Something went wrong. Try again later

mxdirector

This user has not updated recently.

48 0 0 0
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

mxdirector's forum posts

Avatar image for mxdirector
mxdirector

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By mxdirector
@jams said:
@ZanzibarBreeze: What gives you the right to tell me I'm wrong in thinking MGS4 was a great game?   
 
That's a  closed minded statement. People express opinions whether negative or positive to open people up to new ideas and ways of looking at things.  
How many times have you heard people say "I've never thought about it like that". People's opinions can educate us, and dismissing opinions you disagree with  is extremely stubborn and closed minded of you. 
 
The person has made an argument for justifying his opinion, if you can prove him wrong on some things, that's great. If he has said some things you disagree with, that's great. But  if there's something there that you didn't think about before and you gained from his post, then that is also great. It works both ways, your opinions can engage with others and heighten their knowledge or interest in a subject.
 
I can't believe the amount of times I've had to explain opinions and their benefits to people on the internet.
Avatar image for mxdirector
mxdirector

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By mxdirector

"  I pity you for being some asshole that clearly only gets enjoyment out of trolling internet forums.  I hope I make your days a little brighter by responding to you." 
 You edited it out, but it's saved in the pm that alerts you when one has replied to you. 
 
taking something to absurd extremes to try and disprove something. but by this point i am not surprised at all. Hell, i could roll out kojima at this point and he would explain that he was high, and you would still argue it all.  
 
small plot holes do not compare to large plot holes. again you are justifying nonsense, trying to convince your self it's great even though i#ve already proven its wrong. you're arguing the semantics over the term immortal, trying desperately to find some form of victory. fine they are not immortal, just capable of surviving the radiation tunnel.  You win by ignoring logic and common sense and focusing on the definition of a word (which by the way that same word is used to describe many beings who have died, but what ever) 
 
let's use an example. die hard is a movie about coincidence. a man in the wrong place at the wrong time. and the film is based around this small coincidence, and you can nit pick at that all you want. but to compare that to mgs4 would be like if alan rickman found willis, flew him in to the building, put him in the room, took his shoes and said "when we meet later pretend that you dont know who i am, and give me an empty gun". Which is a great comparison to mgs4 actually, as that basically happened, ocelot tricked solid snake in to every thing to do something which you have admitted that doesn't make sense to do. There's a major difference between subtle coincidence,  plot holes, and convenience  and major  coincidence,  plot holes, and convenience. but this is something you fail to understand . actually i know you understand it, you just refuse to accept it, because you think i'm a asshole and you're ego won't let you accept that i'm right. so go ahead and do your best at clutching at the few remaining straws, you won't convince me of anything, because right now you're struggling to convince yourself. 

Avatar image for mxdirector
mxdirector

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By mxdirector
@MethodMan008:  
" Naomi/Vamp are not immortal" yes they are, they are immortal Because of the nanomachines. healing at a incredible pace has nothing to do with it, they can't die, meaning immortal.  nor does this address why they couldn't of gone down the tunnel
 
" Because Kojima didn't write iit that way. " SO? That doesn't stop it from making more sense. you can't dismiss plot holes because "the writer didn't write it that way, so there".   
 
I expose why mgs4 factually makes no sense, and your response is to try and nit pick any argument you can possibly form and ignore the issue at hand. 
This is exactly why i am an (as you like to put it ) asshole to people like you.  as soon as it has been explained you put your fingers in your ears and shout "la le lu la lo" over and over again.
Avatar image for mxdirector
mxdirector

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By mxdirector
@MethodMan008:  
what the hell playing the previous games have to do with understanding the story? 
Obviously you have completely looked over the crucial flaw in mgs4. so i shall point it out to you, maybe you can think critically for once about it, and work out that it doesn't make sense. 
Considering that ocelot had planned the events in mgs4 (excluding sunny's involvement) and had invested years in to this one moment and even transformed himself in to another person for this cause (a issue which lovers and haters both agree was stupid in mgs2 and could never be explained away, so we shall forget that) given all this would you put your faith in a dying old man who could factually die at any time (that's the whole point of foxdie) to complete your master plan. especially when there are so many better and more practical options, naomi/vamp are two immortals in your employ. you then have a machine army you could send down there. why didn't he pretend to be osama bin laden instead of liquid and convince a load of islamic extremeist to go down there.  
 
The story is based on the retarded logic of a man trying to shoe horn solid snake in there. If this retarded logic makes sense to you, then i truly pity you.
Avatar image for mxdirector
mxdirector

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By mxdirector
@MethodMan008:  
The story made sense to you? Well you never under stood the story then. and yes you are a fanboy, because you have no critical thinking skills in regards to this game. Although maybe I am wrong, maybe you're not a fanboy, maybe you're just stupid, who knows. 
Avatar image for mxdirector
mxdirector

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By mxdirector
@MethodMan008:  
why because you are wrong about the story making sense, it factually doesn't. this isn't debatable this isn't a opinion it's a fact. 
the rest of the stuff you are simply justifying. pace was great? maybe the pace didn't annoy you  but you should be abel to acknowledge a problem when there is a problem.in mgs3 a game that i loved, the pace didn't annoy me but i'm capable enough and open minded enough to see that the pacing was bad. 
 
installs, who cared about installs? who walked out out when the installs went on for too long? no one installs didn't effect the game at all. But when you defend this decision and justify it you walk in to the barrier of mindless fanboyism (in this case, a mgs4 fanboy). most people  (even those who love the game) are once again capable of pointing out the flaws and calling mgs4 out on it's installs. 
  
It's ok to call a game out on it's flaws. 
Avatar image for mxdirector
mxdirector

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By mxdirector
@MethodMan008:  
 
so you wanted a badly paced game? a story line that made no sense? you wanted a completely mediocre multiplayer? you wanted stealth mechanics that didn't evolve at all (peace walker improved stealth 10 times more then mgs4). You also wanted sub par shooting? You wanted no improvements in animations or AI? You wanted installs after every act?  
 
If these are true, then fine, but what you wanted is a shit game, and guess what, that's what we all got with mgs4. 
Avatar image for mxdirector
mxdirector

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By mxdirector
@MethodMan008:  
exactly. you are giving it a free ride. 
Avatar image for mxdirector
mxdirector

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By mxdirector
@MethodMan008 said:
" I loved the game.  One of my favorite games this generation. But there isn't one game in existence that everyone likes, so no worries duder.   "
that's not the issue. The problem is people given mgs4 a free ride for all it's problems, and not taking a proper look at the game. 
Avatar image for mxdirector
mxdirector

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By mxdirector
@lilbigsupermario:   "i n my point of view, I just appreciate MGS4 for being that story to connect the dots in the series.   " 
so as long as it connects the dots regardless of how bad it does them, then that means its a successful plot? no, not at all.  
  
"   So is the ending satisfying?  In my opinion, yes, because basically, my questions were answered in a story deep enough to make sense." 
really baffled by that statement. making sense and being intellectually satisfying are two completely different things.