooble
    Ghooble

    84

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #8  Edited By Ghooble

    I believe there are 24" monitors nowadays that can be full 1080p (1920x1080). So if you don't want a massive monitor, but higher resolution that is what I would shoot for. And yes, you do see a good difference when you up resolutions, try opening up your game of choice: Knock the resolution down to 1280x720 (720p), play with it for 10minutes, then put it back to 1680x1050. You will most definitely see the change. 
    -Ghooble

    Avatar image for nekusakuraba
    NekuSakuraba

    7810

    Forum Posts

    1670

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #9  Edited By NekuSakuraba

    @Winsord said:

    Well, for your computer specs, you could go for a 2560x1600 monitor which is a 30" but you will notice frame rate differences. I mean, from a 22" there's not much upgrade room without a big leap. You could go for a 24" but then that's not much of an upgrade, 26" monitors hardly exist at all, so you would be going for a 27" monitor at that point. You're always going to be looking at performance drops when buying a bigger monitor, but with your rig a 27" definitely be manageable. It really comes down to what's more important to you in terms of slightly higher frame rates or a relatively substantial size upgrade.

    So if 1920 x 1080 is full 1080p what is 2560x1600?

    Avatar image for garfield518
    Garfield518

    426

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #10  Edited By Garfield518

    @NekuSakuraba said:

    So if 1920 x 1080 is full 1080p what is 2560x1600?

    1600p.

    Did I blow your mind?

    Avatar image for ghooble
    Ghooble

    84

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #11  Edited By Ghooble

    There are resolutions above 1080p. They just get retardedly huge. There is "Full aperture 4k" which is 4096x3112. But as Garfield said, that would be 1600p. 
    -Ghooble

    Avatar image for nekusakuraba
    NekuSakuraba

    7810

    Forum Posts

    1670

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #12  Edited By NekuSakuraba

    @Garfield518 said:

    @NekuSakuraba said:

    So if 1920 x 1080 is full 1080p what is 2560x1600?

    1600p.

    Did I blow your mind?

    Isn't 1600 lower? >_>

    Avatar image for garfield518
    Garfield518

    426

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #13  Edited By Garfield518

    @NekuSakuraba said:

    @Garfield518 said:

    @NekuSakuraba said:

    So if 1920 x 1080 is full 1080p what is 2560x1600?

    1600p.

    Did I blow your mind?

    Isn't 1600 lower? >_>

    I don't know where you're from where 1080 is a higher number than 1600.

    Avatar image for nekusakuraba
    NekuSakuraba

    7810

    Forum Posts

    1670

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #14  Edited By NekuSakuraba

    @Garfield518 said:

    @NekuSakuraba said:

    @Garfield518 said:

    @NekuSakuraba said:

    So if 1920 x 1080 is full 1080p what is 2560x1600?

    1600p.

    Did I blow your mind?

    Isn't 1600 lower? >_>

    I don't know where you're from where 1080 is a higher number than 1600.

    *facepalm*

    For some reason I thought it was 1060. xD or maybe it was I thought 1080 was 1800?...

    I don't even know how that happened. Shit.

    Avatar image for ghooble
    Ghooble

    84

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #15  Edited By Ghooble
    @NekuSakuraba: FAAAAIL xD 
    -Ghooble
    Avatar image for thekeyboarddemon
    TheKeyboardDemon

    870

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #16  Edited By TheKeyboardDemon

    In terms of screen resolutions there are so many different options out there, for most PC gamers some of the most popular/common modes are:- 
     

    NameResolutionRatioNumber of Pixels
    SXGA1280x10244:3
    1,310,720
    SXGA+1400x1050
    4:3
    1,470,000
    WSXGA (SGI1600)1600x1024
    25:16
    1,638,400
    WSXGA+1680x1050
    16:10
    1,764,000
    HD1920x108016:9
    2,073,600
    WUXGA1920x120016:10
     2,304,600
    WQHD (As used on Dell Ultrasharp 27" IPS screen)
    2560x1440
    16:9
    3,686,400
    WQXGA2560x160016:104,096,000
    3 screens (3 across for Eyefinity on ATi cards with HD screens - my current setup)
    5760x1080
    16:3 6,220,800
    3 screens (3 across for Eyefinity on ATi cards with WQHD screens)5760x1200
    24:5
     6,912,000
    UHDTV (I don't know anyone that uses this or has the hardware to support it)
    7680x4320
    16:9
    33,177,600
     
    With your setup, if you have the budget, you might want to consider the WQHD or the WQXGA screens. Dell's Ultrasharp monitors are considered to be the best of these monitors by many here are reviews for the Dell UltraSharp U2711 27" screen and the Dell UltraSharp U3011 30" monitor.
     
    ** Edit ** I know that nVidia also offer some multiscreen support options and 3D options as well, but I have to say I don't know much about these.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.