• 108 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for hot_karl
#51 Edited by Hot_Karl (3321 posts) -

Amazing gameplay by a hair, because a game can have a bad story and crap graphics/sound, but if it's fun to play, none of that will matter at all. Gameplay can usually hold my interest when the story can't. Sometimes vice versa- for example, Deadly Premonition.

Avatar image for iek
#52 Posted by IEK (40 posts) -

As an artist graphics has always been the thing that attracts me to games, i'll try out the crappiest games if i can at least appreciate the art.

Avatar image for efwefwe
#53 Posted by wefwefasdf (6730 posts) -

I'll take the awesome gameplay. I need a new multiplayer fix.

Avatar image for mosdef
#54 Posted by mosdef (206 posts) -

No story.  No graphics.  Greatest game ever made and only in beta (pronounced beat-a).

Avatar image for theseductivemoose
#55 Posted by TheSeductiveMoose (3629 posts) -

Story, would be nice to see that for once.

Avatar image for gamefreak9
#56 Posted by gamefreak9 (2877 posts) -
@ArbitraryWater said:
 Graphics Smaphics. That shallow preference is reserved for people who don't play that many games to begin with, or people around the age of 13. "
@IEK said:
" As an artist graphics has always been the thing that attracts me to games, i'll try out the crappiest games if i can at least appreciate the art. "
ROUND 1.....................................................................FIGHT!!
Avatar image for animateria
#57 Posted by animateria (3335 posts) -

Honestly, yeah.  

Avatar image for vinchenzo
#58 Posted by Vinchenzo (6463 posts) -

Well Half-Life 2 does all of that, so I don't see why we can't have everything.

Avatar image for toms115
#59 Posted by Toms115 (2329 posts) -

story all day everyday. 

Avatar image for ez123
#60 Posted by ez123 (2145 posts) -

Gameplay is easily 1st.  I would have graphics 2nd.  I play a shit load of games with terrible stories but none that I think are bad looking.    Aside from games with bad stories, I like many racing games(arcade and sim), sports games(arcade and sim), and puzzle games, which mostly have no stories.

Avatar image for spoonman671
#61 Posted by Spoonman671 (5800 posts) -

If gameplay isn't the primary focus, then it shouldn't be a game.  That's what books and movies are for.

Avatar image for iek
#62 Posted by IEK (40 posts) -
I disagree, movies and books aren't nearly as immersive as well presented games can be. Besides, games like flower would make terrible movies...
Avatar image for c0v3rt
#63 Posted by C0V3RT (1420 posts) -

Story - it what keeps me coming back. Gameplay has to be tolerable. Graphics just enhance the experience.

Avatar image for spoonman671
#64 Posted by Spoonman671 (5800 posts) -
@IEK said:
" @Spoonman671:  I disagree, movies and books aren't nearly as immersive as well presented games can be. Besides, games like flower would make terrible movies... "
They also make terrible games.
Avatar image for iek
#65 Posted by IEK (40 posts) -
to each his own i guess
Avatar image for wickedcobra03
#66 Posted by WickedCobra03 (2241 posts) -

Just as the poll indicates, first the gameplay has to be in order and good.  Then usually with me, if the game really has a good story, that is another hook in me.  Graphics are not a huge deal really with me unless they just look completely awful.  I own and regularly play games on the Wii you know.... therefore I would say I am not concerned really in the least with graphics being a big draw.  Then again, I am  a PC boy from back in the day when the whole Half Life 2 and Doom 3 thing was going on and was gushing over those 2 games with my Radeon 9800.

Avatar image for klei
#67 Posted by Klei (1798 posts) -

Gameplay for me. Story is meaningless for me in videogames, simply because I don't invest myself fully enough to be immersed. Take for instance, the Stalker or Fallout games. I played them over and over, and I have no idea of the storyline. I always fast forward the conversations just to keep on with my gameplay. 
And this come from a guy who pays his bill writing books. Weird, heh?

Avatar image for spoonman671
#68 Posted by Spoonman671 (5800 posts) -
@IEK: That was far too civil of you.  I believe you were supposed to insult my intelligent or possibly curse at me.
Avatar image for aus_azn
#69 Posted by Aus_azn (2272 posts) -

Definitely not graphics, but it's a real toss-up between the other two.

Avatar image for dalai
#70 Posted by Dalai (7869 posts) -

Gameplay, with story a distant second. 
And HitmanAgent47 is a filthy liar. Gameplay... pshaw!

Avatar image for deactivated-58c3985c661d1
#71 Posted by deactivated-58c3985c661d1 (2120 posts) -

Story. I stopped playing Just Cause 2 quite quickly because the story was utter shit.

Avatar image for darkwingduck
#72 Posted by darkwingduck (215 posts) -

dont care for graphics, story is nice but if i play through a game for a second time i cant stand having to sit through long cutscenes, gameplay is where its at!

Avatar image for ntm
#73 Posted by NTM (9929 posts) -

I have to have all of them be good enough. Not just "oh, these are great graphics... but the game is boring and the story isn't compelling." or, "Yeah, this game's fun, but I wish if they make a sequel it has a better story and better graphics.." And well, you get the gist.
Avatar image for theblindchessman
#74 Posted by TheBlindChessman (250 posts) -

Story, but mainly because no game I've played has ever had an "amazing" story.

Avatar image for raidingkvatch
#75 Posted by raidingkvatch (1209 posts) -

I can cope with mediocre gameplay, and bad graphics for a good story, for me to play a game with shitty story the other two would either both have to be great or one would have to be absolutely outstanding. I hope that made sense.

Avatar image for mrcellophane
#76 Posted by MrCellophane (570 posts) -
@arab_prince said:
" Story. I stopped playing Just Cause 2 quite quickly because the story was utter shit. "
QFT. I only continued through it to get the trophies :P
Avatar image for festeringneon
#77 Posted by FesteringNeon (2276 posts) -

Graphics all the way. We know storyline and gameplay don't matter. You may have an award winning script on your hands.. but that's all you have. I'm playing a dumb plot-less game at 2400X1675 MAXXXXED OUT bitches!!
I hate you. :)

Avatar image for aleryn
#78 Posted by Aleryn (718 posts) -

Gameplay.  Story second if it's a single player game.

Avatar image for az123
#79 Edited by AZ123 (192 posts) -

Gameplay. This should not even be a discussion. Everything about Comic Jumper was awesome EXCEPT the gameplay, which really hurt it. No matter how good the graphics or story, if the game ain't fun to play, then why play games?

Avatar image for wickedcestus
#80 Posted by WickedCestus (3781 posts) -

I don't know. A game that favors any of the three over the others could appeal to me. I don't really like to limit myself, I'll give a chance to any game.

Avatar image for three0nefive
#81 Edited by Three0neFive (2387 posts) -

i don't understand why people always talk like it's only possible for games to do one of those things good at any one time

Avatar image for iam3green
#82 Posted by iam3green (14368 posts) -

gameplay has to be good. story is just alright in games now. gameplay has to be good in a game. a game can be crappy.

Avatar image for jeanluc
#83 Posted by JeanLuc (3882 posts) -

Story is always a big selling point for me. It has to be the kind of story that only a game can provide though. Something like Mass Effect would never work as a movie because I get to make choices that effect the outcome.  
I don't always need a story though. Bayonetta was a great example of me playing for the crazy fun combat; the stupid batshit insane story was just a plus. I guess thats another example of a story that would only work in a video game. Can you imagine a Bayonetta movie? I'd see it. 
Really though, I feel that both story and gameplay are equally important when making a game. Graphics are just a plus.

Avatar image for jorbear
#84 Posted by jorbear (2570 posts) -

If the story is good enough, I will finish the game no matter how bad the gameplay is. Vice-versa for gameplay. Graphics can certainly make a good impression for a game, but thats about it. 

Avatar image for superfluousmoniker
#85 Posted by SuperfluousMoniker (2928 posts) -

I almost prefer it when games don't have involved stories. I want to shoot people and jump on platforms, not watch cutscenes. RPGs with good stories and dialogue choice stuff are good, but 75% of games could have as much story as your average Mega Man game and I wouldn't care. For every game like Uncharted 2 that has a decent story, there are a dozen Gears of Wars and Vanquishes where it's just an excuse to do what I bought the game for.

Avatar image for zombiehunterog
#86 Posted by ZombieHunterOG (3529 posts) -

anyone who said graphics does not have a solid grasp of priorities 

Avatar image for trebz
#87 Posted by Trebz (488 posts) -

Gameplay. It's a video game. Above all, having fun is the important part.

Avatar image for robot4me
#88 Posted by robot4me (204 posts) -


Avatar image for monetarydread
#89 Posted by MonetaryDread (2784 posts) -
  1. Gameplay
  2. Graphics
  3. Story
Avatar image for ahmadmetallic
#90 Posted by AhmadMetallic (19301 posts) -
@gamefreak9 said:
" I can get story from books and movies, i play Games for amazing interactivity. GAMEPLAY!! "
Avatar image for ahmadmetallic
#91 Posted by AhmadMetallic (19301 posts) -
@CarlSmith said:
" I kind of think that the majority of the Mass Effect community out there told us - Sometimes awful gameplay and at time terrible graphics still makes the original Mass Effect one of the greatest gaming experiences ever. :) So yeah - story.  "
whats with all this STORY talk? you make it sound like Mass Effect has this extraordinary never-thought-of-before story.. 
I loved both Mass Effect games. the first one is one of my all time favorites. the story was very epic and moving, with characters that mattered and a war that kept me fighting til the end, but it wasnt all that fantastic.. simply put, it was about an ALIEN FORCE that threatened HUMANITY and ONE MAN had to lead the forces of good to DESTROY EVIL .... hello? Lord of the Rings ? Dragon Age Origins ? and many many other books and movies and games ? 
i challenge anyone here to name 5 games that had a great stories that werent basically about a hero fighting off evil and saving the world, or going up to an infected space station and purging it/defeating the alien infection, or going behind enemy lines to sabotage their shit and cripple their evil WMD-related plans...  
Actually, come to think of it, there pretty much arent great stories at all ! we THINK that movies and games have great stories, but we're fooled by either the intensity or the characters etc.. but the stories at core are 90% of the time about some liberation or some other typical shit. The Matrix for example. my all time favorite movie. whats it about? Liberating humanity from the machines that enslaved their minds.. 
Avatar image for eviltwin
#92 Posted by EvilTwin (3316 posts) -

Gameplay might be too narrow a term.  Interactivity is what makes the medium unique, though, so I think the interactivity has to be central to the game you're making.  Therefore, I choose gameplay.

Avatar image for bigrhyno
#93 Posted by Bigrhyno (509 posts) -

I can't believe graphics is losing so bad. Graphics are clearly the only thing that matters in video games.

Avatar image for herbiebug
#94 Posted by HerbieBug (4228 posts) -

For the longest time story held the #1 spot for me.  Now, not quite as much.  I no longer have the kind of free time available to sit down with a long narrative heavy game that I used to, so naturally gameplay has taken precedence.  There is also the issue of not having the patience to tolerate mediocre gameplay just to experience a good story.   I just called it quits with AC:brohood about 70% through, for example, due to lack of enthusiasm about the checkpoint and scripting heavy escort missions the game was laying on thick.  Youtubed the ending, good enough. 

Avatar image for deshawn2ks
#95 Posted by DeShawn2ks (1108 posts) -

I play games to have fun so I have to go with amazing gameplay. I don't care how good the story or graphics are if the game plays like shit it isn't worth it. I

Avatar image for noxious
#96 Posted by NoXious (1365 posts) -

If you ask me what's more important, it'd be gameplay because I wont play a terrible game despite of it's story. But if you ask me if I would like an amazing story or gameplay - I'll say story. 
As long as the gameplay is tolerable I'm set! But if the gameplay is tolerable and the story is amazing, I'll purchase any sequel to come as long as it follows suit.

Avatar image for haroldonvu
#97 Posted by HaroldoNVU (623 posts) -

I can play and have fun with games with little or no story like Altitude or Gran Turismo, but it's the story driven games that I hold on highest regard. So Story for me. Gameplay is a close second. Graphics matter but no nearly enough as those two. I actually care a lot more about sound and soundtrack that aren't even on this poll than graphics.

Avatar image for grumbel
#98 Posted by Grumbel (1010 posts) -

Good gameplay is relatively easy to replace, a good story on the other side is what makes a game truly unique.

Avatar image for gamer_152
#99 Posted by Gamer_152 (14500 posts) -

It's a bit of a draw between gameplay and story for me.

Avatar image for geno
#100 Posted by Geno (6767 posts) -

Oh not this shit again. I would rather have all 3. I would also like to have amazing sound design, amazing characters, amazing music, etc.
A game's quality is determined by the sum of its parts. It's almost impossible to find a game that highly excels in one area but fails in all the rest anyway.