Quick Look: No Man's Sky

The wait is over and Alex is finally able to tell us about the mysterious wonders of the universe.

Vinny Caravella on Google+
Click To Unmute
Please use a html5 video capable browser to watch videos.
This video has an invalid file format.
Sorry, but you can't access this content!
Please enter your date of birth to view this video

By clicking 'enter', you agree to Giant Bomb's
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Giant Bomb Review


No Man's Sky Review

  • PS4

It's light years from being a great game, but there's still something at the heart of No Man's Sky that speaks to the would-be explorer in all of us.

No Man's Sky feels like it's been in the public consciousness for an eternity. In reality, it's closer to two-and-a-half years. All that build-up, all those weighty expectations, all of it began a little over half a US Presidential term ago at, of all places, the 2013 VGX Awards. Remember that show? If you do, it's probably because of what a disaster it was. But somewhere in there, tucked amid Joel McHale's active disdain for his hosting role and a bunch of ill-fitting Odd Future interview segments, maybe you remember Sean Murray of Hello Games unveiling his studio's latest creation, an impossibly huge-sounding space exploration game called No Man's Sky. Maybe you remember him nervously shifting as Geoff Keighley grilled him on the details of the game, looking down at his shoes as he described his vision of the ultimate "You see that mountain? You can go there" game, a procedurally generated universe of over 18 quintillion planets, all explorable from pole to pole. Maybe you remember even McHale himself, so detached and sarcastic throughout the show, letting out a brief eruption of genuine-feeling incredulity at the scope of what Murray's small team was trying to accomplish.

No Caption Provided

That incredulity has built steadily in parallel to a ludicrous amount of hype in the years since. For every person pinning their dreams of "endless gameplay" in "the last game they'll ever play," there was another demanding to know "what you do" in the game, and casting doubts as to whether Hello Games could ever pull off what it was purporting to do. Normally as a critic I wouldn't care to mention the hype cycle any big game inevitably goes through, but that cycle is inextricably linked to No Man's Sky. So much of what has been wished upon it has informed the discourse around it. Though Hello Games' own messaging has been at best, muddled, and at worst, ultimately misleading--especially around the possibility of players finding each other in this huge universe--that messaging has also been largely drowned out by people projecting their own hopes and fears onto the game.

It's as difficult to imagine a game that met the loftiest of those expectations as it is easy to understand why people would be disappointed with the game that No Man's Sky ultimately turned out to be. At its core, No Man's Sky is a game of exploration. You jump from star system to star system in your own little ship, landing on planets and moons and leaving your personal stamp on them as you go. The constant feeling of discovery is its greatest asset, but that discovery often feels in service of far less interesting ends. Both its fleeting attempts at narrative, and economically-driven gameplay systems, are fairly terrible at respecting the player's time. And yet they're seemingly what are meant to propel the player forward in No Man's Sky. Resource gathering, crafting, inventory management, robot fighting, ship combat, it's all in there, wrapped in a veneer of Greater Purpose that points you toward the center of the galaxy, a place you are meant to go because the developers felt the game needed a place everyone is supposed to go. But taken individually, none of these things are particularly compelling. They're all skeletons of systems that basically work together, but not completely. Even the procedural generation, the heart of this whole crazy endeavor, starts showing its seams long before you even start thinking about those hypothetical "hundreds of hours" of gameplay.

And yet. And yet.

Calling something "greater than the sum of its parts" is beyond cliche, but no other description feels more apt for No Man's Sky. There's a rhythm to playing it that's unusually transfixing. Even as I came to realize the limitations of every single thing the game does, the sense of wonder never quite left me. Thirty-five hours in, I still found great joy in setting foot on a new planet for the first time, looking around, and drinking in whatever environment surrounded me. It's hard to explain why that feeling is still here, even after I've discovered every flaw in the game's design, every crack in its facade. There are so many different ways that No Man's Sky fails to deliver that I should be disappointed. I should be done with this game. And yet. And yet.

No Caption Provided

The longest I ever spent on a single planet was the planet @bombsfall (named, as many of my planets were, for someone I follow on Twitter, because I'm just not that creative a person). This was early in my time in the Euclid Galaxy, before I had fully grasped the pace of life in this universe. @bombsfall was, at the time, by far the liveliest planet I'd encountered, filled with useful elements, significant volumes of weird wildlife, and a great number of Vy'keen bases and installations. By this point in my journey, I hadn't stopped to think much about where I was going. I was still enamored with the mere concept of landing on a planet, and trying to plant my flag in as many locations as I could. According to the clock, I was there for 15 sols, which roughly translated to six hours in real world time. At no point did anything on @bombsfall reveal itself to be wildly different from any planet I'd been to up to this point, nor any I've visited since. Apart from its abundance of everything, it was just another planet.

But I stayed here. I mined heridium and plutonium in huge quantities. I scanned every bit of life I could find, every vaguely different-looking rock formation that happened to appear in my field of view. I found galloping horse-looking things with heads and necks like screaming plants, skittering lizards with bug-eyes that seemed at once alarmed and sleepy. I discovered something like 30 different waypoints before I finally decided to move on. There was no good reason to stay as long as I did, but nonetheless I stayed, checking off boxes, giving identity to any question mark that scanned in walkable distance. Fifteen sols of obsessive documentation and resource gathering, all for what? Why did I stay here, and not other, frankly prettier places I eventually found? What kept my boots on this particular ground?

By this point in my journey through No Man's Sky, I hadn't fully grasped the notion of how the game metes out its objectives. I was treating No Man's Sky like a typical open-world game, reluctant to jettison myself from an active planet because I wanted to check off as many objectives as I could before moving on. If you play No Man's Sky like this over the long term, you should get out of your first solar system by Christmas, if you're lucky.

Every planet in No Man's Sky has the same basic things, just in vastly different quantities. A barren moon still has limited mineable resources and locations to visit, but not very many of them. The best planets are teeming with native flora and fauna, along with numerous bases and monoliths established by the game's other intelligent races, the warrior Vy'keen, the trade-focused Gek, and the Daft Punk-looking machine race called the Korvax Convergence. The variety of what you find in these bases is not very wide. Sometimes you'll find an observatory that will point you toward an ancient ruin or distress call from a wrecked ship. Sometimes it was an abandoned station that had been overtaken by betentacled alien unpleasantness, in which I would usually find some new tech to attach to my multitool or exosuit. Sometimes I'd find a trading depot manned by a solitary member of one of the previously mentioned races.

No Caption Provided

In a normal open-world game, the repetition of these familiar icons on a map would be lessened, because you're aiming toward a set endpoint. They only have to be copied and pasted a few times throughout the game because they exist alongside larger story missions that are the primary focus for the player. These are distractions from the point, not the point unto themselves. In No Man's Sky, everything outside of the game's single story thread is a side objective, copied and pasted hundreds of quintillions of times across the universe. No matter how long you spend in No Man's Sky, you will never see them all, but not long after you begin No Man's Sky, you will have seen them all before.

That repetition will likely be critically damaging to a lot of people's enjoyment, especially given how threadbare the core survival game mechanics are. Resources are mined, systems are recharged and repaired, money is gained, and so on. In between, you manage and build out your inventory so you can store more of everything. Crashed ships (or ones purchased from other aliens) give you more cargo space than the beater you begin the game with, but they're expensive, so you keep grinding. Exosuit upgrades are found on every space station, and frequently scattered across planets and moons, but they increase in cost with each purchase, so you keep grinding. This process repeats itself forever. As the game exists at the time of this writing, there is nothing to do but look for new versions of the same things, take whatever's useful for you, and move onto the next planet, all in the hopes of creating a bigger bag in which to store whatever.

Once you start earning upgrades for your equipment, tasks like mining start feeling less like a tedious chore. There's no worse modern game design convention than "this task sucks until you upgrade to make it suck less," and that's a convention No Man's Sky is oddly invested in, sadly.

But there are appealing aspects too. Scanning environments on a newly discovered planet doesn't get old, or at least it hasn't yet for me. Yes, you'll see the same assets recombined in various ways as you play, but even apart from the financial benefits--you earn additional money by uploading your discoveries to a galactic database--it's a wonderful sensation to know you're the first person to see this particular thing, whatever that thing happens to be. And even though engaging with the wildlife on any given planet rarely amounts to much--feeding the more docile creatures sometimes nets you additional resources they scout for you, or occasionally excrete for you--I still like doing it. I like befriending these Frankensteined animals, no matter how grievously repellant they might be. By no means will this grind work for every player; I often wondered not if, but when it would ever stop working for me. But for the subset of players who, like me, succumb to No Man's Sky's perpetual thrum of galactic busywork, it does the job.

No Caption Provided

The closest I ever came to actual death in No Man's Sky was on the planet @MOUNTENNUI. A mountainous planet with minimal wildlife, @MOUNTENNUI was a rock I almost bolted from moments after touching down. It was only because I noticed an unfamiliar object near my landing point that I stayed. Vortex Cubes. I'd never seen these on a planet before. As far as I knew, they only existed as rare, valuable items you could buy on the open trading market. Here they were, not in great quantities, but enough that it was worth my while to snag a few. The one thing I hadn't counted on was the sentinels.

The sentinels on this planet were aggressive. Any attempt to take resources would result in a couple of them coming at me guns blazing. They were especially protective of these rare cubes, which sat on pedestals like ancient idols, begging to be stolen, if only so that a giant boulder could finally be unleashed upon the thief. Stealing the cubes alerted the sentinels to my presence. At this point, my multitool was pretty strong, so I could take out the first wave without much hassle. Even the second alert tier, the dog-looking machines with hyperaccurate laser fire, usually died after a single grenade launch. Here though, I first encountered the next tier, a giant AT-ST-looking monster that seemed dead set on wiping me from this universe entirely. The second he showed up, my shields were blasted away in seconds. I bolted for my ship, jumped in the cockpit with barely any health left, and flew to the stars, thinking I'd escaped. Suddenly, alarms sounded. Sentinel ships were coming out of hyperspace. I fought a few off, but they just kept coming. I figured I was doomed.

Then I turned my ship toward the nearest space station, hit the pulse drive, and got away. They didn't chase me. I was fine.

No Caption Provided

The worst parts of No Man's Sky are the ones that most closely hew to the idea of what a traditional video game is supposed to have. Take the aforementioned sentinels. These robotic creatures exist on every world. Though they vary in temperament, the idea is that they police the universe. Huge chunks of the other races' history is wrapped up in fighting them or researching their omnipresent existence. Why they're here isn't an interesting mystery, especially since they only seem to exist to give players something to fight. Even the most aggressive wildlife isn't much of a challenge, so here are some robots that get larger and nastier depending on how much chaos you cause. Here are your antagonists, because video games are supposed to have those.

Fighting them is always a nuisance, but never tense or fun. They're not strong or smart enough to put up a meaningful fight once you've implemented enough weapon upgrades. They're just there to start shit because nothing else in the game, save for the occasional space pirate you encounter off-planet, does. Engaging them (and the pirates) in space is no better. Ship combat goes from frustrating to depressingly simple as soon as you acquire your first beam weapon. Instead of having to carefully lead targets with your shot (and mostly miss in the process), you just blast a few phaser beams out and the autotargeting does the rest of the work. Video games are theoretically supposed to make fighting the antagonists they present you with an enjoyable experience, something No Man's Sky never finds a way to pull off.

The same can be said for the game's attempts at story. Finding monoliths and knowledge stones offers up some interesting backstory for the histories of the different races you encounter, as well as individual word translations for the various alien languages, but the actual story direction for the player, which involves following a path laid out for you by an ancient force called Atlas, is just an absolute waste. The notion here is that players might want something to guide them early in the game. Given the scope of the universe, having something to latch onto besides a vague longing toward getting to the center of the galaxy makes sense. But what's on offer isn't much of a story at all. It's a series of stations to visit that spoon feed you a bit of philosophical baby food before offering you a special orb and sending you back on your way. If you collect ten of those orbs, your final station visit will give you the option to create a new star, which is presented with as little fanfare as you could imagine.

The good news is that you don't have to follow this path. You have the option at the very beginning of the game to go that route, or just freely explore. You should freely explore, because for all the things that No Man's Sky misses the mark on, that freedom of exploration is the one thing it gets very, very right.

No Caption Provided

I never felt more alone than I did on the planet @UtilityLimb. At this stage of my journey, I'd never been to a harsher place. Impossibly massive cliffs jutted up all around, offering sheer drops into small pools of putridly hot water. Huge storms that almost completely killed visibility beyond a few feet in front of me rolled in regularly, kicking up purple dust clouds that made the environment look like an early Nintendo 64 game. The only life I ever found were a few out-of-place-looking cow creatures, and a small number of pulsating shrimp things that swam around those tiny pools of water. Of the precious few stations I found, all were empty of life. No one existed on this bizarre, horrible place.

And I have never had more fun in No Man's Sky than I did on this garbage planet. Due to some pre-day-one-patch glitch, my ship's engines had broken. I needed to farm a fair amount of iron in order to make the necessary repairs, and while iron was certainly around, it was gonna take a while to get it. Knowing that I would end up wiping my save when the patch dropped, I decided this is where I was going to make my stand. I was going to die on this rock, but before then, I wanted to find someone else alive. I had to know if I was truly, utterly alone.

I spent a long time wandering @UtilityLimb's hostile terrain. Maybe every 10 minutes or so, I'd find another question mark, but it never materialized into an interaction. Just monoliths and abandoned facilities, with knowledge stones dotting the path between them. I learned the Gek words for "origin," "fluid," and "kneel" but I never found another sapient presence.

No Caption Provided

After a couple of hours, I allowed myself one last question mark. I hoofed it in the icon's direction, but it took forever. The cliffs were unforgiving, and my jetpack hadn't been suitably upgraded by this point. You could see where the procedural generation had borked up in places, as giant, yet unusually slender outcroppings of rock, which looked like the result of anything but nature, appeared sometimes completely free of gravity, floating peculiarly above the world. Storms kept hitting, but finally, as the last one broke, I saw the outline of my final destination. It was another monolith.

I interacted with it, and it told me that amid its pulsing energies, a small birdlike creature had appeared. It looked dead, with its neck clearly broken. The monolith had reanimated it for my benefit, as some kind of test. It screamed in agony. The monolith gave me a choice: Let it be, or put it out of its misery. I thought for a second, and chose to kill it. Mercy seemed altogether absent on this world, so I felt it my duty to inject a little into it. I was rewarded with a new upgrade for my exosuit.

As I turned away, the computer sounded the alert of yet another incoming storm. As purple dust clouds filled the space, I poked the last few knowledge stones that surrounded me. I learned the Gek words for "fire," "stop," and "awake." Those were the last words that went through my head as I, and my original save, died.

No Man's Sky does an incredible job of making you feel insignificant. Maybe this sounds like a weird thing to compliment a game for. After all, games are often obsessed with making you feel like the most significant person in their individual worlds. No Man's Sky is the opposite of a power fantasy. You're just a person scraping by, taking what you need, selling the rest, and working to survive in a universe that's thoroughly uninvested in your survival.

No Caption Provided

It's lonely as hell, and I think that's wonderful. I mean, thinking about space and its distressing infiniteness tends to have that effect on people, but this feels different from what other space games tend to offer. This isn't grand space opera; you're not building a galactic empire. You're in this universe all by yourself. You know full well that you will never see the whole of it. The only way to leave any kind of mark is through discovery. Putting your stamp on the star systems, planets, individual waypoints, and even names of various species you encounter, is the closest anyone will ever get to knowing where your journey took you. It's the galactic equivalent of carving "Brooks Was Here" into the ceiling of a boarding house.

And it's kind of a beautiful, even humbling thing. This is what ultimately kept me going in No Man's Sky. When I'd finished the Atlas path, I almost called it quits in disgust. But when I eventually convinced myself to go back, I decided to return to the pace of play I'd been holding to before I decided to rush through the last few Atlas stations. I made it a point to go to every planet in a star system, and even if I opted not to stay long, maintaining that need to explore brought me back to how I felt when I first began the game. The sense of wonder returned as I continued my solitary journey through space. Knowing that I was totally on my own, and that there was nothing left to guide me, reminded me why I was ever enjoying the game in the first place.

I don't expect that sense of wonder will hold for everyone. There's a good chance that your immersion in No Man's Sky will be broken far sooner than mine. You may find yourself deeply bored of the game's loop once you've seen all the varieties of animal and plant and rock that the game recycles across its universe. You may tire of the frequent bugs and crashes that, while sure to be patched down the road, nonetheless distract quite a bit from the current version of the game. Maybe you've already decided not to jump into No Man's Sky at all because, in numerous ways, it's never quite manages to live up to its original promise, imagined or otherwise.

And yet, there's something underneath all those blemishes, something intangible beyond its rickety framework and lackluster individual pieces, that I couldn't ignore. The thing is, almost entirely in spite of what No Man's Sky is, I really like playing it. It calms me in a way that few games ever manage to. Knowing that I'll never see the entirety of it, knowing that my path through this overwhelmingly massive, deeply flawed universe will be uniquely my own, is enough to keep me on that path. I like being here, lonesome in my insignificant corner of the galaxy, doing the things I need to do to survive.

No Caption Provided

This is the vision of the game I hope Hello Games leans into as they work to improve No Man's Sky. Yes, deeper systems, better draw distance, better frame rate, greater variety of, well, everything, all of this is important. Maybe that theoretical possibility of interaction between players should actually make its way into the game, too. But I don't want any of that to come at the expense of that magnificent solitude that No Man's Sky already does so well. That's why I remain here, wrestling with all the ways in which this game's universe is fundamentally broken.

Because this broken universe gives me a small taste of something that our own broken universe can't. I will never leave Earth. I will almost assuredly never go to a place no one has ever been, because nearly every place on Earth has already been discovered. Though the promise of interstellar travel, or at least travel to other places in our little solar system, has never seemed more tantalizingly close, I know that I will never be one of those people to set foot on those unfamiliar places. That opportunity has passed me and a great deal of my generation by. If and when space travel becomes a normal aspect of human life, I'll be an old man, if I'm even alive at all.

No Man's Sky makes me feel like I can go somewhere no one else has ever been, and no one else may ever be again. And I love it for that. Maybe you will too.

No Caption Provided
Alex Navarro on Google+
237 CommentsRefresh
Avatar image for kill3rpastry
Posted By Kill3rPastry

Haven't finished the review, but yeah 3 stars feels right so far

Avatar image for solh0und
Edited By Solh0und

I would personally say it's the best "podcast" game to play thus far.

Well that and Diablo.

Avatar image for betaband
Posted By BetaBand

I'm probably never going to buy this game, but I always enjoy Alex's writing. Thanks!

Avatar image for sravankb
Posted By sravankb

@solh0und said:

I would personally say it's the best "podcast" game to play thus far.

Well that and Diablo.

As far as "podcast games" go, nothing beats Minecraft, IMO. There are far more engaging gameplay elements in that game compared to NMS.

Avatar image for drdarkstryfe
Posted By DrDarkStryfe

Incredible read. I really enjoyed the direction you went with the very personal touch of telling stories of your adventures in the game.

Avatar image for rongalaxy
Posted By RonGalaxy

This is the definition of a 3 star game. There is so much wrong with it that can't be ignored, but still something about it that makes it immensely enjoyable. I really hope Hello Games supports it for a long time because it has so much God damn potential.

Avatar image for ohnonono
Posted By Ohnonono

Great review, echoes my experience very much. All the hype and price point aside it is still so crazy to think that such a small team made this game.

Avatar image for willyod
Edited By WillyOD

Great review. 3/5 is just right (atm).

Avatar image for sinjunb
Posted By sinjunb

Remarkably forgiving review IMO. This game has no soul and is essentially just a space mining simulator with barebones ship flight stuff. The procedurally generated worlds are novel to some people I guess but I just find them ugly and bland, not a replacement for artistic hand crafted environments by any stretch.

Avatar image for mezentine
Posted By mezentine

Holy shit. Best written thing I've read about NMS. Easily

Avatar image for banicabolnica
Posted By banicabolnica

As one not so famous youtuber said: "This is a great 15-20$ Early Access Game, nothing more." And I completely agree, and especially for the PC version - a big nope.

Avatar image for junker_seed
Edited By JUNKER_Seed

Great review. 3/5 is about right. Love playing the begeezus out of it still.

Avatar image for bybeach
Edited By bybeach

Yes Alex, that Was a long review. But I will read it because perhaps I will learn a bit more how to play it. I felt I was banging my head against the wall till I remembered the term 'mining'. Now I have my second ship.

Your lead in sentence I could not agree more.

Avatar image for mach_go_go_go
Posted By Mach_GO_GO_GO
@sravankb said:
@solh0und said:

I would personally say it's the best "podcast" game to play thus far.

Well that and Diablo.

As far as "podcast games" go, nothing beats Minecraft, IMO. There are far more engaging gameplay elements in that game compared to NMS.

Certainly that's true right now, but after a few years of background development I would like to think that Hello Games fleshes out some of the more bare aspects of NMS, similarly to what was done with Minecraft (albeit, without the understanding that comes with paying for an alpha-release).

Man, what a bummer of a game.

Avatar image for iammattz
Posted By iammattz

Thanks for this review, Alex. Great stuff.

Avatar image for galenblade
Posted By galenblade

God DAMN, Alex. That was a great read.

Avatar image for dovah
Posted By dovah

Great review.

Avatar image for joey_ravn
Edited By JoeyRavn

I would have given it 3 stars if I hadn't played past the first hour or so, before leaving the first planet. Aftewards, it quickly became a 2-star (aka "bad") game for me. Once I realized that the initial gameplay loop was basically all there was to the gameplay, I refunded the game as soon as possible. Maybe the game does get better after a while, but, man, it did nothing for me to get interested in it in its opening hours.

Oh, and the constant maintenance of everything from your character to your ship to your mining tool is incredibly annoying. "Life support system low" = "75%". Yikes.

Avatar image for csl316
Posted By csl316

I'm glad you went with the long-ass review.

Played it yesterday for the first time. Started at 9pm. Did some of the early stuff. Decided I probably won't need to play it again, not sure if it would be worth the effort to continue. Looked at my watch.

It was 4am.

And I'm ready to go again.

Avatar image for linkster7
Posted By linkster7

Wow, that was beautifully written Alex. I think this might be my favorite review ever

Avatar image for mirado
Posted By Mirado

No Man's Sky is a chill game that has a lot of annoying things stacked on top of it that keep it from being as chill as I would like. Once they add more to it so the ratio of cool things to find starts to eclipse annoying things to deal with (or they start fixing some of those things), I think it could be something special, broken promises and all.

Great review Alex. Nice to see someone that can enjoy the exploration of it all while acknowledging there's a ways to go before Sean Murray's vision matches with what we're actually doing.

Avatar image for lestephan
Posted By LeStephan

Hot dang, what a review Alex!

Avatar image for pants_ghidorah
Edited By pants_ghidorah

Thanks Alex, great review. I have been having a very similar experience so far.

Avatar image for freewriter55
Posted By freewriter55

Beautiful wrap-up on this review. Great review overall, thanks for putting the weird emotions into words

Avatar image for knotley
Edited By Knotley

As always an exceptional, bang on review.

Avatar image for greenmac
Edited By greenmac

That was wonderful, Alex.

Avatar image for hott8bitaction
Edited By hott8bitaction

Great assessment of the game Alex! I have the same feeling as you do with this game. My only issue is the amount of crashing that has been occurring as I play this on my PS4. Even with the recent 1.04 patch my game has crashed five times in the two hour period I was attempting to play it. It may be my PS4, as it is LOUD when I play this game.Though for a game I want to be immersed in these crashes really dissuade me from playing it.

Also I love your planet naming! It makes me thing of some dystopian future where all planetary bodies are referred to by handles from our mega-conglomerate sponsors.

Avatar image for sonofsnow
Posted By SonofSnow

What a fantastic review, despite the broken systems the experiences described by the Beastcast crew and Austin really make me want to check out NMS for myself at some point.

Great work as always Alex.

Avatar image for pickassoreborn
Posted By pickassoreborn

Really lovely review. I'm enjoying the hell out of the game though I think it's definitely not for everyone. It's kind of relaxing though already there's tales I can tell which have helped shape my experience. Currently chilling on a planet of acid rain with suitable protection while grabbing rare stuff is a nice place to be.

Avatar image for foxmulder
Posted By foxmulder

As someone who played way too much Spore and enjoyed it, I'd say I'll probably play too much of this and enjoy it as well!

Avatar image for probablytuna
Posted By probablytuna

Still patiently waiting for the patch to finish downloading so I can jump back in. It's not a great game, but it's certainly hooked me.

Avatar image for j_derek
Posted By j_derek

Best review of NMS I have read. Eloquently summarizes my thoughts on the game in ways I never could. I'm just linking this review to all my freinds who ask me if they should play it.

Thanks Alex!

Avatar image for wandrecanada
Edited By Wandrecanada

I still feel like NMS is overpriced for what it provides. There are a lot of games out there and alternatives for 3D visual treats are many and diverse (Abzu is a great example).

If you are looking for exploration Starbound already does this part better and contains more story, character and ways to make a meaningful mark on the universe. The crux of my problem with No Man's Sky is that nothing has any meaning. Your naming things in the universe is not impactful and there is no reason to give it a name beyond what is auto generated.

As much as I don't think it's always appropriate to take price into account during review, for No Man's Sky it might actually be important. It's sad that a massive marketing budget can sell a game that provides a mediocre experience for such a high price. Starbound and Abzu caz be bought for $20 less than No Man's Sky and released one and two weeks before No Man's Sky.

Avatar image for thesoutherndandy
Posted By TheSouthernDandy

Everytime I read an Alex review I'm reminded how great a writer he is. Awesome job dude.

Avatar image for mmarsu
Edited By mmarsu

@joey_ravn: The game is about exploration, like Alex says in his reviews, that's what kept him ( and myself & I assume many others ) coming back. Its not about making gold or getting to the atlas stations. The fact that you've played two hours of it and had enough basically tells me that this game isnt for you. And that's okay. But that doesnt neccesarily make it a bad game.

I really enjoyed this review Alex, I agree on most of your points and I hope they (HG) continue to improve upon the base game. The sense of exploration and wonder hasnt really stopped with me either, even after plunking down a lot of hours into it.

Avatar image for vigil80
Edited By Vigil80

A game environment that wears itself out after about an hour, leaving you to fill in the blanks with depressing philosophizing if you choose to keep going. Wee.

Yes, I'm being somewhat facetious. And I don't intend to take anything away from Alex's excellent (Alexcellent?) review, either. But I'll be quite surprised if No Man's Sky doesn't take the gold, or at least silver, this year for Biggest Disappointment.

I don't think we can just blame the hype machine, vicious though it is. Seems to me at the moment that the No Man's men were happy to fan the flames.

Avatar image for sjaak
Posted By sjaak

Excellent review, very personal. Thinking of buying it now, something a review never did before in my lifetime.

Avatar image for bojackhorseman
Edited By BojackHorseman

After listening to the latest beastcast, this review is bestowed the honor of having the most predictable score in the history of the universe.

Avatar image for jadegl
Posted By JadeGL

Great review and I feel like the 3/5 score is very fair.

I've played probably between 10-15 hours of the game and I find myself being completely enamored with the exploration aspects. There is something really wonderful about getting in your ship, taking off and going into space, then jumping to a new star system to see what else is out there. The universe feels big and imposing, and I enjoy that.

On the other hand, once you get over the euphoria of finding a new planet, space station or anomaly, you're just back to the same mining and accumulating items, all in the service to make yourself better so you can travel farther and find more planets, mine more stuff and accumulate more things. It's a loop, but it's not a wholly satisfying loop. It makes me feel like I felt when I was playing Minecraft but it doesn't have the depth of Minecraft to carry me through. I would love to find a planet and build a home, plant my own plants and raise my own strange pets. I know that this wasn't what the game was advertised as, it's just the feeling I get when I find myself becoming bored with the gameplay as it is now.

I also wish that the interactions with the aliens had more depth. I wish being chummy with the Gek would lead to me being an enemy of the other two races, or something like that, but that's not the case. The thing is, I like the aliens a lot. Whenever I find a little Gek with a nifty hubcap hat on, I get all excited. But than I remember that he's pretty much just going to give me a schematic if I get the multiple choice answer right to his question. And, since I know a lot of Gek language at this point, I pretty much always get the answer right. So there isn't even a worry that i will fail anymore. I'm just so sad that there seems to be all of this interesting stuff here, but it's all surface level. It's like going to FYE and seeing the cardboard standees in the window of Randy Orton or Bella Swan, and then trying to carry on a conversation with them. It just leaves you feeling empty.

I do like the game a lot in spite of it's flaws, of which there are many. The feeling of finding new things, animals and aliens is amazing. I just wish there was more to do once I discovered them. :/

Avatar image for firrae
Posted By Firrae

Personally, I think this is about right for it. My personal star count is between 3 and 4, but I think some of the technical issues I'm facing are caused by my graphics card dying finally...

Avatar image for urnack
Posted By Urnack

This is an excellent review.

Avatar image for ominousbedroom
Posted By ominousbedroom

Excellent write up. I find NMS a bit more flawed than you do, but the reasons I keep playing are the same as yours. Exploring vastness while feeling tiny. If it's one thing the game has retained in its development, it's the sense of scale. See you around, space Alex.

Avatar image for cousi2344
Posted By cousi2344

This game is going to bug me for a while. Even though I had fairly managed expectations (thanks to the Giant Bomb team for that, glad the coverage was fair without swinging too far in either direction), and despite the fact that I'm extremely drawn in by the good things Alex says in the review, I know that I'd be disappointed in this game for a full $60. At the same time, I REALLY don't want to wait on this game -- it feels like I'm missing out on this thing while it's important and I can't wait to explore things no one has seen before, I can really get what Alex is saying about that in the review. This dilemma always sucks, but I know I'll be much happier with my purchase if I can hold out until new features are added and the price tag drops down below the $40 mark.

Avatar image for dizzuncan
Posted By dizzuncan

Haven't read the review yet, but I believe light-years is hyphenated @alex

Avatar image for mistercrow
Posted By MisterCrow

I feel much the same way about the game. Very flawed, but there's something really unique in there. Alex did a great job articulating those thoughts.

Avatar image for wolf_blitzer85
Posted By wolf_blitzer85

Hot damn that was a good read. I always like hearing what Alex has to say about something, and no one else could have reviewed this one better. Definitely captured how I felt about the game. Even though it's super easy to get bored with the game, I still want to see what's next and that is what keeps driving me.

Avatar image for shtinky
Edited By Shtinky

No Man's Sky didn't create the idea of procedural generated planets, and I think we'll see better implementation of the technology in future games to come.

Star Citizen, for example, could be one to look out for if you like the whole procedural planets thing.

Avatar image for amyggen
Posted By AMyggen

Fantastic review Alex.

Avatar image for extintor
Posted By extintor

The only time playing this so far where I have felt as if this had the potential to be anything higher than a three star experience was during the first couple of hours. I'm 20 hours in now and it if anything its starting to feel like a low three rather than a high three.