@gamefreak9 said:
@Jeust said:
@gamefreak9 said:
@rb_man:
If we had the same experience i'd accept your different opinion, but as things stand, I have more information than you do since i've finished D3 in 2 difficulties and the TL2 beta.
And do you need that whole experience for not liking it? Don't be a hater.
i'm confused... I didn't say I don't like TL2. I quite liked it, but to say that D3 is the better game is a gross understatement. I'm not hating at all, i'm merely saying that if you like the genre there is no reason you should not have bought D3 and plan on buying TL2. Those who love the genre will play both, since they would dedicate more time with it, but if you don't particularly like the genre then you should obviously just buy the better game. Is this not making sense?
Also I have serious doubts that you can't come up with 30 extra dollars, if that's the case then you should probably not be playing games at all so i don't count that as an excuse.
The thing is D3 and TL2 are two different beasts. Diablo 3 sure is polished and streamlined, but if you search about the development team that made the prior games Diablo and Diablo 2, you will find that they aren't the ones that develop Diablo 3. Some of the figure heads of Runic games that made Torchlight 2 were part of Blizzard North, and responsible for the Diablo games.
Torchlight 2 has a lesser budget, and less polish, still personally the creative vision of the original creators of Diablo sounds better than of team assigned to recreate the diablo experience in Diablo 3, the lack of the obnoxious online DRM, the much cheaper price, the permission to develop and use mods, and fun factor outweight everything Diablo 3 throws at me.
And personally I think Blizzard appears to be creatively bankrupt and a shadow of its former self. You can see polish and refined mechanics, but I didn't see anyone praising the creativity of Diablo 3. Games are more than polish. And the best ones for me are labours of love.
Log in to comment