Something went wrong. Try again later
Click To Unmute

Want us to remember this setting for all your devices?

Sign up or Sign in now!

Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
00:00:00
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to Giant Bomb's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Giant Bomb Review

238 Comments

No Man's Sky Review

3
  • PS4

It's light years from being a great game, but there's still something at the heart of No Man's Sky that speaks to the would-be explorer in all of us.

No Man's Sky feels like it's been in the public consciousness for an eternity. In reality, it's closer to two-and-a-half years. All that build-up, all those weighty expectations, all of it began a little over half a US Presidential term ago at, of all places, the 2013 VGX Awards. Remember that show? If you do, it's probably because of what a disaster it was. But somewhere in there, tucked amid Joel McHale's active disdain for his hosting role and a bunch of ill-fitting Odd Future interview segments, maybe you remember Sean Murray of Hello Games unveiling his studio's latest creation, an impossibly huge-sounding space exploration game called No Man's Sky. Maybe you remember him nervously shifting as Geoff Keighley grilled him on the details of the game, looking down at his shoes as he described his vision of the ultimate "You see that mountain? You can go there" game, a procedurally generated universe of over 18 quintillion planets, all explorable from pole to pole. Maybe you remember even McHale himself, so detached and sarcastic throughout the show, letting out a brief eruption of genuine-feeling incredulity at the scope of what Murray's small team was trying to accomplish.

No Caption Provided

That incredulity has built steadily in parallel to a ludicrous amount of hype in the years since. For every person pinning their dreams of "endless gameplay" in "the last game they'll ever play," there was another demanding to know "what you do" in the game, and casting doubts as to whether Hello Games could ever pull off what it was purporting to do. Normally as a critic I wouldn't care to mention the hype cycle any big game inevitably goes through, but that cycle is inextricably linked to No Man's Sky. So much of what has been wished upon it has informed the discourse around it. Though Hello Games' own messaging has been at best, muddled, and at worst, ultimately misleading--especially around the possibility of players finding each other in this huge universe--that messaging has also been largely drowned out by people projecting their own hopes and fears onto the game.

It's as difficult to imagine a game that met the loftiest of those expectations as it is easy to understand why people would be disappointed with the game that No Man's Sky ultimately turned out to be. At its core, No Man's Sky is a game of exploration. You jump from star system to star system in your own little ship, landing on planets and moons and leaving your personal stamp on them as you go. The constant feeling of discovery is its greatest asset, but that discovery often feels in service of far less interesting ends. Both its fleeting attempts at narrative, and economically-driven gameplay systems, are fairly terrible at respecting the player's time. And yet they're seemingly what are meant to propel the player forward in No Man's Sky. Resource gathering, crafting, inventory management, robot fighting, ship combat, it's all in there, wrapped in a veneer of Greater Purpose that points you toward the center of the galaxy, a place you are meant to go because the developers felt the game needed a place everyone is supposed to go. But taken individually, none of these things are particularly compelling. They're all skeletons of systems that basically work together, but not completely. Even the procedural generation, the heart of this whole crazy endeavor, starts showing its seams long before you even start thinking about those hypothetical "hundreds of hours" of gameplay.

And yet. And yet.

Calling something "greater than the sum of its parts" is beyond cliche, but no other description feels more apt for No Man's Sky. There's a rhythm to playing it that's unusually transfixing. Even as I came to realize the limitations of every single thing the game does, the sense of wonder never quite left me. Thirty-five hours in, I still found great joy in setting foot on a new planet for the first time, looking around, and drinking in whatever environment surrounded me. It's hard to explain why that feeling is still here, even after I've discovered every flaw in the game's design, every crack in its facade. There are so many different ways that No Man's Sky fails to deliver that I should be disappointed. I should be done with this game. And yet. And yet.

No Caption Provided

The longest I ever spent on a single planet was the planet @bombsfall (named, as many of my planets were, for someone I follow on Twitter, because I'm just not that creative a person). This was early in my time in the Euclid Galaxy, before I had fully grasped the pace of life in this universe. @bombsfall was, at the time, by far the liveliest planet I'd encountered, filled with useful elements, significant volumes of weird wildlife, and a great number of Vy'keen bases and installations. By this point in my journey, I hadn't stopped to think much about where I was going. I was still enamored with the mere concept of landing on a planet, and trying to plant my flag in as many locations as I could. According to the clock, I was there for 15 sols, which roughly translated to six hours in real world time. At no point did anything on @bombsfall reveal itself to be wildly different from any planet I'd been to up to this point, nor any I've visited since. Apart from its abundance of everything, it was just another planet.

But I stayed here. I mined heridium and plutonium in huge quantities. I scanned every bit of life I could find, every vaguely different-looking rock formation that happened to appear in my field of view. I found galloping horse-looking things with heads and necks like screaming plants, skittering lizards with bug-eyes that seemed at once alarmed and sleepy. I discovered something like 30 different waypoints before I finally decided to move on. There was no good reason to stay as long as I did, but nonetheless I stayed, checking off boxes, giving identity to any question mark that scanned in walkable distance. Fifteen sols of obsessive documentation and resource gathering, all for what? Why did I stay here, and not other, frankly prettier places I eventually found? What kept my boots on this particular ground?

By this point in my journey through No Man's Sky, I hadn't fully grasped the notion of how the game metes out its objectives. I was treating No Man's Sky like a typical open-world game, reluctant to jettison myself from an active planet because I wanted to check off as many objectives as I could before moving on. If you play No Man's Sky like this over the long term, you should get out of your first solar system by Christmas, if you're lucky.

Every planet in No Man's Sky has the same basic things, just in vastly different quantities. A barren moon still has limited mineable resources and locations to visit, but not very many of them. The best planets are teeming with native flora and fauna, along with numerous bases and monoliths established by the game's other intelligent races, the warrior Vy'keen, the trade-focused Gek, and the Daft Punk-looking machine race called the Korvax Convergence. The variety of what you find in these bases is not very wide. Sometimes you'll find an observatory that will point you toward an ancient ruin or distress call from a wrecked ship. Sometimes it was an abandoned station that had been overtaken by betentacled alien unpleasantness, in which I would usually find some new tech to attach to my multitool or exosuit. Sometimes I'd find a trading depot manned by a solitary member of one of the previously mentioned races.

No Caption Provided

In a normal open-world game, the repetition of these familiar icons on a map would be lessened, because you're aiming toward a set endpoint. They only have to be copied and pasted a few times throughout the game because they exist alongside larger story missions that are the primary focus for the player. These are distractions from the point, not the point unto themselves. In No Man's Sky, everything outside of the game's single story thread is a side objective, copied and pasted hundreds of quintillions of times across the universe. No matter how long you spend in No Man's Sky, you will never see them all, but not long after you begin No Man's Sky, you will have seen them all before.

That repetition will likely be critically damaging to a lot of people's enjoyment, especially given how threadbare the core survival game mechanics are. Resources are mined, systems are recharged and repaired, money is gained, and so on. In between, you manage and build out your inventory so you can store more of everything. Crashed ships (or ones purchased from other aliens) give you more cargo space than the beater you begin the game with, but they're expensive, so you keep grinding. Exosuit upgrades are found on every space station, and frequently scattered across planets and moons, but they increase in cost with each purchase, so you keep grinding. This process repeats itself forever. As the game exists at the time of this writing, there is nothing to do but look for new versions of the same things, take whatever's useful for you, and move onto the next planet, all in the hopes of creating a bigger bag in which to store whatever.

Once you start earning upgrades for your equipment, tasks like mining start feeling less like a tedious chore. There's no worse modern game design convention than "this task sucks until you upgrade to make it suck less," and that's a convention No Man's Sky is oddly invested in, sadly.

But there are appealing aspects too. Scanning environments on a newly discovered planet doesn't get old, or at least it hasn't yet for me. Yes, you'll see the same assets recombined in various ways as you play, but even apart from the financial benefits--you earn additional money by uploading your discoveries to a galactic database--it's a wonderful sensation to know you're the first person to see this particular thing, whatever that thing happens to be. And even though engaging with the wildlife on any given planet rarely amounts to much--feeding the more docile creatures sometimes nets you additional resources they scout for you, or occasionally excrete for you--I still like doing it. I like befriending these Frankensteined animals, no matter how grievously repellant they might be. By no means will this grind work for every player; I often wondered not if, but when it would ever stop working for me. But for the subset of players who, like me, succumb to No Man's Sky's perpetual thrum of galactic busywork, it does the job.

No Caption Provided

The closest I ever came to actual death in No Man's Sky was on the planet @MOUNTENNUI. A mountainous planet with minimal wildlife, @MOUNTENNUI was a rock I almost bolted from moments after touching down. It was only because I noticed an unfamiliar object near my landing point that I stayed. Vortex Cubes. I'd never seen these on a planet before. As far as I knew, they only existed as rare, valuable items you could buy on the open trading market. Here they were, not in great quantities, but enough that it was worth my while to snag a few. The one thing I hadn't counted on was the sentinels.

The sentinels on this planet were aggressive. Any attempt to take resources would result in a couple of them coming at me guns blazing. They were especially protective of these rare cubes, which sat on pedestals like ancient idols, begging to be stolen, if only so that a giant boulder could finally be unleashed upon the thief. Stealing the cubes alerted the sentinels to my presence. At this point, my multitool was pretty strong, so I could take out the first wave without much hassle. Even the second alert tier, the dog-looking machines with hyperaccurate laser fire, usually died after a single grenade launch. Here though, I first encountered the next tier, a giant AT-ST-looking monster that seemed dead set on wiping me from this universe entirely. The second he showed up, my shields were blasted away in seconds. I bolted for my ship, jumped in the cockpit with barely any health left, and flew to the stars, thinking I'd escaped. Suddenly, alarms sounded. Sentinel ships were coming out of hyperspace. I fought a few off, but they just kept coming. I figured I was doomed.

Then I turned my ship toward the nearest space station, hit the pulse drive, and got away. They didn't chase me. I was fine.

No Caption Provided

The worst parts of No Man's Sky are the ones that most closely hew to the idea of what a traditional video game is supposed to have. Take the aforementioned sentinels. These robotic creatures exist on every world. Though they vary in temperament, the idea is that they police the universe. Huge chunks of the other races' history is wrapped up in fighting them or researching their omnipresent existence. Why they're here isn't an interesting mystery, especially since they only seem to exist to give players something to fight. Even the most aggressive wildlife isn't much of a challenge, so here are some robots that get larger and nastier depending on how much chaos you cause. Here are your antagonists, because video games are supposed to have those.

Fighting them is always a nuisance, but never tense or fun. They're not strong or smart enough to put up a meaningful fight once you've implemented enough weapon upgrades. They're just there to start shit because nothing else in the game, save for the occasional space pirate you encounter off-planet, does. Engaging them (and the pirates) in space is no better. Ship combat goes from frustrating to depressingly simple as soon as you acquire your first beam weapon. Instead of having to carefully lead targets with your shot (and mostly miss in the process), you just blast a few phaser beams out and the autotargeting does the rest of the work. Video games are theoretically supposed to make fighting the antagonists they present you with an enjoyable experience, something No Man's Sky never finds a way to pull off.

The same can be said for the game's attempts at story. Finding monoliths and knowledge stones offers up some interesting backstory for the histories of the different races you encounter, as well as individual word translations for the various alien languages, but the actual story direction for the player, which involves following a path laid out for you by an ancient force called Atlas, is just an absolute waste. The notion here is that players might want something to guide them early in the game. Given the scope of the universe, having something to latch onto besides a vague longing toward getting to the center of the galaxy makes sense. But what's on offer isn't much of a story at all. It's a series of stations to visit that spoon feed you a bit of philosophical baby food before offering you a special orb and sending you back on your way. If you collect ten of those orbs, your final station visit will give you the option to create a new star, which is presented with as little fanfare as you could imagine.

The good news is that you don't have to follow this path. You have the option at the very beginning of the game to go that route, or just freely explore. You should freely explore, because for all the things that No Man's Sky misses the mark on, that freedom of exploration is the one thing it gets very, very right.

No Caption Provided

I never felt more alone than I did on the planet @UtilityLimb. At this stage of my journey, I'd never been to a harsher place. Impossibly massive cliffs jutted up all around, offering sheer drops into small pools of putridly hot water. Huge storms that almost completely killed visibility beyond a few feet in front of me rolled in regularly, kicking up purple dust clouds that made the environment look like an early Nintendo 64 game. The only life I ever found were a few out-of-place-looking cow creatures, and a small number of pulsating shrimp things that swam around those tiny pools of water. Of the precious few stations I found, all were empty of life. No one existed on this bizarre, horrible place.

And I have never had more fun in No Man's Sky than I did on this garbage planet. Due to some pre-day-one-patch glitch, my ship's engines had broken. I needed to farm a fair amount of iron in order to make the necessary repairs, and while iron was certainly around, it was gonna take a while to get it. Knowing that I would end up wiping my save when the patch dropped, I decided this is where I was going to make my stand. I was going to die on this rock, but before then, I wanted to find someone else alive. I had to know if I was truly, utterly alone.

I spent a long time wandering @UtilityLimb's hostile terrain. Maybe every 10 minutes or so, I'd find another question mark, but it never materialized into an interaction. Just monoliths and abandoned facilities, with knowledge stones dotting the path between them. I learned the Gek words for "origin," "fluid," and "kneel" but I never found another sapient presence.

No Caption Provided

After a couple of hours, I allowed myself one last question mark. I hoofed it in the icon's direction, but it took forever. The cliffs were unforgiving, and my jetpack hadn't been suitably upgraded by this point. You could see where the procedural generation had borked up in places, as giant, yet unusually slender outcroppings of rock, which looked like the result of anything but nature, appeared sometimes completely free of gravity, floating peculiarly above the world. Storms kept hitting, but finally, as the last one broke, I saw the outline of my final destination. It was another monolith.

I interacted with it, and it told me that amid its pulsing energies, a small birdlike creature had appeared. It looked dead, with its neck clearly broken. The monolith had reanimated it for my benefit, as some kind of test. It screamed in agony. The monolith gave me a choice: Let it be, or put it out of its misery. I thought for a second, and chose to kill it. Mercy seemed altogether absent on this world, so I felt it my duty to inject a little into it. I was rewarded with a new upgrade for my exosuit.

As I turned away, the computer sounded the alert of yet another incoming storm. As purple dust clouds filled the space, I poked the last few knowledge stones that surrounded me. I learned the Gek words for "fire," "stop," and "awake." Those were the last words that went through my head as I, and my original save, died.

No Man's Sky does an incredible job of making you feel insignificant. Maybe this sounds like a weird thing to compliment a game for. After all, games are often obsessed with making you feel like the most significant person in their individual worlds. No Man's Sky is the opposite of a power fantasy. You're just a person scraping by, taking what you need, selling the rest, and working to survive in a universe that's thoroughly uninvested in your survival.

No Caption Provided

It's lonely as hell, and I think that's wonderful. I mean, thinking about space and its distressing infiniteness tends to have that effect on people, but this feels different from what other space games tend to offer. This isn't grand space opera; you're not building a galactic empire. You're in this universe all by yourself. You know full well that you will never see the whole of it. The only way to leave any kind of mark is through discovery. Putting your stamp on the star systems, planets, individual waypoints, and even names of various species you encounter, is the closest anyone will ever get to knowing where your journey took you. It's the galactic equivalent of carving "Brooks Was Here" into the ceiling of a boarding house.

And it's kind of a beautiful, even humbling thing. This is what ultimately kept me going in No Man's Sky. When I'd finished the Atlas path, I almost called it quits in disgust. But when I eventually convinced myself to go back, I decided to return to the pace of play I'd been holding to before I decided to rush through the last few Atlas stations. I made it a point to go to every planet in a star system, and even if I opted not to stay long, maintaining that need to explore brought me back to how I felt when I first began the game. The sense of wonder returned as I continued my solitary journey through space. Knowing that I was totally on my own, and that there was nothing left to guide me, reminded me why I was ever enjoying the game in the first place.

I don't expect that sense of wonder will hold for everyone. There's a good chance that your immersion in No Man's Sky will be broken far sooner than mine. You may find yourself deeply bored of the game's loop once you've seen all the varieties of animal and plant and rock that the game recycles across its universe. You may tire of the frequent bugs and crashes that, while sure to be patched down the road, nonetheless distract quite a bit from the current version of the game. Maybe you've already decided not to jump into No Man's Sky at all because, in numerous ways, it's never quite manages to live up to its original promise, imagined or otherwise.

And yet, there's something underneath all those blemishes, something intangible beyond its rickety framework and lackluster individual pieces, that I couldn't ignore. The thing is, almost entirely in spite of what No Man's Sky is, I really like playing it. It calms me in a way that few games ever manage to. Knowing that I'll never see the entirety of it, knowing that my path through this overwhelmingly massive, deeply flawed universe will be uniquely my own, is enough to keep me on that path. I like being here, lonesome in my insignificant corner of the galaxy, doing the things I need to do to survive.

No Caption Provided

This is the vision of the game I hope Hello Games leans into as they work to improve No Man's Sky. Yes, deeper systems, better draw distance, better frame rate, greater variety of, well, everything, all of this is important. Maybe that theoretical possibility of interaction between players should actually make its way into the game, too. But I don't want any of that to come at the expense of that magnificent solitude that No Man's Sky already does so well. That's why I remain here, wrestling with all the ways in which this game's universe is fundamentally broken.

Because this broken universe gives me a small taste of something that our own broken universe can't. I will never leave Earth. I will almost assuredly never go to a place no one has ever been, because nearly every place on Earth has already been discovered. Though the promise of interstellar travel, or at least travel to other places in our little solar system, has never seemed more tantalizingly close, I know that I will never be one of those people to set foot on those unfamiliar places. That opportunity has passed me and a great deal of my generation by. If and when space travel becomes a normal aspect of human life, I'll be an old man, if I'm even alive at all.

No Man's Sky makes me feel like I can go somewhere no one else has ever been, and no one else may ever be again. And I love it for that. Maybe you will too.

No Caption Provided
Alex Navarro on Google+

238 Comments

Avatar image for jimmydyke
Jimmydyke

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jimmydyke

i think 3 is an ok score for a developer who was honest about his work but this guy lied more then once on an open interview no one co-horsed him he just lies you dont have to be deaf or stupid to listen to the videos and interviews and hear him lying and hesitating about what he is going to say next to make the game hype get outta control this was sean murrays fault for making the game seem like there was more to do like solar systems dont move ive left my computer setting on in space and they just set there never moving or how about the loading screens this guy plainly lied to his fans he deserves a 1 star for being dishonest give it a 3 stars gives this dev a chance to lie again about another title and get away with it i think reviews need to derail this guy asap

Avatar image for countrybumsbro
countrybumsbro

10

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This review illustrates my feelings on the game. The loneliness of No Man's Sky is it's strongest asset.

Good review Alex you summed up the game perfectly.

Avatar image for humanity
Humanity

21858

Forum Posts

5738

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 40

User Lists: 16

I see the site hasn't been DDoS'd yet, so far so good!

Avatar image for renahzor
Renahzor

1043

Forum Posts

386

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 3

@alex I always love your written reviews. Great work. Informative, colorful, and even handed piece about a pretty divisive game.

Avatar image for weegieanawrench
weegieanawrench

1974

Forum Posts

747

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

That was beatiful, Alex. Spot on review too. I do love playing it, but it is very thin in what it offers the player. I haven't even left my starting system, and I don't know if I'll pursue the story to its end, but exploring new planets and discovering all its life has me hooked. Thanks for the great read.

Avatar image for redhotchilimist
Redhotchilimist

3019

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Best review I've ever read from you, Alex. Really cool.

Avatar image for sravankb
sravankb

564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@sravankb said:
@solh0und said:

I would personally say it's the best "podcast" game to play thus far.

Well that and Diablo.

As far as "podcast games" go, nothing beats Minecraft, IMO. There are far more engaging gameplay elements in that game compared to NMS.

Isn't that the opposite of a good podcast game? If the gameplay is too engaging you can't split your attention easily, no? At least that's how I think of it... SFV is extremely engaging for me, so I would never split my attention from that or I would sacrifice both enjoyment of SF and whatever else is on the side. But NMS is very easy to just have "on the side" because it requires so, so little effort to play. Curious what others look for in "podcast games" now that I write this..

Well, there would have to be a balance between how engaging it is and how boring it can get. I feel like Minecraft meets that balance for me, but NMS doesn't seem like it would. At least based on what I've seen of it.

Avatar image for megalowho
megalowho

1148

Forum Posts

4888

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 28

Exceptional piece of writing. Mirrors many of my own thoughts and experiences, though I'm probably more forgiving of its faults. There's just something incredibly compelling about No Man's Sky for me, nothing quite like it.

Avatar image for counterclockwork87
Counterclockwork87

1162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sravankb said:
@solh0und said:

I would personally say it's the best "podcast" game to play thus far.

Well that and Diablo.

As far as "podcast games" go, nothing beats Minecraft, IMO. There are far more engaging gameplay elements in that game compared to NMS.

The best podcast games IMO are sports games. MLB The Show, Madden, NBA 2K, soooo good with a podcast.

Avatar image for iridium884
Iridium884

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Iridium884

Wow, great writing. @alex

Avatar image for monkeyking1969
monkeyking1969

9095

Forum Posts

1241

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 18

Nice review, Mr Wolf!
Alex, thank you for taking the time to consider your review with substantive time playing; because your meditation on that game were some of the most well considered I have read.

Avatar image for theht
TheHT

15998

Forum Posts

1562

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 9

Awesome review! It's a weird one, that's for sure. Find myself going back to Overwatch and Heroes of the Storm and Skyrim, but still occasionally getting that urge to just explore in No Man's Sky. Learn some words, catalog some species, mine some resources, check out some starships.

Definitely a weird one.

Avatar image for ocelotfox
ocelotfox

108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 21

Alex, thank you for one of the most pleasurable reading experiences I've gotten out of a video game review in quite some time.

Avatar image for alavapenguin
ALavaPenguin

948

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

I think this game looks real cool, but has some issues that is making me not buy it yet. Plus with WoW Legion soon, and Civ 6 not long after, I think this is def a buy a game a number of months out after some updates sort of game for me.

Avatar image for emphulio
emphulio

299

Forum Posts

22

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm really liking the look and feel of this game, also shout-out to @alex, liked the "lets take a break from the review and let me tell you a story" - bits

Avatar image for peffy
peffy

177

Forum Posts

21

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I don't read reviews very often, but I was curious about this one because of how Alex has talked about NMS on the podcast. I'm glad I read it. Amazing review! The anecdotes peppered throughout really add some nice flavour to it.

I haven't purchased or played the game, but I've been following people's reactions to it with great interest. This review mirrors the impression I have of the game - fundamentally flawed, but somehow compelling. That sense of exploration, wonderment, and feeling alone in the universe is something I think I would find interesting. Besides, I have zero interest in "multiplayer" or shooters, so I'm happy those aren't the focus of the game. However, I think the $80 price tag (Canada) is way too steep. I look forward to trying it out when the price drops. (hopefully by then, there will be bug fixes and added features in place)

Avatar image for vetterli
Vetterli

194

Forum Posts

263

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Beautiful review, @alex!

Avatar image for threeoct
threeOCT

556

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

i think 3 is an ok score for a developer who was honest about his work but this guy lied more then once on an open interview no one co-horsed him he just lies you dont have to be deaf or stupid to listen to the videos and interviews and hear him lying and hesitating about what he is going to say next to make the game hype get outta control this was sean murrays fault for making the game seem like there was more to do like solar systems dont move ive left my computer setting on in space and they just set there never moving or how about the loading screens this guy plainly lied to his fans he deserves a 1 star for being dishonest give it a 3 stars gives this dev a chance to lie again about another title and get away with it i think reviews need to derail this guy asap

This is a single sentence, apparently.

Also, 'co-horsed'.

Avatar image for jimmydyke
Jimmydyke

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jimmydyke

@threeoct: im busy sorry! ill edit it out. taking care of a kid in one hand, and typing with the other lol.

Avatar image for jimmydyke
Jimmydyke

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jimmydyke

@threeoct: I think 3 is an ok score for a developer who was honest about his word,but this guy lied more than once on an open interview! no one coerse him! he just lies you don't have to be deaf or stupid to listen to the videos and interviews, and hear him lying and hesitating about what he is going to say next! this is to make the game hype get outta control! this was sean Murray's fault for making the game seem like there was more to do. like solar systems don't move I've left my computer sitting on in space, and they just set there never moving! or how about the loading screens! this guy plainly lied to his fans he deserves a 1 star for being dishonest! to give it a 3 stars gives this dev a chance to lie again about another title, and get away with it I think reviews need to derail this guy asap!

Avatar image for alex
alex

3983

Forum Posts

7447

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Avatar image for grimreefz
GRIMREEFZ

400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Wow. Long read. Great read.

Avatar image for lando81
Lando81

103

Forum Posts

90

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By Lando81
Avatar image for legalbagel
LegalBagel

1955

Forum Posts

1590

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 7

i sense one of the biggest problems people have with this game (at least the more rational ones that aren't ready to crucify people over poor choices of words) is that just being able to explore isn't enough for them, that a game isn't worth its salt unless it's bogged down in multilayered mechanics. i personally think, despite the issues the game indeed has, that it should be commended for being a unique approach to gameplay and for at least trying something a little different than the "gun down anything that moves with convoluted upgrade/xp systems along the way."

i don't think on the whole they were being disingenuous at all; Hello Games said from the start the focus was on exploration. reading a bit of the kotaku review i was with them in that if you start taking it slow and trekking out from your spaceship you start to find some pretty neat things and get lost in just traversing the procedural countryside and finding weird quivering beasts along the way. i understand that's not enough for some (most?), but i'm happy they're taking a different approach.

Eh, I think the biggest problem is the game is bogged down by multilayered mechanics, and they're all pretty bad. NMS has you constantly mining the same things for upkeep on your suit/ship, chirping out warnings all the time, managing limited inventory for everything you find, and engaging in badly done dogfights in between planets. The mechanics were in complete contrast with the supposed chill, exploratory nature of the game. I can't explore for a minute without some meter in my suit reminding me of its existence, or having to shove an element into something. And it feels like those mechanics are stripped down from what was in there before, with every required element all around you at all times, making it all just kind of busywork instead of a challenge.

Avatar image for themaintank
TheMainTank

132

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@alex: you REALLY don't want to see the interview where Sean Murray DID get co-horsed. It wasn't a pleasant sight for him or the horses.

Avatar image for ripelivejam
ripelivejam

13572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ripelivejam said:

i sense one of the biggest problems people have with this game (at least the more rational ones that aren't ready to crucify people over poor choices of words) is that just being able to explore isn't enough for them, that a game isn't worth its salt unless it's bogged down in multilayered mechanics. i personally think, despite the issues the game indeed has, that it should be commended for being a unique approach to gameplay and for at least trying something a little different than the "gun down anything that moves with convoluted upgrade/xp systems along the way."

i don't think on the whole they were being disingenuous at all; Hello Games said from the start the focus was on exploration. reading a bit of the kotaku review i was with them in that if you start taking it slow and trekking out from your spaceship you start to find some pretty neat things and get lost in just traversing the procedural countryside and finding weird quivering beasts along the way. i understand that's not enough for some (most?), but i'm happy they're taking a different approach.

Eh, I think the biggest problem is the game is bogged down by multilayered mechanics, and they're all pretty bad. NMS has you constantly mining the same things for upkeep on your suit/ship, chirping out warnings all the time, managing limited inventory for everything you find, and engaging in badly done dogfights in between planets. The mechanics were in complete contrast with the supposed chill, exploratory nature of the game. I can't explore for a minute without some meter in my suit reminding me of its existence, or having to shove an element into something. And it feels like those mechanics are stripped down from what was in there before, with every required element all around you at all times, making it all just kind of busywork instead of a challenge.

i guess YMMV. so far the resource collecting and alarms haven't been too nagging for me. you're probably right that it may encumber things too much in general. i'm totally aware this game has issues, but like alex eloquently put it there's just something there (for me anyway).

Avatar image for ripelivejam
ripelivejam

13572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@alex: you REALLY don't want to see the interview where Sean Murray DID get co-horsed. It wasn't a pleasant sight for him or the horses.

now i just have to name the next animal i find Co-Horse.

Avatar image for jonny_anonymous
Jonny_Anonymous

3694

Forum Posts

6

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Jonny_Anonymous

When I play a game with inventory I purposefully limit it myself and I never ever use fast travel. I wonder how many other people do that.

Avatar image for hermes
hermes

3000

Forum Posts

81

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

Edited By hermes

@solh0und said:

I would personally say it's the best "podcast" game to play thus far.

Well that and Diablo.

Yeah, I have the same impression. I haven't had a new podcast game since the last Borderlands, but this seems quite apt to scratch that itch.

Avatar image for vigil80
Vigil80

477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Vigil80

I, for one, have finally learned not to buy games until the word is out. I always recognized that as good advice, but I still found myself getting swept up in the occasional exciting-seeming game and thinking, "Yeah, but this one will be good..."

Do not preorder games. Do not put money down sight unseen.

A "bonus" palette swap costume or "exclusive" item that is obsolete after the first hour is cold comfort if the game is not fun. Even if the bona fide press is shorted on review copies, odds are that some streamer will at least put up some video. You can still get in on launch day/week if the game looks good to you, and you can spare yourself the butt pain of remorse if it isn't.

Avatar image for vaeng
Vaeng

159

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Vaeng
No Caption Provided

Who all wants some of those sick ass horse coloring pages though?

I mean look at this. Cutest thing ever.

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for jimmydyke
Jimmydyke

4

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

at least it got a laugh! and that is google auto correct for you :) if he added that into the games naming system then we would at least get a better laugh!

Avatar image for gobo212
gobo212

46

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By gobo212

Great review Alex! You've really developed your own voice as a writer over the years and this one of your best pieces. Also co-horsed.

Avatar image for veektarius
veektarius

6420

Forum Posts

45

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

Sort of like the game it covers, this review might have aspired to be a bit more than it is, but then again I seem to be in the minority in saying so.

Avatar image for josephknows
JosephKnows

500

Forum Posts

13043

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 18

Edited By JosephKnows

Haven't read any other review on the game, but I think this one is all I'll ever need. Stellar writing once again from Giant Bomb's best writer.

My interest in getting the game has been on and off from reading and hearing impressions and watching the video content here. As weird as it is for me to think of assigning monetary value to a game based on "hard facts" like "amount of content" and "length" given all the great experiences I've had with games of varying sizes, I still have this undeniable feeling that No Man's Sky is not worth me spending $60 on.

But Alex's very considered opinions and anecdotes have me leaning towards getting it eventually instead of not at all.

Avatar image for assirra
Assirra

521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@sravankb said:
@solh0und said:

I would personally say it's the best "podcast" game to play thus far.

Well that and Diablo.

As far as "podcast games" go, nothing beats Minecraft, IMO. There are far more engaging gameplay elements in that game compared to NMS.

Certainly that's true right now, but after a few years of background development I would like to think that Hello Games fleshes out some of the more bare aspects of NMS, similarly to what was done with Minecraft (albeit, without the understanding that comes with paying for an alpha-release).

Man, what a bummer of a game.

Minecraft was also in alpha and beta state for a long time, never got a huge marketing campaign and never costed the same as a full price AAA game. Compare the release version of Minecraft to the release copy of NMS.

Avatar image for yakov456
yakov456

2021

Forum Posts

133

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Don't focus on the three stars, Alex's review perfectly sums up my thoughts on the game. It's fantastic, for those whose sweet spot is hit by this game.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a4ea8fdbe490
deactivated-5a4ea8fdbe490

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I have not played the game, but something has been bugging me, and let me preface this by saying I am usually super optimistic about games, and try to find the good in even bad games and give every game a chance. Also, considering it was a struggle to even figure out how to be able to walk around in a Unity world, I know game development is tough.

That being said, No Man's Sky was absolutely painted to be something it's not. The whole confusion about what this game was going to be was no accident, the developers did not want to tell the truth. Everybody started assuming what this game would be, and as gamers typically do, they got ahead of themselves and got super amped about a game that was not going to be what they thought. I truly believe that Hello Games did not want to clarify what this game would be because the hype would have significantly died, and greatly impacted sales. I am confused how this game could exist and not be multiplayer, but I am even more confused about how it was so hard to get a clear answer about that. I will check out No Man's Sky when it's fixed and greatly discounted, because I am really put off by the whole situation.

Avatar image for the-nanomachines
the-nanomachines

122

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By the-nanomachines

Outstanding review. Thanks Alex, I really enjoyed reading this.

Avatar image for rentalfloss
RentalFloss

18

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This is the best writing I've seen around this game, or on the site in a while!

Puts my own thoughts into concise statements better than I ever could.

ALEX NAVARRO IS STILL A THREAT

Avatar image for onemanarmyy
Onemanarmyy

6406

Forum Posts

432

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Onemanarmyy

I want to see the animal in NMS that gets the name Co-horse.

I'm thinking about a 4 legged animal with 2 necks, one of them having a horse-like head. Like a co-pilot of the main neck.

Avatar image for sravankb
sravankb

564

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By sravankb

@ripelivejam: Not really. Even if it was just an exploration title, everything about its awful survival mechanics bog down the core exploration. People have legitimate reasons to not like this game. Let's not be this reductive about those reasons.

Avatar image for ericwinholt
EricWinholt

57

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Couldn't agree more, Alex. I'm ~26 hours in, I've accomplished very little, there's no story to be seen, no goals to set, and I don't have a positive or convincing argument for the game, but it's my favorite thing I've played in years.

The first planet I was on was a giant-fungus-covered, hostile-ass crock pot of a planet, and as soon as I found a cave, I was happy I spent sixty dollars. I can't wait to play more.

Avatar image for runwithmonkeys24
runwithmonkeys24

22

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Just wanted to say, great review! I always appreciate a well written article like this.

Avatar image for kukamunga
Kukamunga

77

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

That was an excellent review Alex. I think I'm going to give this game a shot now.

Avatar image for shintsurugi
shintsurugi

87

Forum Posts

241

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

I'd like to give this review a 5/5. A great read, Alex.

Pity the game isn't better. :/

Avatar image for gm
gm

1

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By gm

This is a terrific review and perfectly sums up my experience with this game. Great work Alex.