Why is incest wrong?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mushir
Mushir

2630

Forum Posts

3328

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

I started thinking about this today. One of the big negatives of incest is the higher probability of birth defects for a child. But what if a brother and sister have strong feelings for each other and they sleep together just once? Why is that considered wrong? The only reason I can think of is that it's been considered wrong for so long. I don't believe it's that uncommon with other animals. It seems to me that the only thing hindering it is that it's a taboo in society.

PS: I'm in no way condoning incest. I'm just curious.

Avatar image for jasonr86
JasonR86

10468

Forum Posts

449

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

Because genes. Because society. Because because.

Avatar image for pr1mus
pr1mus

4158

Forum Posts

1018

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 4

I'm out of here.

Avatar image for nightriff
nightriff

7248

Forum Posts

1467

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 7

Because it is a fucked up thing, and I'm with Pr1mus, I'm out of here

Avatar image for natedawg_kz
natedawg_kz

265

Forum Posts

215

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

Whatever, it's your opinion man but expect everyone to be mad at you because your opinion is different

Avatar image for jasonr86
JasonR86

10468

Forum Posts

449

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

Avatar image for bleako
Bleako

14

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for daveyo520
Daveyo520

7766

Forum Posts

624

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

Whhhheeeeeeeelllllllllpppp

Avatar image for mushir
Mushir

2630

Forum Posts

3328

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

#9  Edited By Mushir

Don't get me wrong, I would never do it, and I get weirded out whenever I read that it's been done. But I just got to thinking why it's considered so taboo in society. Homosexuality was also a taboo before, but it's thankfully getting more and more accepted now. I'm not saying that homosexuality and incest are the same thing, all I'm saying is that it's interesting how taboo it is in society today, considering that it's done by many creatures on this planet.

Avatar image for deactivated-63bbfc9f777ec
deactivated-63bbfc9f777ec

1424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

No Caption Provided

Cause it's gross

Avatar image for daveyo520
Daveyo520

7766

Forum Posts

624

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

I am sure this thread will only go good places and won't be weird at all.

Avatar image for nightriff
nightriff

7248

Forum Posts

1467

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 7

#12  Edited By nightriff
Avatar image for starvinggamer
StarvingGamer

11533

Forum Posts

36428

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 25

#13  Edited By StarvingGamer

Mostly because society. Personally, if two adult siblings want to get it on, whatever. That's their business. But incest also carries the context of pedophilia or underage intercourse as it is generally expected that by the time a child is of-age, they have left home to pursue further education and their own lives.

Avatar image for siroptimusprime
SirOptimusPrime

2076

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#14  Edited By SirOptimusPrime

Not too long ago we had a guy on here asking why pedophilia was considered wrong, and now this.

It's a website, about Video Games!

Avatar image for jz
JZ

2342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15  Edited By JZ

Think

Avatar image for jasonr86
JasonR86

10468

Forum Posts

449

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

Avatar image for mylifeforaiur
mylifeforAiur

3594

Forum Posts

46902

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#17  Edited By mylifeforAiur

Please continue. I need this.

Avatar image for werupenstein
Kidavenger

4417

Forum Posts

1553

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 90

User Lists: 33

#18  Edited By Kidavenger

Why does it have to be brother sister, couldn't it be mother and son?

Loading Video...

Seriously; besides the birth defect thing; you dont want to take the chance of screwing up one of the few lifelong relationships you are guaranteed to have in your life.

Avatar image for herbiebug
HerbieBug

4228

Forum Posts

43

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The greater risk for birth defects is the reason. Also, you will find that most people would recoil in disgust at the very suggestion; not because of socially accepted norms, but natural instinct. It has to be this way for the strength of future offspring.

Are you an only child, Mushir?

Avatar image for dagbiker
Dagbiker

7057

Forum Posts

1019

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 16

Incest should not be Illegal, what should be Illegal is having a baby with your relative.

But yes, there is no other reason then the birth defects, and the fact that people are ether turned on by it and don't want to admit it, or are disgusted by it and want to wipe it out.

But honestly those feelings are normal.

Avatar image for deactivated-5cc8838532af0
deactivated-5cc8838532af0

3170

Forum Posts

3

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

I think we need a special version of the Giant Bomb Dating Advice Hotline photo. Someone get on that please.

Avatar image for mushir
Mushir

2630

Forum Posts

3328

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

@herbiebug: Nope, I have four siblings. And no, I have never had these kinds of thought about them, incase you were wondering.

Avatar image for siroptimusprime
SirOptimusPrime

2076

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@dagbiker said:

But honestly those feelings are normal.

No, they're not. Evolution should have told you instinctually that the resultant offspring would be more likely not to survive.

Avatar image for phatmac
Phatmac

5947

Forum Posts

1139

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 12

YOU'RE ALL GOING TO JAIL I'M AN INTERNET COP!

Avatar image for mylifeforaiur
mylifeforAiur

3594

Forum Posts

46902

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#25  Edited By mylifeforAiur

The only issue I take with incestual relationships is the potential for procreation. It's unfair for the child to be engendered in such a way: it'll undoubtedly affect him later in life given the taboo nature of incest.

Avatar image for video_game_king
Video_Game_King

36563

Forum Posts

59080

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 14

#26  Edited By Video_Game_King
I believe this is enough reason.
I believe this is enough reason.

Avatar image for oscar__explosion
Oscar__Explosion

3003

Forum Posts

5651

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#27  Edited By Oscar__Explosion

@mushir:

I started thinking about this today. One of the big negatives of incest is the higher probability of birth defects for a child.

This is pretty much why the whole thing is a problem.

But what if a brother and sister have strong feelings for each other and they sleep together just once? Why is that considered wrong?

I would consider it wrong, but hey that's just me. If a brother and sister want to get it on, sure go ahead I guess. As soon as there is a kid involved that's when things will go horribly wrong.

Avatar image for thebunnyhunter
thebunnyhunter

1555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

#28  Edited By thebunnyhunter

Seems to be fine with the Lannisters and Zeus so idk. And whatever is good enough for Zeus should be good enough for everyone

also why googling i stumbled upon a riveting answers.yahoo answers

Avatar image for beachthunder
BeachThunder

15269

Forum Posts

319005

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 30

#29  Edited By BeachThunder

The greater risk for birth defects is the reason. Also, you will find that most people would recoil in disgust at the very suggestion; not because of socially accepted norms, but natural instinct. It has to be this way for the strength of future offspring.

Ok, well, just to play devil's advocate then, what if it's between two people that physically cannot have children together (same gender, sterility, etc...)? If there is absolutely no possibility of children - and therefore, no possibility of birth defects - is there still a legitimate reason to consider it wrong?

Avatar image for daveyo520
Daveyo520

7766

Forum Posts

624

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 12

It is just silly and nonsexual.

Avatar image for justin258
Justin258

16688

Forum Posts

26

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 8

Why does it have to be brother sister, couldn't it be mother and son?

'Cause that makes you poke pins in your eyes and causes your offspring to get locked in a cave.

On topic, because it causes birth defects and is therefore unnatural. Yes, there are ways to prevent pregnancy but none of them are foolproof.

Are you the guy who asked why pedophilia is wrong?

Avatar image for babychoochoo
BabyChooChoo

7106

Forum Posts

2094

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 2

#33  Edited By BabyChooChoo

It's wrong? ...b-but onee-chan said...

Avatar image for razielcuts
RazielCuts

3292

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Flag and move on guys, this is a (semi) respectable gaming website not fucking 4chan.

Avatar image for hailinel
Hailinel

25785

Forum Posts

219681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 28

@mushir said:

I started thinking about this today. One of the big negatives of incest is the higher probability of birth defects for a child. But what if a brother and sister have strong feelings for each other and they sleep together just once? Why is that considered wrong? The only reason I can think of is that it's been considered wrong for so long. I don't believe it's that uncommon with other animals. It seems to me that the only thing hindering it is that it's a taboo in society.

PS: I'm in no way condoning incest. I'm just curious.

OK, I'm going to give a serious answer here. (Even if I am the one that created the Giant Bomb concept page for it.)

Incestuous pregnancies lead to a high risk of genetic abnormality and and disability in the resulting children. This is why monarchs of the middle ages tended toward being crazy or imbeciles; their gene pool was too shallow due to the nobility only breeding among themselves. Societies around the world eventually put laws in place to put a stop to this once they all began to realize the connection between incest and the bad things that result from it.

Avatar image for herbiebug
HerbieBug

4228

Forum Posts

43

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36  Edited By HerbieBug

Flag and move on guys, this is a (semi) respectable gaming website not fucking 4chan.

Are you implying that Giant Bomb is too good for wincest? D:

Avatar image for leinad44
leinad44

630

Forum Posts

193

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Has Game of Thrones taught you nothing!?

Avatar image for ollyoxenfree
OllyOxenFree

5015

Forum Posts

19

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

It's just like in one of my Japanese animes!

Avatar image for mushir
Mushir

2630

Forum Posts

3328

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

@hailinel: Thanks for an intelligent answer.

@herbiebug said:

The greater risk for birth defects is the reason. Also, you will find that most people would recoil in disgust at the very suggestion; not because of socially accepted norms, but natural instinct. It has to be this way for the strength of future offspring.

Ok, well, just to play devil's advocate then, what if it's between two people that physically cannot have children together (same gender, sterility, etc...)? If there is absolutely no possibility of children - and therefore, no possibility of birth defects - is there still a legitimate reason to consider it wrong?

This is kind of the situation I was thinking of. If the possibility of having children is literally non-existent, is there a reason to not allow it?

Avatar image for fancysoapsman
FancySoapsMan

5984

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

#40  Edited By FancySoapsMan

because eeew.

Avatar image for artelinarose
artelinarose

1999

Forum Posts

470

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41  Edited By artelinarose

@mushir said:

@hailinel: Thanks for an intelligent answer.

@beachthunder said:

@herbiebug said:

The greater risk for birth defects is the reason. Also, you will find that most people would recoil in disgust at the very suggestion; not because of socially accepted norms, but natural instinct. It has to be this way for the strength of future offspring.

Ok, well, just to play devil's advocate then, what if it's between two people that physically cannot have children together (same gender, sterility, etc...)? If there is absolutely no possibility of children - and therefore, no possibility of birth defects - is there still a legitimate reason to consider it wrong?

This is kind of the situation I was thinking of. If the possibility of having children is literally non-existent, is there a reason to not allow it?

Socially imposed morality brought on by generations of dogma. I personally don't see a problem with it so long as both parties are consenting, of appropriate age and put a helmet on that soldier. None of my business what other people do, even if it's their family.

Avatar image for hailinel
Hailinel

25785

Forum Posts

219681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 28

@mushir said:

@hailinel: Thanks for an intelligent answer.

@beachthunder said:

@herbiebug said:

The greater risk for birth defects is the reason. Also, you will find that most people would recoil in disgust at the very suggestion; not because of socially accepted norms, but natural instinct. It has to be this way for the strength of future offspring.

Ok, well, just to play devil's advocate then, what if it's between two people that physically cannot have children together (same gender, sterility, etc...)? If there is absolutely no possibility of children - and therefore, no possibility of birth defects - is there still a legitimate reason to consider it wrong?

This is kind of the situation I was thinking of. If the possibility of having children is literally non-existent, is there a reason to not allow it?

I think in that case, equal rights come into play. If it's wrong for a brother and sister to engage in it, then it's equally wrong for two brothers or sisters to engage in it even if giving birth to a child is an impossibility.

Avatar image for jay_ray
jay_ray

1571

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

#43  Edited By jay_ray

I'm all for incest if it's hot twin lesbians..........................................................................................

Okay, I can kick myself out

Avatar image for funkasaurasrex
FunkasaurasRex

854

Forum Posts

84

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44  Edited By FunkasaurasRex

Don't fuck your relatives, yo.

Avatar image for manu_fan10ne
ManU_Fan10ne

688

Forum Posts

81

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Avatar image for nekusakuraba
NekuSakuraba

7810

Forum Posts

1670

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#46  Edited By NekuSakuraba

Errr... Maybe we should talk about video games or something? This is creepy.

Avatar image for hailinel
Hailinel

25785

Forum Posts

219681

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 28

#47  Edited By Hailinel

Errr... Maybe we should talk about video games or something? This is creepy.

Well, then. Did you ever play Drakengard?

Avatar image for toowalrus
toowalrus

13408

Forum Posts

29

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#48  Edited By toowalrus

So uh, is it appropriate to post the Girl Advice Line ad? This guys obviously got the hots for... somebody.

Avatar image for aegon
Aegon

7345

Forum Posts

104

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#49  Edited By Aegon

@hailinel said:

@nekusakuraba said:

Errr... Maybe we should talk about video games or something? This is creepy.

Well, then. Did you ever play Drakengard?


I did, when I was a kid. At first I thought it was kind of fun, then it was frustrating. My current impression of it is that it wasn't very good.

Avatar image for zombiepie
ZombiePie

9295

Forum Posts

94844

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 19

Giant Bomb is first and foremost a website about video games. While the Off-Topic forum is open to a myriad of topics, sexually explicit ones are not permitted as evident on our Forum Rules.