i always make the mistake to read waaaayyy to many comments on crap like this... 
 
 
and after like half an hour my brain hurts and i want to punch a baby because i hate humanity or something

Yeah, I really don't care about some internet e-peen measuring contest.

Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer?

Oh sweet! MORE DRAMA TO READ!

" i always make the mistake to read waaaayyy to many comments on crap like this...   and after like half an hour my brain hurts and i want to punch a baby because i hate humanity or something "

" i always make the mistake to read waaaayyy to many comments on crap like this...   and after like half an hour my brain hurts and i want to punch a baby because i hate humanity or something "

" Yeah, I really don't care about some internet e-peen measuring contest. "

" Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer? "

" @Gamer_152 said:

" Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer? "

Normally i would say yes, this might sound out of proportion but i am pretty sure that the majority of the Halo community did not play an RTS like SC2 whilst the opposite is not that true(i have no doubt there are exceptions), and since Halo has had like 4 games, i'm sure that most people have at least some idea of how it works, and TBH Reach barely had any new innovations in it.  "

" @raiz265 said:

" i always make the mistake to read waaaayyy to many comments on crap like this...   and after like half an hour my brain hurts and i want to punch a baby because i hate humanity or something "

I'm not proud of either communities comments, but i'm just trying to get SC2 to become a little more out there. @Thule said:

" Yeah, I really don't care about some internet e-peen measuring contest. "

Its E4, tv show, this could actually bring in quite alot of attention to the winning game. 
@Gamer_152 said:

" Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer? "

Normally i would say yes, this might sound out of proportion but i am pretty sure that the majority of the Halo community did not play an RTS like SC2 whilst the opposite is not that true(i have no doubt there are exceptions), and since Halo has had like 4 games, i'm sure that most people have at least some idea of how it works, and TBH Reach barely had any new innovations in it.  "

" @gamefreak9 said:

" @Gamer_152 said:

" Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer? "

Normally i would say yes, this might sound out of proportion but i am pretty sure that the majority of the Halo community did not play an RTS like SC2 whilst the opposite is not that true(i have no doubt there are exceptions), and since Halo has had like 4 games, i'm sure that most people have at least some idea of how it works, and TBH Reach barely had any new innovations in it.  "

Let's face it, for a game 10 years coming Starcraft II didn't have all that many innovations either, just because they both stick to their core formula doesn't make either bad games. This isn't about innovation or who played what though, it's about which game more people like. "

" @raiz265 said:

" i always make the mistake to read waaaayyy to many comments on crap like this...   and after like half an hour my brain hurts and i want to punch a baby because i hate humanity or something "

I'm not proud of either communities comments, but i'm just trying to get SC2 to become a little more out there. @Thule said:

" Yeah, I really don't care about some internet e-peen measuring contest. "

Its E4, tv show, this could actually bring in quite alot of attention to the winning game. 
@Gamer_152 said:

" Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer? "

Normally i would say yes, this might sound out of proportion but i am pretty sure that the majority of the Halo community did not play an RTS like SC2 whilst the opposite is not that true(i have no doubt there are exceptions), and since Halo has had like 4 games, i'm sure that most people have at least some idea of how it works, and TBH Reach barely had any new innovations in it.  "

" @gamefreak9 said:

" @raiz265 said:

" i always make the mistake to read waaaayyy to many comments on crap like this...   and after like half an hour my brain hurts and i want to punch a baby because i hate humanity or something "

I'm not proud of either communities comments, but i'm just trying to get SC2 to become a little more out there. @Thule said:

" Yeah, I really don't care about some internet e-peen measuring contest. "

Its E4, tv show, this could actually bring in quite alot of attention to the winning game. 
@Gamer_152 said:

" Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer? "

Normally i would say yes, this might sound out of proportion but i am pretty sure that the majority of the Halo community did not play an RTS like SC2 whilst the opposite is not that true(i have no doubt there are exceptions), and since Halo has had like 4 games, i'm sure that most people have at least some idea of how it works, and TBH Reach barely had any new innovations in it.  "

My vote is for Starcraft also but you can't sell Reach short. Reach innovated to the same extent Starcraft did. Both games added some features, changed things up a little bit but on the whole kept the core game play and both games were for the better for it. I loves me some Halo but damn do Halo fanboys deserve some of the crap they get. Some of those comments are painful to read. "

" @gamefreak9 said:

" @raiz265 said:

" i always make the mistake to read waaaayyy to many comments on crap like this...   and after like half an hour my brain hurts and i want to punch a baby because i hate humanity or something "

I'm not proud of either communities comments, but i'm just trying to get SC2 to become a little more out there. @Thule said:

" Yeah, I really don't care about some internet e-peen measuring contest. "

Its E4, tv show, this could actually bring in quite alot of attention to the winning game. 
@Gamer_152 said:

" Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer? "

Normally i would say yes, this might sound out of proportion but i am pretty sure that the majority of the Halo community did not play an RTS like SC2 whilst the opposite is not that true(i have no doubt there are exceptions), and since Halo has had like 4 games, i'm sure that most people have at least some idea of how it works, and TBH Reach barely had any new innovations in it.  "

I'm voting for Halo, because I fucking love me some Halo. And you know what, I didn't play SC2, and I probably won't because I can't be arsed with the super-competitive community and elitist attitudes a lot of them seem to develop (not pointing any fingers, just speaking in general terms from what I've experienced so far)   And dude, who are you trying to fool saying that SC2 needs more attention. It's one of the biggest games this year, the people who wants it bought it already, and the rest will buy it when it drops in price. It doesn't need more attention more than any other game. And I highly doubt that G4tv will have any impact whatsoever on people's decisions on what to buy. "

Done. 
 
I like Halo too, but eh, SC2 is amazing.

" @audiosnag said:

" @gamefreak9 said:

" @raiz265 said:

" i always make the mistake to read waaaayyy to many comments on crap like this...   and after like half an hour my brain hurts and i want to punch a baby because i hate humanity or something "

I'm not proud of either communities comments, but i'm just trying to get SC2 to become a little more out there.  @Thule said:

" Yeah, I really don't care about some internet e-peen measuring contest. "

Its E4, tv show, this could actually bring in quite alot of attention to the winning game. 

@Gamer_152

said:

" Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer? "

Normally i would say yes, this might sound out of proportion but i am pretty sure that the majority of the Halo community did not play an RTS like SC2 whilst the opposite is not that true(i have no doubt there are exceptions), and since Halo has had like 4 games, i'm sure that most people have at least some idea of how it works, and TBH Reach barely had any new innovations in it.  "

My vote is for Starcraft also but you can't sell Reach short. Reach innovated to the same extent Starcraft did. Both games added some features, changed things up a little bit but on the whole kept the core game play and both games were for the better for it. I loves me some Halo but damn do Halo fanboys deserve some of the crap they get. Some of those comments are painful to read. "

Painful because they are retarded or because they are true? I'm not really saying reach is all bad, my fav is still the first one though, i feel like the formula just went down from there, Reach was better than 2-3 imo, but i'v been playing Halo every year nowadays that it takes alot more to impress me, whilst i did play SC for the fist 5 years after its release, i then changed up to W3, and SC2 just felt sooo new.  "

Reach and SC2 are equal.

" @Gamer_152 said:

" @gamefreak9 said:

" @Gamer_152 said:

" Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer? "

Normally i would say yes, this might sound out of proportion but i am pretty sure that the majority of the Halo community did not play an RTS like SC2 whilst the opposite is not that true(i have no doubt there are exceptions), and since Halo has had like 4 games, i'm sure that most people have at least some idea of how it works, and TBH Reach barely had any new innovations in it.  "

Let's face it, for a game 10 years coming Starcraft II didn't have all that many innovations either, just because they both stick to their core formula doesn't make either bad games. This isn't about innovation or who played what though, it's about which game more people like. "

I don't disagree that for 10 years its not much, but you have to keep in mind that its hard to innovate while keeping it so balanced, fps don't mind that much if some weopons are a little OP, in fact sometimes they overlap roles wayy too much.   Anyways the new innovations i consider are, Roaches, quick underground healing + them and infestors can move burrowed, banelings, can be used as mines, sentry, create temporary building blocks, collosus, a unit thats ground but can be be it by air whilst not seeing the difference in terrain between cliffs and ground,  void ray, continuously increasing damage, phoenix, graviton beam, make a ground unit temporarily aerial, terran reactors doubling que of a building, supply depot adding on and mule(even though supply depot not used much in pro games), i guess Xel Naga towers? I'm sure theres more, the innovations are just more subtle thats all.  "

i saw a comment about how starcraft is for 30 year olds who live in their moms basement. if i had an account there i would say halo is for 12 year olds who live in their moms attic 

" @Azteck said:

" @gamefreak9 said:

" @raiz265 said:

" i always make the mistake to read waaaayyy to many comments on crap like this...   and after like half an hour my brain hurts and i want to punch a baby because i hate humanity or something "

I'm not proud of either communities comments, but i'm just trying to get SC2 to become a little more out there. @Thule said:

" Yeah, I really don't care about some internet e-peen measuring contest. "

Its E4, tv show, this could actually bring in quite alot of attention to the winning game. 
@Gamer_152 said:

" Honestly, shouldn't people just vote for the game they prefer? "

Normally i would say yes, this might sound out of proportion but i am pretty sure that the majority of the Halo community did not play an RTS like SC2 whilst the opposite is not that true(i have no doubt there are exceptions), and since Halo has had like 4 games, i'm sure that most people have at least some idea of how it works, and TBH Reach barely had any new innovations in it.  "

I'm voting for Halo, because I fucking love me some Halo. And you know what, I didn't play SC2, and I probably won't because I can't be arsed with the super-competitive community and elitist attitudes a lot of them seem to develop (not pointing any fingers, just speaking in general terms from what I've experienced so far)   And dude, who are you trying to fool saying that SC2 needs more attention. It's one of the biggest games this year, the people who wants it bought it already, and the rest will buy it when it drops in price. It doesn't need more attention more than any other game. And I highly doubt that G4tv will have any impact whatsoever on people's decisions on what to buy. "

If you haven't played SC2, why are you posting in this forums?  That's something I don't really understand. "

" i saw a comment about how starcraft is for 30 year olds who live in their moms basement. if i had an account there i would say halo is for 12 year olds who live in their moms attic  "

" @Gamer_152:  Quoting got too much. Well no those are innovations because they are new mechanics in RTS in general, i didn't mention repears for instance since tiberium wars had jet packs that could jump over cliffs too(even though you had to have sight).  I mean which of the additions i mentioned has been done before? Thats IS innovation, innovation's aren't only big things, they are minor improvements(this might be random but one of my courses is Management of Innovation, so i think i'm in a pretty good position to say what qualifies as innovation).  "

" @Gamer_152:  Winning a popularity contest might make people snobby and stuck up, but it never hurt a product :P.  "

I'm not voting for anything if it means I have to sign up with G4's website. :P

1.Inhuman – pretends to create outside the mind what can only exist within it. 2.Destroys memory skills – readers forced to rely on aids 3.Unresponsive – texts can’t explain or justify 4.Real speech works within the give and take of real people. 

" @gamefreak9: Why do I have to prefer one? They are kind of completely different and both have appealing aspects.  Why do you have this contest in such high regard, it's a popularity contest that doesn't mean a thing... Both games are already immensely successful and have their established communities. I would also hope this contest is not as important as your mom choking.  Do you consider adding new units an innovation to the genre? Would you want all RTSes to build off basic unit archetypes? I'd hope not, that would make things very bland. "

The Starcraft community is above shit like this. No need to get dragged in with all the Halo kiddies. 

" @Azteck:  Predictable...Well i am saying that SC2 getting more attention could recreate the Korean scene in a small scale in the US, this would be a HUGE step for games, there would be differentiation between E sports and games. This can bring respect to the gaming community, i mean imagine in 30 years you might be able to put SC2 on ur CV, like poker players put that in theirs.    Your the ignorant idiot i am trying to marginalize myself from, why i hate being called a gamer.  "

" @gamefreak9 said:

" @Azteck:  Predictable...Well i am saying that SC2 getting more attention could recreate the Korean scene in a small scale in the US, this would be a HUGE step for games, there would be differentiation between E sports and games. This can bring respect to the gaming community, i mean imagine in 30 years you might be able to put SC2 on ur CV, like poker players put that in theirs.    Your the ignorant idiot i am trying to marginalize myself from, why i hate being called a gamer.  "

WE HAVE A WINNER PEOPLE FOR THE DUMBEST COMMENT OF THE YEAR !  I love starcraft but you will never put starcraft 2 in your CV "

" @Edin8999 said:

" @gamefreak9 said:

" @Azteck:  Predictable...Well i am saying that SC2 getting more attention could recreate the Korean scene in a small scale in the US, this would be a HUGE step for games, there would be differentiation between E sports and games. This can bring respect to the gaming community, i mean imagine in 30 years you might be able to put SC2 on ur CV, like poker players put that in theirs.    Your the ignorant idiot i am trying to marginalize myself from, why i hate being called a gamer.  "

WE HAVE A WINNER PEOPLE FOR THE DUMBEST COMMENT OF THE YEAR !  I love starcraft but you will never put starcraft 2 in your CV "

NEVER!!!! "

" @Edin8999 said:

" @Edin8999 said:

" @gamefreak9 said:

" @Azteck:  Predictable...Well i am saying that SC2 getting more attention could recreate the Korean scene in a small scale in the US, this would be a HUGE step for games, there would be differentiation between E sports and games. This can bring respect to the gaming community, i mean imagine in 30 years you might be able to put SC2 on ur CV, like poker players put that in theirs.    Your the ignorant idiot i am trying to marginalize myself from, why i hate being called a gamer.  "

WE HAVE A WINNER PEOPLE FOR THE DUMBEST COMMENT OF THE YEAR !  I love starcraft but you will never put starcraft 2 in your CV "

NEVER!!!! "

Koreans have been putting it in their CV for 5 years, its actually supposed to be one of the best indications for fast stock Brokering, thank you, try again.  "

" Starcraft doesn't need support its too awesome "