Something went wrong. Try again later
Click To Unmute

Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?

Sign up or Sign in now!

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to Giant Bomb's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Giant Bomb Review

292 Comments

Call of Duty: Ghosts Review

3
  • PS3
  • X360
  • XONE
  • PS4

The basic core of fast-action multiplayer shooting is largely intact on all platforms, but Call of Duty: Ghosts tries new things that don't make the game better while omitting features and modes that players have come to expect from the franchise.

An assortment of South Americans team up to attack American soil, with devastating results.
An assortment of South Americans team up to attack American soil, with devastating results.

There are no UAVs to shoot down. Strike packages are back, and the dolphin dive has been replaced with a knee slide. You can lean out from cover. All of the launchers are free-fire, and knife kills now come with an annoyingly forced kill animation that leaves would-be stabbers open to counterattack. Theater mode is history. Headquarters mode is nowhere to be found. Same with Hardpoint. Call of Duty: Ghosts continues the weird trend of reversing/removing changes made by the other development team(s) that ensure that Activision's dominating shooter franchise makes it to shelves every November, but it also represents some of the largest multiplayer changes the series has seen since Call of Duty 4 redefined console-based first-person shooters for the previous generation of consoles. Here's the catch, though: many of those changes just make me want to play Black Ops II, instead.

In some cases, Call of Duty: Ghosts provides similar items in an attempt to iterate on existing ideas. UAVs, for example, used to fly around overhead (which then provided a clear need for lock-on rocket launchers). Now, the baseline killstreak item is the SAT COM, a ground-based deployable that, by default, paints enemies on your minimap if they're in your team's direct field of vision. Placing multiple SAT COM units eventually gives it a UAV-like "sweep" effect. Since they're on the ground, enemies can shoot or stab them out of service pretty easily--if they can find where you put them. I hated the move away from UAVs at first, but eventually warmed up to it. There's an overall reduction in airpower going on across most of Ghosts' killstreaks, which shifts the focus back down to the ground where you once again need to aim carefully but quickly to take out your targets. Compared to Modern Warfare 3, the last game to come out of Infinity Ward, you'd think that Ghosts took place in one big no-fly zone.

You'll also have some new modes to play in multiplayer, like Cranked, which gives you a speed boost and a timer when you get your first kill on every life. Once you're in this "cranked" state, you have to keep getting kills to reset your timer or else you blow up, respawning as normal. Search and Rescue replaces Search and Destroy in playlists, though the old mode is still available in private matches. S&R mixes S&D with Kill Confirmed, causing dog tags to pop out of players when they're killed. If your team recovers your dog tags, you respawn. If the enemy grabs them, you're out until the next round. Hunted starts everyone with pistols and drops low-ammo weapon cases onto the maps over the course of the match. That means you must fight your way to a crate to get a temporary crack at some random, potentially useful equipment. Blitz is a team mode that gives each team a goal point. Players try to run into the opposing team's goal to score, resulting in a ton of monotonous pistol runs from one side of the map to the other. Infected is a pretty standard "regular guys spawn with shotguns, but if the fast-moving zombie kills them, they're infected and swap to the other team" mode that feels like it fell out of a Halo game. The inclusion of some new modes is a nice touch, but none of them are as much fun as Hardpoint or Headquarters, both of which are missing from the game.

For all the pre-release talk about dogs, Riley the combat mutt only factors into a couple of sequences throughout the campaign.
For all the pre-release talk about dogs, Riley the combat mutt only factors into a couple of sequences throughout the campaign.

As Call of Duty does every year, Ghosts changes up the way you unlock the same sorts of guns, perks, and create-a-class options. This year, you have a squad of ten different soldiers, each of which can be visually customized with a variety of different heads, hats, and clothing. These serve as different sets of custom classes, in a way, since you can't change soldiers mid-match, but you can choose from a collection of loadouts and unlocks specific to that soldier. The choice between Assault, Support, and Specialist strike packages returns from Modern Warfare 3, and the perk limits feel a bit like Black Ops II's points-based class system in that you can opt to remove items from your loadout in exchange for more perk points. Each perk--these are the character modifiers like "don't take fall damage" or "be invisible to SAT COMs," in case you forgot--has a number of points associated with them, and you're free to choose any perk you like, provided you don't go over your points total. There are no "pro" versions of perks this time out. Care packages are relegated to a new "field orders" system that asks you to complete specific tasks to earn a Care Package drop. Some of these are simple, so when you pick up a field order briefcase it might tell you to kill one enemy from behind or get a melee kill. It also might tell you to kill one enemy while jumping or, yes, "humiliate" the next enemy you kill. Yeah. The game actually rewards you for teabagging. This might be the lamest thing to ever appear in a Call of Duty game.

Perks unlock as you gain experience points, but everything else only unlocks when you spend squad points, which are a new type of currency in Ghosts. You'll earn squad points by playing the game, and you can use them to unlock new weapons, attachments, perks, additional loadout slots--just about anything except for the cosmetic stuff. This means that if you already know what type of player you are, you can just get on with the process of unlocking the exact items you know you'll want to use. For me, that meant immediately unlocking an LSAT light machine gun with a rapid fire attachment and the tracker sight, which highlights targets when you aim down your sights but covers the rest of the screen with a blur filter that looks a little ugly on Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 but has a decent depth-of-field look to it on next-generation consoles.

The game takes you around the world, both in campaign and multiplayer.
The game takes you around the world, both in campaign and multiplayer.

Squad points can also come out of the new squads mode, which is essentially a place to play bot matches in a variety of configurations. The core idea is that your long list of unlockable soldiers form a squad that other players can challenge when you aren't online, giving you some incentive to outfit each soldier with some better gear than they start with. If you like, you can take your AI-controlled squad in and match against one other player who also rolls with an AI squad. Or you can opt for Safeguard, which is one of the wave-based survival modes in Ghosts. This one is set on multiplayer maps and has you teaming up with other players to take on dogs, soldiers, and other AI-controlled enemies. Aside from this mode, though, the squads section of the game feels like training wheels for people who are too squeamish for the real multiplayer modes. Unless taking on AI squads or sending your AI squad out for battle becomes a great way to farm squad points, it doesn't seem like something anyone who's played a previous Call of Duty game would ever use.

The other wave-based survival mode is called Extinction, and it has aliens in it. It's not a simple carbon-copy of the window-boarding weirdness found in Black Ops II's overwrought Zombies mode, though there are certainly plenty of similarities. Instead you and a team must carry a drill around from one alien hive to the next. As the drill works to destroy each alien hive, you have to protect it and yourselves from a handful of different alien types. You earn currency as you play, which can be used to buy additional weapons or dole out power-ups for your team, like explosive ammo or bouncing betty mines. You'll also earn skill points, which are used to upgrade your character's deployables, but this upgrades don't persist from one round to the next. The goal is to get to the end of the level and then race all the way back to the start for extraction. It's not terribly complicated, but a variety of optional challenges (like pistols only or maintaining a high accuracy level for the duration of one drill session) toughen things up. The glowing alien designs look like something out of a Lost Planet game, which is either good or bad, depending on which Lost Planet you think of when I say "Lost Planet."

Then there's the campaign. One of the nice things about the Black Ops games was that it felt like it was at least rooted in some sort of fiction. By playing the games, you got the impression that someone was thinking about keeping things semi-plausible, or playing off of real-world events in a just-beyond-believable way. Black Ops II took a huge-but-worthwhile risk by adding a branching storyline that made every moment matter just a bit more than it has in other Call of Duty games. For its part, the Modern Warfare series was ridiculous in a really enjoyable way, with Captain Price and his big, broomy mustache doing just the sort of over-the-top nonsense you'd want to see out of a big, ludicrous action movie. It was ridiculous, but it worked. Ghosts trades all this in for a new universe that fails to meaningfully distinguish itself.

Underwater and other low-gravity environments make finding cover a challenge.
Underwater and other low-gravity environments make finding cover a challenge.

You primarily play as Logan Walker, a silent protagonist who follows his brother, Hesh (Hesh?!?) around as the world goes completely sideways. An ill-defined enemy blows huge holes into the United States and it's up to the brothers--who, conveniently, report to their father--to... shoot a bunch of people and eventually join up with an elite force known as the Ghosts and fight back against a decidedly underwhelming foe that only feels barely connected to the main conflict. It's hokey, with corny dialogue that eschews actual moment-building in favor of cheap emotion by playing off of the fact that you're constantly interacting with your father, your brother, and a dog. Later missions divert you to other characters as the battles heat up, but they do so in a way that feels disjointed, like someone accidentally dropped in levels from a different game.

Story aside, the game still puts you in a few interesting situations with cool, cinematic moments, like a city near a dam that has just been blown up or a high-speed chase on the ice. It also attempts to change its pace in spots, but most of these--including the much-vaunted sequence where you play as a dog--boil down to you going prone and remaining still while enemies pass, just like that flashback sequence in Call of Duty 4. The best mission in the game has you stealing some enemy uniforms and infiltrating an installation. This mission creates the tension that the entire game feels like it's striving for, but rarely manages to reach.

As for the gameplay in campaign, it's straightforward. The campaign doesn't branch in huge ways, it just presents itself, you perform the same basic shooting tasks you've been doing for years, it surprises you a couple of times with sequences that look better than they play, and the credits roll. Taken as the follow-up to Black Ops II's ambitious (if occasionally flawed) campaign, this feels like a huge step back.

After playing a lot of Call of Duty: Ghosts with a lot of different gamepads, the PS4's new DualShock 4 came up as my favorite.
After playing a lot of Call of Duty: Ghosts with a lot of different gamepads, the PS4's new DualShock 4 came up as my favorite.

Call of Duty: Ghosts has the pleasure of being the first next-generation game I've played to completion as well as being the first game I've been able to play on both current and new consoles. The PlayStation 4 version of the game looks very sharp and feels very effects-laden, with a lot of good-looking lighting and reflections. It has a long draw distance, while the current consoles occasionally fog things up a bit to reduce the amount of geometry on-screen at a given time. The campaign has an early moment where you come up and see the state of the world by looking at a shot of the Hollywood Sign, which is way off in the distance. On the next-generation consoles, this sign is sharp and easily viewable. On current consoles, it's sort of a blocky mess.

That said, the 360 and PlayStation 3 versions of Ghosts still look good on their own terms. The facial animations in the campaign are intact and the action is roughly identical across all platforms. If you don't mind some flat, occasionally ugly textures, some frame rate hitching, and a lower limit on bots (11 on current-gen versus 17 elsewhere) you could certainly get away with playing this on a current system. And if the current-generation runs it better than expected, it also holds that the next-generation versions aren't really doing anything that will blow you away. It looks nice, but it's a sharper, better-lit and textured version of the game, nothing more. Additionally, the PlayStation 4 version has a handful of noticeable dips in its frame rate. This usually seemed to happen when a lot of smoke or other effects were on-screen, but occasionally it occurred in multiplayer for reasons I couldn't even guess at. Judging graphics on a brand-new platform can be tough, since we don't have a lot to compare it with at this point, but I will say that I had hoped that it would look a little better across the board. Whether that says more about my expectations or the quality of the game will have to wait until we see more next-generation games in action.

Ghosts offers the same style of video game combat that Call of Duty has had since 2007. The core of it is still engaging and can be very thrilling, if you're receptive to this type of action. In fact, it's still my favorite online multiplayer shooter. But the bells and whistles surrounding the game are muted and missing, leaving behind that same core without giving you enough new and exciting reasons to come back. Even with the improved graphics to be had on next-generation consoles, I'd rather play Black Ops II.

Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

292 Comments

Avatar image for hxcaleb
hxcaleb

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I've always been a much bigger single-player gamer, than I am a multi-player gamer, but I do end up getting all of the Call of Duty games in one way or other. It's tradition at this point to play through the single player of each one that comes out, weather I buy it or rent it; I decided to just pick this up on Red Box, and go back to Black Ops 2 if I want some more multi-player. Great review Jeff!

Avatar image for bacongames
bacongames

4157

Forum Posts

5806

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 8

Edited By bacongames

I don't know if it's just me but the portion where Jeff keeps describing the MP modes and features felt like it fell out of game reviews from 10-15+ years ago. It's an odd thing that seems to be sitting there amidst an otherwise meaningful review but it reminded me that Jeff has been doing it for that long and the habit occasionally creeps up.

Put another way, I felt like Jeff conveyed exactly what he should have about the multiplayer in the first paragraph and then spent a larger portion than I expect nowadays just describing the game modes and multiplayer. I hate to say it but I think that kind of thing feels antiquated and means little to the reader. This isn't targeting Jeff necessarily because I still see it in a variety of reviews even today but the reason I bring this up is that Jeff has occasionally addressed this topic in Jar videos seeing in one of his reviews kinda stood out.

As I said, the rest is a good mix of editorial and information, although in general I think Jeff leans more toward information than Brad or Alex anyway but that part is neither here nor there.

Avatar image for ripelivejam
ripelivejam

13572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ripelivejam

well here's hoping treyarch at least makes something decent come their turn next year. unless A¢tivi$ion pulls the plug on the series lmaooo

Avatar image for cybexx
Cybexx

1697

Forum Posts

1458

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

For all the talk in the advertising about destructible environments in multiplayer, the fact that Jeff doesn't mention them seems to speak volumes.

I wonder if Treyarch can revitalize the franchise next year? They will have an extra year of next-gen development, on final hardware no less but they will be stuck for a while trying to make current-gen versions so I bet current gen realities are going to cripple next gen ambitions for a few years.

Avatar image for zero_
zero_

2105

Forum Posts

378

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

The dog dies at the end doesn't it....

Avatar image for probablytuna
probablytuna

5010

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Really interested to see how this one would sell given that it's also coming out on next gen consoles.

Avatar image for davvyk
Davvyk

793

Forum Posts

4246

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 19

Edited By Davvyk

Something tells me im going to regret playing The Stanley Parable right before Ghosts.

Avatar image for hollitz
hollitz

2398

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 12

More excited than ever to get my mitts on that DualShock 4. 10 more days.

Avatar image for mystyr_e
Mystyr_E

1475

Forum Posts

24

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 93

User Lists: 4

so in other words, go with Battlefield 4. Done.

Avatar image for mikelemmer
MikeLemmer

1535

Forum Posts

3089

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 2

Explains exactly why it got a 3-star score, and why fans of the series may (or may not) want to pick it up. Although I think "I'd rather play the previous one" is pretty damning for an annual series.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f8ac39b52e76
deactivated-5f8ac39b52e76

2590

Forum Posts

1360

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 3

The game actually rewards you for teabagging. This might be the lamest thing to ever appear in a Call of Duty game

COD catering to the lowest common denominator, as usual.

Avatar image for korolev
korolev

1800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 8

Edited By korolev

Ghosts cant eat

Avatar image for truthtellah
TruthTellah

9827

Forum Posts

423

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

For all the pre-release talk about dogs, Riley the combat mutt only factors into a couple of sequences throughout the campaign.

Aw man. Come on, Call of Duty...
Aw man. Come on, Call of Duty...

Avatar image for themanwithnoplan
TheManWithNoPlan

7843

Forum Posts

103

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 14

Welp. There you go.

Avatar image for mewarmo990
mewarmo990

862

Forum Posts

1131

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Dogs?

Avatar image for joey_ravn
JoeyRavn

5290

Forum Posts

792

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By JoeyRavn

Meh. It's OK, I guess. CoD, for me, is just an annual blockbuster, explosion-ridden, Michael-Bay-esque past-time. I don't play multiplayer, I'm just in for the ride of the singleplayer. If they manage to keep me entertained for a few hours, mission accomplished.

Also, <8.8>, Gerstmann.

Edit: Oh, and two interesting factoids for the PC crowd.

1. You NEED 6 GB of RAM in your system to be able to boot this game. Yes, it doesn't even use 2 GB, but it won't even boot up unless you have 6 GB.

2. AFAIK, this is the first Infinity Ward CoD that supports gamepads on PC. If that's how you play these games, it's a nice addition.

Avatar image for athleticshark
AthleticShark

1387

Forum Posts

298

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Its to be expected, new consoles are a-coming, but who knows when they can harness all that goodness.

We can only hope man. Rehashed games with better graphics...PLEASE NO

Avatar image for elpork
ELpork

467

Forum Posts

301

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 4

Sad to hear the story didn't quite delver.

Avatar image for darkbeatdk
DarkbeatDK

2503

Forum Posts

330

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 22

No branching story line any more? That's a proper shame. I thought that was an absolutely brilliant addition and something the modern FPS genre has been missing. I hope it'll return when Treyarch is behind the wheel again.

Also, here's a thing related to Black Ops 2 and Space Jam.

Loading Video...

Avatar image for athleticshark
AthleticShark

1387

Forum Posts

298

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I love Giant Bomb. Honest reviews.

Avatar image for rangers517
rangers517

368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great review Jeff. Was waiting for this review to hear if there was anything special with the campaign, since they were talking up the hollywood writer/director guy and the dog, but looks like I'll continue not buying Call of Duty games.

Avatar image for kkotd
kkotd

364

Forum Posts

36

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Sounds like they dun goofed on the MP changes. I wonder how fast or if they'll have a patch that reverts those modes back in at a later date. I never quite understood taking popular modes out. It's not like the playerbase is small enough to justify scrapping them. CoD, even on the PC, has never reached the point where say AC3 did a month after launch, where certain rule sets were NEVER played in MP matches.

Avatar image for 2headedninja
2HeadedNinja

2357

Forum Posts

85

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@akumasan said:

There needs to be a serious change in these types of games real soon, lest they go the way of Tony Hawks games. Great games but too little meaningful revision from year to year.

as long as CoD-Games still sell millions and millions of copys it doesn't really matter what we think.

Avatar image for l4wd0g
l4wd0g

2395

Forum Posts

353

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By l4wd0g

I am glad to hear you liked the DualShock 4 experience. I was always hesitant playing shooters on the PS3 because of the controller.

Avatar image for ucankurbaga
ucankurbaga

182

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Its official: CoD is dead.

Avatar image for vuud
Vuud

2052

Forum Posts

74

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Vuud

Sad to see that Year of the Dog has been underwhelming so far.

edit: HESH WANTS SEX!

Avatar image for ntm
NTM

12222

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By NTM

Well that's too bad. I know the campaigns of Call of Duty games are short, but I liked previous ones (especially the Modern Warfare trilogy).

Avatar image for kishinfoulux
kishinfoulux

3328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Looking around at other reviews it seems like FINALLY other sites are starting to give these games the scores they deserve. Took damn long enough.

Avatar image for koolaid
koolaid

1435

Forum Posts

16

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Ill probly get it anyway just cuz i wanna see what next gen call of duty looks like. Should make a good living room action experience.

Avatar image for dijon
Itwastuesday

1269

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

legit disappointed that the dog isn't a big deal in this game

Avatar image for markhawk
MarkHawk

153

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By MarkHawk

SHOTS FIRED!

Avatar image for nadril
Nadril

649

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Damn, I was really hoping this would be one of the CoD's to help move the series forward -- but it seems to have moved it back.

It's too bad really because I've been kind of itching for a good arcade shooter to play. Battlefield has never really been my jam (usually not a fan of the vehicle combat), and I've heard BF4 is a decent bit buggy currently anyways.

Can't say the review is too surprising though. They've been doing CoD with the same engine for a long fucking time now. It was only a matter of time before people grew tired of it.

Avatar image for alwaysbeclothing
alwaysbeclothing

2078

Forum Posts

6765

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Its to be expected, new consoles are a-coming, but who knows when they can harness all that goodness.

Avatar image for antfoolish
antfoolish

21

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By antfoolish

Daaaaamn.

Avatar image for mithhunter55
mithhunter55

1104

Forum Posts

709

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By mithhunter55
Avatar image for showrock
Showrock

18

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

What a great opening paragraph. Right to the point, no bs necessary. Good writing. Good review.

Avatar image for sub_o
sub_o

1261

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 8

So is the Call of Duty fatigue finally dawning on us ?

Avatar image for lameimpala
lameimpala

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

"For all the pre-release talk about dogs, Riley the combat mutt only factors into a couple of sequences throughout the campaign."

NO DOG NO SALE

Avatar image for akumasan
akumasan

29

Forum Posts

30

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

There needs to be a serious change in these types of games real soon, lest they go the way of Tony Hawks games. Great games but too little meaningful revision from year to year.

Avatar image for solidlife
solidlife

910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

For a ageing franchise seems about the right score.

Avatar image for beachthunder
BeachThunder

15269

Forum Posts

318865

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 30

Wow, that seems spoooooooky.