Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb Review

341 Comments

Metal Gear Solid V: The Phantom Pain Review

5
  • PS4

Metal Gear Solid V practically redefines the notion of what open-world gameplay can be.

Metal Gear Solid V feels like Hideo Kojima having one last laugh. The game embodies a particular irony: in what may well be Metal Gear's final outing, the series often derided as more movie than game has delivered perhaps the most impressively deep, dynamic, exhilarating stealth combat sandbox ever made. Just when you thought stealth games were pretty much dead, here comes the series that didn't even seem to care about being a stealth game anymore to show everyone else how it ought to be done. The Phantom Pain isn't without fault, but the core of this thing is so fresh and so profoundly satisfying--and it's rife with oddball Metal Gear-ness in so many subtle, quirky ways--that you absolutely need to experience it for yourself.

An enormous set of tools and exceptional enemy AI make MGSV arguably the best stealth sandbox ever made.
An enormous set of tools and exceptional enemy AI make MGSV arguably the best stealth sandbox ever made.

The Phantom Pain is crammed into the last unexplored period in Metal Gear's enormous century-long timeline, picking up in the mid-1980s as the once hero and future villain Big Boss builds up the army-without-a-nation that will figure prominently into the series' future events. As such, you already know what the inevitable outcome of this game has to be, which is not to say that The Phantom Pain is without its surprises. There are some real doozies in this story. Yes, the game has significantly fewer cinematics than past games, and (wisely) trades in the series' ponderous codec-transmission exposition dumps for optional cassette tapes you can play at your leisure while you play. But there's still plenty of Metal Gear in this Metal Gear game, although much of it now exists on the fringes and in the game's mechanics and systems rather than in outlandish story sequences that strive to one-up each other until they're impossible to take seriously. MGSV uncharacteristically exhibits some restraint at the core of its storytelling, and is mostly better off for it.

Relatively thin story aside, it's mainly the quest to build Outer Heaven--and tranquilize every guard in the world along the way--that drives this game. On paper, MGSV's various components aren't much different from the ones that make up other open-world action games: you breach bases and installations with the same sort of mark-and-infiltrate approach as in recent Far Cry games, you gain resources and then dump them into new weapons and abilities along the way, and you... kidnap hundreds of enemy soldiers and force them into servitude back at your aquatic mercenary stronghold. Okay, that last part is more akin to Pokémon or something than most modern shooters, but the point is that all of these aspects are so much more thoroughly fleshed out and interconnected than in similar games that they form to create a singular experience that's so thrilling and addictive it's been hard for me to stop playing it.

For my money, it's that in-the-moment stealth action that makes The Phantom Pain so special. The game offers you an overwhelming number of choices in tackling any given situation, from the angle you approach the completely open enemy encampments, to how loud or how stealthy, how lethal or not you want to be, to what sort of gadgets you want to pull from your enormous toolbox to use in creative and often unexpected ways. I could write another two thousand words about the many entertaining uses for sleep gas grenades and inflatable Big Boss decoys, or offer you two dozen anecdotes about amazing escapes or incredibly tense super-spy sneaking missions I pulled off, but there's no need, because you'll discover just as many when you play for yourself, and it'll be an enormous rush every time. It's an open-world cliche to say that the same sequence never plays out the same way twice, but MGSV takes this old adage to an unprecedented level. Every time something crazy happens, you'll wish you'd had an audience watching. The game produces an endless series of moments you want to tell other people about.

A sprawling base-building metagame is important when you need to research a plexiglass riot shield for your horse.
A sprawling base-building metagame is important when you need to research a plexiglass riot shield for your horse.

It would be tough to list out all the big and small factors that make every single moment of MGSV feel unique to your own experience. Random elements can have a profound effect on how enemies act and therefore how a mission plays out, including time of day, weather like rain and sandstorms, your angle of approach, and even how long you wait to get things done. That's because the important NPCs in this game don't stand rooted in place, waiting for you to run up and trigger them. They roam around the world, carrying out story-relevant actions like touring an airport or moving a convoy halfway across the map, and the game does a great job of withholding just enough information about their whereabouts that you end up feeling like a master sleuth when you track them down. Those chance encounters lead to an enormous amount of variety and a feeling that you aren't just running through a script carefully built by a game designer, but instead truly plotting the course of your own missions. In general, the enemy AI and the way it reacts to your actions is excellent, and while it initially feels like guards can spot you from a mile away, you'll start to get a feel for how to manipulate them and use their tendencies against them. But just when you really are starting to feel like the legendary mercenary, they'll start randomly throwing in body armor, night vision goggles, and other gear that stops you from just tranquilizer-head-shotting your way through every camp. Back to the toolbox.

But what if I told you that you could instead deploy combat units around the world, Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood-style, to disrupt the enemy's supply of all that gear and make your missions a little easier to deal with? The action taking place in the field is already good enough to support this game on its own, but as you start to factor in the surprisingly deep base-building metagame and the effects it has on that action, the truly impressive scope of MGSV starts to come into focus. You'll shuffle soldiers with individual stats, special abilities, and language proficiencies between departments like R&D, intel, and medical to unlock dozens of new items and abilities for yourself, as well as add all kinds of ancillary functions to your map, binoculars, and other peripheral functions during missions. All of these mechanics tie into progression for the "buddy" characters you can bring into missions with you, as well as security upgrades for your own base and security team, since other players can invade your stronghold online. At one point in the story, the game even finds a way to use the base mechanics in a clever, unusual way that has you doing a little detective work among your ranks. Building up your own Mother Base is deeply engaging and ended up motivating me to keep pushing through the game just as much as the stellar action did.

MGSV's is not a typical open world in the sense that there are radio towers to climb and collectibles to find all over the place. It's actually pretty bereft of meaningful things to do in between the major bases and minor guard outposts, although the world sure does look nice, and the openness is crucial to the free-form nature of the infiltrations. But between story and side missions (of which there are something like 200), there's more than enough to keep you busy here. Moreover, if you share my fascination with watching numbers steadily climb upward, MGSV's base-building metagame is likely to bury its hooks deep in your compulsive need to always be upgrading. I somewhat shamefully found myself letting the game idle at my desk while I was doing other things, just so I could keep dispatching new combat missions as soon as the timers on the previous missions had completed. Since you can physically visit and run around on Mother Base, it's neat to see your empire expanding strut by strut (although there's not nearly enough to occupy your attention while you're there). And going back through previously infiltrated installations just to continue "recruiting" new operatives became an appealing prospect in itself when I started seeing more enemies in the field with coveted A++ and S ranks, which naturally show up on your scope in various enticing shades of gold. It feels like one of those slightly manipulative upgrade loops that are so fun and goofy that you don't mind going along for the ride.

You wouldn't believe how much cocaine Ocelot did in the '80s.
You wouldn't believe how much cocaine Ocelot did in the '80s.

The game's online Forward Operating Base mode is a bit manipulative too, but in a less forgivable way. Here you can build satellite ocean bases around the world that greatly expand your troop population, resource-gathering, and other base functions. Or, more accurately, you can build ONE extra base when this mode opens up; additional bases will cost you a significant amount of real-world cash. Since you regularly bump into severe resource constraints when pursuing late-game upgrades and have to watch a bunch of very lengthy timers (some six to eight hours or more) as your base builds up, locking up a bunch of progress-accelerating abilities behind a pay wall is pretty disappointing. It feels too much like the bad kind of mobile free-to-play game.

The other function of the FOB system is to let you invade other players, Dark Souls-style, to attempt to steal resources and personnel from their own platforms. There's a ton of depth to the process of building out the security forces on your own base, and making your way into the base of a player who's spent a lot of time tweaking their defenses is a stiffer challenge than anything I saw in the story missions. But crucially, there's no reliable way to opt out of player invasions once you've built a FOB; you can turn the game off for the night and wake up to the aftermath of a ruinous invasion that's robbed you of a huge number of resources. It seems you could simply refuse to ever build and upgrade your first FOB to prevent these invasions, but since the FOB and its cheap capacity upgrades become available at a time in the game when you're just starting to hit major limits on your main base, this isn't a good option either. If the design weren't questionable enough, the servers have been extremely unreliable well over a week after release. Server trouble can prevent you from accessing single-player functionality, which is just inexcusable, and I've had issues like getting a notification my base was being invaded but then having the game hang, error out, and then crash entirely when I tried to go defend it. There are some great ideas in the FOB mode, but it's possible to come away from this mode feeling more than a little burned by exploitative design decisions and lousy implementation.

Maybe the most impressive thing about this already very impressive game is just how damn weird it is. MGSV is bursting with the kinds of bizarre little touches this series is known for but which you never see in the biggest games that cost tens of millions and take years to create, especially the ones in this genre. At the top level, the game is self-seriously occupied with Cold War-era ruminations on global hegemony and nuclear deterrence, but out in the field you're busy extracting soldiers and assets back to base by comically attaching balloons to them and watching them soar into the sky, while the strains of "Maneater" emanate from your cassette player. You're pulling up a radial menu to order your horse to poop on command (which, yes, has a relevant gameplay use). You're inflating Big Boss decoy standees that spout catchphrases to distract guards. There's a zoo in your sea base where all the animals you've extracted live. Your dog companion wears an eyepatch. There's a deeply goofy sense of humor around the edges of the game that's made more refreshing by its contrast with the solemn, high-stakes tone of the core storyline. For me, Metal Gear got predictable and a little boring when it lost all restraint and went full anime in past games. Here, it keeps you guessing with those constant shifts in tone, and frequently surprises you.

Want to drive a bipedal robot that can body slam enemies? Play this game.
Want to drive a bipedal robot that can body slam enemies? Play this game.

In the same vein, MGSV's narrative structure is quite unlike anything I've seen in any other big-budget game, with the possible exception of other Metal Gear Solid games. This is the series that gave us the Raiden bait-and-switch, so it shouldn't be surprising to say that there are tremendously unconventional elements in the way this game is laid out, how the story is presented, and how missions connect to one another. The game plays on your expectations and perceptions in a handful of ways; some of those moments struck me as brilliant, while others felt unearned by the story and fell a little flat for me. It's impossible to objectively say whether all this is good or bad, since the way you react to these things will entirely come down to your own personal taste and interpretation. Discovering that stuff for yourself is most of the fun, so I'll leave it there, but, just, look. The game is amazing in a lot of strange and unusual ways that most games just plain aren't.

The Phantom Pain is a game I can't stop thinking about and didn't want to end. How this immense accomplishment in game design came from Kojima Productions, a studio helmed by a guy who always seemed like he was more interested in directing movies than making games, is completely beyond me. The unfortunate strife between Kojima and Konami has been well documented in the rumor mill, so maybe The Phantom Pain is a game too offbeat and beautiful to exist after all. What a swan song, though. The handful of things I wish were better about this game pales next to all the things it does better than any similar game on the market. It left me feeling inspired and excited about the future of open-ended, mechanics-driven video games, and I hope it isn't another seven years before we see its like again.

Brad Shoemaker on Google+

341 Comments

Avatar image for drlove
DrLove

449

Forum Posts

37

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

witcher, mgs5, fallout 4... crazy year. I hope halo and tomb raider will be good too.

Avatar image for entreri10
Entreri10

581

Forum Posts

15

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 10

I'd love to say this game is perfect, but the camerawork on Quiet is so awkward.

I'm with you there, Love this game otherwise though.

Avatar image for relkin
Relkin

1576

Forum Posts

2492

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

I'm seeing a bit of a parallel with the Thief franchise here. The reboot is the best game in the franchise, but it's also the worst Thief game.

Phantom Pain seems like it's the best game in the franchise, but easily the worst Metal Gear. I'll play it to engage in this open world-whatever-the-hell-genre-it-is sandbox extravaganza they've created, but I'm almost sure to be disappointed by the package as a whole. I come to this series for the story; the overwhelming number of CODEC calls and cutscenes, all of it.

Avatar image for mashzapotato
mashzapotato

164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

My third night of staying up until my eyes hurt and my body begged for sleep I realized that this game has grabbed me in a way videogames haven't for a really long time.

Avatar image for marblecmoney
marblecmoney

599

Forum Posts

113

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

Good stuff, Brad! I've been waiting to see what you thought about this game.

Avatar image for xbob42
xbob42

927

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Brad's weird aversion to the "ruinous" invasions of his FOB are kind of funny to me. "He's taking my resources, it might have been better not to build this base!" Uhh, yeah, that makes total sense!

Look, no matter how bad your FOB gets robbed, it's rarely going to qualify as "ruinous." The materials stolen are unprocessed, which you can get tens of thousands of in a few minutes in side ops. It's not a big deal. Your "stolen fuel resources" likely didn't influence anything at all.

The additional staff you can put at these FOBs is far more important, and likely all your best staff are at Mother Base, not a FOB, so even if they get stolen, you've likely got dozens and dozens of backup troops in your waiting room. The FOB system is a fun diversion, and Giant Bomb's hilarious traditionally anti-online mindset really overblows the super minor things that happen with FOBs.

Avatar image for av_gamer
AV_Gamer

2934

Forum Posts

17819

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 13

MGSV is awesome... but this game gets a review and not The Witcher 3? Okay, Giant Bomb. I see you. ;)

Avatar image for jondan
jondan

166

Forum Posts

557

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

If you're so paranoid about losing your best staff, just put them under Direct Contract in the Staff Management screen. I have the top 20 or so soldiers in each unit set up like so, and everyone worse than that is expendable and can be replaced. We're not running a fucking daycare service out here in the Seychelles. You're a Diamond Dog now. >:D

Avatar image for ominousbedroom
ominousbedroom

563

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@mitch0712 said:

I'd love to say this game is perfect, but the camerawork on Quiet is so awkward.

It is worth note that Brad didn't bring that up. It a topic worthy of comment, so for Brad not say anything about that in the review is __________________(pick an adjective).

well, they sorta laid to rest their opinions about it on the last podcast. but imo, i guess since V is so gameplay-heavy in a 'i wanna see what all my toys do in this environment' way (and relatively sparse narrative-wise), any issue becomes minimized?

Avatar image for amyggen
AMyggen

7738

Forum Posts

7669

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Great review, Brad.

Avatar image for tuxfool
tuxfool

688

Forum Posts

28

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By tuxfool

Metal Gear Solid V practically redefines the notion of what open-world gameplay can be.

Not Really. It is an example of extremely well executed Sandbox gameplay. The open world is barely there.

Avatar image for priorityseven
priorityseven

352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Great review, Brad. Fallout 4 has gotta come correct if it's going to be half the open-world game that MSGV is.

Avatar image for ghosthouse
GhostHouse

209

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

There is going to be such an intense GOTY discussion this year.

Avatar image for len1444
len1444

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By len1444

I don't understand how someone can review this game, focus on most of the positives, and delve very little into the negatives. The game feels incomplete, it has repetitive mission structure, the cover system leaves something to be desired. It feels more like a side mission simulator. Yes, it's more ground zeroes, that's probably what you wanted, but I still don't get how you can just gloss over these flaws and forgive everything about them simply because you enjoyed the game, and give it a "perfect" rating. Yes, it's a good game, but it's not 5 stars worthy.

Avatar image for plonkplonkplonk
plonkplonkplonk

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Best review I've read of The Phantom Pain thus far. Excellent work, Brad.

Avatar image for ronniebarzel
RonnieBarzel

509

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great review, Brad.

This is one of the reasons I love Giant Bomb: its reviews may not be as numerous as GameSpot/IGN/etc. and tend to arrive later, but they're always worth it.

Avatar image for ronald
Ronald

1578

Forum Posts

28

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

@av_gamer said:

MGSV is awesome... but this game gets a review and not The Witcher 3? Okay, Giant Bomb. I see you. ;)

I'm sure once one of them get around to finishing Witcher they will (not, because let's be honest it will be so long since that game came out a review would be silly) review it.

Avatar image for audiofatigue
AudioFatigue

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@poobumbutt: I haven't read Brad's review so I'm not even sure if he mentions Quiet's presentation. In my opinion criticizing a video game on things like social responsibility or morals seems arbitrary. Whether there is importance in the presence of proper morals and ideals in video games can be a great discussion, just keep it out of my reviews (where I am looking for the actual meat and potatoes of video games).

Avatar image for mooseymcman
MooseyMcMan

12791

Forum Posts

5577

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

@icf_19xx: I know you whited that out, but you should edit that to include a, "MASSIVE END GAME SPOILER" warning. Just in case.

Avatar image for ch3burashka
ch3burashka

6086

Forum Posts

100

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Much like Hideo Kojima himself, Brad has completed his MGS cycle by reviewing the first MGS game on the website, and what I assume will be the last MGS game.

Avatar image for csl316
csl316

17008

Forum Posts

765

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Only 5 stars?

Avatar image for kasaioni
kasaioni

2397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

0/5 Because the boss fights in this game are horrendous.

Avatar image for drax_
Drax_

18

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

The games just a little too repetitive to me. I wish there were more locations to explore or diversity in the environments. Also, the cover mechanics are terrible. I dont know how many times I tried to sneak to the edge (in cover), only to come off and be spotted.

The cover mechanics are ok. Git gud son.

Avatar image for turambar
Turambar

8283

Forum Posts

114

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@len1444 said:

I don't understand how someone can review this game, focus on most of the positives, and delve very little into the negatives. The game feels incomplete, it has repetitive mission structure, the cover system leaves something to be desired. It feels more like a side mission simulator. Yes, it's more ground zeroes, that's probably what you wanted, but I still don't get how you can just gloss over these flaws and forgive everything about them simply because you enjoyed the game, and give it a "perfect" rating. Yes, it's a good game, but it's not 5 stars worthy.

5 stars has never meant "perfect" on the Giantbomb review scale.

Avatar image for len1444
len1444

79

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@drax_: this is just completely incorrect, seeing as there's no button prompt for "in cover" or "out of cover" it is bound to fuck up. I've had instances where I run to cover and it doesn't "click" and I've had instances where I was stuck in cover and in both instances got spotted. It's not about gitting gud, it's about mechanics.

Avatar image for hassun
hassun

10301

Forum Posts

191

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

RIP Metal Gear series. You had a good run.

Avatar image for doomsder
doomsder

68

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great review, pretty much sums up exactly how I feel about the game. Your reviews are always a joy to read too brad. Now I'm off to continue playing MGS5!

Avatar image for authenticm
AuthenticM

4404

Forum Posts

12323

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

This game is a fucking masterpiece of game design.

Avatar image for bollard
Bollard

8298

Forum Posts

118

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 12

It's a shame this game didn't get a rating of V instead of 5.

Avatar image for shadypingu
ShadyPingu

1857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Goodnight, sweet Kojima.

Avatar image for nevi
Nevi

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Nevi

I don't think its quite as good as this review and the gushing on this week's bombcast made out, and probably needs a bit more time to sink in. The mission/side op structure and base building feels entirely iterative on Portable Ops and Peace Walker and still does not quite get it perfect. I felt like I was grinding stuff I would rather have not done at certain points. Other systems like the the responsiveness of the shooting is not significantly better than MGS4. Reflex mode is a nice crutch to people not going for stealth perfection (Dan), but I felt the lack of a camo index is a step back for stealth play. The FOB system could be done a lot better, my main gripe with it is that if, after I am done, if I want to come back to play in a year or two then my staff and resources will be robbed bare. I would like to be able to switch it on or off.

The fanservicing camerawork on Quiet is pretty dumb and pandering, and is not particularly noteworthy nor harmful imo. The sex-negative, american-puritanical harping on about this and her outfit is kinda even more dumb. It doesn't stop her outcome being one of the emotional highpoints of the story. There are far, far more sensitivity damaging matters raised in the game around the subjects of child soldiers and torture interrogation that in theory would be the focal point for moral outragists, but it seems a lot of the writers complaining around the internet have not actually played the game, at least not that far, and base their criticisms on screenshots and trailer footage they saw of Quiet?

I loved the true ending and came around on Sutherland voicing, but I still wanted a lot more introspection, commentary and codec chat from Snake throughout, I feel like that would have enhanced the endings and would still have preferred Hayter levels of work.

Don't get me wrong, its one of the best games in recent years, and should be on the GOTY slate with Bloodbourne and Witcher 3, but I don't feel it is the runaway winner it is getting made out to be.

Avatar image for thebloodrite
TheBloodRite

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@len1444: I don't know. For one thing, I scarcely needed to be "clicked in" to cover, unless I was caught and in a firefight. But that's just my experience, and the mechanic itself is certainly a little iffy. Outside of that, I don't agree very much with any of your other points, and I can't justify deducting a full star from a product because of one minor mechanical gripe.

I bet you hated Peace Walker.

Avatar image for shadowswordmaster
ShadowSwordmaster

1119

Forum Posts

714

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

This is such a great game. I really enjoyed your review.

Avatar image for acornactivist
Acornactivist

342

Forum Posts

13

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Acornactivist

This game has done it. It's pushed me over. I'm now shopping for a PS4.

UPSATE: My console arrives tomorrow. Already have the game waiting on my desk. Never would have though a Metal Gear game, of all games, would be the one to pull me into this generation. But there you go. Super excited to get my hands on this tomorrow!

Avatar image for sasnake
sasnake

612

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@audiofatigue said:
@mitch0712 said:

I'd love to say this game is perfect, but the camerawork on Quiet is so awkward.

"Camerawork" should never affect a game's score/merit unless it has an impact on gameplay. If it makes you uncomfortable, then sorry that's a problem within yourself.

no, if it's in the game, it is worthy of criticism. I love this game, but that stuff is terrible.

Some people dont care when a camera swings over sombodies boobs, some people do. So its more a personal taste than a fault with the game, therefore he is correct.

Avatar image for hud209
HUD209

46

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great review Brad, I agree completely. I have been blown away by the game.

It's also my birthday today, even that is a special occasion in this game.

Avatar image for gruff182
Gruff182

1065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Great review @brad. Thanks for giving us thorough overview of the game, without feeling the need to let us all know your political stance on Quiet's attire or lack of.

Avatar image for humanity
Humanity

21858

Forum Posts

5738

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 16

I already know what I think of the game (I love it) but I gotta say this review was a great read and makes me wish Brad did more writing on the site.

Avatar image for ripelivejam
ripelivejam

13572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Im looking forward to seeing how quiet's arc turns out. Sounds like she's a great character overall in spite of her also being what some perceive as pandering.

(I actually think her design on a base level is pretty cool. She comes off more as rough and tumble bond action star if you divorce her from the more questionable stuff.)

Avatar image for justatippler
justatippler

28

Forum Posts

17

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Brad made words and they were good! I miss your writing.

Avatar image for edgaras1103
edgaras1103

796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By edgaras1103

I don't know guys. 5 stars feels a bit generous to me and there are like no negatives in a review . Granted opinions and all, but open world feel visually bland. What about BB being damn near silent protagonist? Or about grind/ repeated mission structure? And I am not talking about sparse storytelling or stuff that at the end that feels unfinished. Does it get a pass for these things because it is Kojima Productions? Does it affect reviewers because this is the last mgs game? Normally it would not right? But people can be affected with minimal nuanced details on a subconscious level. So I think because of the stuff that happened with Konami and Kojima affected most reviewers in one way or another. I don't know if it is good or bad. Or am I just trying to understand how I can't see greatness in mgs 5 that critics are seeing. Yeah, that is it.

Avatar image for polkaduke
PolkaDuke

12

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sasnake said:
@colinwright said:
@audiofatigue said:
@mitch0712 said:

I'd love to say this game is perfect, but the camerawork on Quiet is so awkward.

"Camerawork" should never affect a game's score/merit unless it has an impact on gameplay. If it makes you uncomfortable, then sorry that's a problem within yourself.

no, if it's in the game, it is worthy of criticism. I love this game, but that stuff is terrible.

Some people dont care when a camera swings over sombodies boobs, some people do. So its more a personal taste than a fault with the game, therefore he is correct.

That's very strange logic. Some people don't care that FOBs aren't optional. Some people don't care about microtransactions, some do. Are you telling me that these things shouldn't be considered when forming an opinion of a game?

The entirety of a review is "personal taste", i.e. whether the person likes it.

Avatar image for wefightforever
WeFightForever

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@tricksupsleeves: I see where you're coming from. This game definitely would benefit from a third region to operate in. or one or two more large major bases in favor of the smaller outposts in the two regions they do have.

Avatar image for deathfromace
deathfromace

508

Forum Posts

105

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

brad "5 stars" shoemaker with another 5 star AAA review. Yawn

Damn him for reviewing great games.

Avatar image for bassguy
bassguy

339

Forum Posts

99

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: -1

@mitch0712 said:

I'd love to say this game is perfect, but the camerawork on Quiet is so awkward.

"Camerawork" should never affect a game's score/merit unless it has an impact on gameplay. If it makes you uncomfortable, then sorry that's a problem within yourself.

It's fine for it not to impact your enjoyment, but telling people that their experience is invalid sucks a whole lot.

Avatar image for dsi1
dsi1

237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@bassguy said:
@audiofatigue said:
@mitch0712 said:

I'd love to say this game is perfect, but the camerawork on Quiet is so awkward.

"Camerawork" should never affect a game's score/merit unless it has an impact on gameplay. If it makes you uncomfortable, then sorry that's a problem within yourself.

It's fine for it not to impact your enjoyment, but telling people that their experience is invalid sucks a whole lot.

Man, you think someone getting told their experience is invalid sucks? Imagine getting told that your work is invalid or that your body is.

Avatar image for fitzgerald
Fitzgerald

615

Forum Posts

699

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

"MGSV uncharacteristically exhibits some restraint at the core of its storytelling, and is mostly better off for it."

Yes, just like MGS3 had a restrained, down-to-earth story coming after the schlock that was MGS2.

Odd-numbered MGS >>> even numbered MGS.

Avatar image for qreedence
qreedence

130

Forum Posts

705

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 24

@stubee: You're in for a ride! I was in the same seat as you a month ago.

Avatar image for mems1224
mems1224

2518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By mems1224

There is going to be such an intense GOTY discussion this year.

idk, at this point it seems that they're all pretty set on MGSV winning just by how much they've been raving about it. The only real contender I can see is Fallout 4 but who knows since we've barely seen any of that game.

Avatar image for ntm
NTM

12222

Forum Posts

38

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By NTM

I wonder when, and/or if they do a spoiler talk. Obviously, the story, as he says, is thin. I think it's worth discussing though, at least the end reveal.