Something went wrong. Try again later

Giant Bomb News

148 Comments

Activision Blizzard Buys MLG for $46M, Aims to Build "The ESPN of eSports"

This acquisition follows the recent creation of an Activision eSports Division. It also seems like it could be a bad move.

Is this eSports?
Is this eSports?

Back in October, Activision Blizzard announced its intentions to make a splash in the growing eSports industry by establishing a discrete eSports division, hiring former ESPN president Steve Bornstein and Major League Gaming co-founder and then president Mike Sepso. Now it's taking another step in that direction by acquiring the rest of Major League Gaming.

Activision-Blizzard announced the purchase in a press release posted yesterday, and though no figure is given in the release itself, an early report from the eSports Observer cites a stockholder letter indicating that that Activision Blizzard is spending $46M on the acquisition.

In a statement included in the press release, Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick re-iterated the company's eSports plans:

“Our acquisition of Major League Gaming’s business furthers our plans to create the ESPN of esports. MLG’s ability to create premium content and its proven broadcast technology platform – including its live streaming capabilities – strengthens our strategic position in competitive gaming. MLG has an incredibly strong and seasoned team and a thriving community. Together, we will create new ways to celebrate players and their unique skills, dedication and commitment to gaming.”

While there's no disputing that eSports is continuing to grow, I can't help but see this as an incredibly bold claim for a number of reasons.

First, as of the time of this announcement, Activision Blizzard has no public deal allowing them to broadcast footage from major eSports like League of Legends or DOTA2. Put simply, being unable to cover LCS or The International would be like ESPN being unable to cover the Super Bowl. That's not to say that Activision Blizzard doesn't have its own eSports properties. Heroes of the Storm, Starcraft, and to a lesser degree Call of Duty have established competitive scenes (EDIT: And, as GotFrag co-founder and former COO of Evil Geniuses Scott Smith correctly reminds me, so does Hearthstone!) Looking forward, I can Activision Blizzard's share of the eSports market continuing to grow (especially if Overwatch does well), but so long as eSports coverage remains fractured and company-run, it's hard to imagine anyone becoming "the ESPN of eSports."

Building off of this problem is the fact that MLG just may not be the best way to build this sort of network. When eSports was first kicking off, MLG positioned itself uniquely as the place to go to for competitive gaming. But as game companies began running their own major tournaments, MLG's importance started to fade. This is reflected in the purchase price: When you look at Activision Blizzard's balance book, $46M isn't that much. After all, this is the company that (sort of) spent $5.9B on King last fall. In speaking with our own Brad Shoemaker about the deal earlier, he said it incisively: "$46M is probably more than MLG is worth, but it's also less than it should have been worth."

For what it's worth, this purchase doesn't make me any less excited for Overwatch. That's... something, right?
For what it's worth, this purchase doesn't make me any less excited for Overwatch. That's... something, right?

There's also the matter of shareholder response to this purchase. The report from the eSports Observer reveals that this acquisition was a “corporate action taken without a stockholders’ meeting by less than unanimous written consent of our stockholders." Among the group of stockholders who did decide to make this purchase was Legion Capital Investments LLC, a group managed by Mike Sepso--Yes, the Mike Sepso who recently left MLG and joined Activision Blizzard. That's not really enough to get conspiratorial about, but things get worse when you look at the current state of MLG. Again, from the eSports Observer report:

Stockholders not in these categories are largely meeting the decision in disbelief. Some speculate that the majority of the sale will go towards paying off MLG’s debts, leaving little to go around for the remaining stockholders. MLG has filed for multiple debtfinancing rounds this year alone, for a sum of over $6 million. “I got fucked on stock,” said an affected stockholder, who wanted to remain anonymous.

Yikes.

Look, we just don't know enough to say that anything shady happened here, but it's pretty easy to see why an investor not involved in voting on this purchase might wonder about the motivation. At best, it makes an already questionable decision look worse. At worst, well... it's a bad, bad look.

At this point, it's hard to know how all of this will shake out. Activision Blizzard joins a number of other companies in the hunt to be the top spot for eSports coverage--including ESPN itself. While eSports can be just as exciting and dramatic as traditional sports, eSports brings unique challenges that mean that it needs to be covered in genuinely new ways. I think someone will figure that out eventually, but I'm just not sure that this purchase indicates that Activision Blizzard will be addressing those challenges. Time will tell if I'm proven wrong.

148 Comments

Avatar image for drdarkstryfe
DrDarkStryfe

2563

Forum Posts

1672

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Purchasing an existing platform to build on is the smart move.

The biggest challenge is convincing Valve and Riot that MLG can get enough eyes watching to get the two biggest players in the eSports game on board.

Avatar image for e30bmw
e30bmw

655

Forum Posts

69

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@jakob187 said:

I have a feeling that, very soon, Activision Blizzard will be announcing that Heroes of the Storm, Call of Duty, Overwatch, and any of their other games will ONLY be available for stream through MLG.

I mean, let's be honest: that's totally the kind of thing Bobby Kotick would do.

That doesn't seem like a bad thing considering every single big e-sports thing happens on Twitch. The CS:GO tournaments that are streamed on MLG.tv do way worse than the ones on Twitch.

Avatar image for av_gamer
AV_Gamer

2930

Forum Posts

17819

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 13

Activation hasn't been doing too good lately with their business decisions. It's times like this that I'm glad the FGC isn't full eSports yet.

Avatar image for alucitary
Alucitary

415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Seeking to emulate dying mediums is always a good business decision.

Avatar image for lawgamer
LawGamer

1481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Is there anyone here who can explain why eSports might become a thing? I'm not asking sarcastically, I'm genuinely curious. Every time I've seen a snippet of coverage, it looked and sounded really, really dumb. Basically Dodgeball ESPN "The Ocho"-level announcers who fail to explain any terminology paired with participants with lame gamertag/pro-wrestling names. There was a lot of "Grandmaster Shift McClutch with a wicked carry!". It was probably one of the most off-putting unwatchable things I've seen recently.

It kinda reminded me of early X-Games style stuff - trying way too hard to be hip and cool.

I suppose Activision got spend it's profits somehow so that it can avoid paying tax. why not waste it on brand that no one cares about.

The US Gov't taxes corporations on gross income not profits, so they're on the hook for what they make either way. It prevent them from being under pressure to declare a dividend, though.

If you really want a conspiracy theory, it would be that Activision is picking this stuff up intending that it produce a loss that it can use to offset other income in the future. In other words, wait until they've got some big game like Warcraft 4 coming out that they know will make a ton of money, and then sell the ESports thing the same year at a huge loss to offset the income.

Avatar image for landhawk
landhawk

499

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Bobby Kotick has a face that you just want to punch.

If they replace all the zombies in the next CoD with Bobby, it might actually excite people.

Avatar image for gaspower
GaspoweR

4904

Forum Posts

272

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

@the_ruckus: They were probably less focused on the brand and more focused on the tech and people that ran it. 46M is chump change for Activision in comparison to the purchases they've made in recent years.

Avatar image for jasonr86
JasonR86

10468

Forum Posts

449

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 5

Gross.

Avatar image for iowcatalyst
iowcatalyst

117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@ilikeost said:

I love games and I love Blizzard games but I could not give a shit about e-sports. Fuck e-sports.

1+

Avatar image for gaspower
GaspoweR

4904

Forum Posts

272

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By GaspoweR

@lawgamer: To be fair, it's not on the process of "becoming" since it already exists and despite it not having a huge mainstream presence, it has become really big in recent years with viewers and prizes also reflecting said growth. It's also dependent if you actually like the competitive aspect of certain video games in general since if you weren't interested in that in the slightest then it would obviously come off as incredibly amateurish. There is still room for improvement though if the goal is to appeal to more people like using real names instead of their tags, etc.

Also I wanted to ask other people here to confirm but I find that there are more popular fighting game players that actually use their real name or some shortened derivative of it compared to players in other genres.

Avatar image for gunflame88
gunflame88

412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Not that I care about MLG, but I don't like how big Activision has become. They can buy out basically anyone at this point.

Avatar image for jensonb
Jensonb

2092

Forum Posts

3407

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 8

ESPN doesn't really organise sporting events, generally they just license them. So how this purchase helps build an ESPN of eSports is beyond me. It really seems like Activision are floundering to be seen to be doing something with eSports, but they don't really have clue what they should do.

Avatar image for jamesjeux007
JamesJeux007

586

Forum Posts

1785

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

"Please Stop" eSports ?

Avatar image for gaspower
GaspoweR

4904

Forum Posts

272

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

"Please Stop" eSports ?

You're not the only one who thinks that we should stop using that term. I'm more inclined to "competitive gaming" myself.

Avatar image for amafi
amafi

1502

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

If they want to be like ESPN, they'll need the following:

- Obnoxious blowhard "personalities" that troll everyone by constantly saying offensive/stupid shit

- Wholly useless reports on social media posts made by MLG players

- Hyperfocus on the select few most popular MLG teams/players and non-coverage of the rest

- TMZ-esque coverage on any and all personal drama

- Willingness to present entirely baseless rumors as fact

- Brazen conflicts of interest, with the vast majority of coverage devoted to advertising these "partners"

- Announcers who fancy themselves experts on all video gaming because they once played Pong poorly

So e-sports need to be more FGC instead of the other way around?

Avatar image for slag
Slag

8308

Forum Posts

15965

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 45

Edited By Slag

I think an ESPN of e-sports could easily work and will happen. In fact I think it's something Giant Bomb's own parent company should do (although didn't ongamers flame out recently?)

I don't see it ever working if one of the game companies like Activision Blizzard runs it though, unless they plan to cut people like Valve, and Riot in. And there is about zero chance those guys will work together after all the lawsuits over Dota.

@amyggen said:
@notnert427 said:

If they want to be like ESPN, they'll need the following:

- Obnoxious blowhard "personalities" that troll everyone by constantly saying offensive/stupid shit

- Wholly useless reports on social media posts made by MLG players

- Hyperfocus on the select few most popular MLG teams/players and non-coverage of the rest

- TMZ-esque coverage on any and all personal drama

- Willingness to present entirely baseless rumors as fact

- Brazen conflicts of interest, with the vast majority of coverage devoted to advertising these "partners"

- Announcers who fancy themselves experts on all video gaming because they once played Pong poorly

Who's gonna be the Skip Bayless of esports?

That guy from Breitbart who choked Loda.

http://www.pcgamer.com/richard-lewis-dreamhack-esports-update/

Avatar image for kadoom
KaDoom

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

With this news I can't help but be reminded of WoW's floundering subscription base as a result of it's abysmal update rate and rehashed content

Avatar image for futurstock
futurstock

206

Forum Posts

88

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

so this is them stealth pushing Overwatch as eSports

Avatar image for entangledvyne
entangledvyne

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I don't know how much their stream tech is worth, but their name is worth next to nothing in the e-sports community. Seems like an iffy move. Blizzards iffy moves do tend to make money though.

Avatar image for earlcdwards
EarlCdwards

15

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

eSPN?

Avatar image for machofantastico
MachoFantastico

6762

Forum Posts

24

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 4

I'll be honest, e-sports still does nothing for me so this news isn't that interesting and I've tried to watch a large amount of it over the years. I think only the big Dota 2 tourney got me interested because of Brad and his daily dota. That said I can't help but find this a strange purchase by Activision, makes some sense I guess but feels a little unnecessary to.

Avatar image for pinballrj
pinballrj

64

Forum Posts

28

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

$46 million... they could have made a new Metal Arms with that money

Avatar image for amafi
amafi

1502

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 8

Edited By amafi

@entangledvyne said:

I don't know how much their stream tech is worth, but their name is worth next to nothing in the e-sports community. Seems like an iffy move. Blizzards iffy moves do tend to make money though.

Yeah, I've never met anyone who cared about MLG. Only time I ever watched any of their stuff was the first online rocket league tournament and I'm pretty sure I saw that on an unaffiliated channel on twitch. But maybe they have behind the scenes talent and tech that makes the purchase worth it. Possible, I guess.

Avatar image for deactivated-64162a4f80e83
deactivated-64162a4f80e83

2637

Forum Posts

39

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@l44 said:

Weird thing is that for quite a while Riot has been running their production of the LCS with former NBC producer and emmy award winner Ariel Horn. With their own panel show now and in addition last year they pulled streaming of all the various regions leagues out of their various deals and channels to be broadcast by their own streaming channels. I don't know about how invested Valve are in broadcasting Dota but if they're anywhere as near as invested as Riot are I can't see either giving up or sharing the broadcast rights of their games easily. If MLG can't broadcast the two major esports I don't see it reaching the kind of success they're probably aiming for.

Riot are the example for others to aspire to. Every single aspect of their League Of Legends coverage is done at an incredibly professional standard, so much so that I was a little bit bamboozled when the BBC didn't use it when it was on BBC3's streaming service and instead used their own far shittier presentation. You look at any Riot affiliated event shown on their main youtube channel and you'll go 'yeap that looks like it should be on TV'. I know people on this site use Valve and DOTA2's international production as the gold standard but actually as a total package and doing it week in and week out Riot really have made a loud case for E-Sports to be viewed by more than just the absolute devoted with it's incredible production values and roundup shows. Activision Blizzard certainly have the money to do the same but I'm skeptical if they'll actually achieve what Riot did... simply because the roster of games they'll be promoting initially aren't nearly as popular as Dota or LoL.

Avatar image for hardtarget
Hardtarget

389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

Edited By Hardtarget

But @austin_walker ESPN doesn't air the superbowl!

edit - dammit this was already replied to. that'll teach me.

Avatar image for slowram
SLowrAM

82

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 16

I can't see MLG being anything more than a misleading name. It seems to me for a true MLG to succeed it couldn't have a majority ownership by any gaming company.

Avatar image for richyhahn4
richyhahn4

316

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Man I think my Gamebattles account is long gone...I think...I hope? that was a strange time in my life.

Avatar image for hardtarget
Hardtarget

389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 14

@gold_skulltulla: No, but they have agreements that allow them to show highlights from every game in the NFL all through season and through the Super Bowl (in addition to airing Monday Night Football, themselves.) They're part of the NFL's ecosystem. As it stands it's hard to see companies like Riot and Valve allowing a competitor access to content in that same sort of way.

Depends, if Activision pays Riot and Valve for the rights to show highlights and talk about those matches on a sportcentre style show I could see it happening.

Avatar image for ruthloose
RuthLoose

909

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By RuthLoose

@indeedcodybrown said:

Isn't MLG really just a joke now though? Seems like Codick is on a quest to become the meme king.

Someone's gotta finally outdo Reggie in that department. Feels like the man has continuously been the butt of his own jokes for two hardware cycles now.

Avatar image for goreyfantod
goreyfantod

248

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By goreyfantod

@johnnymcginleycc:@austin_walker

I think you're giving ESPN far too much credit. They have repeatedly shown a failure to maintain journalistic independence by allowing license-holders and advertisers to influence their content choices & editorial stances. Also, ESPN may have been successful in the past, but not so much anymore.

ESPN may be a notch or two above the usual homerism coverage of local sports talk radio, but that's about it. They employ some respected journalists (esp. 'Outside The Lines'), but the network's reputation for integrity within the profession as a whole is nearly non-existent.

This isn't merely my opinion - it's the accumulation of ESPN's business practices over decades.

NFL Pressure Influences ESPN Content (Again)

ESPN Journalists Call Out ESPN

ESPN Dictates Tebow Hype From The Top Down

ESPN Execs Care More About Image Than Integrity

Avatar image for johnnymcginley
johnnymcginley

550

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@johnnymcginleycc:@austin_walker

I think you're giving ESPN far too much credit. They have repeatedly shown a failure to maintain journalistic independence by allowing license-holders and advertisers to influence their content choices & editorial stances. Also, ESPN may have been successful in the past, but not so much anymore.

ESPN may be a notch or two above the usual homerism coverage of local sports talk radio, but that's about it. They employ some respected journalists (esp. 'Outside The Lines'), but the network's reputation for integrity within the profession as a whole is nearly non-existent.

This isn't merely my opinion - it's the accumulation of ESPN's business practices over decades.

NFL Pressure Influences ESPN Content (Again)

ESPN Journalists Call Out ESPN

ESPN Dictates Tebow Hype From The Top Down

ESPN Execs Care More About Image Than Integrity

OK, that's fair, but my point being this would be even more pronounced were they owned by a sports equivalent of a major video games publisher.

Avatar image for viciousbearmauling
ViciousBearMauling

2094

Forum Posts

11

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

I dunno. This seems like a bad move. FPS and MOBA are terrible spectator experiences for the average Joe and the FGC has a toxic attitude towards the whole Esports thing. I doubt we'll be seeing news roundups on top players and Sunday Night Halo matches.

Avatar image for dixavd
Dixavd

3013

Forum Posts

245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

I always find it a little odd whenever a company says they're aiming to be the 'ESPN of esports' when they aren't worldwide (case in point, I only hear about ESPN in these conversations) while esports tries so hard to at least straddle Asia, America and Europe.

Avatar image for revenantxenos
RevenantXenos

127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

It's business decisions like this that make me thankful the fighting game community is so resistant to being part of the eSports scene. There is obviously money and sponsorships being thrown around in the FGC, but the event structure, product integration and management seems to come from the bottom up and stuff happens because it is what the players and fans want. eSports just seem so forced by comparison, all these companies want to monetize it as fast as possible and make as much money as possible that they are making moves like this to control as much as they possibly can while dragging the community with them. I have no problem with people wanting to make money off this stuff, but eSports are quickly becoming the dark cyberpunk future version of the FGC and I'm glad there is one group out there that is having none of it.

Avatar image for honkalot
Honkalot

1046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Electronic sports.

Avatar image for haze
Haze

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

So only popular and relevant in the US like ESPN?

Avatar image for homelessbird
Homelessbird

1681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@slag: Honestly - why would they even hire someone from Breitbart to be there in the first place? They're so far from being a reputable source of anything I can't imagine letting anyone they employ anywhere near an event I was running.

Avatar image for renegadedoppelganger
RenegadeDoppelganger

647

Forum Posts

297

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

This is a weird thing but professional Call of Duty has always been weird. It's a scene that has to rebuild itself every year and its dependant largely on the quality of the game. A game which switches hands every year. Some years the developers care about maintaining a competitive level, other years not so much. Luckily MLG has almost always been there to try and provide some stability.

Call of Duty and MLG have been pretty much synonymous ever since the game started being played competitively. MLG has undoubtedly been the largest supporter of Call of Duty's professional scene and has played host to some of it's largest tournaments throughout the years. However 2 months ago Activision established the "Call of Duty World League" with MLG's main competitor ESL. Add to that Mike Sepso leaving MLG and heading to Activision 1 month before that. This makes this acquisition confusing or completely logical depending on how one views the circumstances of this takeover purchase.

Avatar image for lurkero
Lurkero

628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Activision has enough video game properties to make their own esports league be a viable property. They don't need to license games from any other company and they have plenty of money to advertise and find venues.

Avatar image for deactivated-64162a4f80e83
deactivated-64162a4f80e83

2637

Forum Posts

39

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

It's business decisions like this that make me thankful the fighting game community is so resistant to being part of the eSports scene. There is obviously money and sponsorships being thrown around in the FGC, but the event structure, product integration and management seems to come from the bottom up and stuff happens because it is what the players and fans want. eSports just seem so forced by comparison, all these companies want to monetize it as fast as possible and make as much money as possible that they are making moves like this to control as much as they possibly can while dragging the community with them. I have no problem with people wanting to make money off this stuff, but eSports are quickly becoming the dark cyberpunk future version of the FGC and I'm glad there is one group out there that is having none of it.

Woah woah woah steady on. Say what you want about most games but LoL and Dota aren't 'forced' they're both highly successful and have grown organically over the years. Everyone wanting to be LoL or Dota is forced but 'Esports' or pro-gaming is a real thing now that has aired on TV in multiple countries with millions watching and tens of thousands selling out large arenas. You don't have to like it obviously and it seems you're a fan of a very specific aesthetic but not all esports are forced.

Avatar image for hippie_genocide
hippie_genocide

2574

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

ESPN is more likely to become the "ESPN of eSports" than Activision

Avatar image for dan_citi
Dan_CiTi

5601

Forum Posts

308

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Man, MLG going to become a popular punchline again? Neato.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b8316ffae7ad
deactivated-5b8316ffae7ad

826

Forum Posts

230

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Why do they have to buy MLG?

With 45 million, couldn't they just have some insane multi-million dollar prize pool tournament and viewers/players will flock naturally?

Avatar image for kingyo
kingyo

182

Forum Posts

937

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 9

What a fucking terrible idea... No body wants an ESPN of Esports, correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt ESPN itself is even growing with the big declines in cable subscriptions and stuff

Avatar image for westernwizard
WesternWizard

604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By WesternWizard

@kingyo Thing with ESPN is, even with declining subscriptions etc they are still something like 40% of Disney's revenue, they WERE over 50% at one point. So shooting to be ESPN still makes sense for now.

Avatar image for onemanarmyy
Onemanarmyy

6406

Forum Posts

432

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Edited By Onemanarmyy

Seems like MLG was slowly dying off as time went on. Probably a good move for Activision / Blizzard to buy it on the cheap and at least have something for their esport games. Because they do have an audience for some of those games.

I just think it's crazy to announce this purchase as the ESPN of Esports when there's no LCS or International. How about humbly try to build MLG up to be a force again?

Avatar image for matthewgm
matthewgm

433

Forum Posts

8

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By matthewgm

They still need to solve the riddle of making games that are accessible to play and easy to understand, that are also fun to watch.

LoL and DOTA are fun to watch from the perspective that using the overhead POV I can form a informed opinion of the state of a game, assuming I know the rules. This ameliorates some of the mechanical complexity that the game requires to play.

COD is a lot more easy to understand from a mechanical perspective, but frankly sucks as a spectator sport, since there's no easy way to be informed, as a spectator, of the gamestate. This is true from both perspective (first person camera or zoomed out overhead view), and from an overall progress perspective - it's easier to tell at a glance who's winning in LoL by how many turrets are down.

EDIT:

For all of the people saying that they shouldn't aspire to be like ESPN, I agree out of principle, but keep in mind that live sports are basically all that's keeping television from Netflix-style subscription service (which I would prefer, but your ABCs and FOXs might not).