Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

127 Comments

PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale Review

3
  • PS3
  • VITA

This frantic fighting game just doesn't pack in enough PlayStation flavor to truly earn the title of "All-Star."

PaRappa is one of the older (and better) characters on the roster.
PaRappa is one of the older (and better) characters on the roster.

I don't know that I'd call PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale an ambitious game. Its developers surely must have sat down at some point early in development and said "let's make a Smash Bros. game but with Sony characters in it." And that's precisely what they did. It carves out its own fighting style in the margins, but make no mistake--this is a highly derivative game. That's not necessarily a bad thing, of course, though PlayStation All-Stars makes a couple of design decisions that make the whole thing feel a little more awkward than it should. Also, for a game that's supposed to bring together the greatest heroes of the PlayStation platforms, it's missing too many key figures.

Crash Bandicoot. Let's just get it out of the way up front, OK? I'm certainly not privy to whatever backdoor dealings went into securing (or not securing) characters for this game's roster, but if you're making a game that attempts to bring together the classic PlayStation players and you don't have the system's first big mascot, someone has already screwed up. Don't get me wrong, I'm not one of those weirdo Crash Bandicoot fiends or anything, and I'm well aware that Sony doesn't actually control the rights to the Crash Bandicoot property (through a series of mergers and sales, he belongs to Activision these days), but it's an embarrassing omission. While we're at it--and I'm sure those of you at home have already played along by filling out your own dream roster--it's difficult to talk about stand-out characters from the PlayStation era without bringing up Cloud Strife and Lara Croft. These three characters typify the early days of Sony's console business. Even though they aren't Sony characters, they're the characters that brought Sony to the dance and helped make the PlayStation the must-own platform through the back half of the '90s. If you catch me on the right day, I might even go so far as to say that if you can't lock down those three characters for your Sony fighting game, you probably shouldn't make your Sony fighting game.

The roster isn't all bad, though. The Sony-controlled standards from the modern era are present, like Ratchet (with Clank in tow), Jak (with Daxter, natch), Kratos, Nathan Drake, and not one, but two version of Cole from Infamous. That he gets two squares on the select screen instead of a "press triangle to select Evil Cole" treatment says to me that the developers were struggling to fill out that roster, but perhaps I'm projecting. PaRappa is in, and he's maybe the perfect mix of a known character that's still worth getting nostalgic about. You also get a set of also-rans that are too new and underused to feel classic, like Nariko from Heavenly Sword and Col. Radec from Killzone 2. These aren't franchise players, and while it's cool to dig deep, these guys aren't distinguished enough to feel like meaningful inclusions. Instead they feel like warm bodies, there to pad out Sony's end of the roster.

Each background busts apart at a set interval to reveal parts of another game.
Each background busts apart at a set interval to reveal parts of another game.

The game feels a little heavy on third-party characters, which is entirely sensible. Sony has always enjoyed firm support from third-party developers, and many of the best PS1 and PS2 games don't have SCEA's name on the box. But instead of focusing on the greatest names from PlayStation history (see above!), the inclusions here feel like a bunch of co-marketing deals masquerading as guests in a fighting game. Dante from Devil May Cry is here, but it's the new Dante. Say what you will about that redesign, but of the two Dante designs that are out there, only one of them could safely be referred to as an "All-Star" right now. Raiden from Metal Gear Rising is here. There are two BioShock Infinite-themed backgrounds, and Big Daddy appears on the roster. You know, Big Daddy from BioShock, that huge PlayStation 3 hit... that shipped like a year later than the PC and 360 versions? Instead of leveraging its past, the roster keeps an eye toward future releases. It makes a sizable chunk of the game feel like a series of ads instead of a love letter to the PlayStation brand.

It's a shame that this aspect of PlayStation All-Stars sticks out so much, because once you get past the roster and its lackluster story cutscenes, Battle Royale is a fun little game. It's a chunk of frantic action that blends button mashing with meaningful strategy, even if that strategy comes from a slightly strange set of systems. All-Stars is all about your three-level super meter, and your sole goal is to build that meter up and unleash it at the appropriate times. Landing a super on an opponent is the sole way to kill that opponent and earn points. By default, your overall total at the end of a match is kills versus deaths, with two points earned for earn time you kill an opponent and one subtracted each time you fall to an opposing super. So, in a sense, waling away on another fighter has no direct impact on that fighter. But indirectly, it's key, because while you're landing attacks you're earning more meter and your victim, who's just standing there and taking your attacks, isn't. Throws and a couple of other attacks give you an opportunity to steal some of another player's super meter, too.

This means that the game really comes down to your knowledge of a character's super attacks and how best to land (or avoid) those attacks. So what the game lacks in moment-to-moment monitoring of a damage meter it makes up for in a multitude of "oh snap!" moments when the supers start popping off. Some of these attacks, particularly the low-level ones, feel like they come out of nowhere, so when Parappa runs up behind the other three fighters and busts out a flash kick that kills all three players, it's rad. When Raiden does a breakdancey little spin kick that takes out foes on either side of him before you can figure out what was happening, it's the sort of thing that makes a couch full of players start shouting up a storm. It's chaotic fun. The higher level supers get flashier and are more in line with a character's unique style, so Sly Cooper gets a little sniping sequence that feels like it fell out of one of the Sly Cooper games. Sweet Tooth turns into a giant robot. Kratos goes nuts and starts swinging a sword that kills in one-hit. The bigger attacks are more stylish and pretty interesting, but I always felt like I was doing better when I was slipping into range and busting out my low level supers on unsuspecting players.

The differences between the PS3 and VIta versions are minimal.
The differences between the PS3 and VIta versions are minimal.

For a game that should be bursting at the seams with personality and charm, PlayStation All-Stars sure has some drab, plain menus. Once you're actually inside the game and fighting, things look fine but a little basic. The flashy super combos are certainly over-the-top, but the baseline action looks like a bunch of tiny dudes scurrying around and a bunch of little hit flashes. This ends up being worse on the Vita, since it's a smaller screen to begin with, but even on the PS3 I was picking myself out on-screen by the big player number text that floats above each character's head. All of this action is set on a series of mash-up backgrounds that start out based on one game, but transition into another. These transitions are the same every time, though, so seeing Chop Chop Master Onion's dojo bust apart so a Killzone robot can invade the stage is surprising and cool precisely once. More randomness in the stages would have made this stuff way cooler.

The single-player side of All-Stars is very slim, but a lot of what's there seems to be focused on getting you to understand the game's fighting style and, ideally, train you up to be a better online fighter. The online works great on both the PS3 and Vita, with a ranked mode that's broken up into "seasons," giving players multiple chances to be at the top of a season's leaderboard. And, if you buy the game on the PlayStation 3, you get access to the Vita version for no extra charge. I ended up preferring the default control scheme on the Vita over the PS3, even though the Vita version awkwardly requires you to tap the screen to pick up items during a fight. It's also worth noting that if you know that you only want a portable version of the game, you can get that on its own for $20 less than the console/handheld bundle.

PlayStation All-Stars Battle Royale is an interesting first attempt at bringing Sony's characters, stages, and items together in the traditional Smash Bros. style, but it fails to carve out enough style of its own along the way. It ends up being an interesting, if occasionally awkward "party" style fighting game that works a little better than you might think. But it also feels like a proof-of-concept that misses too many classic PlayStation figures and moments to truly earn the title "All-Star."

Jeff Gerstmann on Google+

127 Comments

Avatar image for meatball
MEATBALL

4235

Forum Posts

790

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

Edited By MEATBALL

Excellent review, you really nailed the roster problems.

Avatar image for draxyle
Draxyle

2021

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Edited By Draxyle

It's really a shame. There's no way they could beat Smash Brothers as far as a roster lineup goes, but they could have done so much better than this. It really feels like a cynical marketing product with so much focus on games that haven't been made yet. For a game touting "Playstation Allstars", the weak roster is a very legitimate complaint.

Super Smash Brothers never gave the sense that they were promoting anything; it always kind of served as a celebration of the past. I mean they threw ROB in their last game. That's certainly not out to promote a franchise with continued support.

Avatar image for upwardbound
upwarDBound

658

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By upwarDBound

I know I'm a little biased but I'm convinced that Sega could fill out an interesting roster for this style of game far better than Sony did. Not to mention that pretty much all of the characters could be first party creations.

Oh well it'll never happen and I still probably wouldn't be interested in it anyway. I'm not a Smash Bros. fan.

Avatar image for cyrisaurus
Cyrisaurus

465

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Cyrisaurus

Mention Smash Bros in first sentence - check

Complain about characters not being in that Sony doesn't have control over - check

figured Jeff wouldn't make the same dumb mistakes other reviewers did, but oh well.

It's a really fucking fun game, and in case everyone kinda forgot why they started playing games to begin with, Fun is kind of the most important factor.

FYI Jeff, Sucker Punch requested Good and Evil Cole. They are not palette swaps, they have different move sets.

Avatar image for ehker
Ehker

233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Ehker

A big point of this game is selling these modern characters and games, so why would Sony be putting time and money into licensing dead mascots?

Besides the marketing issue, suggestions like Lara Croft for being on a Playstation (but also the PC) some 15 years ago is still such an obscure and dated reference to force them to make for an All-Stars game, especially one that isn't called "Old School Playstation All-Stars".

Avatar image for krakn3dfx
Krakn3Dfx

2746

Forum Posts

101

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 3

Edited By Krakn3Dfx

As someone who enjoys the Smash Bros series, I had a good time with the beta for this and picked it up as a XMas gift for my son. Looking forward to cracking it open then and playing more. Yes, they could have done more, but I think it comes across as a solid first attempt at what it does. It also doesn't hurt than you're getting a free handheld copy alongside the big screen version if you happen to own a Vita.

I don't know that it'll sell especially well, and I don't know if it should, but as a fan of the "genre" as it is, it seems to scratch the itch between now and when a Smash Bros hits the Wii U,whenever that might be.

Avatar image for yummylee
Yummylee

24646

Forum Posts

193025

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 24

Edited By Yummylee

Concerning the two Coles, I think it's really no different from how there's both Mario and Luigi in SSB's. I mean technically they're different characters, but when it comes down to it Luigi is just a taller Mario wearing a different coloured outfit, and the personalities for each variations of Cole are of course drastically different from one another. I imagine each Cole even has his own unique moveset like in the inFAMOUS games themselves?

I'm not trying to defend this game or anything mind you as I have no interest in playing it anyway, but I just wanted to air my thoughts to anyone who perhaps regarded putting in two different Coles a little weird. Of course I won't deny that the roster is still a little weak all the same... A Big Daddy before even Kazuma Kiryu?! Let alone all of the other bigger Playstation omissions? GTFO, Sony U_U

Avatar image for napalm
napalm

9227

Forum Posts

162

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By napalm

@SlashDance said:

More like 3 Stars Battle Royale !!! aaaaHA !

Give this man a medal.

Avatar image for dixavd
Dixavd

3013

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Dixavd

At least it isn't broken - but I find that these titles really need all-out crazy references to work (something which the unimaginably large number of collectibles in Brawl really works). But purely from the fact that it works and does seem to be a proof-of-concept, I hope Sony gives the team more time to go for a bigger scope and knock it out of the park on the next PS console (I really think a next gen All Stars could steal a lot of fanfare from Nintendo's Smash Bros. on the WiiU).

We'll just have to wait and see.

Avatar image for bkbroiler
bkbroiler

1739

Forum Posts

438

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By bkbroiler

@TheHT said:

A bit ranty when it comes to the roster and presentation, but I get that a huge part of the concept for this game is exactly that.

A fine review all the same. Like you said, those "oh snap" moments are fantastic, and totally what makes the game for me. It's downright addictive looking for the right moment to drop down to the thick of things and wipe out all other players with a level 1 or 2.

I think you mean "on snap"

Avatar image for pixeldemon
Pixeldemon

252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Pixeldemon

Neither Sony nor MS actually managed to create a mascot for their game systems. For a while Sony had Crash Bandicoot as an answer to Mario, but that wasn't their IP and it went multi platform.

Avatar image for veektarius
veektarius

6420

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

Edited By veektarius

There's also a typo here where you say "on snap!" But thanks for the review. I would certainly be more interested in a game with Cloud Strife and Lara Croft, even if I would never select Crash Bandicoot.

Avatar image for theht
TheHT

15998

Forum Posts

1562

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Edited By TheHT

A bit ranty when it comes to the roster and presentation, but I get that a huge part of the concept for this game is exactly that.

A fine review all the same. Like you said, those "oh snap" moments are fantastic, and totally what makes the game for me. It's downright addictive looking for the right moment to drop down to the thick of things and wipe out all other players with a level 1 or 2.

Avatar image for joey_ravn
JoeyRavn

5290

Forum Posts

792

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By JoeyRavn

@leejunfan83 said:

Why is Jeff reviewing a game that is of a style that he does not like?

He is thorough in his review and presents the positive and negative points of the game in a balanced way. Why shouldn't he? He knows more about fighting games than anyone else on the staff, even if this particular approach to the genre is not his cup of tea exactly. Besides, everyone reviews games that may or not click with them This game is not special, it's not an exception to the rule.

Avatar image for gesi1223
gesi1223

266

Forum Posts

111

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By gesi1223

This review sums up my opinion of the game to a T.

This game feels like nothing more than a really poor rip of Smash Bros. The roster desicions and lack of polish to the aesthetics makes it that much more uninteresting. What a bummer, but if they happen to make a second game, maybe they'll try a little harder to put in the real Playstation All-Stars.

Avatar image for strife777
Strife777

2103

Forum Posts

347

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Strife777

Just wanted to point out you wrote ''on snap!'' instead of ''oh snap!''. Also, somebody else mentioned the Bioshock PS3 and 360 typo.

Great review. It's really too bad they didn't go further with the roster. I would've loved seeing characters like Noby Noby Boy or Vibri from Vib-Ribbon. Even levels from more "recent" games like Trash Panic. Hopefully, they get a second go at it and put more charm into the menus and that whole thing.

Avatar image for slashdance
SlashDance

1867

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By SlashDance

More like 3 Stars Battle Royale !!! aaaaHA !

Avatar image for beargirl1
beargirl1

12935

Forum Posts

14417

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 24

Edited By beargirl1

"You know, Big Daddy from BioShock, that huge PlayStation 3 hit... that shipped like a year later than the PS3 and 360 versions?"

i think you mean PC version instead of PS3

Avatar image for ravelle
Ravelle

3541

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Ravelle

I'll wait it out and see if they're planning on releasing a bunch of DLC characters or pull an Capcom All-Star Complete edition down the line. The game seems fun but with this few characters and the price still steep I can spend my money on better things.

Avatar image for hawkerace
Hawkerace

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Hawkerace

Bit of a typo, 'BioShock, that huge PlayStation 3 hit... that shipped like a year later than the PS3 and 360 versions?'

I assume it means the PC, just a typo nothing to lose shit over.

However while watching the quickplay and referencing super smash bros, I can't say either are appealing but probably feel more attached to the playstation as opposed to the nintendo brand for a battle royale. Either way I thought it was a dead genre more or less. Neither are appealing so my opinion really is a bit hollow.

Avatar image for sooty
Sooty

8193

Forum Posts

306

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By Sooty

@Young_Scott said:

@Sooty said:

I'm still finding it hard to look past them including a Big Daddy when that series was exclusive to 360 originally.

It's so stupid.

Actually, according to wikipedia, Bioshock came out on the PC the same day as the 360. But I understand and agree with your basic point! It's a bit weird.

Being out on PC has never made the "Only on Xbox" marker go away, that only seems to refer to console exclusivity. There's been quite a few other games to follow this pattern, it makes sense in a way as the PC doesn't directly compete with the 360 and it also runs a Microsoft OS. (well the vast majority of games require that)

Avatar image for morningstar
morningstar

2548

Forum Posts

351

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By morningstar

Too bad.

Avatar image for xeirus
Xeirus

1729

Forum Posts

418

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Xeirus

@Darthozzan said:

Closest I have ever been to the quest =( Oh well! I think this game plays really well, and I think 3 stars is personally a bit low but as I'm reading I find myself agreeing. Oh well. I think PSAS 2 could be sick though!

Quests are getting removed in the new website design. I wouldn't think too hard about it.

Avatar image for young_scott
Young_Scott

171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Young_Scott

@Sooty said:

I'm still finding it hard to look past them including a Big Daddy when that series was exclusive to 360 originally.

It's so stupid.

Actually, according to wikipedia, Bioshock came out on the PC the same day as the 360. But I understand and agree with your basic point! It's a bit weird.

Avatar image for leejunfan83
leejunfan83

1241

Forum Posts

54

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By leejunfan83

Why is Jeff reviewing a game that is of a style that he does not like?

Avatar image for sooty
Sooty

8193

Forum Posts

306

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

Edited By Sooty

I'm still finding it hard to look past them including a Big Daddy when that series was exclusive to 360 originally.

It's so stupid.

Avatar image for darthozzan
Darthozzan

145

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Darthozzan

Closest I have ever been to the quest =( Oh well! I think this game plays really well, and I think 3 stars is personally a bit low but as I'm reading I find myself agreeing. Oh well. I think PSAS 2 could be sick though!