Possible 8yrs in prison for video game comment

Avatar image for pop
Pop

2769

Forum Posts

4697

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

What I don't understand is how the fuck did that "canadian woman" from the article find his address?

Avatar image for rebgav
rebgav

1442

Forum Posts

335

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152  Edited By rebgav

Here's the thing; this whole scenario is ridiculous and what the dude said wasn't much of a threat even if you did think he was being serious.

However... it's still-beating not "still, beating," the latter suggests a disembodied heart which is both still and beating rather than continuing to beat after removal. Eight years isn't enough for that misplaced comma.

Edit: How disturbing is the thought that the people who can't detect sarcasm in text now wield an enormous amount of power over your liberty thanks to the US' fear of terrorism?

Avatar image for stryker1121
stryker1121

2178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Odd comment from the father:

“Justin was the kind of kid who didn’t read the newspaper,” said Jack Carter. “He didn’t watch television. He wasn’t aware of current events. These kids, they don’t realize what they’re doing. They don’t understand the implications. They don’t understand.”

For a 19-year-old, he sounds like he's fucking 12, and just the type of "just for the lulz" callous internet idiot I cannot stand. Did he not know about Newtown? That said, it's unbelievable that he's been in prison for 3 months over making a joke in poor taste. That Canadian woman has her head up her ass.

Avatar image for jazz_lafayette
Jazz_Lafayette

3897

Forum Posts

844

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

#154  Edited By Jazz_Lafayette

Alright, a few things:

  • Defending this kid's right to blurt out dumb shit is entirely valid, but a few people here are sliding into defending the competitive online culture itself, which I don't think is a great idea. The fact that he said something casually offensive is an "acceptable response" only because of the context of frequently disgusting trash-talking that goes on in games like LoL, and that's not something that should be fostered as some form of nebulous community-building. In other words, don't just shrug your shoulders, try to help and create an environment in which an 18-year-old boy wouldn't feel pressured to elevate the conversational stakes to absurdity.
  • Had this been an interpersonal threat, I'd feel much more conflicted about supporting him. Because of how the negative emotional impact of death tends to be inversely proportional to the scale of the crime, making light of public violence might be easier to justify. To this guy, the idea of attacking a school probably seemed like the most blatantly ridiculous threat he could make. But insinuating an intention to physically harm another individual, especially in this day and age (I mean, how much trouble was it for this Canadian woman to find where the boy lived?), strikes me as a much more real danger. Especially given the tendency of online chat to devolve into horrible misogyny.
  • I really have to wonder if the way this guy has been handled so far was affected by Joe Public's perception of video games. Every single time we hear about a massacre, one of the first things the media will dig up is the perpetrator's game collection. Obviously, we here can point to the fundamental flaws in giving that association as much import as it receives, but what was the first thing the authorities thought of when they got the tip? Would the arrest have been made if the conversation had been about, say, the latest season of American Idol? For that matter, would a judge and jury be able to separate this case from all the "ban violent video games" politicking that Texas' elected representatives are so fond of? Austin may be an easygoing, liberal city, but we've still got some hard-line sons of bitches running our justice system.

EDIT: For people who don't understand how his address was found so easily, evidently the conversation itself did not take place in LoL itself but on Facebook.

Avatar image for connerthekewlkid
connerthekewlkid

1873

Forum Posts

31

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I didnt know this was what brought out peoples Anti America vibe, geez.

Avatar image for milkman
Milkman

19372

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

This is obviously pretty ridiculous but I'd like to also point out that this kid sounds like just the worst.

Avatar image for jsnyder82
jsnyder82

871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#157  Edited By jsnyder82

8 years for any kind of remark is way, way too much time. That's ridiculous.

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#158  Edited By Turambar

@yukoasho said:

@politicalscientist said:

Anyone defending this kind of behavior is a fucking moron and sums up why I hate gamers. They should do a little research and learn what Free Speech actually means.

Would you defend someone who said they were going to shoot up the Giant Bomb offices?

How is this different?

This.

While eight years for some stupid shit talk online is a bit harsh, this isn't the sort of thing you can "lol, jk" off. In the unfortunate world we live in, you have to take every threat of a school shooting seriously.

As a highschool teacher, no, we actually don't. Context and perspective should be something all human beings are capable of. The "Zero Tolerance" policy that has been the norm for quite awhile now is a giant failure in accomplishing its original intended purpose: protecting welfare of students.

Avatar image for korolev
korolev

1800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 8

Jesus Christ this is stupid as hell. 8 Years? That's sheer nonsense!

Okay, I agree that such comments need to be taken seriously - but 8 years? 8 hours of community service is a more appropriate punishment.

Making a "threat" is not the same thing as carrying out that threat. If the police investigated and they found that the individual had not made concrete plans or assembled the means to carry out a threat (as in, starting stocking weapons and ammo), then they should do the sensible thing and just give the guy a warning.

He didn't call into the police to make the threat. He didn't make the threat against a school directly - it was a stupid, crass comment said in a video game. He doesn't deserve 8 days in jail, let alone 8 years. Hopefully a jury will see how stupid this case is and throw it out of court.

Avatar image for CastroCasper
CastroCasper

1589

Forum Posts

164

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Don't say dumb shit. 8 years is a little much, but kidding or not, don't say dumb shit.

Avatar image for blastroid
Blastroid

289

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

@blastroid said:

Click here to view/sign petition. As of writing this only need around 2,100 more of the 16,000 sigs.

What happens when 16,000 sigs are acquired?

There was another case where a kid rapping was arrested and a petition was needed to start some legal process. Not sure the details but that petition got 900,000 sigs and kid was released a few days ago.

Avatar image for likeassur
LikeaSsur

1625

Forum Posts

517

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

8 years is a bit excessive, but good for them for throwing him in the slammer. Accountability is a lost art that needs to be recovered.

Avatar image for neato
neato

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163  Edited By neato

jailing non-criminals for 8 years sounds like the best way to make someone a criminal. the kid is going to come out of jail with nothing going for him and tons of resentment.

Avatar image for aetheldod
Aetheldod

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

I just wish to add ... 18 years old IS NOT A KID , and he should know better , on the other hand 8 yrs for a bad joke is nonsensical at all , thats a fucked up "fascism" style of punishment for words. Also isnt it creepy that a Canadian woman ratted him out? What the heck? I dunno what to say....

Avatar image for pulledabrad
PulledaBrad

631

Forum Posts

54

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165  Edited By PulledaBrad

Asshole kid actually sees repercussions of his actions on the internet? I see no problem with this.

Avatar image for clonedzero
Clonedzero

4206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

8 years is a bit excessive, but good for them for throwing him in the slammer. Accountability is a lost art that needs to be recovered.

A bit excessive? Good for them? Are you insane? He was talking to his friend and some canadian woman took his sarcastic remark seriously and called the cops.

He didnt like threaten the school as a joke, he didnt insult anyone, he was joking around with his friend.

It's insane people think WORDS are a reason to send someone to PRISON.

Avatar image for alexandersheen
AlexanderSheen

5150

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

8 years for shit talking on the internet? Seems fine to me. I don't know why you guys are so upset about this.

Avatar image for grillbar
Grillbar

2079

Forum Posts

310

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

that's freedom of speech for you.
the way i heard the story. (did not care to read the link) he was just talking shit to a friend, and taking out of context he mentioned doing a school shooting if he was insane but it was used as an argument to prove that he was not insane. and some canadian mother got overly concerned and apparently diddent know what sarcasm was and tracked him and his address down and reported him to the police, and since he lived near a school that ofc was enough reasons to claim that he would actually do it, even though neither he or his dad owned a gun or any other from of firearm. its retarded that he has even been held in prison for so long just to wait for his trial. i though they had to prove intent/motive for doing so. and a basic psych eval should prove him innocent. even if it had to be on his own dime.
is what he said okay, ofc not it was insensitive, inappropriate and down right stupid.
but i mean come on

Avatar image for otleaz
Otleaz

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The crazy thing is all these people saying it is okay because he was clearly being sarcastic. No, it is okay even if there was no indication that he was being sarcastic. People say stupid shit on the internet all the time. If he had a record of violent comments and then started talking about it, sure look into it, otherwise you are overreacting... because this IS the internet after all.

Avatar image for thugg1280
thugg1280

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

WTF Texas why is it when I hear about some dumb shit it's going down in Texas?

Avatar image for thugg1280
thugg1280

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#172  Edited By thugg1280

Freedom of speech is in place for unpopular speech even if it is in poor taste this is not minority report where you can be locked up for crimes they think you are going to comet in the future. Hope his mom and dad sue the shit out of the state.

Avatar image for levio
Levio

1953

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

Oh man, Canadian women have the sexiest accents. I'd love meet one of them in court as I try to explain how I don't want to eat children's hearts! Yowza.

Avatar image for thugg1280
thugg1280

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

But a Canadian woman who saw the post looked up Carter’s Austin address, determined that it was near an elementary school, and called the police. Carter was arrested one month later

evaluate all potential threats seriously lmao is that why they waited a month what a joke

Avatar image for levio
Levio

1953

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

I bet if he had said he was going to eat chickens' hearts, no one would even care. People are real bigots.

Avatar image for foolishchaos
FoolishChaos

515

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

This is insane... guys I don't want to be on the internet anymore :(

Avatar image for gamingmichael
gamingmichael

127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@demoskinos: Well, it depends on the full context of the argument. We don't know the full conversation. Even if it was in poor taste, going to jail for even one day in this instance is too long as there was no indication that his comment was an actual threat.

Avatar image for otleaz
Otleaz

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#178  Edited By Otleaz

@gamingmichael: Because all of the threats of people killing our families and raping our mother should be taken completely seriously since they aren't being sarcastic... and that is a very civil example.

People say stupid shit all the time on the internet: fact.

Avatar image for yummylee
Yummylee

24646

Forum Posts

193025

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 88

User Lists: 24

#179  Edited By Yummylee

And Dumber.

Avatar image for egg
egg

1666

Forum Posts

23283

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

signed, displayed signature

Avatar image for bunnymud
bunnymud

765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181  Edited By bunnymud

@thepickle: Closed it the second I saw it was on dailycaller. The audience for that site seems to be 40-60 year old white racists.

Please tell me how you know that they are in that age range and white. I would also like super powers like that.

Avatar image for green_incarnate
Green_Incarnate

1789

Forum Posts

124

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Sarcasm, the deadliest of killers on the internet since its inception. It just might cost you your life folks.

Avatar image for professoress
ProfessorEss

7962

Forum Posts

160

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

#183  Edited By ProfessorEss

@neato said:

jailing non-criminals for 8 years sounds like the best way to make someone a criminal. the kid is going to come out of jail with nothing going for him and tons of resentment.

Yup. Good job, they removed a internet big-mouth from the streets. Unfortunately they'll most likely be releasing a real criminal in 8 years in his place.

Avatar image for masternater27
masternater27

944

Forum Posts

17

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I think he probably learned his lesson and should be let out on time served.

Avatar image for russellmetimber
RussellMeTimber

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Seems extreme on both sides of the coin

Avatar image for cabbages
CABBAGES

616

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This must be a joke.

How do they know it was him ? what if it was his friend or brother or anyone ?

Avatar image for melficevkm
MelficeVKM

161

Forum Posts

98

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is insanely dumb. It sounds like a silly remark made in the heat of the moment. If he is locked away, he'll probably come out of prison with actual resentment and will be more likely to commit a crime

Avatar image for veektarius
veektarius

6420

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

#188  Edited By veektarius
@jakob187 said:

This is so fucking stupid. Given that this was in League of Legends, I can already imagine what the exact conversation was:

Other player: "s20, this fucker feeds."

This kid: "oh yeah my fault you suck bitch"

Other player: "says 0/22 yi ap mid yi fucking sucks uninstall plz"

This kid: "fuck you man you fed cho'gath up top"

Other player: "youre messed up in the head if you think i fed dipshit"

This kid: "oh yeah, I’m real messed up in the head, I’m going to go shoot up a school full of kids and eat their still, beating hearts"

"lol"

"jk"

If it wasn't something like that, it was something like this:

Other players: "OMG STOP DL'ING PORN AND YOU WILL QUIT LAGGING"

"stop playing on a ti82 idiot"

This kid: "i like tentacle porn best, they love me long time"

Other players: "i love the octopussy"

"you guys are messed up"

This kid: "oh yeah, I’m real messed up in the head, I’m going to go shoot up a school full of kids and eat their still, beating hearts"

"lol"

"jk"

Basically, it's stupid shit being said for the sake of saying stupid shit.

This country needs to get its hens in a row at some point and stop being so fucking idiotic about this shit.

I loled.

Avatar image for gaminghooligan
gaminghooligan

1831

Forum Posts

30

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 1

I think he deserved to be called out on his statement, however giving jail time to someone for something so minor and ruining their life is pretty harsh punishment. Seems like the situation could have been resolved with a firm discussion of the issue, no one needed to get a black mark on their record.

Avatar image for selfconfessedcynic
selfconfessedcynic

3005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

@dudeglove said:

Reaffirming the belief that MOBA players are a vile bunch. Joy.

Pretty much where I stand, too. Free to play games in general seem to be a great place to see the internet's low-points. Sigh.

(though I don't play MOBAs myself, half my friends play DOTA2 - which kinda makes me bias, I guess)

Avatar image for oraknabo
oraknabo

1744

Forum Posts

12

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#191  Edited By oraknabo

I don't know how anyone can defend the treatment of this guy or say things like "at least someone is being punished for being an asshole" and be posting on this site or listening to the Bombcast. The original source of this site's name was a joke to troll organizations like the NSA and US homeland security hawks. Go back and watch the How to Build a Bomb videos. They contain multiple comments just like this guy made. I don't know how many times I've heard Jeff or Ryan make comments like this on camera and in print, not just on an essentially private conversation on Facebook and I don't remember anyone here calling them vile or demanding they be called out or jailed for it.

This is going to sound hypocritical coming from someone posting on an online forum, but I think the real lesson to be learned here is that people need to realize that having a conversation on Facebook is broadcasting to an audience of billions, not private. There are lots of things I will say in private that I wouldn't say if someone put a live TV camera on me.

Avatar image for nekroskop
Nekroskop

2830

Forum Posts

47

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Only in America. More labor for the prison industrial complex, I guess.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e49e9175da37
deactivated-5e49e9175da37

10812

Forum Posts

782

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

@jsnyder82 said:

8 years for any kind of remark is way, way too much time. That's ridiculous.

Any amount of years for any kind of remark is too much time unless you're living in a Goddamn police state.

@kurtdyoung said:

Don't say dumb shit. 8 years is a little much, but kidding or not, don't say dumb shit.

There is no shit so dumbly spoken as to justify incarceration.

@likeassur said:

8 years is a bit excessive, but good for them for throwing him in the slammer. Accountability is a lost art that needs to be recovered.

ACCOUNTABILITY?! GOOD FOR THROWING HIM IN THE SLAMMER?! What country do you live in?! How on earth can you possibly think that?! Are you even aware that people in western democracies are supposed to have rights?

@otleaz said:

The crazy thing is all these people saying it is okay because he was clearly being sarcastic. No, it is okay even if there was no indication that he was being sarcastic. People say stupid shit on the internet all the time. If he had a record of violent comments and then started talking about it, sure look into it, otherwise you are overreacting... because this IS the internet after all.

People say stupid shit on the internet all the time, and they're allowed to, provided they don't live in China or Pakistan. Anyone who believes that people should only be able to say things the government deems as acceptable should maybe move to those countries.

These kind of reactions, the "good, we need to protect people's feelings and punish people for saying objectionable things" make me so crazy I can hardly breathe. I understand you don't want freedom of speech, it's too much for you, the potential for people to say things that you don't like is just too much for you to bear and you wish for an authoritarian system to come eliminate anything you dislike, but the rest of us actually enjoy having rights and will not tolerate you attempting to sell them. But thank you so much for justifying informing on absolutely anyone or anything you find 'suspicious'. Inform on your neighbors, never turn off the telescreen.

Avatar image for jerseyscum
jerseyscum

1285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Trolling is not a crime.

Avatar image for the_laughing_man
The_Laughing_Man

13807

Forum Posts

7460

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

There is an update. Seems he posted all this on his Facebook or something.

Avatar image for zirilius
Zirilius

1700

Forum Posts

49

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Avatar image for streetninja
streetninja

198

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

@jakob187 said:

@joeyravn said:

@jakob187 said:

3. Free speech means FREE speech. Say what you want. You can literally say anything you want. The problem is that this country has gone so far in terms of censorship that they lost common sense and logic.

I think you are mixing things a bit here. "Free speech" is not absolutely free. Or, at least, it's not free as in "without consequences". Sure, no one can prevent you from actually saying literally anything you want. They can't gag you and stop you from saying, for example, that you love Hitler. But that doesn't mean that what you say will not have consequences because it's protected under "freedom of speech". Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights clearly states that:

1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.

The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:

(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;

(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.

Your reply was the United Nations treaty? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I should show this post to Libya, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Brazil, China, and Cuba. I'm sure they'll all get a good laugh.

By the Constitution of the United States of America, free speech means FREE speech. Moreover, the Anti-Defamation League has gone to great lengths to ensure that it means EVERYONE, including (whether we like it or not) the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Brotherhood, the Westboro Baptist Church, and other forms of speech we may not necessarily want to hear.

Unfortunately, thanks to modern government and their love of censorship, free speech is becoming less and less relevant everyday.

Take a look at the time, place and manner restrictions of the first amendment.

Avatar image for bestusernameever
BestUsernameEver

5026

Forum Posts

347

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jace said:

That's insanity. Fuck Canada.

BRB SOMEONES AT THE D

The police want your D.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e49e9175da37
deactivated-5e49e9175da37

10812

Forum Posts

782

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

@streetninja: The restrictions on free speech or liberty are there to prevent one from infringing on the free speech or liberty of others. A sarcastic comment does not constitute this, it doesn't even constitute a credible threat.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a1a3d3c6820c
deactivated-5a1a3d3c6820c

3235

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

He didn't even make a threat. It was a silly sarcastic comment. Yeah, a little tasteless maybe, but seriously, if making tasteless comments gets you locked up for months, then I don't even know what to think anymore.