@spaceinsomniac: A "movement" is completely worthless if not everybody within it agrees with each other 100% of the time? What?
And who's blaming people for not sharing their opinion? I really don't know what you're on about here dude.
Let's look at what I actually said, what what I was replying to:
@spaceinsomniac said:
@pcorb said:
@spaceinsomniac said:
It's hard to agree with a social movement that can't agree with itself, isn't it? In the end, you're taking an opinion you have, and holding another party responsible for your opinion.
It's almost as if social movements are ultimately composed of individuals with their own opinions, and not some weird homogeneous borg of collective, unanimous agreement. Almost.
At worst, that makes the gender issue movement in gaming completely worthless. At best, it makes it extremely disingenuous to suggest that your opinion is anything but YOUR opinion, which happens every single time that someone assigns blame to someone else for not sharing their opinion.
First part: "At worst, that makes the gender issue movement in gaming completely worthless."
Literally the only thing that the gender issue movement in gaming can agree on is that there should be more good female characters in video games, which I also happen to completely agree with, as do many others who reject the type of journalism going on at places like Polygon.
The problem comes with the fact that no one agrees with what "good female characters" means, which is a rather large issue for a movement.
Some people don't want violence against women, some don't want you to pull your punches when it comes to female characters being able to take the same abuse as any man. Some people want women to be violent, some don't. Some think female characters should only have feminine aspects to their character, and some want them to be as strong as any man. Some people are bothered by women that take a secondary role to a male protagonist, and others are not.
Your question was "A "movement" is completely worthless if not everybody within it agrees with each other 100% of the time?"
In this case, yes, because the only thing that the movement can agree upon is something that I already agree with, and I don't consider myself part of the movement.
Do you know what the gay marriage movement wants? Gay people to be able to get married. That is an example of a strong movement. No one is debating what "able to get married" means, and everyone is united in working towards a single and highly specific goal.
And now for the second part of my post.
"At best, it makes it extremely disingenuous to suggest that your opinion is anything but YOUR opinion, which happens every single time that someone assigns blame to someone else for not sharing their opinion."
Your question was "And who's blaming people for not sharing their opinion? I really don't know what you're on about here dude."
If I suggest that the most recent God of War game wasn't fun, that's an opinion. If I say this instead, that's no longer an opinion. It's a personal attack on someone's character because of my opinion, and that happens all the time these days with gaming journalism on the topics of gender and race.
Log in to comment