Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

208 Comments

Blackwater Review

1
  • X360

This game is practically a war crime.

While I am sure there are some out there who view the idea of private military corporations as a necessary evil in America's war on terror, I doubt too many of them even have particularly fond feelings toward the company formerly known as Blackwater. The company, which has made hundreds of millions of dollars in government contracts working for the US Army in Iraq, has changed its name not just once (to Xe Services) but twice (it's now known as Academi) in the last few years to try and counteract its own bad PR. Not that you can blame them. After years of accusations regarding illegal weapons trafficking, the alleged killings of civilians and subsequent cover-ups, and recruiting practices that saw them employing former members of Augusto Pinochet's death squads, you can hardly be surprised that they'd do just about anything they could to make the public forget about all of that.

Apparently
Apparently "beard technology" is not something Zombie Studios has quite grasped yet.

Thus enters Blackwater, a video game with a curiously outdated title and a message to the public that lets you know that, hey, these guys aren't so bad after all! When they aren't smuggling guns to the King of Jordan or getting sued by dozens of Iraqi families for "random killings," they're helping out the U.N., rescuing formerly deposed peaceful leaders of fictional North African countries, taking down brutal military dictatorships, rescuing hostages and killing the same five recycled models of generic terrorists for about 90 minutes at a time.

Blackwater feels, for all intents and purposes, like a public relations blast. It's less a video game than an attempt to try and sway the public opinion (at least insofar as the public opinion relates to gamers) back to their side, presenting them as a bunch of selfless, good-natured totally-not-mercenaries who save hostages and deliver food and totally don't kill civilians. How could they, when there are literally no civilians anywhere in this game? It's like they took a one way ticket straight to terrorist town.

As a PR tool, Blackwater is rather vile, not to mention woefully ineffective. It stages life as a Blackwater contractor as something akin to being in the fucking A-Team, minus any of the dramatic flair or clever wit. All these chuckleheads do is crack the same jokes to each other--literally, it's the same jokes recycled dozens and dozens of times throughout the game--while periodically dropping an "Oscar Mike" or other piece of equally ubiquitous military terminology to let you know how legit these guys really are. The dialogue is so stiff and tone-deaf that it makes Richard Marcinko sound like Ernest Hemingway, and that's before it even gets around to actually making cracks about the company's own miserable reputation. Yes, that's right: this game actually makes fun of the fact that people think Blackwater is awful and made up of mercenary killers. There are no words...

Do you like this enemy model? I hope so, because you're going to shoot it about six thousand times.
Do you like this enemy model? I hope so, because you're going to shoot it about six thousand times.

Whatever you may have heard about Blackwater being the first real attempt at bringing a "real first-person shooter" to Kinect, go ahead and disregard any such nonsense now. This is an on-rails light gun game without the light gun. Light gun games are not "real first-person shooters," at least as I understand the definition. They're target shoots where the targets shoot back. This game has more in common with Time Crisis or Hogan's Alley than it does Modern Warfare or Battlefield, and it's not even as good as Hogan's Alley.

For one thing, the aiming is terrible whether you're using Kinect or not. With Kinect, you're theoretically supposed to aim your hand like it's a gun, and effectively live out a way more boring version of this. Except that's really tiring after a while, and also patently unnecessary. You can just lift your hand up a bit so it recognizes that your arms are there, and then you're fine. It's like you're shooting bullets out of your palms, but whatever. The bigger issue is that the aiming reticle is jittery and also slow as hell. It takes seconds (as in plural) to move the reticle from one side of the screen to the other. It's even worse if you play with a controller, though maybe that should be of no surprise. No light gun game translates well to dual-analog sticks, but the fact that it still sucks with Kinect is pretty astounding.

That's the least of Blackwater's gameplay sins. More atrocious are the enemies and level designs, which dart violently between stump-stupid and frustratingly harrowing. Roughly half the enemies in the game will dart out from cover and then just kind of stand there while blurting out lines that sound about a step away from South Park's "Durka Durka!" terrorist dialogue. Forever. They will never move. Only after you shoot every other enemy on screen will they bother to shoot, but they still won't move. As for the ones who do demonstrate cognitive ability, they're still usually pretty easy to blow away, except for a random few who are such crack shots that they can basically pick you off entirely in three shots. This is where cover presumably comes into play, except that the cover mechanics are largely broken. If you're standing right next to a perfectly placed wall, then great, you can just hide behind it until your health regenerates. If you have to crouch, or bend in any sort of awkward way, most times the game has no idea what the hell you're trying to do, and just makes you stand there, soaking up bullets like they were glorious, life-giving sunlight.

If you buy Blackwater, the terrorists don't win. However, the next step below terrorists (mercenaries) do.
If you buy Blackwater, the terrorists don't win. However, the next step below terrorists (mercenaries) do.

Once you do die, you have to replay the entire level over again. All of it. Granted, most levels last between 5-7 minutes, but that's still a decent chunk of content you're going to be repeating again and again, until you either figure out which enemy is randomly really good at shooting you, or you quit in pure frustration. I'm not sure if it's an accidental bonus or something close to tragic, but ultimately you'll only be doing any of this for maybe 90 minutes total. The campaign is ludicrously short, which gives one the impression that this game may have been intended for arcades at one point in its development cycle. What to do when you finish that 90 minute campaign? You could replay the same godawful levels you just played for better scores, or you could try out the barely-stitched-on multiplayer component, though that would entail subjecting friends to this game's various unpleasantries. With friends like you, who needs private military contractors?

All of this misery for $50 a pop. An hour and a half of busted-ass light gun shooting that barely masks the deplorable PR message underneath. In effect, buyers of Blackwater are paying for propaganda. They're handing over money to a shady group of alleged killers for the privilege of being told that these guys aren't shady or killers or anything to that effect. The only good news is that the message is altogether lost in a sea of half-baked gameplay, barely-functioning graphics, and horrible one-liners. I don't know if the folks at publisher 505 Games actually sympathize with these dirtbags, or just figured they could make a quick, easy buck with this thing, but that they, and developer Zombie Studios have even failed to make the compelling propaganda tool they were tasked with is, in a way, kind of perfect. Shame on everyone involved.

Alex Navarro on Google+

208 Comments

Avatar image for ultrapeanut
ultrapeanut

425

Forum Posts

22

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Which chapter was it where you made death threats to State Department officials? That was my favorite one!

Avatar image for sthusby
sthusby

449

Forum Posts

68

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By sthusby

They really have it in for that one black guy.

Avatar image for jollygreencc
jollygreencc

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By jollygreencc

@The_Laughing_Man: Who knows?

Avatar image for andrewb
AndrewB

7816

Forum Posts

82

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 16

Edited By AndrewB

Thank you so much for the recommendation, Alex. Can't wait to play this!

Avatar image for mrneoshredder
MrNeoshredder

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By MrNeoshredder

@Acheron:

Shame on you for making assumptions...yup.

Avatar image for hawklander
HAWKLANDER

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By HAWKLANDER

Do not waste your money buying this game! Horriable game play

Avatar image for yababavideo
YababaVideo

10

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By YababaVideo

I haven't played this tittle yet, but the game is pretty brave attempt by it's developer and publisher. Many know the controversy surrounding the real life company formerly known as Black Water. All things considered, I must in good spirit agree with the review and establish without even picking up the joystick a belief that this is a PR move by the corporation. What else would it be slander? That's a death wish.

Avatar image for undeadpool
Undeadpool

8418

Forum Posts

10761

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 18

Edited By Undeadpool

@lemonadesweetheart: I got it, duder.

Avatar image for boricuainexile
BoricuainExile

34

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By BoricuainExile

I Like Salon.com, o wait this is..GB? WTF?

Avatar image for tangmcgame
tangmcgame

83

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By tangmcgame

@sennenhund said:

the biggest crap is always on console's

I have to appreciate your efficiency. You take a meaningless jab at consoles while simultaneously illustrating your inability to tell the difference between the possessive and plural form of a word.

Avatar image for sennenhund
sennenhund

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By sennenhund

the biggest crap is always on console's

Avatar image for lemonadesweetheart
lemonadesweetheart

9

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Branthog: It's okay, it was A Joke. I was trying to make fun of that ridiculous Foxtrot0245 dude from five or six pages back, but oh well.

I realize that to even mention Poe's law anymore is a huge internet cliche, but it really says something about the state of political discourse in this country that a post about how "'rape' really isn't all that bad, you know" doesn't immediately read as sarcasm.

Avatar image for xsheps
Xsheps

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Xsheps

how is this rated teen

Avatar image for lemonadesweetheart
lemonadesweetheart

9

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@Branthog said:

@RsistncE said:

This review is a pile of shit. Why? Alex somehow felt that launching into a diatribe against a company which he believes stands on shaky moral ground was appropriate. Guess what Alex? So does the US Army. Half of those accusations you talked about have also been levelled against the US Army (along with most others in the world). With this in mind: why didn't the reviewer of Call of Duty, or Battlefield, or one of the other million games that portray US soldiers in a positive light, launch into an off-topic rant about how immoral the US Army is etc.?

Stick to reviewing the product and keep non-game related stuff out. If you feel that you can't, then it should be expected that the same treatment should be given to all game reviews.

Yeah, and keep your criticism of Rapelay to the gameplay mechanics! Don't get all high and mighty on me about how rape is wrong, you sanctimonious pricks!

Ugh, tell me about it.

Listen, I'm not legally allowed to discuss the details, but speaking as someone with first hand experience on the matter, this "rape" thing really isn't as bad as the mainstream media makes it out to be. Trust me.

Don't believe everything you hear on CNN, or from left wing extremists like Katie Couric.

Avatar image for armedbear
ArmedBear

285

Forum Posts

910

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By ArmedBear

@Cube said:

Really don't understand this website sometimes. Can't even cover all major releases, but once and a while there is a weird ass random review of a game no one cares about, considered purchasing, or have even heard of. If Giant Bomb uses the "this is what our audience is" justification for their mainly Xbox 360 coverage, why does it not apply to something like this? Giant Bomb's coverage makes absolutely no sense sometimes. Reviews are so sporadic and not even a third of them have a video review. Disappointing. Between the coverage, Endurance Run slip up, and Patrick's recent handling of the Xbox Live shenanigans, I am close to leaving the site.

You talk like an emotionally abusive boyfriend.

Avatar image for spilledmilkfactory
spilledmilkfactory

2085

Forum Posts

13011

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 75

User Lists: 23

I beg you for a quick look

Avatar image for gordo789
Gordo789

364

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Gordo789

@Cube said:

Really don't understand this website sometimes. Can't even cover all major releases, but once and a while there is a weird ass random review of a game no one cares about, considered purchasing, or have even heard of. If Giant Bomb uses the "this is what our audience is" justification for their mainly Xbox 360 coverage, why does it not apply to something like this? Giant Bomb's coverage makes absolutely no sense sometimes. Reviews are so sporadic and not even a third of them have a video review. Disappointing. Between the coverage, Endurance Run slip up, and Patrick's recent handling of the Xbox Live shenanigans, I am close to leaving the site.

don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

GB cannot please everyone, they can only please most of us.

Avatar image for napalm
napalm

9227

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By napalm
@Cube said:

Really don't understand this website sometimes. Can't even cover all major releases, but once and a while there is a weird ass random review of a game no one cares about, considered purchasing, or have even heard of. If Giant Bomb uses the "this is what our audience is" justification for their mainly Xbox 360 coverage, why does it not apply to something like this? Giant Bomb's coverage makes absolutely no sense sometimes. Reviews are so sporadic and not even a third of them have a video review. Disappointing. Between the coverage, Endurance Run slip up, and Patrick's recent handling of the Xbox Live shenanigans, I am close to leaving the site.

See ya, bro.
Avatar image for marcness
marcness

59

Forum Posts

247

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By marcness

Well, now we know what terrible gift you can give to that certain loved one this Christmas.

Avatar image for tiago
Tiago

91

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Tiago

Racist, game is racist.

Avatar image for sanzee
sanzee

198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By sanzee

God bless you Alex Navarro. There's nothing more entertaining on the internet than to see you tear apart some movie, game, or media product with old testament style condemnation. It's smart writing that gets right to the core of the problem. It's intelligent, but written in a manner that all can understand it, even a 12 year old. To tell you the truth I had never even heard of this game until I read your review. It was an entertaining read my friend. Please do a quicklook of this... interactive abomination.

Avatar image for tdous
tdous

270

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By tdous

@Cube said:

Really don't understand this website sometimes. Can't even cover all major releases, but once and a while there is a weird ass random review of a game no one cares about, considered purchasing, or have even heard of. If Giant Bomb uses the "this is what our audience is" justification for their mainly Xbox 360 coverage, why does it not apply to something like this? Giant Bomb's coverage makes absolutely no sense sometimes. Reviews are so sporadic and not even a third of them have a video review. Disappointing. Between the coverage, Endurance Run slip up, and Patrick's recent handling of the Xbox Live shenanigans, I am close to leaving the site.

I am sure... you will be... sorely missed.

You may have noticed, as an observant journalism student, that this is a pretty non-standard gaming website. As such there are occasional random diversions such as this. I can get my shiny plastic video reviews with perfect "radio" V.O. from Game Trailers if I want to feel like Geoff Keighley is dribbling down my back, and I'm sure IGN can give me all the very latest, hottest review content otherwise. If you still come here expecting that, then perhaps you should see if journalism school has an optional class on spotting really very obvious things.

Since you apparently dislike so much of the site's content, or its perceived bias, why don't you stop spending your valuable time reading it then whining about it, and just fuck off. You'll be a lot happier and, while it will make no difference to me one way or the other in real terms, the idea of feeling like I had even a modicum of influence in you fucking off may keep me warm over Christmas. In fact, stay. I'm never heard of you before today and just telling you to fuck off once has fanned the kindling under my heart.

I hardly ever comment, which is a shame because I'm awesome. Most of the time it's people complaining about something often only tangentially related to the subject at hand, or some ad hominem attack in lieu of an actual point. But you of the "I hate this, but I like complaining about it, but I'm warning you I might leave..." crowd are a special kind of ass.

Best part of it is, as a non-regular commenter, I rarely come back to see replies to my replies. So if you spend any time responding to this instead of, as suggested just fucking off, you will have only wasted more of your own precious time. Personally, I've killed a dead 6 mins before work so I've done well out of you.

Merry Christmas!

Avatar image for napalm
napalm

9227

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By napalm
@MegaPigeon said:

So, Alex......

Blackwater or Big Rigs?

Oh god. You're going to rip a hole in the space-time vortex! Oh god!
Avatar image for darkjester74
darkjester74

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By darkjester74

I just realized that Alex's avatar and the Blackwater box art are nearly mirror images of each other.

Oh dear...

Avatar image for sammo21
sammo21

6040

Forum Posts

2237

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 45

Edited By sammo21

Honestly though, this isn't the first propaganda tool out there. Hell, MSNBC is actually news channel and its mostly propaganda that people willfully watch.

Avatar image for jasondesante
jasondesante

615

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

Edited By jasondesante

quick look! :D

edit: with alex! :D

Avatar image for cptbedlam
CptBedlam

4612

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By CptBedlam

@Foxtrot0245 said:

@insanejedi: PMC's are not perfect companies, but one could ask what companies or governmental institutions are perfect? There is not a single actor that has participated in these wars that has not done at least one thing a little sketchy. Blackwater messed up and they have been caught doing shady things, but some of the fantastical bullshit behind people's rage toward them is just fueled by bigoted and political hatred for the CEO's Republican and Christian ideals.

Wow. What a huge load of bullshit. "Christian" ideals, I laughed hard. Most American right-wingers don't know shit about Christian ideals with their twisted and perverted take on Christianity which only serves them as a tool for propaganda and self-affirming their crazy ideas. The head bigot of Academi even thinks of himself as a Christian crusader.

Avatar image for elyk247
elyk247

423

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 25

Edited By elyk247

Where's my Quick Look?

Avatar image for tehjedicake
TehJedicake

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By TehJedicake

God damn it. Every time I read or watch somethin on Giantbomb, I tell myself "Don't look at the comments, don't look at the comments!" but I eventually do, and I regret it.

Avatar image for megapigeon
MegaPigeon

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MegaPigeon

So, Alex......

Blackwater or Big Rigs?

Avatar image for walta
walta

72

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By walta

Adding my vote to the requests for a quick look of this. I think it could be KILLarious.

Avatar image for recallberserk
RecallBerserk

145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RecallBerserk

@Cube: because someone somwhere finds it funny. its about the lols more than the seriousness.

Avatar image for privateirontfu
PrivateIronTFU

3858

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By PrivateIronTFU

@Cube said:

Really don't understand this website sometimes. Can't even cover all major releases, but once and a while there is a weird ass random review of a game no one cares about, considered purchasing, or have even heard of. If Giant Bomb uses the "this is what our audience is" justification for their mainly Xbox 360 coverage, why does it not apply to something like this? Giant Bomb's coverage makes absolutely no sense sometimes. Reviews are so sporadic and not even a third of them have a video review. Disappointing. Between the coverage, Endurance Run slip up, and Patrick's recent handling of the Xbox Live shenanigans, I am close to leaving the site.

Endurance run slip-up? Xbox Live shenanigans? Coverage? Care to explain, I dunno, any one of these things?

Avatar image for outerabiz
outerabiz

717

Forum Posts

16

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By outerabiz

@Foxtrot0245 said:

@insanejedi: PMC's are not perfect companies, but one could ask what companies or governmental institutions are perfect? There is not a single actor that has participated in these wars that has not done at least one thing a little sketchy. Blackwater messed up and they have been caught doing shady things, but some of the fantastical bullshit behind people's rage toward them is just fueled by bigoted and political hatred for the CEO's Republican and Christian ideals. This initial hatred led to ridiculous rumors about how and why certain things happened, and the rumors are now discussed as absolute facts some years later.

If Alex needs to discuss the political shit storm surrounding the company this game is based on, then by all means, he should. However, I only wish he could do so with factual information rather than just regurgitating opinionated general conceptions.

nothing is perfect, but when a soldier commit a warcrime, he can be court marshaled.

PMCs were not under Iraqi jurisdiction at least for the better part of the last decade, which meant they were immune to prosecution and were free to commit all sorts of crimes of war (,which they did) without any repercussions. I don't know how it is now, but the way they have handled themselves in the past shows (,at least in my opinion,) that they should not be granted any power, trust or funding by any government, unless under strict supervision from someone who can be held accountable.

Avatar image for rekt_hed
Rekt_Hed

958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 8

Edited By Rekt_Hed

DANGER CLOSE!

Avatar image for foxtrot0245
Foxtrot0245

325

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Foxtrot0245

@insanejedi: PMC's are not perfect companies, but one could ask what companies or governmental institutions are perfect? There is not a single actor that has participated in these wars that has not done at least one thing a little sketchy. Blackwater messed up and they have been caught doing shady things, but some of the fantastical bullshit behind people's rage toward them is just fueled by bigoted and political hatred for the CEO's Republican and Christian ideals. This initial hatred led to ridiculous rumors about how and why certain things happened, and the rumors are now discussed as absolute facts some years later.

If Alex needs to discuss the political shit storm surrounding the company this game is based on, then by all means, he should. However, I only wish he could do so with factual information rather than just regurgitating opinionated general conceptions.

Avatar image for insanejedi
insanejedi

781

Forum Posts

777

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Edited By insanejedi

@Foxtrot0245 said:

@insanejedi: That pretty much sums up why everyone hates on BW, which is fine, but the hate is fueled by a maelstrom of hearsay and left leaning anti-war propaganda. I'm sure that's not the message you were trying to send with your little YouTube video, but I just thought it was interesting that while it supports a theory that I'm full of shit, it also supports my claim that the outlandish accusations against Blackwater are mostly unfounded.

No I totally agree with you. My friend is a PMC but not with blackwater or any of the other names they changed. I've read documentaries and other first hand reports that aren't opinionated by news media or the public. What I take out of it is that PMCs mostly do a lot of mundane jobs that are highly beneficial to the country that you don't hear about like janitorial, educational, and protection of VIP's that are trying to invest into countries like Afghanistan and Iraq to make the country a better place. They also take the jobs that most military personal don't want to do like convoy's which are one of the highest targets of Al-qaeda; since their lower profile since they don't have to have military markings or uniforms while riding them it's less likely they get attacked by them. So objectively you could say PMC saves lives by taking jobs that people don't want. Taking out PMC's means that the convoy's will have to be done by military personal, which means a higher profile target and more obvious, and that means the chances are that more people on our side are going to get killed on both sides and civilian. It's also no secret that PMC places also hold top notch training facilities that also are used by special forces all over the world. At the end of the day, does it matter if their doing it for the money or not if what their doing means that less people get killed on the battlefield and the countries a better place?

Avatar image for foxtrot0245
Foxtrot0245

325

Forum Posts

25

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Foxtrot0245

@insanejedi: That pretty much sums up why everyone hates on BW, which is fine, but the hate is fueled by a maelstrom of hearsay and left leaning anti-war propaganda. I'm sure that's not the message you were trying to send with your little YouTube video, but I just thought it was interesting that while it supports a theory that I'm full of shit, it also supports my claim that the outlandish accusations against Blackwater are mostly unfounded.

Avatar image for synchronatic
Synchronatic

137

Forum Posts

1774

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Synchronatic

Love the review. Very entertaining, but it kinda makes me want to see how you guys would treat it in a quick look...

Avatar image for insanejedi
insanejedi

781

Forum Posts

777

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Edited By insanejedi

Is all I really have to say to that...

@Foxtrot0245 said:

@CptBedlam: Wrong. Every single contractor that was sent over had US military experience, and a large majority of them had Special Forces experience as well... Far from "mercenaries." Also, if you think that training indigenous forces and building local police/military forces is "too shady for US soldiers," then yea, they do that.

However, we are letting your MSNBC loaned opinions and my first-hand knowledge get in the way of my original point... This is a video game website. Does this game suck? Yes? Moving on then.

plus it's super convenient to have a private military force available to go in on the high-public-relations risk mission and shoot shit up. US military stays squeeky clean and people in the private sector make sweet, sweet stacks of cash. Everyone wins. Except the bystanders.
Avatar image for blacklab
blacklab

2025

Forum Posts

22

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By blacklab

Why bother reviewing this? It's not like this is especially clever social commentary.

Avatar image for cube
Cube

4410

Forum Posts

1677

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 5

Edited By Cube

Really don't understand this website sometimes. Can't even cover all major releases, but once and a while there is a weird ass random review of a game no one cares about, considered purchasing, or have even heard of. If Giant Bomb uses the "this is what our audience is" justification for their mainly Xbox 360 coverage, why does it not apply to something like this? Giant Bomb's coverage makes absolutely no sense sometimes. Reviews are so sporadic and not even a third of them have a video review. Disappointing. Between the coverage, Endurance Run slip up, and Patrick's recent handling of the Xbox Live shenanigans, I am close to leaving the site.

Avatar image for maskedarcstrike
maskedarcstrike

792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By maskedarcstrike

O_O after the reading some of the comments I feel bad for anyone who would have reviewed this game.... Which makes me wonder why it was even reviewed in the first place, I never even heard about this game until I saw the review on this site. Sometimes if no one else talks about the game it's best to just let the shit die quietly.

Even drunk I'm not gonna get involved in this shit storm of comments, and i've made some BAD THREADS while drunk.

Avatar image for bulldog300
bulldog300

112

Forum Posts

1567

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By bulldog300

I'm not even sure how games like this make it to shelves anymore. You'd think the realization that the vast majority of people will at least glance at reviews before dropping $50 on a game would encourage better QA all around.

Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor

I feel smart after reading that. Excellent review, Alex.

Avatar image for darkstorn
darkstorn

481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By darkstorn

@CuntDracula said:

Okay, dudes demanding that Alex shouldn't talk about politics when reviewing this game seem to have forgotten that it wasn't Alex who brought politics on the table, but "Blackwater - The Game". How can someone not talk about politics when a game takes such an offensive political stance.

Nice read, thanks Alex. Too bad you had to kinda waste your time on this game.

This. Everyone has opinions, especially those paid to publish their opinions. If the subject matter of a game deals with politics, then it should be addressed, especially in the case of pernicious mercenary organizations.

Regarding the review, normally I would want more details on the game's mechanics, but I feel like Alex said enough about this game's shittiness to warrant it a title to avoid at all costs.

Avatar image for miasmafett
MiasmaFett

139

Forum Posts

64

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By MiasmaFett

Getting very Zeitgeist!

Avatar image for acheron
Acheron

57

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Acheron

@miva2: I wouldn't, that kind of thinking made Duke Nukem Forever a commercial success.

"Shame on everyone involved." Yup.