Something went wrong. Try again later

nakke

This user has not updated recently.

67 0 4 2
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

nakke's forum posts

Avatar image for nakke
nakke

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#1  Edited By nakke

I changed v.giantbomb.com to point to Paris instead (instructions on http://www.giantbomb.com/profile/szlifier/blog/a-fix-for-crappy-download-speeds-from-giant-bomb/100558/), seems to maybe have fixed the issue. Still pretty bad speeds compared to what I 'should' be getting, but at least streaming seems to work without hickups.

Avatar image for nakke
nakke

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Your problem had nothing to do with streaming/connection/download speed, that was probably an issue with your graphics card drivers or similar.

Avatar image for nakke
nakke

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Extremely slow speeds for me the past few days. I'm on a 350mbps connection in Finland. Occasionally it jumps to an acceptable ~3-4MB/s, but then goes back to just around 20kB/s or whatever for ages.

C:\Users\nakke>tracert v.giantbomb.com

Tracing route to a1189.g2.akamai.net [87.108.18.41] over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 8 ms 8 ms 9 ms 10.235.0.1
2 9 ms 7 ms 7 ms hel5-sr3.dnaip.fi [62.78.106.136]
3 14 ms 9 ms 7 ms hel5-tr3.dnaip.fi [62.78.107.116]
4 9 ms 11 ms 6 ms esp2-tr2.dnaip.fi [62.78.107.41]
5 10 ms 11 ms 7 ms academica.ficix1.ficix.fi [193.110.226.52]
6 10 ms 8 ms 9 ms xe-0-1-0-0.cr1-usp1.hel.ip.as29154.net [79.99.155.3]
7 10 ms 7 ms 11 ms a87-108-18-41.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com [87.108.18.41]

No Caption Provided

Seems to be in order.. Speedtest aswell:

Avatar image for nakke
nakke

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@gnatsol said:

Not everyone likes the idea of others making money off of their work and that is their right to oppose that. Don't lose sight of that even in this era.

Sticky situation though....

Right. The major problem is the companies who EXPLICITLY state that you're free to use and monetize their content (say Valve) whose content is still getting copyright claimed. And whether a company likes it or not, fair use (criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research) should be allowed, but the current system does not differenciate between fair use and just uploading all cutscenes without comment or whatever.

Avatar image for nakke
nakke

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Avatar image for nakke
nakke

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#6  Edited By nakke

Yeah, definitely interested. Didn't think the QL would make so many people sign up!

Avatar image for nakke
nakke

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#7  Edited By nakke
Jordan23 said:
"Wipeout HD received a letter grade of an "A" on 1UP (Milkman was the reviewer). It should be something to be check out, this franchise has been a pretty solid one for a long time.
"
Uh okay, thanks for the contribution to the thread dude!

It's pretty weird that this is legal. Also, the game costs $20, jeez.
Avatar image for nakke
nakke

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#8  Edited By nakke

It's a full game, but with reused content. Though there will be new tracks, ships etc to download in the future.

Avatar image for nakke
nakke

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#9  Edited By nakke

I think it supports survival of the fittest pretty clearly. Obviously the first way to think is "hehe you design your creatures, ergo intelligent design", but it's more deep than that. You have to constantly update your creature's design in order to adapt; get rid of crappy features and 'buy' good new ones. ID doesn't say god or some other guy constantly updated the design of creatures, right?

Avatar image for nakke
nakke

67

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#10  Edited By nakke

"Unlike DirectX 10 it will not require new graphics card hardware specifically supporting the new API version, and will support both DirectX 10 and DirectX 10.1 hardware."

OH NO THEY ARE MAKING DIRECTX WORK BETTER ON CURRENT HARDWARE AND THEY'RE INTRODUCING GPGPU SUPPORT!!!! OH NO! EVIL MICRO$OFT