To the people on this site who are on the side of, or at least sympathetic towards, gamergate, the lovely people who started and have been coordinating this whole mess had this excellent thing to say about some people you may care about. AND I FUCKING QUOTE:
"IGNORE FUCKING ATTENTIONWHORES!... THAT INCLUDES PATRICK FUCKEK. EVERYTHING THAT COMES OUT OF HIS MOUTH IS PUTRID SHIT. HE WILL NEVER BE FIRED OR LAID OFF FROM GIANTBOMB BECAUSE HE IS LITERALLY JEFF'S FINAL LIFELINE TO RYAN DAVIS"
End fucking quote. This is the scum you are supporting, or at least indirectly aiding.
To the people on this site who are not on the side of, or at least aggresive towards, gamergate, the people who started defending the journalists had this to say, AND I FUCKING QUOTE:
"I have more respect for ISIS than the anti-Quinn people"
"I think chemical weapons dealers have a more tolerable consumer base than videogames"
"Gamer? Shit person who cares way too much about videogames"
"Isn't Adam Baldwin just like a washed up crackead? Which one is he again"
"-Oh, so it's serious when someone threatens to rape Anita, but it'snot serious when you threaten to kill a child?
- That's correct. What I'm demonstrating is a functioning conscience, but I understand why that would confuse you. Flippant Explanation: Sarkeesian's feelings matter. That kid's don't."
"-There are no reasonable voices against Zoe Quinn or Anita Sarkeesian. Sorry.
- None you're willing to listen to, in any case.
- I'm also not willing to listen to Holocaust deniers. Should I be willing to hear them out?"
Fallacies in argumentation go both ways, you know.