Something went wrong. Try again later

joshrocks2245

This user has not updated recently.

246 4 12 13
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

joshrocks2245's forum posts

Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

246

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#1  Edited By joshrocks2245
FengShuiGod said:
"joshrocks2245 said:
"FengShuiGod said:
"Well, it depends.

If America's troops were displaced throughout the globe like they are now, I don't see much of a chance. Most USA forces would be wiped out before they could get back to North America, and they don't stand a chance on their own in places like Iraq. Even is just Russia, Iran, and Israel mobilized their armies, they could probably take out USA forces in the middle east, thus crippling the US military.

If America's troops were concentrated in North America, I think we would have a chance. In a conventional war, America doesn't have the numbers, but it has the technology. Although EVERY country would be fighting against America, what would much of South America, much of Africa, and other third world countries be able to do? Not much. Geographically, the USA is in an excellent place. Many countries don't even have the technology to get their troops to North America.
Someone mentioned oil becoming a problem, but I don't think it would be a major problem. America would probably be able to take out Canada quickly, and we would be able to use Canada's oil for awhile. That, coupled with the oil we have at home, would be enough to last for at least a couple years. Such a conflict would be total war, so there would be virtually no civilian consumption of oil, and the whole country would be militarized.
USA's missile defense system is superb (not counting nukes), so we would be able to eleminate many enemy combatants before they even got to North America, and once they got here, I think America could fend them off, and maybe even win. I don't think it could withstand a sustained conflict of more than several years though. In such a fight, America would have to go on the offensive and quickly take over Canada and South America (Venezula = more oil for the war machine). From there, I don't know if the USA should go on the defensive, of if it should try to go toe to toe with Russia and China, but either way I think we'd have a shot.

However, if nukes got involved noone would win. Everyone would lose. There wouldn't be anything left.
"
Why does everyone always say USA can defeat Canada with no problem??

I suggest to other people before posting in my thread, to read the facts.
America can barely do shit in Iraq, they keep getting killed.
They will never win.

So you really think they could take out Canada that easy?
You know the pictures making fun of the Canadian army are fake you know??

You know the picture of the guy on the little coast guard boat isn't actually the army??
Maybe the Canadian army isn't that big, but we won't go down easily.

"
America could level Iraq to the ground. The USA isn't "losing" because of military incompetence, but because of political strife at home. I suggest you read the facts.

And yes, in total war America could take out Canada relatively easy. Of course Canada would put up a fight, but wouldn't win. Canadian forces would continue to be a threat for years, but the US could bust it's way in there and get the oil/supplies they need.  I'm not bashing Canada at all, and I don't mean to offend you. Sorry if I have."
Haha yeah Canada would win, and heres why.
First of all, Canada is giant.
I could go fucking hide in the country somewhere and no American solider would even bother to look there.
Any Canadian solider can stand the cold, but the Americans can't stand even 1 inch of snow in their own country.

Also, 1 Canadian solider is smarter then 500 Americans soldiers put together.
So yeah, you put 2 Canadian soldiers together and they can take out 1,000 American soliders, thats how smart us Canadians are.

Sorry i had to say that but since you can do nothing but offend Canadians, i might as well do the same to Americans. 
And at least what i said is true.
Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

246

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#2  Edited By joshrocks2245
FengShuiGod said:
"Well, it depends.

If America's troops were displaced throughout the globe like they are now, I don't see much of a chance. Most USA forces would be wiped out before they could get back to North America, and they don't stand a chance on their own in places like Iraq. Even is just Russia, Iran, and Israel mobilized their armies, they could probably take out USA forces in the middle east, thus crippling the US military.

If America's troops were concentrated in North America, I think we would have a chance. In a conventional war, America doesn't have the numbers, but it has the technology. Although EVERY country would be fighting against America, what would much of South America, much of Africa, and other third world countries be able to do? Not much. Geographically, the USA is in an excellent place. Many countries don't even have the technology to get their troops to North America.
Someone mentioned oil becoming a problem, but I don't think it would be a major problem. America would probably be able to take out Canada quickly, and we would be able to use Canada's oil for awhile. That, coupled with the oil we have at home, would be enough to last for at least a couple years. Such a conflict would be total war, so there would be virtually no civilian consumption of oil, and the whole country would be militarized.
USA's missile defense system is superb (not counting nukes), so we would be able to eleminate many enemy combatants before they even got to North America, and once they got here, I think America could fend them off, and maybe even win. I don't think it could withstand a sustained conflict of more than several years though. In such a fight, America would have to go on the offensive and quickly take over Canada and South America (Venezula = more oil for the war machine). From there, I don't know if the USA should go on the defensive, of if it should try to go toe to toe with Russia and China, but either way I think we'd have a shot.

However, if nukes got involved noone would win. Everyone would lose. There wouldn't be anything left.
"
Why does everyone always say USA can defeat Canada with no problem??

I suggest to other people before posting in my thread, to read the facts.
America can barely do shit in Iraq, they keep getting killed.
They will never win.

So you really think they could take out Canada that easy?
You know the pictures making fun of the Canadian army are fake you know??

You know the picture of the guy on the little coast guard boat isn't actually the army??
Maybe the Canadian army isn't that big, but we won't go down easily.

Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

246

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#3  Edited By joshrocks2245

Alright well what i'm saying that is if there were 2 countries fighting against each other and everyone in the country was involved in fighting and defending their country, then that would be a war that would last a long time.
So a war like that but with all countries involved would probably be bad.

Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

246

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#4  Edited By joshrocks2245
HitNRun said:
"joshrocks2245 said:
Canada by them selves could invade America and the war would last for years probably.
They can't even win the war in Iraq, they would never be able to win a war against the whole world, ever."
They won the war in Iraq (20 million people) with approx 300 (not a typo) casualties.

I think you had a different vision of this hypothetical war when you made the topic. Do you mean if America tried to invade and annex the rest of the planet? Obviously nobody could do that."
Um they haven't won the war in Iraq..They are still fighting..
Dude where do you get your facts from??
Only 300 casualties??
Seriously where do you read this non sense??
Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

246

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#5  Edited By joshrocks2245
HitNRun said:
"Coltonio7 said:
"The world...as the world is larger than America by a fairly large margin."
But what would those people do? Throw rocks at the horizon and hope they hit America?

The fact is, once you start breaking down the numbers, only a fraction of the world's population has the resources to put even a single pair of boots on the North American continent, even given a month's notice. Then you look at the geography, which is basically Canada and Mexico. Canada has good elite and special forces, but has reduced their overall military to very little since World War 2. Mexico has a sizable "army," but it's essentially a third world force. If US forces seized the Mexican isthmus, invading from the south would be almost impossible, no matter what the numbers were. Invaders would have to come through Northeast and Northwest Canada...not exactly Rio. Then, of course, about a third of Americans own guns and many of them are multiple gun owners.

Of course, all this assumes no nukes. If it's nukes, then it's pretty obvious who wins: whoever starts first."
Canada by them selves could invade America and the war would last for years probably.
They can't even win the war in Iraq, they would never be able to win a war against the whole world, ever.
Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

246

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#6  Edited By joshrocks2245

If America declared war on every single country, who do you think would win?
Would America be able to defeat every single country or would the rest of the world defeat America?

I think America would loose quickly

Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

246

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#7  Edited By joshrocks2245

Dang that looked painful.
I think he oversold that injury a little bit though by the screaming.

Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

246

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#8  Edited By joshrocks2245
TheGamerGeek said:
"

BionicIguana said:

"Did Sting turn heel?"


 

Yea,he attacked AJ after AJ's match against Kurt Angle and I agree there commentary and storys suck horribly,but to me they have some great matches."
I think it's cool Sting turned heel
He was a face for too long
Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

246

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#9  Edited By joshrocks2245

Thats the worst joke i ever heard, friends sucks.

Avatar image for joshrocks2245
joshrocks2245

246

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

13

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#10  Edited By joshrocks2245

cool thanks for the results