It has been a month since Burial at Sea episode 2 has been released. Since then I have been thinking about the overall narrative of the dlc, and how it's nearly impossible to find any way in which most of the elements introduced in BaS ( The last Comstock, the tear to Columbia, Elizabeth being killed by the Big Daddy despite being able to see the future and her ability to create tears to defend herself like she did with songbird, Elizabeth being able to merge herslef with the other Elizabeths to form only one Elizabeth, even though it was stated that she was the last Elizabeth) make sense, given the rules of the mythos established in Bioshock: Infinite and especially in its ending. I know that half of the fan base has tried to give logical explanations, but those are also contradictory to what was presented in Infinite and its ending. Also some of the stuff they introduced ( drinkable plasmids, fink and suchong collaborating together, Suchongs discovery of tears, Sally, the air grabber, the fact that there was a Booker Dewitt and Elizabeth) are never mentioned in Bioshock 1 nor have an impact on the main story of Bioshock Infinite. What are your thoughts?
x_29's forum posts
Anita Sarkeesian thought it would be a good idea to make a video series called Tropes vs. Women in Video Games. It would be about, well, the tropes developers resort to when portraying women in video games. Stuff like armour that doesn't actually cover anything. To help market the idea, she set up a Kickstarter page and made a YouTube video. What follows is just sad.
I thought this would be interesting to discuss since this happened recently.