Something went wrong. Try again later

hurrikenux

This user has not updated recently.

50 0 0 0
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

hurrikenux's forum posts

Avatar image for hurrikenux
hurrikenux

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By hurrikenux

@MattyFTM said:

I don't think you're living in the real world. Not everyone has the ability to save up thousands of dollars for "what if..." scenarios. Some people struggle to get by with their kids having a decent standard of living and just can't save money for hypothetical scenarios. Heck, when I was a kid it would be rare for my mother to have more than £100 in her bank account. And she certainly didn't have enough spare cash to save up in case somehow her bank account got accessed and someone took all her money. She spent every penny trying to give me the best standard of living she could. We had an OK standard of living, but if she had saved up money just in case something bad would happen we would have pretty much down to our bare bones. She was a single parent. There wasn't a lot else she could do.

I don't know enough about Susan's situation to make a judgement either way about her financial situation, but saying her kids are fucked just because the family is a little low on money is just flat out dumb.

This is correct, some of us single parents barely make enough to make ends meet and used trade-ins and gift cards to procure an XBOX so that we can have some semblance of a social life. What, do we have to be single neckbeards jacking off into our hands to be able to have an XBOX? Thanks for saying this Matty, although the jerk replied.

@EightBitShik said:

@MattyFTM: Their mom buying Xbox360 games when she doesn't have enough set aside for an emergency is what makes them "fucked" and stupid. If this bitch was working hard everyday and just had a bad job then yeah I can understand it. But don't cry to me about you can't afford to feed your kids when you have a 360. That is a 1st world problem right there "My kids can't afford to eat but holy shit we played Portal 2, Skyrim, Saints row the third, Shadows of the damned" that's my point lol. That is the real world.

It's like me I love the shit out of Giantbomb but I lost my job so I canceled my monthly subscription to the site it pained me but fuck man I wanna eat.

Have you ever been a parent or even know what the hell you are talking about? This "bitch" (I can tell you are forever alone) may have that XBOX because it is hard for her to be able to have a personal life and a parental one. I am a single parent far away from any of my family and the XBOX was a nice way to talk to friends and family in other states while enjoying games after my kid goes to sleep and the housework is done. My budget is tight, so having my XBOX hacked put me at a loss when all I use it for is recreation and I am only able to purchase items for it with the occasional gift card, credit card rewards and eBaying household items. All extra money goes towards my kid having the life I feel she deserves, having money stolen from me WOULD hinder me providing food and care for her on a month to month basis.

This is all the things you never had to worry about while your parents spoiled the shit out of you.

Some people have no class.

Avatar image for hurrikenux
hurrikenux

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By hurrikenux

Mine says "error set to Private" when it is not, honestly the achievement tracking hasn't worked for XBox or Steam since I signed up.  It works just fine on Playfire and Raptr so the "Private" error is clearly a mistake.

Avatar image for hurrikenux
hurrikenux

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By hurrikenux
@MrKlorox: Reggie is an exception with a clear difference, he also doesn't make the largest of decisions at Nintendo - the majority of those come from Japan.  I'm almost positive Reggie will not tell you running Nintendo is like creating the Bigfoot pizza, on the other hand one of the Activision execs *did* compare selling Call of Duty to "making a white shirt whiter" with Tide.  I'll dig up the source here in a moment.
 
Source:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=128252
Avatar image for hurrikenux
hurrikenux

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By hurrikenux
@Kordesh: "Hell, I like you.  You can come over to my house and **** my sister."
 (in other words, agreed)
Avatar image for hurrikenux
hurrikenux

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By hurrikenux
@iAmJohn:  Ah, yes - Respawn - thank you for the correction.
Avatar image for hurrikenux
hurrikenux

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By hurrikenux
@iAmJohn: I agree that games falter trying to be like COD, even the last two CODs faltered in my opinion.  I'd also like to point out that Infinity Ward is no longer really Infinity Ward.  The two founders were fired and 47 employees left with them, I believe they said the new heads of IW came from Proctor and Gamble?  Somehow being able to sell toilet paper relates to being able to manage the Call Of Duty series.
 
If you are looking for Infinity Ward, I believe they are now Relapse (?) Gaming.
Avatar image for hurrikenux
hurrikenux

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By hurrikenux

Hacking Bethesda's website is akin to a full-grown man punching an old lady.  Sure, you CAN do it but isn't it a bit beneath you to do so?

Avatar image for hurrikenux
hurrikenux

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By hurrikenux
@NZt said:

Source: http://libcom.org/library/when-it-comes-crunch-unpaid-overtime-games-industry

 
No suprise this development studio suffered this fate. Although blaming the closure down to the dev studio making a poor game isn't such a great response without knowing what went on behind closed doors. Fact is THQ and many other of the big publishers are forcing studios into near permanent crunch period to shell out mediocre quality games for fast profit. This is ultimately the end result in being picked up by the big guns, when the're done with you they leave you out to the garbage.
 
There are plenty of studio's in recent memory that have met the same fate, so you can't be so judgemental in thinking the dev studio is to blame for making a mediocre game with poor sales.


This is exactly correct, and it mirrors what Activision and EA expect from their developers as well.  Often times, development teams that go against the grain (*cough* IW) are let go or are canned when they do follow orders and the product suffers.  Splash Damage as hinted at these issues with Bethesda, those of us that read between the lines can see this being a problem as well.
 
TL;DR, great logic but sadly it probably falls on many deaf ears (not including mine).
Avatar image for hurrikenux
hurrikenux

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By hurrikenux
@downtime58 said:

@hurrikenux: Your reply screams "PC gamer" which honestly doesn't mean anything - the method through which a person plays video games doesn't define their sensibilities in the least.  It seems your complaint isn't that COD is bad, but that's it's popular, and that it's popular on home consoles. If that be your beef, then it's not with the game, but the changing nature of the video games market - more people play games on consoles nowadays, COD or no COD.   And that all boils down to a million different factors, such as cost, accessibility, connectivity, changing demographics etc etc.   It seems to me that you're not lamenting the quality of the games, but simply the fact that the majority of people no longer play them the way you do, and that's not likely going to change as consoles move closer and closer to digital-only. My PC-playing friend, you are living in the niche now.

Sadly, I agree with you - I'll compare how this affects PC gaming with how it also affects Console gaming.
 
I would think even the most hardcore of Console gamers will agree that the "casual" gamer is the biggest part of their demographic.  Publishers now pander to this demographic, whether it is with watering down games like Madden or simplifying controls and gameplay aspects with other established titles.  Publishers know the attention spans of these types only span a few years for a game series (examples are Halo, Guitar Hero, etc.) and accommodate as such.  The people that suffer are the loyal Console users that want the game experience the developers made a priority with the first one or two titles, a vision that is often lost after a publisher takes over and pressures for faster, recycled releases to capture the market's attention span during that present moment.
 
This is how PC gamers feel now, so there is a similar sentiment with Console gamers as well (the ones that have been around the block).  When a new IP is released (like Homefront), it is trashed almost immediately by apparent COD fans ("f**k this game, I'm gonna go play COD").  I can submit links to hundreds of Steam User Forums posts that attest to this fact.  So MNC, Breach, HOMEFRONT, Crysis 2, Section 8:Predjudice and BRINK were all horrible game, or is it that everyone has a false sense of entitlement of what they should receive for their money?  Nintendo games used to cost the same amount of money or more in 80's dollars for less content and less prospective gameplay hours, at that time we were very much satisfied with it.
 
Developers like Valve and Tripwire Interactive truly care about their customers in the PC market, the reason why many of us do not switch to Consoles is because they do not have that counterpart as of yet (mostly because Consoles typically require a publisher outside of XBLA/PSN).  Look at what publishers did to developers like IW (Guess what, MW3 is not truly IW), Bungie, Kaos, Bizarre Creations, etc.  As long as we let it continue, it will continue.
Avatar image for hurrikenux
hurrikenux

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By hurrikenux
@SuperSambo said:

@hurrikenux said:

@SuperSambo said:

Homefront is dire, CoD games are good.

Big difference.

Fanboyism is dire, to each their own but you should be asking yourself if you would buy it no matter the content simply because it says "Call of Duty" on the box. Just like with Guitar Hero, they do not have to do anything ground-breaking feature or content-wise. In addition, PC games get shafted with limited support due to Console gamers that don't seem to know their history (not meant to include quoted poster) buying up anything with a name.

I know what I am going to get with CoD, a decent 6 - 8 hour sp game that is worth playing and a game that my friends will play online. I am not a fan boy, I just enjoy the games.

I won't buy anything with "Call of Duty" on the box, but if people I know are all playing and enjoying a game online then I will buy it regardless of groundbreaking features or content. If I was having a ball playing a game with 1 map and 4 weapons, then it is still worth the money. Games should be judged and entertainment, not features. Sure, they usually go hand in hand, but there are exceptions.

I strayed a little there... But my point still stands. Call Of Duty games are well honed, exciting games that I can easily play 20 hours online without getting bored. It is popular to hate on Call of Duty now, and I can see why some are angry, but as it stands they are great FPS games.

I think the common misnomer is that everyone hates on Call of Duty because it is popular to do so, not because it killed the concept of PC first person shooters - which is where the genre originated and was honed.  Console users quickly and eagerly scarf up millions of dollars worth of DLCs, leaving developers/publishers no reason to provide PC users with mod tools or dedicated server files.

Your reply screams "Console gamer", which granted to you the Call of Duty series may be the end-all-be-all title of choice while for PC it clearly isn't.  Counter Strike and Counter Strike:Source still lead this front because Valve still believes in true PC platform support and everything that goes along with it.  COD4 was the last great COD for PC, not only was the gameplay innovative and fun but the game had everything PC users come to expect from games.  I think Console users also expect less from games, partially due to the fact that if they do not like it they can simply trade it in while PC users do not have that option.