I saw this article on Ultimate-Guitar, that I don't want to go too into because it is a lot of legal-ise, but basically there is a band from England that has been called Rocksmith for 4 years, who are upset that there is game called Rocksmith.
Rocksmith
Game » consists of 6 releases. Released Oct 18, 2011
Rocksmith is a guitar-based music game designed around playing a real electric guitar.
Apparently there is a band called Rocksmith who is not happy
@Pinworm45 said:
They're unsigned. Their own fault. Else I have infinite bands and sideprojects for every possible combination and will sue anyone and everyone who uses them.
Basically this.
They may be unsigned, but they do have a trademark on Rocksmith, so having a contract would only get them access to better corporate lawyers. I'm sure they would be on a decent label if they could.@Pinworm45 said:
They're unsigned. Their own fault. Else I have infinite bands and sideprojects for every possible combination and will sue anyone and everyone who uses them.Basically this.
Four fucking years, and they're still unsigned? Yea, i guess it's time to close the curtains guys.
Also, if they win the case, what do they think the aftermath will be? They'll forever be known as the butthurt band.
@Pinworm45 said:
They're unsigned. Their own fault. Else I have infinite bands and sideprojects for every possible combination and will sue anyone and everyone who uses them.
What does being signed have to with a trading name? Do you actually understand basic business law?
They're unsigned. Their own fault. Else I have infinite bands and sideprojects for every possible combination and will sue anyone and everyone who uses them.It's called Trademark. It has nothing to do with being unsigned or not. And according to the article, they trademarked the name back in 2003, meaning Ubisoft should have no legal foundation whatsoever against them.
Isn't notoriety supposed to be good for rock bands?Also, if they win the case, what do they think the aftermath will be? They'll forever be known as the butthurt band.
Zenimax / Bethesda's Lawyers should be all over this, The Elder Scroll series contains both Rocks & (Black) Smiths. What if someone gets confused?
There are more bands that take longer than 4 years to get signed than signed bands that didn't. Pretty dumb comment.Four fucking years, and they're still unsigned? Yea, i guess it's time to close the curtains guys.
Unsigned? Who cares, then. In the worst case situation, they'll have to change the name of the game in the UK. How about a band who could actually have a legitimate complaint?
I'm gonna go ahead and assume they're an 80's hair metal throwback band judging by that name. Nobody will convince me otherwise.
Sounds like an unknown nobody band wanting to make money off a company.
Not surprised- everyone tries to find a lottery ticket when and where-ever they can.
They don't care about the name, they just want money. Not that I entirely blame them, but these kinds of things always come off as whiny. (The concept of litigation with potential money, not the OP. I find the topic legitimately fun to talk about hehe)
Erm some great bands went years without being signed. Pantera (Not my favorite, but I'm sure someone here likes them) were unsigned for nine years or something.Four fucking years, and they're still unsigned? Yea, i guess it's time to close the curtains guys.
Also, if they win the case, what do they think the aftermath will be? They'll forever be known as the butthurt band.
@Pinworm45 said:
They're unsigned. Their own fault. Else I have infinite bands and sideprojects for every possible combination and will sue anyone and everyone who uses them.
If I read it right he trademarked the name Rocksmith 8 years ago, not sure how it works in the UK but where I live that is at least enough to either get a settlement or force ubisoft to change the name.... (most likely they would just change it to another equally generic name)
http://www.youtube.com/user/steveleguitar
funniest part is their guitarist recently went on YouTube complaining that his band's music wasn't considered for the game and one of those videos happened to be mine.
They claim that Ubisoft told THEM to change their name. I highly doubt Ubisoft gives a toss about what some bar band does lol
I would agree with you if time travel to the year 2003 was posibleSounds like an unknown nobody band wanting to make money off a company.
Not surprised- everyone tries to find a lottery ticket when and where-ever they can.
They don't care about the name, they just want money. Not that I entirely blame them, but these kinds of things always come off as whiny. (The concept of litigation with potential money, not the OP. I find the topic legitimately fun to talk about hehe)
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Comment and Save
Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment