So as another member of the target audience I will go over my experience with the prequels. Before the prequels I had seen much of the original trilogy's in bits and pieces over the years. I thought they were cool and all but I never really got into them.
So I saw Phantom when it came out. It pretty much left no impression on me. All I really recall from those days was that there was Phantom Menace Doritos, the pod racing arcade game was dope, and that Darth Maul fight being great. But outside of that pretty much forgettable and I was not really a Star Wars fan after watching it.
In the years the followed leading up to Attack of the Clones, I must have caught a bit more of the original trilogy and gotten some more through osmosis because by then I had a general working knowledge of what Star War was. I was like oh so that kid from that other movie grows up to be Darth Vader and he fights Obi Wan on a volcano and becomes a cyborg. This time I can some expectations coming in like oh were are going to learn the origin of the storm troops and maybe see Anakin become bad.
I watched the movie and like Phantom before it, it just didn't leave much of a mark. To me then it just felt like nothing but complete filler and that they were saving all the cool stuff for the third movie. The one thing I could say was the filler actually served some purpose and that was for the first time in the movies at least actually painted a picture of what the Star Wars universe is. We got to see how the Jedi council and Senate worked, the capital of the galaxy, and even the how the Sith operated to some extent. The original trilogy always took place on the fringe of the universe and this was the first time we were actually at the center of it. The Phantom Menace also did some of this itself to give it some credit but Attack really solidified the Star Wars universe to me.
Still was not particularly a Star Wars fan. I liked what I caught of the Clone Wars miniseries. One of my friends had gotten Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy on PC and I really loved what I played of that. Eventually I got Kotor 2 on the xbox and that was really when I started to consider myself a star wars fan. I would eventually catch whole marathons of the Star Wars movies and track all them down myself to watch many times. I realized just how much better the original trilogy was. I was pretty much at my peak fandom. I had some high hopes for Sith.
So I saw Sith and I was satisfied with what I got. I wasn't blown away by any means but I was satisfied. Anakin's turn to Darth Vader was done just fine. It set up the transition from prequels to the originals really well. Everything with the Emperor was great he was the best part of Jedi and one of the highlights of the original trilogy and he is just the same here. When the Emperor tells the tragedy of Darth Plagues is easily the best scene in the entirety of prequels maybe even in the entire series it just adds so much to the series. First of all it is just a really great piece of lore. It is the apple that turns Jedi's greatest hope into there worst nightmare in a believable way. It sets up just how ambitious the Emperor is. He is not the kind of person who would be satisfied with ruling the universe but rather he wants to become an immortal all powerful god. You knew when he was offering both Anakin and Luke the position of being his apprentice he in why intended to actually share his power they would just be puppets to further his goals.
My in hindsight summary of the prequels is this. I pretty much have no intention really watch the first two ever again. I like Revenge well enough that if I as going to re watch the movies it certainly makes it on the list along with the original trilogy. Also I recognize that the other movies should get some credit for actually fleshing out the Star War universe making it a distinct place with room to grow. The highest complement I can give them is that the new movies will better off with the ground work the prequels laid than if they had never existed at all.
Log in to comment