

What I don't understand is why 99.9% of the time when a company announces that they will have DLC for a game and that it is in the works less then a month before a game is released, people go through the roof with anger. Sure there are some games and developers that get attacked and deserve it, but most don't. The only times that that is acceptible is when the CONTENT THAT THEY ARE MAKING YOU PAY FOR IS ON THE DISK!!!! Soul Calibur IV is the best example of this. They charged $5.00 to unlock a character that is on the game disk itself. Things like that are unacceptable and should stop. But the majority of the time this is not the case.
My main case in point is the very recent release of Borderlands. The DLC is called The Zombie Island of Doctor Ned. It was announced October 15th. A whole five days before the game came out. I remember reading on this site a couple of things that made my skin crawl.
-"So, Gearbox, you've already started designing this stuff, eh? Tell me then... Why is this not in the box of the actual game? *Cough* micro-transactions... *Cough* I'm not disappointed to see it, certainly looks great: I'm just disappointed to see such a blatant marketing strategy at work."
-"ehhh, I'm sorry, but this kind of DLC announcement is what I dislike. Something like this could've been put in the actual game, but instead they're trying to milk the consumer. Not saying the content is bad or anything, and heck, it would be ok even if it was announced after the game came out by a few months, but the game isn't even in stores yet. And yet they already got stuff in finished for this. It would sit well with me if they actually worked on it AFTER the game was released, not during the game's actual development. "
-"Another one bites the dust. Chalk this up with Dragon Age as two games I was looking forward to but now am going to pass on because of ridiculous DLC scams to make the game more expensive. How about devs just put everything into the game until release, then start working on a large, PC-worthy expansion pack if you want to extend the game properly. "
These are things that just make me angry. Does no one realize that development on a game is complete weeks if not a full month before the game releases? It does not take long to get good screens for announced DLC to be prepared. There is no firm release date for the Borderlands DLC in question which means that it may not be complete. In the several weeks between a game going gold and release date, it is not inconciveable for DLC to be developed in that time frame. People who get up in arms over DLC being anounced for a game DAYS before its release asking why the content is not on the disk is just ridiculous. Should the game constantly get delayed so that they can get the content on the disk??? No. The main thing is, the content is extra. It is not intended to be a part of the full experiance. The full experiance is on the disk. I'm sorry this kind of stuff just pisses me off to no end. thanks for sticking through my little rant.
|
|
Good, but not Great
(X360)
Middle Earth. A land filled with history, strange creatures, and epic confrontations beyond your wildest dreams. It is in this ancient land that one of the greatest stories of all time is set. That story is The Lord of the Rings. It is this epic story of a Hobbit on ...
Reviewed by JokerClown88 on May 20, 2009
|
|
| Date Joined: | Jan. 30, 2009 |
| City: | Bay Area |
| Gender: | Male |
| Alignment: | Neutral |
| Points: | 0 Points |
| Ranked: | Ranked #10942 of 60,829 |
|
Symphony
7 hours, 25 minutes ago Has cold feet. Literally, not figuratively. My feet are FREEZING! Okay, now that is figurative and not literal, otherwise they'd be as cold as ice (which could be taken both figuratively and literally) |
|
|
CitizenKane
6 days, 12 hours ago Never thought he's see the day where Stanford is ranked higher than Miami, USC and Virginia Tech. |
|
|
phlegms
1 week ago is swamped to shit with work |
|
|
Kamasama
6 months, 1 week ago Kamasama misses the +/- system |
|