Something went wrong. Try again later
Click To Unmute

Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?

Sign up or Sign in now!

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to Giant Bomb's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Giant Bomb Review

238 Comments

No Man's Sky Review

3
  • PS4

It's light years from being a great game, but there's still something at the heart of No Man's Sky that speaks to the would-be explorer in all of us.

No Man's Sky feels like it's been in the public consciousness for an eternity. In reality, it's closer to two-and-a-half years. All that build-up, all those weighty expectations, all of it began a little over half a US Presidential term ago at, of all places, the 2013 VGX Awards. Remember that show? If you do, it's probably because of what a disaster it was. But somewhere in there, tucked amid Joel McHale's active disdain for his hosting role and a bunch of ill-fitting Odd Future interview segments, maybe you remember Sean Murray of Hello Games unveiling his studio's latest creation, an impossibly huge-sounding space exploration game called No Man's Sky. Maybe you remember him nervously shifting as Geoff Keighley grilled him on the details of the game, looking down at his shoes as he described his vision of the ultimate "You see that mountain? You can go there" game, a procedurally generated universe of over 18 quintillion planets, all explorable from pole to pole. Maybe you remember even McHale himself, so detached and sarcastic throughout the show, letting out a brief eruption of genuine-feeling incredulity at the scope of what Murray's small team was trying to accomplish.

No Caption Provided

That incredulity has built steadily in parallel to a ludicrous amount of hype in the years since. For every person pinning their dreams of "endless gameplay" in "the last game they'll ever play," there was another demanding to know "what you do" in the game, and casting doubts as to whether Hello Games could ever pull off what it was purporting to do. Normally as a critic I wouldn't care to mention the hype cycle any big game inevitably goes through, but that cycle is inextricably linked to No Man's Sky. So much of what has been wished upon it has informed the discourse around it. Though Hello Games' own messaging has been at best, muddled, and at worst, ultimately misleading--especially around the possibility of players finding each other in this huge universe--that messaging has also been largely drowned out by people projecting their own hopes and fears onto the game.

It's as difficult to imagine a game that met the loftiest of those expectations as it is easy to understand why people would be disappointed with the game that No Man's Sky ultimately turned out to be. At its core, No Man's Sky is a game of exploration. You jump from star system to star system in your own little ship, landing on planets and moons and leaving your personal stamp on them as you go. The constant feeling of discovery is its greatest asset, but that discovery often feels in service of far less interesting ends. Both its fleeting attempts at narrative, and economically-driven gameplay systems, are fairly terrible at respecting the player's time. And yet they're seemingly what are meant to propel the player forward in No Man's Sky. Resource gathering, crafting, inventory management, robot fighting, ship combat, it's all in there, wrapped in a veneer of Greater Purpose that points you toward the center of the galaxy, a place you are meant to go because the developers felt the game needed a place everyone is supposed to go. But taken individually, none of these things are particularly compelling. They're all skeletons of systems that basically work together, but not completely. Even the procedural generation, the heart of this whole crazy endeavor, starts showing its seams long before you even start thinking about those hypothetical "hundreds of hours" of gameplay.

And yet. And yet.

Calling something "greater than the sum of its parts" is beyond cliche, but no other description feels more apt for No Man's Sky. There's a rhythm to playing it that's unusually transfixing. Even as I came to realize the limitations of every single thing the game does, the sense of wonder never quite left me. Thirty-five hours in, I still found great joy in setting foot on a new planet for the first time, looking around, and drinking in whatever environment surrounded me. It's hard to explain why that feeling is still here, even after I've discovered every flaw in the game's design, every crack in its facade. There are so many different ways that No Man's Sky fails to deliver that I should be disappointed. I should be done with this game. And yet. And yet.

No Caption Provided

The longest I ever spent on a single planet was the planet @bombsfall (named, as many of my planets were, for someone I follow on Twitter, because I'm just not that creative a person). This was early in my time in the Euclid Galaxy, before I had fully grasped the pace of life in this universe. @bombsfall was, at the time, by far the liveliest planet I'd encountered, filled with useful elements, significant volumes of weird wildlife, and a great number of Vy'keen bases and installations. By this point in my journey, I hadn't stopped to think much about where I was going. I was still enamored with the mere concept of landing on a planet, and trying to plant my flag in as many locations as I could. According to the clock, I was there for 15 sols, which roughly translated to six hours in real world time. At no point did anything on @bombsfall reveal itself to be wildly different from any planet I'd been to up to this point, nor any I've visited since. Apart from its abundance of everything, it was just another planet.

But I stayed here. I mined heridium and plutonium in huge quantities. I scanned every bit of life I could find, every vaguely different-looking rock formation that happened to appear in my field of view. I found galloping horse-looking things with heads and necks like screaming plants, skittering lizards with bug-eyes that seemed at once alarmed and sleepy. I discovered something like 30 different waypoints before I finally decided to move on. There was no good reason to stay as long as I did, but nonetheless I stayed, checking off boxes, giving identity to any question mark that scanned in walkable distance. Fifteen sols of obsessive documentation and resource gathering, all for what? Why did I stay here, and not other, frankly prettier places I eventually found? What kept my boots on this particular ground?

By this point in my journey through No Man's Sky, I hadn't fully grasped the notion of how the game metes out its objectives. I was treating No Man's Sky like a typical open-world game, reluctant to jettison myself from an active planet because I wanted to check off as many objectives as I could before moving on. If you play No Man's Sky like this over the long term, you should get out of your first solar system by Christmas, if you're lucky.

Every planet in No Man's Sky has the same basic things, just in vastly different quantities. A barren moon still has limited mineable resources and locations to visit, but not very many of them. The best planets are teeming with native flora and fauna, along with numerous bases and monoliths established by the game's other intelligent races, the warrior Vy'keen, the trade-focused Gek, and the Daft Punk-looking machine race called the Korvax Convergence. The variety of what you find in these bases is not very wide. Sometimes you'll find an observatory that will point you toward an ancient ruin or distress call from a wrecked ship. Sometimes it was an abandoned station that had been overtaken by betentacled alien unpleasantness, in which I would usually find some new tech to attach to my multitool or exosuit. Sometimes I'd find a trading depot manned by a solitary member of one of the previously mentioned races.

No Caption Provided

In a normal open-world game, the repetition of these familiar icons on a map would be lessened, because you're aiming toward a set endpoint. They only have to be copied and pasted a few times throughout the game because they exist alongside larger story missions that are the primary focus for the player. These are distractions from the point, not the point unto themselves. In No Man's Sky, everything outside of the game's single story thread is a side objective, copied and pasted hundreds of quintillions of times across the universe. No matter how long you spend in No Man's Sky, you will never see them all, but not long after you begin No Man's Sky, you will have seen them all before.

That repetition will likely be critically damaging to a lot of people's enjoyment, especially given how threadbare the core survival game mechanics are. Resources are mined, systems are recharged and repaired, money is gained, and so on. In between, you manage and build out your inventory so you can store more of everything. Crashed ships (or ones purchased from other aliens) give you more cargo space than the beater you begin the game with, but they're expensive, so you keep grinding. Exosuit upgrades are found on every space station, and frequently scattered across planets and moons, but they increase in cost with each purchase, so you keep grinding. This process repeats itself forever. As the game exists at the time of this writing, there is nothing to do but look for new versions of the same things, take whatever's useful for you, and move onto the next planet, all in the hopes of creating a bigger bag in which to store whatever.

Once you start earning upgrades for your equipment, tasks like mining start feeling less like a tedious chore. There's no worse modern game design convention than "this task sucks until you upgrade to make it suck less," and that's a convention No Man's Sky is oddly invested in, sadly.

But there are appealing aspects too. Scanning environments on a newly discovered planet doesn't get old, or at least it hasn't yet for me. Yes, you'll see the same assets recombined in various ways as you play, but even apart from the financial benefits--you earn additional money by uploading your discoveries to a galactic database--it's a wonderful sensation to know you're the first person to see this particular thing, whatever that thing happens to be. And even though engaging with the wildlife on any given planet rarely amounts to much--feeding the more docile creatures sometimes nets you additional resources they scout for you, or occasionally excrete for you--I still like doing it. I like befriending these Frankensteined animals, no matter how grievously repellant they might be. By no means will this grind work for every player; I often wondered not if, but when it would ever stop working for me. But for the subset of players who, like me, succumb to No Man's Sky's perpetual thrum of galactic busywork, it does the job.

No Caption Provided

The closest I ever came to actual death in No Man's Sky was on the planet @MOUNTENNUI. A mountainous planet with minimal wildlife, @MOUNTENNUI was a rock I almost bolted from moments after touching down. It was only because I noticed an unfamiliar object near my landing point that I stayed. Vortex Cubes. I'd never seen these on a planet before. As far as I knew, they only existed as rare, valuable items you could buy on the open trading market. Here they were, not in great quantities, but enough that it was worth my while to snag a few. The one thing I hadn't counted on was the sentinels.

The sentinels on this planet were aggressive. Any attempt to take resources would result in a couple of them coming at me guns blazing. They were especially protective of these rare cubes, which sat on pedestals like ancient idols, begging to be stolen, if only so that a giant boulder could finally be unleashed upon the thief. Stealing the cubes alerted the sentinels to my presence. At this point, my multitool was pretty strong, so I could take out the first wave without much hassle. Even the second alert tier, the dog-looking machines with hyperaccurate laser fire, usually died after a single grenade launch. Here though, I first encountered the next tier, a giant AT-ST-looking monster that seemed dead set on wiping me from this universe entirely. The second he showed up, my shields were blasted away in seconds. I bolted for my ship, jumped in the cockpit with barely any health left, and flew to the stars, thinking I'd escaped. Suddenly, alarms sounded. Sentinel ships were coming out of hyperspace. I fought a few off, but they just kept coming. I figured I was doomed.

Then I turned my ship toward the nearest space station, hit the pulse drive, and got away. They didn't chase me. I was fine.

No Caption Provided

The worst parts of No Man's Sky are the ones that most closely hew to the idea of what a traditional video game is supposed to have. Take the aforementioned sentinels. These robotic creatures exist on every world. Though they vary in temperament, the idea is that they police the universe. Huge chunks of the other races' history is wrapped up in fighting them or researching their omnipresent existence. Why they're here isn't an interesting mystery, especially since they only seem to exist to give players something to fight. Even the most aggressive wildlife isn't much of a challenge, so here are some robots that get larger and nastier depending on how much chaos you cause. Here are your antagonists, because video games are supposed to have those.

Fighting them is always a nuisance, but never tense or fun. They're not strong or smart enough to put up a meaningful fight once you've implemented enough weapon upgrades. They're just there to start shit because nothing else in the game, save for the occasional space pirate you encounter off-planet, does. Engaging them (and the pirates) in space is no better. Ship combat goes from frustrating to depressingly simple as soon as you acquire your first beam weapon. Instead of having to carefully lead targets with your shot (and mostly miss in the process), you just blast a few phaser beams out and the autotargeting does the rest of the work. Video games are theoretically supposed to make fighting the antagonists they present you with an enjoyable experience, something No Man's Sky never finds a way to pull off.

The same can be said for the game's attempts at story. Finding monoliths and knowledge stones offers up some interesting backstory for the histories of the different races you encounter, as well as individual word translations for the various alien languages, but the actual story direction for the player, which involves following a path laid out for you by an ancient force called Atlas, is just an absolute waste. The notion here is that players might want something to guide them early in the game. Given the scope of the universe, having something to latch onto besides a vague longing toward getting to the center of the galaxy makes sense. But what's on offer isn't much of a story at all. It's a series of stations to visit that spoon feed you a bit of philosophical baby food before offering you a special orb and sending you back on your way. If you collect ten of those orbs, your final station visit will give you the option to create a new star, which is presented with as little fanfare as you could imagine.

The good news is that you don't have to follow this path. You have the option at the very beginning of the game to go that route, or just freely explore. You should freely explore, because for all the things that No Man's Sky misses the mark on, that freedom of exploration is the one thing it gets very, very right.

No Caption Provided

I never felt more alone than I did on the planet @UtilityLimb. At this stage of my journey, I'd never been to a harsher place. Impossibly massive cliffs jutted up all around, offering sheer drops into small pools of putridly hot water. Huge storms that almost completely killed visibility beyond a few feet in front of me rolled in regularly, kicking up purple dust clouds that made the environment look like an early Nintendo 64 game. The only life I ever found were a few out-of-place-looking cow creatures, and a small number of pulsating shrimp things that swam around those tiny pools of water. Of the precious few stations I found, all were empty of life. No one existed on this bizarre, horrible place.

And I have never had more fun in No Man's Sky than I did on this garbage planet. Due to some pre-day-one-patch glitch, my ship's engines had broken. I needed to farm a fair amount of iron in order to make the necessary repairs, and while iron was certainly around, it was gonna take a while to get it. Knowing that I would end up wiping my save when the patch dropped, I decided this is where I was going to make my stand. I was going to die on this rock, but before then, I wanted to find someone else alive. I had to know if I was truly, utterly alone.

I spent a long time wandering @UtilityLimb's hostile terrain. Maybe every 10 minutes or so, I'd find another question mark, but it never materialized into an interaction. Just monoliths and abandoned facilities, with knowledge stones dotting the path between them. I learned the Gek words for "origin," "fluid," and "kneel" but I never found another sapient presence.

No Caption Provided

After a couple of hours, I allowed myself one last question mark. I hoofed it in the icon's direction, but it took forever. The cliffs were unforgiving, and my jetpack hadn't been suitably upgraded by this point. You could see where the procedural generation had borked up in places, as giant, yet unusually slender outcroppings of rock, which looked like the result of anything but nature, appeared sometimes completely free of gravity, floating peculiarly above the world. Storms kept hitting, but finally, as the last one broke, I saw the outline of my final destination. It was another monolith.

I interacted with it, and it told me that amid its pulsing energies, a small birdlike creature had appeared. It looked dead, with its neck clearly broken. The monolith had reanimated it for my benefit, as some kind of test. It screamed in agony. The monolith gave me a choice: Let it be, or put it out of its misery. I thought for a second, and chose to kill it. Mercy seemed altogether absent on this world, so I felt it my duty to inject a little into it. I was rewarded with a new upgrade for my exosuit.

As I turned away, the computer sounded the alert of yet another incoming storm. As purple dust clouds filled the space, I poked the last few knowledge stones that surrounded me. I learned the Gek words for "fire," "stop," and "awake." Those were the last words that went through my head as I, and my original save, died.

No Man's Sky does an incredible job of making you feel insignificant. Maybe this sounds like a weird thing to compliment a game for. After all, games are often obsessed with making you feel like the most significant person in their individual worlds. No Man's Sky is the opposite of a power fantasy. You're just a person scraping by, taking what you need, selling the rest, and working to survive in a universe that's thoroughly uninvested in your survival.

No Caption Provided

It's lonely as hell, and I think that's wonderful. I mean, thinking about space and its distressing infiniteness tends to have that effect on people, but this feels different from what other space games tend to offer. This isn't grand space opera; you're not building a galactic empire. You're in this universe all by yourself. You know full well that you will never see the whole of it. The only way to leave any kind of mark is through discovery. Putting your stamp on the star systems, planets, individual waypoints, and even names of various species you encounter, is the closest anyone will ever get to knowing where your journey took you. It's the galactic equivalent of carving "Brooks Was Here" into the ceiling of a boarding house.

And it's kind of a beautiful, even humbling thing. This is what ultimately kept me going in No Man's Sky. When I'd finished the Atlas path, I almost called it quits in disgust. But when I eventually convinced myself to go back, I decided to return to the pace of play I'd been holding to before I decided to rush through the last few Atlas stations. I made it a point to go to every planet in a star system, and even if I opted not to stay long, maintaining that need to explore brought me back to how I felt when I first began the game. The sense of wonder returned as I continued my solitary journey through space. Knowing that I was totally on my own, and that there was nothing left to guide me, reminded me why I was ever enjoying the game in the first place.

I don't expect that sense of wonder will hold for everyone. There's a good chance that your immersion in No Man's Sky will be broken far sooner than mine. You may find yourself deeply bored of the game's loop once you've seen all the varieties of animal and plant and rock that the game recycles across its universe. You may tire of the frequent bugs and crashes that, while sure to be patched down the road, nonetheless distract quite a bit from the current version of the game. Maybe you've already decided not to jump into No Man's Sky at all because, in numerous ways, it's never quite manages to live up to its original promise, imagined or otherwise.

And yet, there's something underneath all those blemishes, something intangible beyond its rickety framework and lackluster individual pieces, that I couldn't ignore. The thing is, almost entirely in spite of what No Man's Sky is, I really like playing it. It calms me in a way that few games ever manage to. Knowing that I'll never see the entirety of it, knowing that my path through this overwhelmingly massive, deeply flawed universe will be uniquely my own, is enough to keep me on that path. I like being here, lonesome in my insignificant corner of the galaxy, doing the things I need to do to survive.

No Caption Provided

This is the vision of the game I hope Hello Games leans into as they work to improve No Man's Sky. Yes, deeper systems, better draw distance, better frame rate, greater variety of, well, everything, all of this is important. Maybe that theoretical possibility of interaction between players should actually make its way into the game, too. But I don't want any of that to come at the expense of that magnificent solitude that No Man's Sky already does so well. That's why I remain here, wrestling with all the ways in which this game's universe is fundamentally broken.

Because this broken universe gives me a small taste of something that our own broken universe can't. I will never leave Earth. I will almost assuredly never go to a place no one has ever been, because nearly every place on Earth has already been discovered. Though the promise of interstellar travel, or at least travel to other places in our little solar system, has never seemed more tantalizingly close, I know that I will never be one of those people to set foot on those unfamiliar places. That opportunity has passed me and a great deal of my generation by. If and when space travel becomes a normal aspect of human life, I'll be an old man, if I'm even alive at all.

No Man's Sky makes me feel like I can go somewhere no one else has ever been, and no one else may ever be again. And I love it for that. Maybe you will too.

No Caption Provided
Alex Navarro on Google+

238 Comments

Avatar image for wanaming0
Wanaming0

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great review Alex.

Avatar image for foeaminute
foeaminute

142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By foeaminute

I have to admit, I teared up a little bit reading this. I'm not sure if it was because of how well it was written (which it was, incredibly so), whether it was that it matched my feelings of the game (which it does), or whether it matches my "capital F" FEELINGS that this game drums up when I'm playing it. It's not my favorite game ever, but it's one of my favorite games ever. It's confusing and simple and boring and thrilling.

Avatar image for muffinsaka
muffinsaka

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By muffinsaka

This review sounds exactly like it came from the core of my brain. I am 20 hours in and have all the same feelings. It shouldn't work, it has issues, it's not the best game or even one of the best but I can't stop pushing on to the next planet to see what's there.

I won't use the term emergent gameplay because I don't think it's exactly apt but there are moments that happen when you're down on the planet that an unintended story develops. In a Minecraft sort-of-way you have all the right events unfold that leads to something the developers never could have dreamed up.

It might not be the perfect video game but it keeps taking me to places I want to go.

Avatar image for triviaman09
triviaman09

1054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 2

Great review, Alex, you did a great job of explaining why this flawed game is so compelling.

It's rare that a game gives me a satisfying feeling of exploration and that's why, despite the thinness of the game's actual systems, I feel compelled to keep playing No Man's Sky.

Avatar image for av_gamer
AV_Gamer

2911

Forum Posts

17819

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 13

This might be one of your best reviews yet, Alex. You was able to make it clear what makes this game click for you. However, I agree with Jeff Gertsmann's opinion on the game. Once you play and seen everything, No Mans Sky becomes that game you spend time playing while doing other things at the same time. I only hope the future updates of the game add content that will really help the universe come alive. This game still has the potential to be something special. I hope a year or so from now, that reality will happen.

Avatar image for sauseman
sauseman

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Maaaan, Alex is a really good writer. I probably wouldn't of read this super long thing if it wasn't written as well as it was. The verdict was kind of predictable though given everyones opinions since the game came out, but this review echoes all those opinions in the most, i dont know, enjoyable way. Cool job alex.

Avatar image for eribuster
Eribuster

1164

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 22

This is an incredible review that echoes what I have been feeling about the game 9 hours in.

Great job, Alex.

Avatar image for thekitkatshuffler
thekitkatshuffler

170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's amazing the amount of energy being wasted on a game this bland.

Avatar image for humatt
HumaTT

126

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great review, Alex. I'm feeling a little bit of Austin in there and I LIKE IT.

Avatar image for knightdehumidifier
KnightDehumidifier

274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The best opinion I can give about No Man's Sky after all is said and done, it's this:

It is a good game. That's it. Not an awful game, not a disappointing game, not the great game, or the best game of the year. Just a good game. I applaud Hello Games in making something truly ambitious after making forgettable downloadable games like Joe Danger and getting their foot in the door in a future where they can be taken more seriously as developers, but if had toned down the hype and drive for No Man's Sky, it could have been more welcomed without vitriol from the fanbase.

Avatar image for muffinsaka
muffinsaka

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's amazing the amount of energy being wasted on a game this bland.

Yikes.

Avatar image for slimepuppy
slimepuppy

122

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

This is one of my favourite pieces of writing about this game. Stellar work from Alex. Not all the same things resonated with me but the overall conclusion is exactly how I feel about ten hours in.

Avatar image for montezuma
Montezuma

15

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm struggling to feel a great deal of sympathy for the devs in regards to the game getting overly-hyped as they were certainly massive parts of it themselves and in some situations just flatout lied.

Avatar image for brettvandelay
BrettVandelay

126

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The second to last paragraph was incredible.

Avatar image for fatalflame
fatalflame

127

Forum Posts

23

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@alex : What a great and brilliantly written review. I know often the internet doesn't give enough credit when things are good, but I just wanted to make a point of posting how much I enjoyed this review and your journey through this. As a fan and follower of you guys from the old gamespot days, thanks for reminding me how much I love your style and tone of writing. Hope you get to keep writing more reviews and maybe bring back Guns of Navarro!

Avatar image for raych56
Raych56

24

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Damn. The last few paragraphs make me almost want to buy this game...almost...

Great review Alex!

Avatar image for broletariat
broletariat

90

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By broletariat

I'll never need another video game review after this one!! Awesome work @alex

I agree that there's a lot this game could be doing better, but it still got its hooks in me enough to make me want to keep going back to it. Sometimes it's fun to just drift in space between planets and not really go anywhere (until pirates notice all the gold I'm hauling, but hey). Or just poke around on a particularly oddly-colored planet.

Also, yeah, the narrative's not much of anything, but I love finding the little snippets of the aliens' history. Especially the Gek, who get a little scarier every time I find a monolith?? It's like wow, these cute little frog guys sure have a terrifying history of conquest

Avatar image for mooseymcman
MooseyMcMan

12789

Forum Posts

5577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

This is a very good, well written review. Thanks, Alex.

Avatar image for tunacat
TunaCat

43

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By TunaCat

Why does Sean Murray get a pass for all his lies? Haven't seen a single gaming website bring it up. It's as if they forgot about every interview and preview regarding the game. I'm not asking for his head on a pike, but there's zero accountability.

E.g. Planets orbit their stars, animals eat each other, there are massive creatures that can affect the world including demolishing trees, you can land on asteroids, no paid DLC, you can customize your character, multiplayer will be there and it'll be like Dark Souls, etc.

Edit: Just listened to the Beastcast. Was super refreshing to hear because they addressed what I commented on here.

Avatar image for viking_funeral
viking_funeral

2881

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

@solh0und said:

I would personally say it's the best "podcast" game to play thus far.

Well that and Diablo.

Someone hasn't played Euro Truck Simulator 2.

Avatar image for iwanecky
iwanecky

57

Forum Posts

48

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Wonderful review, Alex. I think I'll give this game a try.

Avatar image for belegorm
Belegorm

1862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This game really seems up my alley, I really enjoy exploring stuff in games, that's a large reason why I play games. I can't afford a $60 right now, but maybe if there's a sale in the future.

Avatar image for legalbagel
LegalBagel

1955

Forum Posts

1590

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 7

Edited By LegalBagel

A fair summary of the game's good and mostly bad points. Though the fact that I fell off the exploration pretty quickly - especially getting bogged down by the mechanics - would put it even lower in my book.

The biggest problem for me is that the exploration is entirely solitary in nature within the game. There's no sense of exploring and discovering things within a shared universe with everyone else playing, or calling out and highlighting some crazy new thing I found to the community or the galactic encyclopedia. Instead it's just scanning every repetitive thing the game generated for me and "uploading" dozens of "discoveries" into the void. Sharing screenshots on twitter sharing the rare interesting thing you came across does a better job than anything in the game to creating a sense of shared exploration and discovery.

"Discovered by X" should mean something, like planting your flag down onto a world. But then you happen upon the dozen other sentient lifeforms already living on that planet and realize even among NMS players the "discovered by" tag means absolutely nothing. And the personal satisfaction of discovering things only goes so far when the content is so thin.

I stayed pretty grounded in my expectations, but the game still felt overpriced and way overpromised from even what they were saying in the last couple months. Missing on nearly every gameplay element is bad, but disappointing on the central loop of exploration is just tragic. The sense of scale in the galaxy and feeling of taking on and off planets or warping through star systems is awe-inspiring for a couple hours, but becomes sad after a few more. We'll see what they do with it, but right now it stands in a pantheon with Spore in terms of ambition and promise versus execution.

Avatar image for faeriegodfather
FaerieGodfather

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Incredibly well-written, Alex. One of the best reviews I can remember reading.

Avatar image for slowhanded
slowhanded

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By slowhanded
Avatar image for darkjester74
darkjester74

1743

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By darkjester74

Alex that was an amazing review, a wonderful read!!

Avatar image for stara
Stara

127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great read. Cheers, Alex.

Avatar image for comradecrash
comradecrash

603

Forum Posts

40

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By comradecrash

I agree with your review! Good job Alex. I was thinking about trading it in but I might just keep it and check back periodically and see what kind of updates Hello Games does to it.

Avatar image for buzzlightbeard
buzzlightbeard

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

write more, alex. I mean, if you want. It's awesome to read each chance i get.

Avatar image for belowstupid
BelowStupid

497

Forum Posts

65

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Giving this game ample time to be worked on before I buy. Possibly my first Neo game if it comes out this year.

Avatar image for christoffer
Christoffer

2409

Forum Posts

58

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Great review as always, Alex. I'm eager to experience all the positive things you talk about and I hope they can iron out all the unfortunate shortcomings of the game. Especially the PC version.

I really loved the short-story interludes from your playthrough in this review. These kinds of games feel much richer when you use your imagination like that.

Avatar image for sil3n7
Sil3n7

1512

Forum Posts

1540

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

This really captures it in a subtle, honest and personal way.

See you on the other side of the horizon space cowboy.

Avatar image for callmesarge
CallMeSarge

35

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

A great review, totally captures how I feel playing the game, and pulls no punches (not that this site ever does) - good job duder!

Avatar image for bstrom
bstrom

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The most perfect 3-star game I've ever played. Flawed, irritating, but I can't put it down, and I really believe it's only going to get better.

Also, really well-written review. Thanks Alex!

Avatar image for gatobolo
Gatobolo

17

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Opinions, way to generous ; )


I kinda want my 60 back

Avatar image for ghost_cat
ghost_cat

2840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ghost_cat

The way I am taking this rating is for the game itself, and not for the experience I believe is intended by Hello Games.

Yeah, the "game" itself isn't great, but when you let that part go (as hard as it may be), you get something I don't think any game has done before. A feeling of being small and insignificant on a galactic scale such as this is so powerful, which compliments more the will of human beings to continue to push to make some sort of mark, even if no one will ever see or remember.

Everyone is ultimately alone in this world or universe, but we still keep pushing to feel, learn, and hopefully make any sort of impact.

Avatar image for grimluck343
Grimluck343

1384

Forum Posts

20

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

A great read.

Avatar image for seiru
Seiru

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm glad Alex got something out of this game. I just couldn't find anything interesting in the same-y flat videogame planets I found in every star system. And no, that doesn't mean that I lack exploration, or curiosity, or whatever else people would like to infer about my personal character because I dislike NMS.

Well, enough has been said in other places about the flaws of this game. I truly am happy for you if you enjoy playing it.

Avatar image for mezmero
Mezmero

4107

Forum Posts

420

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 16

Great review as usual Alex. What this game is going for isn't necessarily something I want right now but I'd like to play it at some point. Full retail price seems a bit steep for this experience but if the devs plan on supporting it with updates then more power to them. I can't get over the lack of things to actually do gameplay wise though I for one never got sucked into the hype machine quite like some of the collective internet. I personally need something with sharper action like Rebel Galaxy which has been scratching my space itch better than I could've imagined. Thanks and keep up the great work.

Avatar image for morcane
morcane

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Wow, this review nails it completely. The and yet, onward and upward.

Seriously one of the best reviews I've ever read.

Avatar image for mike
mike

18011

Forum Posts

23067

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 6

I enjoyed this review more than the game.

Avatar image for mrputz
MrPutz

44

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

"No Man's Sky makes me feel like I can go somewhere no one else has ever been, and no one else may ever be again. And I love it for that. Maybe you will too."

Precisely how I've felt. I've not been in a hurry to follow the Atlas path, and there's nothing pushing me to do so, and I find that very empowering. If I want that, I'll load up Overwatch (which I do, often).

Avatar image for bigd145
BigD145

299

Forum Posts

28

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Lots to do, lots of time, and boring real fast.

Avatar image for lasse_momme
lasse_momme

97

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Spectacular review as always, Alex. Your writing is just the damn best

Avatar image for casty
casty

141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By casty

On Twitter you mentioned the review would be long, but I wanted to comment to say I really enjoyed this longer review format. I know video is what the site leans heavy into, but I'd be happy to read more articles of this length (also this isn't THAT long)!

Avatar image for ripelivejam
ripelivejam

13572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ripelivejam

i sense one of the biggest problems people have with this game (at least the more rational ones that aren't ready to crucify people over poor choices of words) is that just being able to explore isn't enough for them, that a game isn't worth its salt unless it's bogged down in multilayered mechanics. i personally think, despite the issues the game indeed has, that it should be commended for being a unique approach to gameplay and for at least trying something a little different than the "gun down anything that moves with convoluted upgrade/xp systems along the way."

i don't think on the whole they were being disingenuous at all; Hello Games said from the start the focus was on exploration. reading a bit of the kotaku review i was with them in that if you start taking it slow and trekking out from your spaceship you start to find some pretty neat things and get lost in just traversing the procedural countryside and finding weird quivering beasts along the way. i understand that's not enough for some (most?), but i'm happy they're taking a different approach.

now that i think about it, though; you could even postulate this is a sort of Pokemon Snap sequel writ large. something i'm also quite fine with.

fucking fantastic review, @alex. bring back guns of navarro please!

Avatar image for mbdoeden
mbdoeden

329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Fucking rad review Alex.

Avatar image for kawatora
Kawatora

16

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great review, impressive writing Alex.

Avatar image for geraltitude
GERALTITUDE

5991

Forum Posts

8980

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 2

@sravankb said:
@solh0und said:

I would personally say it's the best "podcast" game to play thus far.

Well that and Diablo.

As far as "podcast games" go, nothing beats Minecraft, IMO. There are far more engaging gameplay elements in that game compared to NMS.

Isn't that the opposite of a good podcast game? If the gameplay is too engaging you can't split your attention easily, no? At least that's how I think of it... SFV is extremely engaging for me, so I would never split my attention from that or I would sacrifice both enjoyment of SF and whatever else is on the side. But NMS is very easy to just have "on the side" because it requires so, so little effort to play. Curious what others look for in "podcast games" now that I write this..

--

I thought this was a really fantastic review Alex, probably the most even handed text I've read about this game so far, both capturing the let-downs and mechanical disappointments, while still admiring the strong qualities of the game. I feel quite similarly to you, I think.

Plus, all the politicking aside, this was just well written. Nice!