@theht That was a very good video. Thank you for sharing. I really enjoyed this part
"Ideologues are creating a stage for constant, artificial high drama, where everybody is either a magnificent hero or a sickening villain... The great thing about social media is that it gave a voice to voiceless people but we're now creating a surveillance society, where the smartest way to survive is to go back to being voiceless."
I guess it begs the question that if anybody can misconstrue what you say or your meaning in any way, should you bother to express your opinion at all? Or should you just keep quiet? Is there a place for objection, of criticism of popular beliefs, of being negative, or being insensitive and ignorant because sharing your ideas will mark you as a "sickening villain"?
There should be a place for discourse on a wide scale, not limited to a small community like Giant Bomb. To share ideas without immediately being judged and dehumanized as a demon. Twitter is not that. Even the structure of Giant Bomb doesn't allow for that. There are definitely things I can't talk about because sharing these opinions and my ignorance would label me lesser making me ripe for defamation and humiliation. Even I change what I write based on how it will be perceived by the Giant Bomb audience. I participate here on Giant Bomb because I'm more familiar with the community and the community's ideals. But on Twitter and elsewhere, I choose to be voiceless because I'd rather avoid confrontation than willingly invite it.
edit: this post sounds really preachy, sorry bout that
Log in to comment